![]() |
Originally Posted by ArizonaGuy
(Post 9772329)
Why can't US restaurants start the trend of including a 10% service charge? It works well enough in other parts of the world. So backwards we are here. We tip based on basic service that we're in theory already paying for - part of the cost is supposed to cover service! Like tip jars - why should I tip someone who scooped me an ice cream cone when that's what they're already paid to do? Did I get an extra large scoop or a second scoop free?
Aren't tips supposed to be for excellent service generally above and beyond? It's not like the waiter is a hotel concierge who got me tickets to a sold-out show. Pay the staff a livable wage, tack on a 10% service fee and leave me alone. I don't like feeling obligated to tip a person who simply performed the minimum requirements and I will add another 5% to 10% if the service was truly exceptional. |
Originally Posted by Taiwaned
(Post 9771127)
I know in BC, this is an audit method used by CRA.
Every server must declare every dollar they earn by tip Have reasonable documenation to prove their income. I used to advise clients to keep a daytimer or calendar with the amount of tips they earn per shift so they can declare it on their taxes. When servers do not do their due dillegence, they have an auditor do an average mean per meal. |
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
(Post 9772692)
It is actually disappearing in a lot of places. Last summer in western Europe, I noticed that I didn't see it on many menus in smaller places anymore, and I would ask "is service included?" and heard NO each time.
|
Tipping For Server Mistakes and Credit Cards
Originally Posted by jfulcher
(Post 9764703)
Regardless it's classless to not tip your server if your food was not prepared to your liking or the place didn't take a credit card. :rolleyes: Now if you had complained to the server and he did nothing to correct the situation then maybe you should lessen his tip. Regardless the IRS looks for them to claim tips on their total sales if you tipped them or not. So the OP really screwed the server.
What I don't agree with is not lessening the tip if your order wasn't OBVIOUSLY correctly brought out. Your server is supposed to COMPARE the plate of food and make sure EACH COMPONENT is correctly plated such as the correct side dish, correct entree, and any sides of condiments that were ordered. The server is supposed to be EARNING their tip, so tipping them well if they bring out obvious mistakes to the table only inforces the bad service instead of making the server realize they need to verify what food and drinks they are bringing to the table. Even if they fix the situation, it doesn't entirely make up for a long wait or any inconvenience this may have caused the customer. If the server doesn't apologize, definately a hit in the tip even more so. If another server brings out the food, sides or bottles of condiments can definately be brought out by the main server without trusting that other server that won't be seeing any tip from that customer. There's no reason in the world to wait 15-30 or more minutes to bring out a side of ranch for example or a bottle of A-1 steak sauce. That other server isn't going to take any effort to verify the plate of food, because they aren't getting tipped from that customer, so they could care less what's on the plate if it's correct or not. The IRS is NOT in my service, my SERVER IS, so if they don't care about MY DINING EXPERIENCE, WHY SHOULD I CARE ABOUT THE IRS TAKING THEIR MONEY REGARDLESS OF IF I TIP OR NOT? The way to get good service is to reward very good service by tipping 20% or over and the way to avoid bad service is tip 15% or below. They will NEVER LEARN if they always get paid no matter what happens. Don't you want to have your server check your food for mistakes instead of wasting your time everytime you have that particular server? I am ONLY talking about obvious mistakes. Example: I have had plenty of times my server takes an appetizer order, brings out the appetizer without the side of ranch I JUST TOLD THEM ABOUT to add to the appetizer and they even wrote it down. It's OBVIOUS the ranch isn't there, so it's up to the SERVER to bring it out, even if another server ends up bringing out the food, it's up to my SERVER to bring it out since my server is the person I am tipping. My server is going to tipout the other server or food runner out of the SALES, NOT out of my tip I leave. |
Other Servers and Food Runners
Originally Posted by jfulcher
(Post 9764725)
What if your server isn't the one that brought out your food. Especially at places like Chili's where managers and other servers run out food a lot. A lot of good restaurants are this way as well. Would your rather the food sit under the lamp until the server gets a second to make it to the back to run your food to you?
If you are my server, it's up to YOU to bring out the side of ranch I ordered, NOT that other server or food runner. Am I tipping YOU or the other server/food runner? Since I gave the order to YOU, it's up to YOU to get sides of condiments out BEFORE the food comes out. At least OFFER the customer to do that for them. If they refuse, well, it's the customer's fault for not letting their server TRY to get the condiments not forgotten. Let's say it's not condiments that's the mistake and it's a wrong side dish. That server that brought the food out, even though is not my server, is STILL PART OF MY SERVICE, so it's ONLY FAIR to tip according to the SERVICE I am receiving. If I don't count off, then that other server that ran the food wrong will keep doing it. The main server will get on the other server for not verifying the plate, making the main server get a bad tip. It's truly not fair to tip well just because my server didn't actually bring me the wrong side dish. The wrong side dish could have also have been put incorrectly into the computer to begin with BY the SERVER HIM OR HERSELF. Let's say the order was put in correctly, even if that's so, that other server bringing out the food IS PART of the ENTIRE EXPERIENCE, so sorry, but the tip WILL be LOWERED. Especially when 9 times out of 10, my server remedies the problems and almost 100% of the time, the other server/runner DOESN'T APOLOGIZE. That other server should have verified the ticket and compared it to the food, as long as the ticket was correct, that is. My husband and I have had a time that our server was at fault for the other server bringing out the wrong food. One time at Applebee's, my husband ordered a burger. Another server brought out ribs. Turns out, our waitress admitted putting the order in incorrectly into the computer and our check even had voided baby back ribs on it. To be quite honest with you, I truly wish my food would be under a heat lamp instead to have more of a chance to get my food brought out more correctly. I have had more mistakes with other servers/runners running the food than the main server. Even if my server brings out my food, I have had LOTS of times OBVIOUS mistakes brought out by my own server. It's pathetic when your own server, being you are only in a party of 2, brings you quesadillas when you ordered bbq chicken nachos. That is what happened to me and my husband. He wrote it down, but admitted putting in the order wrong. He should have VERIFIED the WRITTEN ORDER, which he could have caught his own mistake instead of us having to catch it. He made 2 mistakes. 1. Not putting the order in correctly 2. Bringing the food completely wrong to the table from the kitchen. |
Paying a GOOD Tip Regardless of WHO BRINGS Out the Food
Originally Posted by jfulcher
(Post 9764785)
Still not fair to take it out on your server something wasn't brought out correct that they didn't bring out themselves.
It may not be fair to punish my server, BUT, it's NOT FAIR to make the customer pay for GOOD SERVICE THEY HAVEN'T RECEIVED even if MY SERVER didn't do the wrong thing. Also, I wouldn't truly ever know if the order was put in correctly or not, because I am not in that kitchen. If I have to sit and wait to eat my food, don't I have a RIGHT to be pissed and tip less? If I tip less based on another server's mistake, at least the main server can try to make that other server COMPARE the tickets with the food next times around so it doesn't happen again. If I tip a full amount 20% or higher, bringing out obvious mistakes from other servers will keep going on and bad service will keep happening. The only way to stop it, is to stop tipping well for bad service. Also, let's say my server is chit-chatting with a friend, so that's why my food was brought out by another server, well gee, that's another reason why that the mistake would be my server's fault even if they didn't bring out the food, because my server could have brought out the food instead of the other server or food runner since they had time to chit-chat. So tipping lower promotes working harder and less playing on the job as well with this type of situation. I sure as hell would get on my co-workers if the weren't working as a team and affecting my tips. I wouldn't just let them be lazy. I would report them to the manager. If the main server gets a good tip, then NO ONE WILL KNOW ABOUT THE MISTAKES or if the main server does know about the mistake, she or he won't CARE AT ALL, because "I'm getting tipped well anyway" attitude. |
Instead of walking 30 minutes to get cash I'd ask the restaurant if there was an ATM nearby - and if not whether I could send a cheque or return later (e.g. next day). If none of these options were offered I'd reduce the tip on my return (likely 10% or less instead of 20%).
|
Tipping Less Based on Not Accepting Credit Cards
Originally Posted by erik123
(Post 9773587)
If none of these options were offered I'd reduce the tip on my return (likely 10% or less instead of 20%).
I don't get WHY would you reduce the tip according to what the OWNER wants to accept as payment or not. HOW EXACTLY is that the server's fault? |
Welcome Springs!.
Interesting that all of your posts are in this thread. I take you are a waiter? |
Originally Posted by Louie_LI
(Post 9772936)
Where in western Europe? It would help in determining if things are really changing or whether you just ran into a lot of dishonest waiters.
|
Originally Posted by Dugernaut
(Post 9773760)
Welcome Springs!.
Interesting that all of your posts are in this thread. I take you are a waiter? |
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
(Post 9773779)
In Lisbon, in Brussels and Brugges, and in Amsterdam. I used to specifically recall that esp. in Brussels and other cities I'd been to (I had never previously been to Lisbon) that the menu would say, in whatever the native language, that service is included. I did not see it on a single menu in cafe-type places anymore (not that I was in more than a few places in any city).
|
Originally Posted by violist
(Post 9751142)
It was the diner's responsibility to find out what means of payment were
allowed. Having said all that, using cash instead of credit cards in a restaurant is a really, really good idea. Restaurants are the number one source of identity theft. |
Accepting SELF-RESPONSIBILITY
Originally Posted by agrater
(Post 9773916)
At one time, long ago, this would be true. But now, accepting a credit card is an ingrained part of running a business. To use some hyperbole, a restaurant's policy could be for diners to bring their own silverware. If they choose to do that, fine, but it's their responsibility to let you know that before you order.
Having said all that, using cash instead of credit cards in a restaurant is a really, really good idea. Restaurants are the number one source of identity theft. NO SERVER SHOULD HAVE TO TELL YOU "Oh we don't let you use credit cards today." I am sorry, but COMMON SENSE COMES INTO PLAY HERE as well as SELF-RESPONISIBILITY!!! NO ONE TOLD ME "BRING EXTRA MONEY" when I went to the drs. office, because I just did it JUST IN CASE, which I was SO DAMN LUCKY I DID. It's just called being RESPONSIBLE!!! Situations come up, so you cannot ALWAYS depend on ONE FORM OF PAYMENT ONLY!!! I can totally understand not getting a money order since that cost money, but bring at least $30. At least you can pay PART of something until you get to an ATM if it's more. A SMART person would carry at least $50 on themself. WHY do you feel it's the server's responsiblity to let the customer know such a thing? The customer should be responsible to be PREPARED that no credit cards may not be accepted. Sorry, but it's true. NO SERVER SHOULD HAVE TO TELL THEIR CUSTOMERS THAT!! EVERY CUSTOMER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING THE BILL, so it's up to the CUSTOMER to ALWAYS HAVE A "BACK-UP PLAN" of some sort. The server is just following what their manager told them to do, that is it. There is NO PART in the SERVER'S RESPONSIBILITY to let the customer know they cannot pay with a credit card until pay time comes. The CUSTOMER SHOULD be able to pay with another method such as cash without having problems with that. The server has NOTHING to do with accepting payment methods unless they are dishonest with you, which 9 times out of 10, they are probably very honest with you. |
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
(Post 9773779)
In Lisbon, in Brussels and Brugges, and in Amsterdam. I used to specifically recall that esp. in Brussels and other cities I'd been to (I had never previously been to Lisbon) that the menu would say, in whatever the native language, that service is included. I did not see it on a single menu in cafe-type places anymore (not that I was in more than a few places in any city).
Sometimes there is confusion between the service charge (included) and the tip (not included). If one asks the waiter if the tip is included, he can in all honesty, if somewhat misleadingly, say no. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:55 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.