FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   DiningBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/diningbuzz-371/)
-   -   Consolidated "Champagne - Questions/Suggestions/Recommendations" thread (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/diningbuzz/1297044-consolidated-champagne-questions-suggestions-recommendations-thread.html)

Rejuvenated Jul 24, 2007 4:13 pm


Originally Posted by slawecki (Post 6786204)
If you want impressive labels, get a cristal or a krug or a dom.

Oh yeah, I've had plenty of them on my FC flights with SQ & CX. ^

YVR Cockroach May 29, 2008 11:09 am

Is it me or is Jacquart champagne revolting?
 
I've drunk a variety of Champagnes in BC and FC but the one I've found most revolting is Jacquard. First came across it last year as that's what was served in lounges and short-haul BC on AF (it's the normal long-haul BC offering too but fortunately there was a Bollinger promotion early last year). Seems it's also what LH is offering in long-haul BC. Is it my personal taste or do others concur?

dchristiva May 29, 2008 11:12 am

I'll say it's you. I've had no issues with that particular brand.

slawecki May 29, 2008 12:01 pm

i think it is quite decent. it is considered to be equivalent to all the mass produced mid priced labels. made form the same batches of grapes as all the rest. if NV, perhaps you got some that was quite old.

YVR Cockroach May 29, 2008 1:17 pm

I find it a bit more sour and tart (didn't give it a critical taste) than I like, and this was from at least 3 separate flights (and hopefully bottles!) and at least 1 tasting on the ground. I presume it's the lowest-priced in the line (LH serves the Brut Mosaique).

slawecki May 29, 2008 3:11 pm

sounds like very little dossage, and no yeastie taste. could be trying to make a very dry with not enough guts to follow through. is a coop wine, do not know how much variation in the label.

YVR Cockroach May 30, 2008 4:38 pm


Originally Posted by slawecki (Post 9796627)
sounds like very little dossage, and no yeastie taste. could be trying to make a very dry with not enough guts to follow through. is a coop wine, do not know how much variation in the label.

Definitely no yeastie taste, not even a subtle hint of one (which is fine by me). I wonder if QC isn't that great and/or the worse stuff gets fobbed onto the airlines cheap. I see about 4 years ago, it was retailing in the U.K. for GBP 12 a bottle.

I have come across wine in batches (low end of an Aussie label) where there were said to be 4 different batches and taste varied greatly among the 4 batches.

JOUY31 May 30, 2008 10:40 pm

I have no problem with it; IMHO, it is better than the Pommery currently served on BA in CE and its dreadful Monopole predecessor.

slawecki May 31, 2008 6:30 am


Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach (Post 9802117)

I have come across wine in batches (low end of an Aussie label) where there were said to be 4 different batches and taste varied greatly among the 4 batches.

usually it is the other way around. most low end wines are finished/blended/ etc in a very large container. most high end wines come from smaller barrels to bottle. many of the first and second labels are decided by tasting the individual barrels and grading as such. remember being at Château Prieuré-Lichine once and asked why the chalk X's on some of the barrels. those were the ones adjudged to be second label.

YVR Cockroach May 31, 2008 9:31 am


Originally Posted by slawecki (Post 9804047)
usually it is the other way around. most low end wines are finished/blended/ etc in a very large container. most high end wines come from smaller barrels to bottle. many of the first and second labels are decided by tasting the individual barrels and grading as such. remember being at Château Prieuré-Lichine once and asked why the chalk X's on some of the barrels. those were the ones adjudged to be second label.

Usually, but in that case, the quantities were so huge (we're talking one of the major Aussie labels' entry-level wines) that it may have exceeded the annual output of several French AOCs combined.

dobba Jun 5, 2008 7:05 am

BA champers
 

Originally Posted by JOUY31 (Post 9803250)
I have no problem with it; IMHO, it is better than the Pommery currently served on BA in CE and its dreadful Monopole predecessor.

Have to agree with you on this. They're both just nasty. I'd rather go without especially as they're often served lukewarm.

Condition One Nov 22, 2008 11:57 am

Need suggestions for a champagne stopper
 
Can anybody suggest a good champagne stopper? Being single, I'd be hard pressed to drink a bottle of champagne in one night. Yeah, yeah, I know that's not an excuse for some FT'ers :D

But are there good ones, bad ones, or will just any $5 one work?

slawecki Nov 22, 2008 3:33 pm

you cannot vacuvan(trademark). all you can do is cram a cork in it. you can cram a vacuvan cork in it, but cannot pump it down.

i had some device that would allow me to pump air into the bottle, which kept the bubbles, but ruined the wine.

if there is such a thing that would seal, then replace the air with nitrogen, that would be best, but i am not famaliar with such a device for home use.

szg Nov 23, 2008 5:08 am


Originally Posted by Condition One (Post 10795901)
Can anybody suggest a good champagne stopper? Being single, I'd be hard pressed to drink a bottle of champagne in one night. Yeah, yeah, I know that's not an excuse for some FT'ers :D

But are there good ones, bad ones, or will just any $5 one work?

I have a standard one for about 5 EUR, which really makes a good job.

macabus Nov 23, 2008 6:48 am

SteelCork


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:34 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.