FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   DiningBuzz (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/diningbuzz-371/)
-   -   Coffee not Decaf (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/diningbuzz/1002045-coffee-not-decaf.html)

jackal Oct 4, 2009 11:35 pm


Originally Posted by MDSD (Post 12515334)
In an average person ~ 13% of caffeine is eliminated each hour; thus, total caffeine elimination usually occurs just short of 8 hours.

citation: Georgetown.edu

I don't have a citation from a prestigious educational institution, but I've seen numerous references to caffeine having a half-life of approximately four hours in the human body. That would fit for the first four hours (13*4=52%), but after that, your formula doesn't fit with the half-life claim (at a flat 13% per hour, you'd be rid of it after 7.6 hours). With a four-hour half-life, after eight hours, your body still has 25% of the original caffeine level left.

Unless you mean that it's a logarithmic scale wherein each hour your body eliminates 13% of what's remaining, in which case, it's closer to the half-life idea (8 hours later, you'd have 32% of caffeine remaining).

magiciansampras Oct 5, 2009 6:50 am


Originally Posted by MDSD (Post 12515334)
In an average person ~ 13% of caffeine is eliminated each hour; thus, total caffeine elimination usually occurs just short of 8 hours.

citation: Georgetown.edu

This doesn't support your claim nor is it really a cite (how about a link?).

djk7 Oct 5, 2009 7:12 am


Originally Posted by magiciansampras (Post 12522595)

Originally Posted by MDSD (Post 12515334)
In an average person ~ 13% of caffeine is eliminated each hour; thus, total caffeine elimination usually occurs just short of 8 hours.

citation: Georgetown.edu

This doesn't support your claim nor is it really a cite (how about a link?).

It's unclear to me if MDSD's post is trying to support or refute -DSH-'s assertion. Add me to the list of skeptics regarding -DSH-'s claim, it certainly doesn't jibe with my personal experience.

magiciansampras Oct 5, 2009 7:46 am


Originally Posted by djk7 (Post 12522824)
It's unclear to me if MDSD's post is trying to support or refute -DSH-'s assertion. Add me to the list of skeptics regarding -DSH-'s claim, it certainly doesn't jibe with my personal experience.

It seems like DSH got this info from a student homework sheet that mentions 13% in passing. :rolleyes:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...YhiVl1CP_oh-uQ

777-9X Oct 5, 2009 9:34 am


Originally Posted by magiciansampras (Post 12523125)
It seems like DSH got this info from a student homework sheet that mentions 13% in passing. :rolleyes:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...YhiVl1CP_oh-uQ

Yep :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:.

TMOliver Oct 5, 2009 11:29 am


Originally Posted by magiciansampras (Post 12514398)
I have a friend who used to work at a moderately upscale restaurant as a waitress. She confessed to me that should would routinely pour coffee coffee for people who ordered decaf for a number of reasons. First, decaf wasn't that popular so you would have to brew an additional pot to serve it. Second, she would often forget if folks ordered caf or decaf. Third, she was lazy.

In the lesser class of joints I patronize most often, decaf may only be prepared in the pots with orange rims. Regular coffee made in such pots is automatically transubstantiated into unleaded.

In home environments, when the host(ess) offers offers coffee from a blue-dappled steel pot in which egg shells have been used to settle the grounds during boiling, chances are that the coffee is the super-caf sort, "ethyl".


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.