DL ATL-HNL 3/26/21 diverted to LAX
DL 1186 ATL-HNL diverted to LAX. The news reports that the diversion was due to an oil leak. It was about halfway between LAX and HNL. So close. Yet so far.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...435Z/KATL/KLAX https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...1a4558beb4.png |
Originally Posted by Finkface
(Post 33129477)
DL 1186 ATL-HNL diverted to LAX. The news reports that the diversion was due to an oil leak. It was about halfway between LAX and HNL. So close. Yet so far.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...435Z/KATL/KLAX https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...1a4558beb4.png |
Wow that would be frustrating. Looks like they really were halfway, probably an operational decision to turn around (easier to repair and more replacement planes at LAX)
|
Originally Posted by HaleiwaFlyer
(Post 33129605)
That is one long day, once all of the issues gets handled.
|
Originally Posted by kjnangre
(Post 33129608)
Wow that would be frustrating. Looks like they really were halfway, probably an operational decision to turn around (easier to repair and more replacement planes at LAX)
Originally Posted by kjnangre
(Post 33129613)
Looks like they're putting everyone up for the night. Special flight DL9905 LAX-HNL scheduled to depart tomorrow at 7am
|
Originally Posted by jrl767
(Post 33129650)
ETOPS procedures are “land at the nearest suitable airport”; maintenance/repair considerations don’t enter into the decision (basically, there are defined points on the route at which the divert point changes; once they pass the last one, the crew has to continue to the destination)
Originally Posted by jrl767
(Post 33129650)
per FR24, it’s the same jet (N840MH)
|
I was on one of these "flights to nowhere" once. ATL-MUC which diverted as we started to cross the North Atlantic past Canada due to one of the hydraulic systems having issues. Initially, the captain was instructed to divert to JFK. But was then told to go all the way back to ATL. It wasn't as long as this 10 hour ordeal (was closer to 8 hours). But definitely very frustrating (especially when the voucher for the Quality Inn at ATL I was given at 2AM was no good because it was full).
|
interesting that the crew can apparently change the divert destination after the mandatory decision to divert
in this case, “oil leak” is probably due to something like an O-ring seal, which is a fairly routine repair |
No biggie. It's all ball bearings nowadays, just fix the fetzer valve and get back in the air. (don't make me explain this :-)
|
Maybe the fix didnt go well.
Looks like DL9905 was switched to N837MH overnight. The diverted plane is headed to JFK now. |
Originally Posted by kjnangre
(Post 33129608)
Wow that would be frustrating. Looks like they really were halfway, probably an operational decision to turn around (easier to repair and more replacement planes at LAX)
The divert may have been to LAX from the start. ATC clearance across the existing tracks can be difficult due to it being a non-RADAR environment. The options are to wait or descend below the organized track system. That decision would be made based on information that we don't have. |
Originally Posted by pfreet
(Post 33130006)
No biggie. It's all ball bearings nowadays, just fix the fetzer valve and get back in the air. (don't make me explain this :-)
|
Feel sorry for these folks - wouldn’t their 72 hours in advance of arrival Covid tests now all be invalid to arrive at HNL without quarantine?
|
Originally Posted by HeadInTheClouds
(Post 33130235)
Feel sorry for these folks - wouldn’t their 72 hours in advance of arrival Covid tests now all be invalid to arrive at HNL without quarantine?
|
Originally Posted by MCO Flyer
(Post 33130305)
No the state accepts test >72 hours if the flight is delayed due to the airline.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.