Consolidated Closed Threads: DL Related COVID Mask Discussions
#31
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
I highly doubt this will go through. It would violate the same laws that prohibit requiring a note for a service animal, or exemption from any policy. I get the concern. However those with actual medical issues are generally easy to tell apart. They don't get defensive, they understand you dont know they're exempt, etc... Fakers get tense/defensive, start yelling/being rude, etc...
#32
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: Alaska Airlines
Posts: 659
Just make it short and sweet and the doc can say "put on a damn mask or stay grounded". End of discussion.
Kudos on Delta for doing this, I hope others follow suit.
#33
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
I highly doubt this will go through. It would violate the same laws that prohibit requiring a note for a service animal, or exemption from any policy. I get the concern. However those with actual medical issues are generally easy to tell apart. They don't get defensive, they understand you dont know they're exempt, etc... Fakers get tense/defensive, start yelling/being rude, etc...
Air carriers make medical judgments about "fit to fly" every day. An entirely legitimate question as to whether someone who suffers from a condition which does not permit a cloth mask is fit enough to fly on an aircraft where, in an emergency, he might require an n oxygen mask for a significant period of time.
#34
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
They don't need to make it long or difficult - as that would be unfair to the people who really do need the exception.
Just make it short and sweet and the doc can say "put on a damn mask or stay grounded". End of discussion.
Kudos on Delta for doing this, I hope others follow suit.
Just make it short and sweet and the doc can say "put on a damn mask or stay grounded". End of discussion.
Kudos on Delta for doing this, I hope others follow suit.
I've noticed no other airline has jumped on this bandwagon, just as they didn't with DL ESA changes.
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
No, such an interview does not.
Air carriers make medical judgments about "fit to fly" every day. An entirely legitimate question as to whether someone who suffers from a condition which does not permit a cloth mask is fit enough to fly on an aircraft where, in an emergency, he might require an n oxygen mask for a significant period of time.
Air carriers make medical judgments about "fit to fly" every day. An entirely legitimate question as to whether someone who suffers from a condition which does not permit a cloth mask is fit enough to fly on an aircraft where, in an emergency, he might require an n oxygen mask for a significant period of time.
#36
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: SFO
Programs: AS 75K (OW), SK Silver (*A), UR, MR
Posts: 3,339
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32535730-post110.html
#37
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; IHG PlatAmb; Hilton Dia; Marriott Plat; Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 7,316
Certainly if a passenger has a disability that makes it impossible for them to breathe with a piece of thin fabric over their mouth and nose, an airline is only being responsible in ensuring that air travel is safe for someone with such a fragile respiratory condition. See 14 CFR 382.19.
I am sure that Delta's General Counsel and likely outside counsel is quite aware of, and read, the Air Carrier Access Act (and it's implementing regs) before the company adopted this policy.
Last edited by Adam1222; Jul 18, 2020 at 9:42 pm
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
I’m not entirely sure that what you say here aligns with this:
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32535730-post110.html
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32535730-post110.html
The one way around is if they required ALL passengers to indeed go this process. The fact they are not means it must fall under an ACAA exception to require it only for those claiming due to disability.
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
There is a "direct threat" exception to the Air Carrier Access Act (and the ADA) that allows what would otherwise be disability discrimination where the passenger's sought accommodation would be a direct threat to others. Also note that Delta is not asking anyone to prove their disability, but rather ensuring that those who don't wear masks are fit to fly, which is a clever loophole. As noted, airlines are free to ensure that passengers with disabilities are fit to fly.
I am sure that Delta's General Counsel and likely outside counsel is quite aware of, and read, the Air Carrier Access Act (and it's implementing regs) before the company adopted this policy.
I am sure that Delta's General Counsel and likely outside counsel is quite aware of, and read, the Air Carrier Access Act (and it's implementing regs) before the company adopted this policy.
#40
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; IHG PlatAmb; Hilton Dia; Marriott Plat; Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 7,316
You're confusing things. Yes airlines have the right to have a policy to require masks. This is not in dispute here. However as per the ACAA they must make exemptions to policy for those with disabilities. They can't require medical certificates/certification except under the limited situations the ACAA allows. None applies in the way DL is doing it.
The one way around is if they required ALL passengers to indeed go this process. The fact they are not means it must fall under an ACAA exception to require it only for those claiming due to disability.
The one way around is if they required ALL passengers to indeed go this process. The fact they are not means it must fall under an ACAA exception to require it only for those claiming due to disability.
#41
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: DL PM; IHG PlatAmb; Hilton Dia; Marriott Plat; Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 7,316
They cant require a passenger to prove to be fit to fly. This is noted on the DOT website even. Also direct threat isn't applicable here. Lastly DL has been slapped recently for violating ACAA in regard to ESA changes they tried. Thus the comment on lawyer knowing is quite wrong.
As one disability rights group explains:
"carriers cannot mandate separate treatment for an individual with a disability except for reasons of safety or to prevent the spread of a communicable disease or infection."
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
Not sure what the ESA has to do with it. The agency and the airline disagreed on the meaning of the relevant regs. That's not the same as your position that it is crystal clear in the statute that something is not allowed (it is not). And I'm not sure why you think direct threat isn't applicable where passengers are claiming a right to an accommodation that would put other passengers at risk of disease.
As for lawyer comment, it was direct rebuttal to show DL counsel has been wrong (and it wasnt a surprise at that). This wasnt an interpretation by DOT that wasnt known. They hoped that since there was demand for rule change they could just change their policies even though rules hadn't changed
Do you think AA/UA/WN/B6/etc/even DL didn't think about this to begin with? There's a reason they all have this exception. There's a reason they've been begging FAA/DOT to issue a rule. DL just like ESA is hoping they can get away with not following the rule because there's public demand for it.
#43
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
As an attorney I look forward to the 5 and 6 figure fees I will receive from Delta and other airlines who deny boarding passengers for this..... I've already settled 3 lawsuits with retailers over these unconstitutional mask "rules". I thank Delta, Walmart, Kroger, Home Depot for ensuring me a wealthy comfortable lifestyle..... Yes I'm one of those attorneys.....
#44
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2020
Programs: Sky Miles
Posts: 2
While I agree that some individuals are not honest in regards to not wearing a useless mouth covering. There are many people who have a hidden disability and or medical condition that prevents them from wearing a useless mouth covering. These are the people who are being discriminated against. To those that will reply with the public health emergency claim.... Save your breath and get a law degree... The ADA and ACAA gives very wide latitude.....
#45
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
While I agree that some individuals are not honest in regards to not wearing a useless mouth covering. There are many people who have a hidden disability and or medical condition that prevents them from wearing a useless mouth covering. These are the people who are being discriminated against. To those that will reply with the public health emergency claim.... Save your breath and get a law degree... The ADA and ACAA gives very wide latitude.....
But you've summed it up very well. These companies and municipalities are playing with fire and are bound to get burned. And Delta really can't afford that right now.