Last edit by: ryandc99
The following two links are updated daily:
Other Discussions on FlyerTalk Pertaining to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus, which is now also known as COVID-2019:
IATA international transit / arrival policies re: Wuhan 2019-nCoV
WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports
Other Discussions on FlyerTalk Pertaining to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus, which is now also known as COVID-2019:
- Corona Virus China forum
- Wuhan coronavirus outbreak — worries as it spread to HK & beyond Hong Kong and Macau
- Coronavirus impact in Japan Japan forum
- The South Korea COVID-19 thread Korea forum
- Coronavirus-thoughts-international-domestic-travel-consolidated.html TravelBuzz
- Airline capacity reductions in response to Wuhan coronavirus TravelBuzz
- Which longhaul routes to/from China will be cut by end of Q1 2020? TravelBuzz
- Coronavirus epidemic, worries for China/ Global GDP OmniPR forum
- BA to China - Coronavirus British Airways | Executive Club forum
- coronavirus travel waiver Air Canada | Aeroplan forum
- Travel Waivers - China Coronavirus - UA Suspends PEK,PVG,CTU - 6 Feb - 28 March 2020 United Airlines | MileagePlus forum
- Corona virus: How will LH handle tickets to China [waiver in place till 28MAR20] Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, Brussels, LOT and Other Partners | Miles & More forum
- Alaska disappointing handling over an award ticket regarding viral outbreak in china Alaska Airlines | Mileage Plan forum
- Finnair China travel waivers?? Finnair | Finnair Plus forum
- Coronavirus Ticket Change Policy? Malaysia Airlines | Enrich
- Coronavirus - Emirates Emirates | Skywards
- AA China Coronavirus paid & award flights cancellation / change questions American Airlines | AAdvantage
- Does AFKL suspend flights to Mainland China? Air France, KLM, and Other Partners | Flying Blue
- SAS stops all direct flights to mainland China SAS | EuroBonus
- Coronavirus waivers Singapore Airlines | KrisFlyer
- IB halts flights to China due to CoronaVirus [29/01/2020] Iberia Airlines | Iberia Plus
- Coronavirus Waivers? Virgin Atlantic Airways | Flying Club
- Coronavirus + NH All Nippon Airways | ANA Mileage Club
- Wuhan Coronavirus travel waiver / service change Japan Airlines | JAL Mileage Bank
- Wuhan coronavirus - effect on Cathay Pacific Cathay Pacific | Marco Polo Club
- Coronavirus - Air China offers full refunds Other Asian, Australian, and South Pacific Airlines
- China Southern travel-waiver corona-virus Other Asian, Australian, and South Pacific Airlines
- Hainan Airlines (HU) Travel Waiver for 2019-nCoV? Other Asian, Australian, and South Pacific Airlines
- NZ Suspends PVG service - till 29 March Air New Zealand | Air Points
- THAI reduces flights to/from Mainland China 08Feb - 28Mar Thai Airways | Royal Orchid Plus
- QANTAS suspends services to China from Feb 9 Qantas | Frequent Flyer
- DL Coronavirus Waiver // Suspension of China flights due to Corona Virus Delta Air Lines / SkyMiles
- BR Adjusts Service/Schedule Due to Coronavirus Outbreak Eva Air / Infinity MileageLands
- Turkish Airlines Suspends Service to China until February 09 Turkish Airlines | Miles&Smiles
- Cancellation of Bookings Due to Corona Virus Accor / ALL (Accor Live Limitless)
DL Corona Virus-COVID-19 / Operational Impact
#1186
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVPG, DL FO, Marriott Gold, Hertz 5 Whatevers
Posts: 1,099
This is just a theory but they cut BOS to spoke (lots of overlap, might stay that way after COVID-19 is over) and probably want to preserve a presence in the NE US. (Same theory for SEA, though IIRC based on the terms of the federal aid package, they have to maintain the domestic stations they're present in, which includes FAI/ANC)
#1187
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RDU
Programs: Hhonors Gold, DL PM
Posts: 359
Looks like the TATL cuts are extended into May. I have a current booking (that I likely wasn't going to fly anyways) and the flights are no longer bookable. Only DL option seems to be 1x daily ATL-CDG
#1188
#1189
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Body in the CLE, soul still in New England
Programs: In 2023? Does it matter? SPG/Marriott: Plat; DL: Plat; B6: Mosaic
Posts: 2,979
Normally, these flights are fairly full (to both NYM destinations), right up to the last flight departing NYM @10pm. I suspect ops will ramp this back up quickly, particularly considering both NY and MA are at the leading edge of the US pandemic.
#1190
Join Date: Mar 2011
Programs: Delta Skymiles
Posts: 1,982
I was planning on going to England this Summer and slightly before Coronavirus decided not to. I'm very glad. Not sure I'd have had a way to get there and back.
I wonder when we will start seeing the big cuts to May and June. No way there is any sort of ramping up of air travel until late June, early July. Will there even be all the carriers then? Glad I am on the strongest one, but I could see some of the smaller operators going on a hiatus never to return...
I wonder when we will start seeing the big cuts to May and June. No way there is any sort of ramping up of air travel until late June, early July. Will there even be all the carriers then? Glad I am on the strongest one, but I could see some of the smaller operators going on a hiatus never to return...
#1191
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVPG, DL FO, Marriott Gold, Hertz 5 Whatevers
Posts: 1,099
I am not surprised they cut the BOS shuttles, it's basically a commuter plane. And with most businesses WFH and cities on virtual lockdown, not surprised they've drastically cut the schedule. At this point, I'd rather drive the 3.5 hours into Manhattan than getting on a plane.
Normally, these flights are fairly full (to both NYM destinations), right up to the last flight departing NYM @10pm. I suspect ops will ramp this back up quickly, particularly considering both NY and MA are at the leading edge of the US pandemic.
Normally, these flights are fairly full (to both NYM destinations), right up to the last flight departing NYM @10pm. I suspect ops will ramp this back up quickly, particularly considering both NY and MA are at the leading edge of the US pandemic.
#1192
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: Amtrak Guest Rewards (SE), Virgin America Elevate, Hyatt Gold Passport (Platinum), VIA Preference
Posts: 3,134
I mean, driving into NYC (or driving to somewhere along the New Haven Line and grabbing a train for the last segment) seems like an entirely feasible thing to do at this stage. The roads are empty and gas is cheap.
As to DL's future in BOS, who knows? I could see them de-hubbing it (though dropping to "focus city" status seems more likely), though "going in for the kill" on AA and B6 also seems quite plausible given that AA was reeling as of a few months ago.
If I had to guess, the net effect of this whole situation is going to be:
(1) A number of smaller airports wind up getting frequency cuts or cut to "tag flight" status (a la Alaska). I don't think we'll see a return to "full" milk runs, but depending on crew rotations and so forth the idea of running some flights between hubs with two stops in between doesn't seem utterly outlandish (particularly if the airports in question were already getting CRJs and the like).
(2) A general decrease in frequency and partial consolidation within some metro areas between airports (e.g. I could see PHF simply getting shut down in favor of ORF/RIC; I think PAE might be a casualty of this as well).
Beyond that, it'll depend on just how bad the long(er)-term hit is (i.e. over the next 2-3 years). A hit of 10% simply means a bunch of airports end up with smaller planes or wind up with a frequency cut here and there. A hit of 20-30% starts verging on requiring a fundamental restructuring of the system since that'll also force prices up to cover a flight that might've just gone from a load factor of 85% to 65% (if downgauging isn't an option). And all of this does hint at major losses in terms of some aircraft getting parked for a long time.
FWIW, regardless of the above my guess is that the main casualty will be "long and thin" routes (which had been proliferating for some time) and there will be a number of city pairs that go back to requiring double connections.
As to DL's future in BOS, who knows? I could see them de-hubbing it (though dropping to "focus city" status seems more likely), though "going in for the kill" on AA and B6 also seems quite plausible given that AA was reeling as of a few months ago.
If I had to guess, the net effect of this whole situation is going to be:
(1) A number of smaller airports wind up getting frequency cuts or cut to "tag flight" status (a la Alaska). I don't think we'll see a return to "full" milk runs, but depending on crew rotations and so forth the idea of running some flights between hubs with two stops in between doesn't seem utterly outlandish (particularly if the airports in question were already getting CRJs and the like).
(2) A general decrease in frequency and partial consolidation within some metro areas between airports (e.g. I could see PHF simply getting shut down in favor of ORF/RIC; I think PAE might be a casualty of this as well).
Beyond that, it'll depend on just how bad the long(er)-term hit is (i.e. over the next 2-3 years). A hit of 10% simply means a bunch of airports end up with smaller planes or wind up with a frequency cut here and there. A hit of 20-30% starts verging on requiring a fundamental restructuring of the system since that'll also force prices up to cover a flight that might've just gone from a load factor of 85% to 65% (if downgauging isn't an option). And all of this does hint at major losses in terms of some aircraft getting parked for a long time.
FWIW, regardless of the above my guess is that the main casualty will be "long and thin" routes (which had been proliferating for some time) and there will be a number of city pairs that go back to requiring double connections.
#1193
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Body in the CLE, soul still in New England
Programs: In 2023? Does it matter? SPG/Marriott: Plat; DL: Plat; B6: Mosaic
Posts: 2,979
I would be very sad if DL scales back operations at BOS. Jet Blue just doesn't have the scale/route network. Guess it's all wait and see at this point.
#1194
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: DL DM 2MM, Marriott LT Titanium, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 15,193
Agreed would also be sad if BOS takes a significant long term hit, especially since DL recently added a lot of service there.
Sure you can drive, but will still have to pay 75/day to park in NYC and deal with traffic. Even with less people at work traffic will still be horrible there, and along the 95 corridor. Yes the Meritt and Hutch are good alternates but those can get plenty of traffic in certain areas too. Good comment about the Cannonball Run there... I miss doing that on the way to/back from college for semester breaks years ago.
Sure you can drive, but will still have to pay 75/day to park in NYC and deal with traffic. Even with less people at work traffic will still be horrible there, and along the 95 corridor. Yes the Meritt and Hutch are good alternates but those can get plenty of traffic in certain areas too. Good comment about the Cannonball Run there... I miss doing that on the way to/back from college for semester breaks years ago.
#1195
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVPG, DL FO, Marriott Gold, Hertz 5 Whatevers
Posts: 1,099
#1196
Join Date: Dec 2008
Programs: ba exec silver
Posts: 551
Delta increase prices and smaller aircraft?
Was looking at prices a couple of days ago from seattle to vegas and was getting like 220 bucks one way on first. 3 weeks ago was like 100 bucks flying out on the same week (not for this week but.. for 3 weeks ago)
Also noticed now they switched aircrafts so only 3 first class rows instead of 5 or 6.
Any ideas what's going on given they did reduce the ticket prices and less flying demand? Not sure how a smaller aircraft will help social distancing but I get trying to be more profitable during these times.
Even if checking to fly next week... same situation.
Any ideas?
Also noticed now they switched aircrafts so only 3 first class rows instead of 5 or 6.
Any ideas what's going on given they did reduce the ticket prices and less flying demand? Not sure how a smaller aircraft will help social distancing but I get trying to be more profitable during these times.
Even if checking to fly next week... same situation.
Any ideas?
#1197
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: Amtrak Guest Rewards (SE), Virgin America Elevate, Hyatt Gold Passport (Platinum), VIA Preference
Posts: 3,134
So, a couple of things:
(1) Loads are in the floor. Like, off by 90% or more on a bunch of routes. It took DL a few weeks to sort out how to rework fleet use, but most flights have been downgauged and frequencies slashed. As an example, JFK-LAX/SFO is mostly running 757s. Monday's JFK-SFO (single) nonstop flight only shows about 16 seats taken (discounting the universal blocking of middle seats); quite literally, if nobody else books this might turn into a "put everyone in First" flight. The JFK-LAX flight seems to show somewhere in the 30s in terms of seats taken, but whereas on the SFO flight it looks like they blocked out the last two rows, the LAX flight has a bunch of seats blocked that might be a management blocking or just a bunch of seats sold there. The bottom line is that it is entirely possible that on some routes, smaller planes might still enable sufficient distancing.
Also, IIRC there are several layouts of some planes within the same family (the 73X family, for example), so it might not actually be a significantly smaller plane (i.e. a 737-700 vs a 737-900), and it might be an artifact of DL sorting out which planes it is keeping in the air vs parking (and frantically rebuilding flight schedules in the meantime).
(2) I think we'll be debating what happened a few weeks ago for a long time, but there are two theories that both hold water in my mind. One is that Delta let fares fall dramatically in order to get people home. They've hard-capped evacuation fares before, so that might have been the impetus behind some of what we saw. The other theory is that the computers basically had a nervous breakdown when loads collapsed. The main question is whether some of the absurdly low fares that popped up (I was seeing RIC-MCO down in the $40s!) were previously in the system or not. Those fares are not presently in the system, so it seems possible that this was a management decision to slash the heck out of fares when people were scrambling back from trips either as a competitive move or as a goodwill gesture. In particular, they might have been loaded in before most airlines gave in on allowing change/cancel on all tickets (if you're hosed by a ULCC and Delta gets you home for $50 or B6 gets you home for $20, that's gonna build a lot of goodwill).
Basically, anything from the last month should be regarded as an unusual situation.
(1) Loads are in the floor. Like, off by 90% or more on a bunch of routes. It took DL a few weeks to sort out how to rework fleet use, but most flights have been downgauged and frequencies slashed. As an example, JFK-LAX/SFO is mostly running 757s. Monday's JFK-SFO (single) nonstop flight only shows about 16 seats taken (discounting the universal blocking of middle seats); quite literally, if nobody else books this might turn into a "put everyone in First" flight. The JFK-LAX flight seems to show somewhere in the 30s in terms of seats taken, but whereas on the SFO flight it looks like they blocked out the last two rows, the LAX flight has a bunch of seats blocked that might be a management blocking or just a bunch of seats sold there. The bottom line is that it is entirely possible that on some routes, smaller planes might still enable sufficient distancing.
Also, IIRC there are several layouts of some planes within the same family (the 73X family, for example), so it might not actually be a significantly smaller plane (i.e. a 737-700 vs a 737-900), and it might be an artifact of DL sorting out which planes it is keeping in the air vs parking (and frantically rebuilding flight schedules in the meantime).
(2) I think we'll be debating what happened a few weeks ago for a long time, but there are two theories that both hold water in my mind. One is that Delta let fares fall dramatically in order to get people home. They've hard-capped evacuation fares before, so that might have been the impetus behind some of what we saw. The other theory is that the computers basically had a nervous breakdown when loads collapsed. The main question is whether some of the absurdly low fares that popped up (I was seeing RIC-MCO down in the $40s!) were previously in the system or not. Those fares are not presently in the system, so it seems possible that this was a management decision to slash the heck out of fares when people were scrambling back from trips either as a competitive move or as a goodwill gesture. In particular, they might have been loaded in before most airlines gave in on allowing change/cancel on all tickets (if you're hosed by a ULCC and Delta gets you home for $50 or B6 gets you home for $20, that's gonna build a lot of goodwill).
Basically, anything from the last month should be regarded as an unusual situation.
#1199
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: MCO
Programs: DL PM, UA Silver, Marriott Titanium, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 4,309
So, a couple of things:
(1) Loads are in the floor. Like, off by 90% or more on a bunch of routes. It took DL a few weeks to sort out how to rework fleet use, but most flights have been downgauged and frequencies slashed. As an example, JFK-LAX/SFO is mostly running 757s. Monday's JFK-SFO (single) nonstop flight only shows about 16 seats taken (discounting the universal blocking of middle seats); quite literally, if nobody else books this might turn into a "put everyone in First" flight. The JFK-LAX flight seems to show somewhere in the 30s in terms of seats taken, but whereas on the SFO flight it looks like they blocked out the last two rows, the LAX flight has a bunch of seats blocked that might be a management blocking or just a bunch of seats sold there. The bottom line is that it is entirely possible that on some routes, smaller planes might still enable sufficient distancing.
Also, IIRC there are several layouts of some planes within the same family (the 73X family, for example), so it might not actually be a significantly smaller plane (i.e. a 737-700 vs a 737-900), and it might be an artifact of DL sorting out which planes it is keeping in the air vs parking (and frantically rebuilding flight schedules in the meantime).
(2) I think we'll be debating what happened a few weeks ago for a long time, but there are two theories that both hold water in my mind. One is that Delta let fares fall dramatically in order to get people home. They've hard-capped evacuation fares before, so that might have been the impetus behind some of what we saw. The other theory is that the computers basically had a nervous breakdown when loads collapsed. The main question is whether some of the absurdly low fares that popped up (I was seeing RIC-MCO down in the $40s!) were previously in the system or not. Those fares are not presently in the system, so it seems possible that this was a management decision to slash the heck out of fares when people were scrambling back from trips either as a competitive move or as a goodwill gesture. In particular, they might have been loaded in before most airlines gave in on allowing change/cancel on all tickets (if you're hosed by a ULCC and Delta gets you home for $50 or B6 gets you home for $20, that's gonna build a lot of goodwill).
Basically, anything from the last month should be regarded as an unusual situation.
(1) Loads are in the floor. Like, off by 90% or more on a bunch of routes. It took DL a few weeks to sort out how to rework fleet use, but most flights have been downgauged and frequencies slashed. As an example, JFK-LAX/SFO is mostly running 757s. Monday's JFK-SFO (single) nonstop flight only shows about 16 seats taken (discounting the universal blocking of middle seats); quite literally, if nobody else books this might turn into a "put everyone in First" flight. The JFK-LAX flight seems to show somewhere in the 30s in terms of seats taken, but whereas on the SFO flight it looks like they blocked out the last two rows, the LAX flight has a bunch of seats blocked that might be a management blocking or just a bunch of seats sold there. The bottom line is that it is entirely possible that on some routes, smaller planes might still enable sufficient distancing.
Also, IIRC there are several layouts of some planes within the same family (the 73X family, for example), so it might not actually be a significantly smaller plane (i.e. a 737-700 vs a 737-900), and it might be an artifact of DL sorting out which planes it is keeping in the air vs parking (and frantically rebuilding flight schedules in the meantime).
(2) I think we'll be debating what happened a few weeks ago for a long time, but there are two theories that both hold water in my mind. One is that Delta let fares fall dramatically in order to get people home. They've hard-capped evacuation fares before, so that might have been the impetus behind some of what we saw. The other theory is that the computers basically had a nervous breakdown when loads collapsed. The main question is whether some of the absurdly low fares that popped up (I was seeing RIC-MCO down in the $40s!) were previously in the system or not. Those fares are not presently in the system, so it seems possible that this was a management decision to slash the heck out of fares when people were scrambling back from trips either as a competitive move or as a goodwill gesture. In particular, they might have been loaded in before most airlines gave in on allowing change/cancel on all tickets (if you're hosed by a ULCC and Delta gets you home for $50 or B6 gets you home for $20, that's gonna build a lot of goodwill).
Basically, anything from the last month should be regarded as an unusual situation.
#1200
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mid Atlantic
Programs: Delta Plat, one-time United Plat, Amex Plat, Marriott Plat, Hertz Prez Circle, Bus Pass
Posts: 1,237
Anybody know when the May schedule is expected to roll out? Have an int'l flight I'd like to cancel for a cash refund -- I'm almost certain it will be cancelled, but it hasn't been yet.