Future of Aerolineas Argentinas
Assuming Delta will control 20% of LATAM will Aerolineas continue as a partner? Does any carrier want Aerolineas as a partner?
|
Currently AR is a SkyTeam member; there's no bilateral partnership with DL AFAIK. AR could leave SkyTeam under the usual notification rules just as CZ has done, but if both AR and DL remain members, they're alliance partners by default.
|
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 31654569)
Currently AR is a SkyTeam member; there's no bilateral partnership with DL AFAIK. AR could leave SkyTeam under the usual notification rules just as CZ has done, but if both AR and DL remain members, they're alliance partners by default.
https://news.delta.com/delta-aerol-n...rship-launches |
Originally Posted by ajeleonard
(Post 31654588)
It's a bit more than just fellow ST members, they do at least have reciprocal codeshares
https://news.delta.com/delta-aerol-n...rship-launches It could be interesting to know how much of AR's USA-EZE and vv traffic is O&D versus being delivered on connections, with the lion's share of the connections being DL (although I would guess that AR interlines with most other major legacy carriers and not just SkyTeam). |
Will be curious to see the future. We just returned from a trip to EZE/SCL and despite my best efforts to fly AR and leverage my DL PM/STE+ benefits, they came in much more expensive than LATAM on both EZE/AEP - BRC and BRC - MDZ (via AEP).
On MDZ - SCL everyone was expensive (since it was OW international even though just a 1 hour flight) but thankfully Avios for the LATAM flight was available. |
Until Chile approves the LA/DL deal, everyone should just hold their respective horses. Oh, this is FT. Or shall I call it "Rampant Spekulashen Ville."
|
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
(Post 31654879)
Until Chile approves the LA/DL deal, everyone should just hold their respective horses. Oh, this is FT. Or shall I call it "Rampant Spekulashen Ville."
In GAAP accounting the price paid over asset value is "good will". In this case, the good will buys good will :-) |
Originally Posted by exwannabe
(Post 31656258)
DL spent about $0.7B over fare value to conditionally buy the stock. Much of that will end up in the hands of the Chilean upper class.
In GAAP accounting the price paid over asset value is "good will". In this case, the good will buys good will :-) |
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 31657938)
Are you sure 0.7B? I have a hard time seeing DL paying that. Removing 0.7B means the value DL should be paying is 1.2B. I dont see them paying 160%.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ion-latam-deal |
OT, but I wonder what DL's next step will be in this international strategy? It might be possible to buy CX for cheap.
|
Originally Posted by mayhem
(Post 31659040)
"... even as it supports Latam’s stock price by buying at almost an 80% premium.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...ion-latam-deal |
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 31659177)
I know DL knows what it's doing, but that just seems way out of line. Curious if that premium includes the costs DL is covering of current/future LATAM debts.
For LATAM, the transaction will improve free cash flow generation, reduce forecasted debt by over $2 billion by 2025 and improve LATAM's capital structure, enhancing its ability to execute its long-term strategy. |
Originally Posted by eneq
(Post 31659227)
It probably also includes the 14 A350s DL acquired.
|
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 31659177)
I know DL knows what it's doing, but that just seems way out of line. Curious if that premium includes the costs DL is covering of current/future LATAM debts.
Another reason is that you don't want to start a bidding war with another airline (not necessarily AA). I hope someone with a better finance background can enlighten us... Remember when we all thought DL was crazy for buying a refinery? |
Originally Posted by mayhem
(Post 31659289)
Not a banker here but the stock premium they offered was ~40%, which is what mattered here. I'm guessing they need to offer that premium in order to get the block stake of 20% confirmed. They'll have an army of bankers advising them on what the fine print includes and who they're buying the shares from. They also need to make it a sweet deal so the other shareholders (and board members) don't revolt, and they got a board seat right away with this, so they did get quite a bit in return.
Another reason is that you don't want to start a bidding war with another airline (not necessarily AA). I hope someone with a better finance background can enlighten us... Remember when we all thought DL was crazy for buying a refinery? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:01 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.