Congrats to Delta on killing JetBlue service to CDMX!
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 157
Congrats to Delta on killing JetBlue service to CDMX!
A hearty congratulations to Delta/Aeromexico for putting an end to affordable flights to Mexico City for Americans who don't live in one of the few marketplaces -- Miami, Chicago, Houston, NYC, Los Angeles -- served by Mexico's excellent low-cost carriers. Jet Blue flights -- while sometimes with long layovers -- were one of the last cheap ways to get to Mexico City, the greatest city in the Western Hemisphere. Delta/Aeromexico flights are generally twice the price of Jet Blue flights to Mexico City, and now will just be even more expensive.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
#2
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA ExPl, DL PM, UA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium, probably some others
Posts: 4,077
A hearty congratulations to Delta/Aeromexico for putting an end to affordable flights to Mexico City for Americans who don't live in one of the few marketplaces -- Miami, Chicago, Houston, NYC, Los Angeles -- served by Mexico's excellent low-cost carriers. Jet Blue flights -- while sometimes with long layovers -- were one of the last cheap ways to get to Mexico City, the greatest city in the Western Hemisphere. Delta/Aeromexico flights are generally twice the price of Jet Blue flights to Mexico City, and now will just be even more expensive.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
A hearty congratulations to Delta/Aeromexico for putting an end to affordable flights to Mexico City for Americans who don't live in one of the few marketplaces -- Miami, Chicago, Houston, NYC, Los Angeles -- served by Mexico's excellent low-cost carriers. Jet Blue flights -- while sometimes with long layovers -- were one of the last cheap ways to get to Mexico City, the greatest city in the Western Hemisphere. Delta/Aeromexico flights are generally twice the price of Jet Blue flights to Mexico City, and now will just be even more expensive.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
The sad truth is that B6 packed their aircraft with low fare passengers resulting in low PRASM and this better and more profitable uses for its aircraft.
Been this way since the ADA was enacted in 1984 and seems to work quite nicely.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Back in Reds Country (DAY/CVG). Previously: SEA & SAT.
Programs: DL PM 1MM, AA PLAT, UA Silver, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 10,334
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
Seems you should be just as upset at B6 for not being able to run the route in a manner that was sustainable.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NYC
Programs: AS MVPG, DL KM, Bee Six, Bonvoy Plat, Avis PC, Natl Exec, Greyhound Road Rewards Z"L
Posts: 16,665
I think it was less DL/AM than it was Interjet, Volaris, and to a lesser extent VivaAerobus. Along with reduced demand due to the political climate, JetBlue was sharing the JFK and MCO routes with too many other carriers who either: were cheaper, or were major network carriers (DL/AM). JetBlue appealed to the VFR (visiting friends and relatives) crowd, which isn't so huge to begin with at MEX but also demands a low cost.
I don't think any of JetBlue's flights turned a profit. JFK was usually around half full, and MCO was 70-95% full -- but not being a business crowd, they were paying much less than customers on DL/AM and it was not profitable. I flew round trip from FLL once and the flight was barely 2/3 full. And I can't imagine who would have been on the Boston flight, as the Mexican populace there is very small compared to elsewhere.
-J.
I don't think any of JetBlue's flights turned a profit. JFK was usually around half full, and MCO was 70-95% full -- but not being a business crowd, they were paying much less than customers on DL/AM and it was not profitable. I flew round trip from FLL once and the flight was barely 2/3 full. And I can't imagine who would have been on the Boston flight, as the Mexican populace there is very small compared to elsewhere.
-J.
#7
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: CHS
Programs: UA GS, Bonvoy Amabassador, Hertz PC
Posts: 2,589
I flew UA from IAH to MEX and VER (E145) no less then 18 times this year and I can't remember having a flight that wasn't packed.
Typical price from CHS-IAH-VER-IAH-CHS was like $425 all spring - that seemed like a heck of a deal and was generally cheaper than DL and AA
CHS-IAH-MEX-VER-MEX-IAH-CHS were about the same for econ and $900ish for Business, where AA was $3000 and DL was $4000 for RT
I never did figure out why they were so expensive
I also boked several of my guy MEX-ORD and Aeromexico was dirt ... cheap, sometimes as little as $267 RT
So, IME, your arguementdoesn't hold water, or your glasses are awefully tinted
Typical price from CHS-IAH-VER-IAH-CHS was like $425 all spring - that seemed like a heck of a deal and was generally cheaper than DL and AA
CHS-IAH-MEX-VER-MEX-IAH-CHS were about the same for econ and $900ish for Business, where AA was $3000 and DL was $4000 for RT
I never did figure out why they were so expensive
I also boked several of my guy MEX-ORD and Aeromexico was dirt ... cheap, sometimes as little as $267 RT
So, IME, your arguementdoesn't hold water, or your glasses are awefully tinted
#8
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: RDU
Programs: DL DM+(segs)/MM, UA Ag, Hilton DM, Marriott Ti (life Pt), TSA Opt-out Platinum
Posts: 3,222
From the cost to provide the service, it probably doesn't cost the airline more to fly you from MSP to AMS than it does to fly you from MSP to MEX. But the prices for airline tickets aren't driven by the "cost". They're driven by supply & demand and what the airline feels the market will bear. Supply & Demand was such that with too much supply, fares were unsustainable and unprofitable. If the demand is actually there and that demand can generate a profitable and sustainable operation, another airline will possibly look to come in and pick up the slack. It really is that simple.
Mkt price = Competition’s price +/- added value (that your product/solutions bring).
In the OP’s situation B6 either didn’t get the formula right, their costs were too high for that to work, or opportunity cost. Either way your rant should be against B6
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 23,023
There are $386 roundtrip fares for BHM-MEX ($446 main cabin) on AA/UA/DL. These have a 2-week advance purchase requirement. Availability looks fairly good on AA/UA (DL looks more challenging finding dates with V bucket availability).
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,373
Mexico, including Mexico City, is basically a leisure market with low yields and the recently publicized incidents of violence and of guests being served tainted alcohol in resort hotels have further reduced demand.
#11
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: OZ Diamond, Jiffypark Manhattan Gold
Posts: 4,485
Welcome to air travel as a whole.
It's routinely cheaper for me to fly from YVR-MEX or PEK than to go to Toronto. Wanna fly to Newfoundland? Good luck getting that ticket for less than $1200 return.
I'm constantly jealous of the myriad of cheapo fares from NYC to EUR, but they're closer than I am. Are you a little bit screwed on the MEX market? Sure maybe. But I'm sure you've got advantages that I don't have.
While MEX isn't always cheap from YVR, having Aeromexico here, especially once they switched to double daily, brought the fares down from here big time. After Mexicana died it was AC or bust basically until AM jumped in. I'm quite happy with the AM product/service when I fly them, the food kinda sucks, but you GET food, which can't be said for the "AC domestic service" offered from YVR-MEX.
It's routinely cheaper for me to fly from YVR-MEX or PEK than to go to Toronto. Wanna fly to Newfoundland? Good luck getting that ticket for less than $1200 return.
I'm constantly jealous of the myriad of cheapo fares from NYC to EUR, but they're closer than I am. Are you a little bit screwed on the MEX market? Sure maybe. But I'm sure you've got advantages that I don't have.
While MEX isn't always cheap from YVR, having Aeromexico here, especially once they switched to double daily, brought the fares down from here big time. After Mexicana died it was AC or bust basically until AM jumped in. I'm quite happy with the AM product/service when I fly them, the food kinda sucks, but you GET food, which can't be said for the "AC domestic service" offered from YVR-MEX.
#12
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: Delta PM, Hyatt Plat-ist, Bonvoyyyyyyed, Hilton $15 Daily F&B Receiver, Food Lion MVP
Posts: 1,203
The recent spate of tourist deaths and tainted alcohol was in the Dominican Republic.
#13
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: RDU
Programs: DL DM+(segs)/MM, UA Ag, Hilton DM, Marriott Ti (life Pt), TSA Opt-out Platinum
Posts: 3,222
#14
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NYC
Programs: AA GLD, AC
Posts: 4,212
A hearty congratulations to Delta/Aeromexico for putting an end to affordable flights to Mexico City for Americans who don't live in one of the few marketplaces -- Miami, Chicago, Houston, NYC, Los Angeles -- served by Mexico's excellent low-cost carriers. Jet Blue flights -- while sometimes with long layovers -- were one of the last cheap ways to get to Mexico City, the greatest city in the Western Hemisphere. Delta/Aeromexico flights are generally twice the price of Jet Blue flights to Mexico City, and now will just be even more expensive.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
#15
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ORD / MDW / FLL
Programs: DL DM/1MM, AA EXP, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 2,295
A hearty congratulations to Delta/Aeromexico for putting an end to affordable flights to Mexico City for Americans who don't live in one of the few marketplaces -- Miami, Chicago, Houston, NYC, Los Angeles -- served by Mexico's excellent low-cost carriers. Jet Blue flights -- while sometimes with long layovers -- were one of the last cheap ways to get to Mexico City, the greatest city in the Western Hemisphere. Delta/Aeromexico flights are generally twice the price of Jet Blue flights to Mexico City, and now will just be even more expensive.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
Delta's anti-competitive behavior is truly one of the greatest threats to affordable North American aviation. It shouldn't cost $600 to fly from Atlanta to Mexico City or to fly from Atlanta to Montreal. It shouldn't cost more to fly to Mexico City from Minneapolis than it does to fly to Amsterdam.
I hate to break it to you, but this is how competition works. BOS used to be an AA stronghold until B6 came in and undercut them. All legacy carriers used to have much more service to FLL until ULCCs came in and undercut them.