LAX-MIA Route
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: SkyMiles (DM)
Posts: 30
LAX-MIA Route
I recall flying this route a couple of times in the past year or two, but don't see it on the schedule this year. Has delta permanently dropped this route? Strange that they'd drop a route between two major markets, especially when they are trying to grow their presence at LAX and are spending upward of $2B for the terminal 2/3 renovation.
#2
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL PM, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 8,414
I recall flying this route a couple of times in the past year or two, but don't see it on the schedule this year. Has delta permanently dropped this route? Strange that they'd drop a route between two major markets, especially when they are trying to grow their presence at LAX and are spending upward of $2B for the terminal 2/3 renovation.
I'm not sure if they have dropped it or not, but the terminal renovation has not, at least yet, added any capacity, thats a few years (at least) away.
Also, there are so many easy LAX-ATL-MIA connections that I'm not surprised that they would not prioritize this route. Also not sure I would call MIA a "major market" when it comes to LAX.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: DL PM, MR Titanium/LTP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,130
I'm not sure if they have dropped it or not, but the terminal renovation has not, at least yet, added any capacity, thats a few years (at least) away.
Also, there are so many easy LAX-ATL-MIA connections that I'm not surprised that they would not prioritize this route. Also not sure I would call MIA a "major market" when it comes to LAX.
Also, there are so many easy LAX-ATL-MIA connections that I'm not surprised that they would not prioritize this route. Also not sure I would call MIA a "major market" when it comes to LAX.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
It's not just AA on LAX-MIA. It's Alaska, Spirit, and JetBlue non-stop on LAX-FLL depressing average fares in the market. Good for passengers. Not so good trying to be the 5th carrier in the market.
#5
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PHX
Programs: Delta 2M DM, Southwest A List and CP
Posts: 1,102
The flight was often a red-eye (LAX-MIA) with V and X fares to be had until a week or two before departure, with the flight rarely sold out, so I'm sure that loads and profits on this route were poor.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: check swarm
Programs: DL DM & 2MM, SPG/Bonvoid LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, $tarbucks Titanium
Posts: 14,404
I was wondering about this route as well. The times were actually decent for getting work done on either coast.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: SkyMiles (DM)
Posts: 30
Yep, I used to travel on the route for work trips to MIA. I think the timings shifted around quite a bit, and there was a time when there was a day flight from LAX-MIA departing around 10 am PT, and the return was an early 6-7 am out of MIA. The additional 3-4 hours it takes to connect in ATL is not ideal.
The reason I ask is that AA somehow manages to fly 3 non stops daily from LAX to ATL despite absolutely no onward connections from ATL. If Delta is serious about matching AA at LAX, I think they need to at least have a daily flight to a place like MIA.
The reason I ask is that AA somehow manages to fly 3 non stops daily from LAX to ATL despite absolutely no onward connections from ATL. If Delta is serious about matching AA at LAX, I think they need to at least have a daily flight to a place like MIA.
#8
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL PM, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 8,414
Yep, I used to travel on the route for work trips to MIA. I think the timings shifted around quite a bit, and there was a time when there was a day flight from LAX-MIA departing around 10 am PT, and the return was an early 6-7 am out of MIA. The additional 3-4 hours it takes to connect in ATL is not ideal.
The reason I ask is that AA somehow manages to fly 3 non stops daily from LAX to ATL despite absolutely no onward connections from ATL. If Delta is serious about matching AA at LAX, I think they need to at least have a daily flight to a place like MIA.
The reason I ask is that AA somehow manages to fly 3 non stops daily from LAX to ATL despite absolutely no onward connections from ATL. If Delta is serious about matching AA at LAX, I think they need to at least have a daily flight to a place like MIA.
It's all about market demand. You may need LAX- MIA service but apparently not enough other DL pax do.
Also, if you are comfortable with a tight connection, the ATL connection only needs to add two hours, not three of four. This is just one of those cases where you need to decide if staying with DL or flying nonstop is more valuable.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: SkyMiles (DM)
Posts: 30
Absolutely right. I'm just wondering how AA is able to make 3 nonstop work daily to ATL, and DL can't even make one nonstop work to MIA. I would have thought that there would be enough domestic and onward connections for passengers from MIA (Sydney, ICN, HND, and other west coast) to make it work.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: DL PM, MR Titanium/LTP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,130
Absolutely right. I'm just wondering how AA is able to make 3 nonstop work daily to ATL, and DL can't even make one nonstop work to MIA. I would have thought that there would be enough domestic and onward connections for passengers from MIA (Sydney, ICN, HND, and other west coast) to make it work.
All other primary TPAC and the majority of west coast can be accessed with one-stop on MIA - ATL / DTW / MSP - XYZ
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
Yep, I used to travel on the route for work trips to MIA. I think the timings shifted around quite a bit, and there was a time when there was a day flight from LAX-MIA departing around 10 am PT, and the return was an early 6-7 am out of MIA. The additional 3-4 hours it takes to connect in ATL is not ideal.
The reason I ask is that AA somehow manages to fly 3 non stops daily from LAX to ATL despite absolutely no onward connections from ATL. If Delta is serious about matching AA at LAX, I think they need to at least have a daily flight to a place like MIA.
The reason I ask is that AA somehow manages to fly 3 non stops daily from LAX to ATL despite absolutely no onward connections from ATL. If Delta is serious about matching AA at LAX, I think they need to at least have a daily flight to a place like MIA.
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: SkyMiles (DM)
Posts: 30
These all the AA flights from ATL. AA Mainline: Charlotte, Chicago–O'Hare, Dallas/Fort Worth, Miami, New York–LaGuardia, Philadelphia, Phoenix–Sky Harbor American Eagle:Charlotte, Chicago–O'Hare, Miami, New York–LaGuardia, Washington–National
Not sure how many folks would connect to NY, Philly, DCA, or Charlotte via ATL from LAX vs taking a direct flight?
Not sure how many folks would connect to NY, Philly, DCA, or Charlotte via ATL from LAX vs taking a direct flight?
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: TPA for now. Hopefully LIS for retirement
Posts: 13,691
Absolutely right. I'm just wondering how AA is able to make 3 nonstop work daily to ATL, and DL can't even make one nonstop work to MIA. I would have thought that there would be enough domestic and onward connections for passengers from MIA (Sydney, ICN, HND, and other west coast) to make it work.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
Wait, what? That's news to Delta. LAX is definitely a hub (10M passengers/year). If it's not, then SEA is definitely not a hub (7M pax) and SLC probably isn't either (11M passengers/year).
Not every airport can be an 80M/year hub like Atlanta.
Not having LAX-MIA is just typical Delta revenue management. They won't run a money-losing route even if it connects two large cities. This is an endemic issue for a lot of their hubs. SEA doesn't service something like 5 or 6 of the largest US cities for the same reason (they're competitor hubs). Houston, Phoenix, Miami, and Chicago are the cities that Delta basically ignores from all of their "secondary" hubs.
#15
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 557
Also, all but maybe one AA LAX-MIA nonstop is either 737s or A320 types. Not great for a 6 hour flight. I was on a morning MIA-ATL AA flight and it seemed like quite a few people connecting from South American flights.