Originally Posted by thecortex
(Post 27459260)
With navigational deviations due to weather, MSP-CVG took 2h 23min on a CR2 a couple of weeks ago. Brutal. At least there is a mix of -900s on the route too.
Originally Posted by jb1012xna
(Post 27464726)
I've done XNA-MSP several times. Ties the 596 number. XNA-ATL is close at 589.
Fortunately the ATL route is a mix of regional and mainline. Conversely, MSP is only CR2. |
Originally Posted by Renes Points
(Post 27465133)
To me a MIX does not count as you CAN, with work, avoid CRJ200s. So to me SBN-ATL-SBN that is exclusively "Satan's Chariot" means that rout wins the worst in the system (btw ND weekend games with a 717 do not count - but feel free to make FT jokes about this)! :mad: :p
|
My backside thanks you and need I say more?
Originally Posted by jb1012xna
(Post 27465214)
Oh I definitely appreciate the mix that XNA is given. If there's a station that only gets the CR2, I have sympathy.
|
I did PIT-MSP back in the NW days... 726 miles. 2.5 hours. It was brutal.
|
I wonder if this is related at all to the very secretive project at NWA around 2005 involving some type of enhanced configuration for CRJ's. NWA parked a Pinnacle CRJ at MSP for several days and tested the configuration with customers who were made to sign non-disclosure agreements. Only thing I remember confirming was it involved a test of a premium configuration for all CRJ-200's and CRJ-440's.
|
About 10 yrs ago NWA ran a CR2 MSP- PNS, did that route about 6 times.
think that was close to 1k miles. |
Originally Posted by jb1012xna
(Post 27465214)
Oh I definitely appreciate the mix that XNA is given. If there's a station that only gets the CR2, I have sympathy.
Nice pic Rene |
NW used to do both BOS-MEM (1139 miles) and AUS-DTW (1149 miles) on CR2s. One of my first trips after I started to travel for work was a BOS-MEM-AUS-DTW-BOS trip with both of the long legs on CR2s because I simply didn't know any better. Let's just say I learned the hard way how bad those planes can be :(.
|
Originally Posted by WWads
(Post 27459197)
CVG-MSP may be close. 596 miles.
|
My last flight from SLC to LWS was on a CR2 that reeked of urine. Longest 50 minute flight I've ever taken.
|
Originally Posted by DCFinanceinFlight
(Post 27497066)
LEX-MSP. 650 Miles
|
Originally Posted by rylan
(Post 27458072)
Good suggestion above. Only removing 2 seats from one side would let them add in a couple rows of C+. I could see people paying a small premium for that since the standard Y experience on the CRJ is so awful. Not sure it would make up for losing 2 Y seats however if those last two would be full fare. However, if those barbi-jets rarely go out totally full then it would be incremental revenue from selling C+, along with goodwill for elites.
Removing two seats just shifts the revenue forward. Instead of passengers #49 and #50 paying full Y, its #47 and #48. Fewer discounted seats they have to sell. Up until about 5 years ago, I flew frequently on the CRJ, but I don't think I was ever on a flight that had all 50 seats occupied due to weight limitations (and I never got a VDB either since they always seemed to have an army of non-revs on board they could kick off for free:mad:). If I was DL, I would add C+ in a heartbeat to these flights. Between less weight of fewer seats, reduced supply leading to higher prices, incremental revenue, increased goodwill and likelihood that more passengers will choose DL to feed other routes they breakeven at worst. |
Originally Posted by WWads
(Post 27498589)
I think we have a winner.
|
Originally Posted by jrl767
(Post 27499280)
nope, not even close ... May of 2010, DSM-DCA (896 miles) ... second place was a month earlier, UA, COS-LAX (832 miles); third goes to DFW-TUS in Jan 2002 (811 miles)
|
picky, picky ... :p
nothing in Rene's question was specific, and I didn't reread the previous 40 posts ... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:58 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.