Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

Delta 55 332 evacuation at LOS after emergency landing

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Delta 55 332 evacuation at LOS after emergency landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2018, 5:53 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ATL
Programs: AA GLD Skymiles DM MM, a+ rewards lifetime elite, AS, Marriott plat, PC plat, HH gold
Posts: 1,275
Delta 55 332 evacuation at LOS after emergency landing

Saw this on the news. 11alive.com | 5 injured after Delta flight from Nigeria to Atlanta forced to turn back due to engine issues
turkeyRIOO is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2018, 5:54 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
TIL Delta flies ATL->LOS.
ethernal is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2018, 8:11 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
"Flight tracking website FlightAware indicates the flight had only been in the air for a little less than an hour and a half, and had only traveled 29 of its roughly 5,800-mile journey, before one of the A330-200's two engines reported issues."

Huh?
StayingHomeIsBetter is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2018, 8:13 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: MSP
Programs: Delta PM, Marriott Plat, Hertz Pres
Posts: 3,649
Originally Posted by StayingHomeIsBetter
"Flight tracking website FlightAware indicates the flight had only been in the air for a little less than an hour and a half, and had only traveled 29 of its roughly 5,800-mile journey, before one of the A330-200's two engines reported issues."

Huh?
Well flight aware DOES say:
Distance
Actual: 29 mi (Planned: 5,793 mi)
xolinlevh is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2018, 8:18 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
Originally Posted by xolinlevh
Well flight aware DOES say:
Distance
Actual: 29 mi (Planned: 5,793 mi)
Must have been one hell of a head wind.
StayingHomeIsBetter is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2018, 9:16 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
Originally Posted by StayingHomeIsBetter
Must have been one hell of a head wind.
Don't be silly. They had engine problems. The problem was that that plane was only going 20 miles per hour!
Vegas Vegan and wrp96 like this.
ethernal is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2018, 9:31 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: midwest
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold
Posts: 920
The flight was only a few minutes long. If you replay the Flightaware track, the plane clearly does a quick return to the airport, but on final approach, Flightaware starts 'estimating' that the plane has started heading towards ATL and runs for about an hour on the assumed (but not real) track.
The interesting (and by that I guess I mean upsetting) thing is that the situation was urgent enough that the flight returned and landed asap, meaning a likely overweight landing. No time to dump or burn fuel. That means that the pilots assessed the situation as critical, and there might be structural problems with this a/c now.
Very thankful that they got down safely and that the injuries appear minor and evacuation-related.
RaflW is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2018, 12:29 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 858
Originally Posted by RaflW
The flight was only a few minutes long. If you replay the Flightaware track, the plane clearly does a quick return to the airport, but on final approach, Flightaware starts 'estimating' that the plane has started heading towards ATL and runs for about an hour on the assumed (but not real) track.
The interesting (and by that I guess I mean upsetting) thing is that the situation was urgent enough that the flight returned and landed asap, meaning a likely overweight landing. No time to dump or burn fuel. That means that the pilots assessed the situation as critical, and there might be structural problems with this a/c now.
Very thankful that they got down safely and that the injuries appear minor and evacuation-related.
Delta’s A330’s do not have fuel dump capability. The aircraft is certified for emergency landings at max takeoff weight. The airframe is back in service today.
Jeff767 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2018, 1:01 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas
Programs: DL DM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 97
Originally Posted by Jeff767


Delta’s A330’s do not have fuel dump capability. The aircraft is certified for emergency landings at max takeoff weight. The airframe is back in service today.
That airframe is most definitely not back in service today. It'll be early next week before it leaves.
RaflW and CPMaverick like this.
misinfobuster is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2018, 6:42 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SJC/YUL
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,877
I'm guessing that if they used the slides, there must have been a fire involved.
Mountain Explorer is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2018, 3:46 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
How many errors can you find?

Delta airline apologises to AIB for reporting emergency - Local - Pulse
StayingHomeIsBetter is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2018, 3:49 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
Every over-ocean aircraft should have four engines. <sigh>

NOLAnwGOLD likes this.

Last edited by StayingHomeIsBetter; Feb 16, 2018 at 3:54 pm
StayingHomeIsBetter is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2018, 3:53 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Programs: Delta GM/1.5MM ~ United Silver ~ Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,434
ETOPS

Engines
Turn
Or
Passengers
Swim

Exactly why i prefer 4 engines than 2.
baccarat0809 is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2018, 4:07 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DFW
Programs: Non-Affiliated
Posts: 7,429
Originally Posted by StayingHomeIsBetter
Well, I am certain Skywest doesn't fly LOS-ATL...
james318 is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2018, 4:53 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SJC/YUL
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,877
Seriously guys, doesn't matter how many engines this plane had. If this had been a 747, and one of its engines failed at or immediately after takeoff (as was the case here), the plane would have turned around and landed, and the flight would have been cancelled. Exactly the same result.
Mountain Explorer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.