Last edit by: RatherBeOnATrain
Waiver posted: https://www.delta.com/content/www/en...er-outage.html
as of ~1am EST on 12/18:
AFFECTED CITIES (TO / FROM / THROUGH)
Atlanta, GA (ATL)
IMPACTED TRAVEL DATE(S)
December 17-19, 2017
TICKET MUST BE REISSUED ON OR BEFORE
December 22, 2017
REBOOKED TRAVEL MUST BEGIN NO LATER THAN
December 22, 2017
An Atlanta newspaper article that describes the aiport's lack of preparation and poor communications during the outage: MyAJC - Zero communication, Airport had no plan for total power outage (Posted: 8:28 p.m. Monday, December 18, 2017)
as of ~1am EST on 12/18:
AFFECTED CITIES (TO / FROM / THROUGH)
Atlanta, GA (ATL)
IMPACTED TRAVEL DATE(S)
December 17-19, 2017
TICKET MUST BE REISSUED ON OR BEFORE
December 22, 2017
REBOOKED TRAVEL MUST BEGIN NO LATER THAN
December 22, 2017
An Atlanta newspaper article that describes the aiport's lack of preparation and poor communications during the outage: MyAJC - Zero communication, Airport had no plan for total power outage (Posted: 8:28 p.m. Monday, December 18, 2017)
Power outage in ATL
#316
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: GYD
Programs: Azerbaijan Airlines Gold, Turkish Miles and Smiles, IHG Plat
Posts: 663
Most flights I am seeing from other airports have an ETD of 15:30, this will probably change.
Anyway, obviously this isn't Delta's fault but is there a way/possible chance to get compensation from ATL/the airport authority? I always here of airlines shelling out compensation but never airports, and while I've never had any issue with any airline that required more than getting me to my destination many airports/their operations have left a lot to be desired.
Anyway, obviously this isn't Delta's fault but is there a way/possible chance to get compensation from ATL/the airport authority? I always here of airlines shelling out compensation but never airports, and while I've never had any issue with any airline that required more than getting me to my destination many airports/their operations have left a lot to be desired.
#318
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RDU
Programs: DL DM, HHonors Diamond, Marriott Platinum, etc etc etc
Posts: 2,341
According to GA Power the fire caused the auxiliary switches to catch on fire.
My only question: who designed a system where the main and auxiliary switches are next to each other? Data centers, hospitals, and other critical infrastructure design their buildings to AVOID this.
In no no way is this DLs fault, they merely are renters at ATL. with that said put this in perspective.....
Pretend ATL is a hospital instead of an airport, if the design was the same we would be talking about a lot of dead people when there ventilators, and other machines shut off.
My only question: who designed a system where the main and auxiliary switches are next to each other? Data centers, hospitals, and other critical infrastructure design their buildings to AVOID this.
In no no way is this DLs fault, they merely are renters at ATL. with that said put this in perspective.....
Pretend ATL is a hospital instead of an airport, if the design was the same we would be talking about a lot of dead people when there ventilators, and other machines shut off.
#319
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 209
I did see a comment where passengers were told planes that ran out of fuel on the tarmac were being evacuated first... who knows if that is accurate or not.
#320
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sunshine State
Programs: Avis Trump. Costco Exec. SPG PLAT PREM-90. WN A+/CP. AA SLV. Nat EE..
Posts: 456
+1. I was thinking the same thing. I'd love to see the one-line diagram here also. That would answer a lot of questions. But, if ATL operates like DL, it's all about obfuscation -- the opposite of transparency, openness and honesty, so highly unlikely for them to come clean.
#321
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 209
Delta is an amateur at this when compared to the city of Atlanta.
#322
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 698
Exactly
#324
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RDU
Programs: DL DM, HHonors Diamond, Marriott Platinum, etc etc etc
Posts: 2,341
#325
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta Skymiles
Posts: 355
#326
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
According to GA Power the fire caused the auxiliary switches to catch on fire.
My only question: who designed a system where the main and auxiliary switches are next to each other? Data centers, hospitals, and other critical infrastructure design their buildings to AVOID this.
In no no way is this DLs fault, they merely are renters at ATL. with that said put this in perspective.....
Pretend ATL is a hospital instead of an airport, if the design was the same we would be talking about a lot of dead people when there ventilators, and other machines shut off.
My only question: who designed a system where the main and auxiliary switches are next to each other? Data centers, hospitals, and other critical infrastructure design their buildings to AVOID this.
In no no way is this DLs fault, they merely are renters at ATL. with that said put this in perspective.....
Pretend ATL is a hospital instead of an airport, if the design was the same we would be talking about a lot of dead people when there ventilators, and other machines shut off.
When I work with clients and we do site strategy work, infrastructure and operational reliability is always a concern. You can contractually pawn off responsibility to a supplier but that doesn't mean you've actually pawned it off.
With that said, I don't blame Delta or the airport for this. I can guarantee you most airports (as well as most things like stadiums, etc) all have a master switch room that - if destroyed - would cripple the facility. They likely had redundant equipment such that if anything failed in the switch room it would still work, but they did not plan for physical destruction. Very, very few non-life safety critical places (data centers being an example*) actually invest in truly physically isolated redundant systems. It was probably acknowledged as a potential SPoF in the event of catastrophic damage and managed as an acceptable risk.
edit: * even then not all data centers physically isolate their systems such that they could survive catastrophic damage (not just component failure) to their electric system
#327
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RDU
Programs: DL DM, HHonors Diamond, Marriott Platinum, etc etc etc
Posts: 2,341
This is wrong, it is definitely Delta's fault. This is not some outstation that they service, this is their core hub and they closely partner with the Atlanta airport on everything (including master site planning like ATLNext as well as smaller projects like the TSA "innovation lanes").
When I work with clients and we do site strategy work, infrastructure and operational reliability is always a concern. You can contractually pawn off responsibility to a supplier but that doesn't mean you've actually pawned it off.
With that said, I don't blame Delta or the airport for this. I can guarantee you most airports (as well as most things like stadiums, etc) all have a master switch room that - if destroyed - would cripple the facility. They likely had redundant equipment such that if anything failed in the switch room it would still work, but they did not plan for physical destruction. Very, very few non-life safety critical places (data centers being an example*) actually invest in truly physically isolated redundant systems. It was probably acknowledged as a potential SPoF in the event of catastrophic damage and managed as an acceptable risk.
edit: * even then not all data centers physically isolate their systems such that they could survive catastrophic damage (not just component failure) to their electric system
When I work with clients and we do site strategy work, infrastructure and operational reliability is always a concern. You can contractually pawn off responsibility to a supplier but that doesn't mean you've actually pawned it off.
With that said, I don't blame Delta or the airport for this. I can guarantee you most airports (as well as most things like stadiums, etc) all have a master switch room that - if destroyed - would cripple the facility. They likely had redundant equipment such that if anything failed in the switch room it would still work, but they did not plan for physical destruction. Very, very few non-life safety critical places (data centers being an example*) actually invest in truly physically isolated redundant systems. It was probably acknowledged as a potential SPoF in the event of catastrophic damage and managed as an acceptable risk.
edit: * even then not all data centers physically isolate their systems such that they could survive catastrophic damage (not just component failure) to their electric system
ATL apparently does not consider themselves to be a critical infrastructure.
#328
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Formerly at PIT, now planted near MSP.
Programs: No flights since April 2019 (Medical Issues). Lost all my status.
Posts: 1,483
#329
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
I don't think you fully appreciate what is required to physically isolate electrical equipment. As an example, high end hospitals do provide physical isolation for a separate circuit that powers equipment deemed to be life safety critical but that is usually it.
#330
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: DL DM, UA Gold, Alaska MVP, Bonvoy (lol) Ambassador
Posts: 2,994
Nuclear power plants fall under my life safety comment. And they are also some of the (if not the) most expensive structures that are built in the world owing to that hyper redundant and generally fail safe design.