DL in J - A333 or B764
Which would be better for TATL in J: A333 (new seat) or B764 (older seat)?
|
This thread belongs in the DL forum, where numerous threads on this topic already exist.
A moderator has been notified. |
There are threads in the DL forum describing and comparing these aircraft.
|
Plenty of discussion on DL forum (will alert mod) but the short answer is the A330 is better.
That being said if the A330 is inconvenient for whatever reason (tight connection, really long connection, etc.) the 764 is perfectly acceptable - especially if you can get a seat in Row 1 (extra space for your feet). |
First of thank you and sorry for posting in the wrong section.
Actually I would be able to get the row 1 in B764 for the outbound leg. Does the more legroom apply for the window seats, middle seats or both? |
I prefer A330 for sleeping, 767 for daytime. 767 has a better console area, but feels coffin-like for sleeping. The footwells for all of row 1 on a 767 are much more spacious than the rest of the rows which are very restrictive.
|
Since the first two answers to your question, did nothing but berate you. Here is my opinion , the A333
|
Originally Posted by jan8
(Post 28474849)
First of thank you and sorry for posting in the wrong section.
Actually I would be able to get the row 1 in B764 for the outgoing leg. Does the more legroom apply for the window seats, middle seats or both? You will hear a lot of people complain about the 767 seats, but I actually think that the row 1 seats are quite nice. I like the large side tables, especially. If you are on the larger side (say 6'2"+ or over 230 lbs), I could see the bed being cramped, but for folks under that, I think the "coffin" criticisms are overstated. For non-row 1, I do think the footwell is tight, almost uncomfortably so. In short, if you aren't a bigger person and can get row 1, I would choose on schedule, even though I think the A330 seat is better. |
A333 no question.
|
Originally Posted by jdrtravel
(Post 28474990)
A333 no question.
|
Schedule and connection would work better with the A333 for me. It's probably decided then.
Thank you all for inputs. |
Just got back from a mileage upgrade to J on the 764, MXP-ATL. The missus and I sat in 1B-1C. We really enjoyed the trip. Also, and maybe this is because we started in Italy, but Delta's food on this particular flight was the best I can remember in some time.
|
Originally Posted by ND76
(Post 28476122)
Just got back from a mileage upgrade to J on the 764, MXP-ATL. The missus and I sat in 1B-1C. We really enjoyed the trip. Also, and maybe this is because we started in Italy, but Delta's food on this particular flight was the best I can remember in some time.
As for food, it must be something about Italy catering. Our FCO - ATL flight home in C+ was the best Y catering I've had in years, easily better than any domestic F I've had the last few years (except maybe UA old PS/D1) |
If you are petite then both are fine. If you are larger then the A330 is better.
|
Surely the reverse herring bone on the A330 will always be superior to the 767 seat. I can't see why anyone would ever pick the 767 seat over the A330 IMO.
|
Originally Posted by jah718
(Post 28476907)
Surely the reverse herring bone on the A330 will always be superior to the 767 seat. I can't see why anyone would ever pick the 767 seat over the A330 IMO.
|
Well I am 6'2, so that A333 it is.
|
Originally Posted by jah718
(Post 28476907)
Surely the reverse herring bone on the A330 will always be superior to the 767 seat. I can't see why anyone would ever pick the 767 seat over the A330 IMO.
I like these seats. Haven't been on DL's A330, but I do like AA/CX's version a lot. But the 767 are fine for me (5'8") and I wouldn't go out of my way to avoid, but I understand if you're bigger you might. |
As long as its Row 1, 767 is great!
Does not feel tight to me |
Originally Posted by jan8
(Post 28477417)
Well I am 6'2, so that A333 it is.
|
I despise the coffin seats on the 764s
|
Originally Posted by jah718
(Post 28476907)
Surely the reverse herring bone on the A330 will always be superior to the 767 seat. I can't see why anyone would ever pick the 767 seat over the A330 IMO.
I'm 5'6" and she's 5'4" - we're both average build. The footwells didn't bother us. Mrs. Lee likes a "cozy" sleeping arrangement so the "walls" of the bed were actually a positive over the open/exposed nature of the reverse herringbone. When flying solo, odd-numbered windows on the 767 are easier to look out of and definitely feels more private than any seat o the 330. As a pair, middle seats on the 767 are easier to talk to each other from than the 330, where your heads are much further apart. List could go on. They are both good seats and when both are options, I'll let price/schedule decide. But all else being equal, I'll raise my hand anytime someone asks "Who would prefer the 767 seat?" :) |
I think the A330 is better if you're alone, but I like the 764 better when traveling with someone else. The middle pair gets you plenty of personal space, but you can still talk and see each other when you want to. If you're traveling with a child, the 764 middle pair is way easier to reach across if you need to help them with something.
|
Originally Posted by gooselee
(Post 28491731)
I'm 5'6" and she's 5'4" - we're both average build. The footwells didn't bother us. Mrs. Lee likes a "cozy" sleeping arrangement so the "walls" of the bed were actually a positive over the open/exposed nature of the reverse herringbone. When flying solo, odd-numbered windows on the 767 are easier to look out of and definitely feels more private than any seat o the 330. As a pair, middle seats on the 767 are easier to talk to each other from than the 330, where your heads are much further apart.
|
Which is better on a 333 for a couple on a daytime TATL (AMS-JFK), Row 1 or 5?
|
Originally Posted by SuperG1955
(Post 28493776)
Which is better on a 333 for a couple on a daytime TATL (AMS-JFK), Row 1 or 5?
|
Originally Posted by matthew64832
(Post 28497741)
I don't think row 1 gets any extra space on the 333 so I would pick row 5 just to be away from the galley/restroom/closet. However, the way the 333 seats work none of them are very good for sitting together since the seats aren't very close together (although they are angled to sort of face each other).
|
Originally Posted by gooselee
(Post 28491731)
After reading all the FT threads, I also thought the same thing. Then I actually flew both planes and decided I like the 767 over the 330. It's personal preference, not an absolute. FWIW, Mrs. Lee agrees.
I'm 5'6" and she's 5'4" - we're both average build. The footwells didn't bother us. Mrs. Lee likes a "cozy" sleeping arrangement so the "walls" of the bed were actually a positive over the open/exposed nature of the reverse herringbone. When flying solo, odd-numbered windows on the 767 are easier to look out of and definitely feels more private than any seat o the 330. As a pair, middle seats on the 767 are easier to talk to each other from than the 330, where your heads are much further apart. List could go on. They are both good seats and when both are options, I'll let price/schedule decide. But all else being equal, I'll raise my hand anytime someone asks "Who would prefer the 767 seat?" :) |
Originally Posted by matthew64832
(Post 28497741)
However, the way the 333 seats work none of them are very good for sitting together since the seats aren't very close together (although they are angled to sort of face each other).
|
Originally Posted by matthew64832
(Post 28497741)
I don't think row 1 gets any extra space on the 333 so I would pick row 5 just to be away from the galley/restroom/closet. However, the way the 333 seats work none of them are very good for sitting together since the seats aren't very close together (although they are angled to sort of face each other).
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:55 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.