Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Johnny Walker Blue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2017, 8:18 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1MM, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 184
Originally Posted by KevinDTW
My question as well. As a dedicated single-malt drinker I hesitate to pay so much for a blend.
The wife and I are Islay single malt drinkers and she raves over JWB. I find it decent enough, so we buy it as Costco when it goes on sale for half of the duty free price.
Ronlap is offline  
Old May 19, 2017, 8:24 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,427
Originally Posted by KevinSFO
I'm a big single malt fan. The smokey/peaty Talisker, Ardbeg and Lagavulin are a few of my favorites. I would never pay the c. $200 for a bottle of JWB, but I received it as a gift recently. I really do think it's a great whiskey and has a lot of the characteristics I like in single malts. Lower priced blends use a lot of grain whiskey. I believe JWB is 100% aged malt whiskey. I kind of like Johnny Walker Black, but I like the Blue MUCH better.
The Walker Brothers bought the Cardhu distillery to ensure the supply of Cardhu for some of their blends. It's used in Blue and others. There are mixed reviews for Cardhu as a single malt...I happen to like it.
OHDL1 is offline  
Old May 19, 2017, 8:25 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,427
Originally Posted by Ronlap
The wife and I are Islay single malt drinkers and she raves over JWB. I find it decent enough, so we buy it as Costco when it goes on sale for half of the duty free price.
So..how much is it at Costco?
OHDL1 is offline  
Old May 19, 2017, 8:27 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,273
Originally Posted by WWads
I mean, will I be completely blown away compared to Black Label, or a Macallan (12 or 15)?
As with most "premium" spirits, you're paying big $$$ for perhaps a marginal percentage improvement. Given a blind taste test, most people are incapable of discerning between one bottle and another that costs 5-10x.
javabytes is offline  
Old May 19, 2017, 9:18 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DCA
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 6,712
Originally Posted by javabytes
As with most "premium" spirits, you're paying big $$$ for perhaps a marginal percentage improvement. Given a blind taste test, most people are incapable of discerning between one bottle and another that costs 5-10x.
I'm generally very pleased with a Macallan 12. Had the 15 in a SC one time, and it was decent, but not really worth the premium.
KDCAflyer is offline  
Old May 19, 2017, 9:56 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: ATL
Programs: SPG, DL
Posts: 307
Originally Posted by javabytes
As with most "premium" spirits, you're paying big $$$ for perhaps a marginal percentage improvement. Given a blind taste test, most people are incapable of discerning between one bottle and another that costs 5-10x.
I disagree. I have been to many blind whiskey tastings, and almost everyone I've seen at one can discern black from blue, or 12 from 25. The issue is whether they can tell the difference between Macallan 12 and Macallan 15, or Glenlivet 12 to 18.

This isn't to say that everyone prefers the 25 or blue to the cheap stuff, although my experience is that those who prefer the cheaper have only ever been exposed to the cheaper and are tasting the "good stuff" for the first time. In other words they prefer what is familiar.

On topic, $30 for a double (a true double) of blue is a good price in pretty much any restaurant, and especially in an airport. I would probably never order it simply because I prefer to drink the good stuff at home or at a good meal, but it's a good price.
ATLawyer is offline  
Old May 19, 2017, 10:35 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,273
Originally Posted by ATLawyer
I disagree. I have been to many blind whiskey tastings, and almost everyone I've seen at one can discern black from blue, or 12 from 25. The issue is whether they can tell the difference between Macallan 12 and Macallan 15, or Glenlivet 12 to 18.

This isn't to say that everyone prefers the 25 or blue to the cheap stuff, although my experience is that those who prefer the cheaper have only ever been exposed to the cheaper and are tasting the "good stuff" for the first time. In other words they prefer what is familiar.

On topic, $30 for a double (a true double) of blue is a good price in pretty much any restaurant, and especially in an airport. I would probably never order it simply because I prefer to drink the good stuff at home or at a good meal, but it's a good price.
My two statements still stand:
1. Most people cannot tell the difference. Test after test shows many of those that believe they can, really can't. I acknowledge there are still some who can, but most who claim to be able to are full of crap.
2. Once you get past a certain point of quality, you begin paying double, triple the price (or more) for improvements that are marginal. Let's accept the premise that Glenlivet XXV is better than 18 is better than Glenlivet 12. The price of Glenlivet 18 is 3 times that of Glenlivet 12. Is the 18 literally 3 times better than the 12? Is the XXV literally 11 times better than the 12? Everyone has their opinion, but I would suggest no. People who must have the absolute best are willing to pay luxury premiums to have something better than everyone else... and that's fine. But at the end of the day, it is still Scotch... maybe better than other Scotch you have had before, but not a mind blowing, order-of-magnitude better experience. You're paying as much for the exclusivity - probably more - than you are for quality. It's no different than Pappy vs. other bourbons. No different than a $350 YSL t-shirt vs. a $35 Urban Outfitters t-shirt.

And in general, I agree: $30 for a double poured from a bottle that retails for ~$180 is quite reasonable.
javabytes is offline  
Old May 19, 2017, 10:47 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Back in Reds Country (DAY/CVG). Previously: SEA & SAT.
Programs: DL PM 1MM, AA PLAT, UA Silver, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 10,348
Originally Posted by javabytes
My two statements still stand:
1. Most people cannot tell the difference. Test after test shows many of those that believe they can, really can't. I acknowledge there are still some who can, but most who claim to be able to are full of crap.
2. Once you get past a certain point of quality, you begin paying double, triple the price (or more) for improvements that are marginal. Let's accept the premise that Glenlivet XXV is better than 18 is better than Glenlivet 12. The price of Glenlivet 18 is 3 times that of Glenlivet 12. Is the 18 literally 3 times better than the 12? Is the XXV literally 11 times better than the 12? Everyone has their opinion, but I would suggest no. People who must have the absolute best are willing to pay luxury premiums to have something better than everyone else... and that's fine. But at the end of the day, it is still Scotch... maybe better than other Scotch you have had before, but not a mind blowing, order-of-magnitude better experience. You're paying as much for the exclusivity - probably more - than you are for quality. It's no different than Pappy vs. other bourbons. No different than a $350 YSL t-shirt vs. a $35 Urban Outfitters t-shirt.

And in general, I agree: $30 for a double poured from a bottle that retails for ~$180 is quite reasonable.
I have to agree overall. The only thing I claim to be able to tell the difference in is Pepsi and Coke (and the difference between other similar types of pop, such as Sprite or Sierra Mist). But when it comes to wine, scotch, etc. there's very little difference to me. Maybe I'm not sophisticated enough to notice or care but at fancy restaurants with multiple brands of the same type of wine, I haven't found paying more for higher end brands to matter. I did the Macallan Distillery tour and tasting a couple years ago in Scotland and the one I was most impressed with, and ended up buying a bottle of, was a 10 year one. (It still remains unopened - I'm saving that for when I either separate or retire from
the Air Force. )
ATOBTTR is offline  
Old May 19, 2017, 10:55 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: LAS HNL
Programs: DL DM, 5.7 MM, UA 3.1 MM, MARRIOTT PLATINUM, AVIS FIRST, Amex Black Card
Posts: 4,479
Johnny Walker Blue in Las Vegas at Total Wine & More is $179.99 for a 750ml bottle.
kettle1 is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 12:53 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: London
Programs: KLM, BA Silver, Etihad
Posts: 918
Originally Posted by andyh64000
I noticed most Sky Clubs have Johnny Walker Blue so tonight I asked the bartender how much. He said $30 for a double. He said it used to be $50 for a single but nobody was buying it. Seems like a pretty good deal to me. In the terminal Dewars White will cost you 11 or 12 for a single.
I was in a bar in London the other week and it was £24 for a single. The people I was with offered to buy a bottle for the table for me. I kindly said no but they insisted but five minutes later they returned to say they would give it a miss as they wanted £600 for it!

I'd only tried it at the LGW flounge and being a single malt man I was dubious.

However wow what an easy to drink scotch is that! It really does knock the socks off the other labels for smoothness, well the red and black I've had before that in my eyes were only good enough for Canada Dry.

As stated before it has no distinction of flavours like your malts but for pure smoothness it cannot be beaten. A real entry scotch for non drinkers but a bit expensive for that! To introduce new drinkers it would be more cost effective to use a Highland Park or an Auchentoshan which are both very accessible in my eyes.

JWB has taught me to be more willing to try the blends (another good one is the Chivas Regal Royal Salute £99).
RockyRobin is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 5:05 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto - YYZ
Programs: Aeroplan/Hilton Gold/Marriott Bonvoy Titanium/Accor/Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 5,899
Originally Posted by andyh64000
I noticed most Sky Clubs have Johnny Walker Blue so tonight I asked the bartender how much. He said $30 for a double. He said it used to be $50 for a single but nobody was buying it. Seems like a pretty good deal to me. In the terminal Dewars White will cost you 11 or 12 for a single.
It sounds like they're depleting stock. $30 for a double - not bad at all.
ACYYZ/SD is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 8:45 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,115
Originally Posted by kettle1
Johnny Walker Blue in Las Vegas at Total Wine & More is $179.99 for a 750ml bottle.
Wow. I just paid $140.99 at Total Wine in LA a couple weeks ago. I'm surprised at that gap.
HeadInTheClouds is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 9:07 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Seattle
Programs: DL DM, Marriott Gold
Posts: 609
I live in Washington State, where we have some of the highest liquor taxes in the country. At the local Bevmo a 750ml bottle of JW Blue is $235, a which is exactly the same as Macallan 18. Macallan 12 is $61, and Talisker 10 (my normal bottle) is $73. All prices include the liquor sales tax and the liquor bottle volume tax.

For people not from WA, liquor here is taxed in two ways to the end consumer: You pay 20.5% of the sales price in a liquor sales tax, and on top of that you pay $3.7708 per liter as a "volume tax."

Last edited by anon2k2; May 20, 2017 at 9:13 am
anon2k2 is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 10:01 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: SE MI
Programs: DL SM, DL Amex Plat, Hilton Silver
Posts: 247
When I was in Edinburgh last month at a nice whisky bar, two tourists walked up and asked for a pour of the most expensive blend. I cringed, and the barkeep did as well once they had paid their £35 each and left. Mind you, this place had amazing single malts for <£10. Sigh.

Last edited by griffy208; May 20, 2017 at 1:07 pm
griffy208 is offline  
Old May 20, 2017, 2:51 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: EDI
Programs: Flying Blue PFL; IHG Rewards Club Diamond; HHonors Silver
Posts: 423
Originally Posted by Griffin Wright
When I was in Edinburgh last month at a nice whisky bar, two tourists walked up and asked for a pour of the most expensive blend. I cringed, and the barkeep did as well once they had paid their £35 each and left. Mind you, this place had amazing single malts for <£10. Sigh.
I agree, people are being taken for complete idiots. Hundreds of dollars for a shot of a whisky (absolutely not whiskey, that is an outright insult; whiskey is for Irish and bourbon products!) is nonsense. As other posters have said good single malts should be available for GBP 30 (USE 50) per bottle and great ones for GBP 100 (USD 140). I live in Edinburgh, Scotland.
Ardecos is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.