Delta to Start RDU-AUS 3/9/17
Already loaded on Delta.com. Daily CR9:
DL 6222 Lvs RDU 0830 Arr AUS 1040 DL 6222 Lvs AUS 1115 Arr RDU 1510 Nice to have the route but that is one long CRJ-900 flight (1,162 miles). Wish they had decided to use a 717 instead. |
Definitely a long time in a CR9.
|
FC is fine, but that's a long fight in Y.
It bothers me that DL frequently uses the E-Jets on short routes, while the 2-cabin CRJs are used on flights this long. |
Nice add.
AUS is a common work trip and combined with the new LAS direct for trade shows, it's getting hard to ignore DL as the ideal option ex-RDU. I would prefer an E-Jet but wouldn't be surprised if this eventually gets upgauged, there are a number of tech companies (including mine) with offices in both locations. Outbound timing are good too - much better than the 545am to ATL you currently have to take to get to AUS by mid-morning. Return is too early though if you need to spend a good chunk of the day in Austin. |
Good addition to Delta's growing presence in RDU. Granted, the CR9 is a bit small, and PDEW is in the low 100s (as of 2014), so we'll see.
I think AA had this service in 2004-08, but as long as DL keeps RDU as a "focus city," this flight should last. |
Originally Posted by FlyerWx
(Post 27380185)
I think AA had this service in 2004-08, but as long as DL keeps RDU as a "focus city," this flight should last.
|
Originally Posted by CMK10
(Post 27381534)
They did. At first it was an ERJ-135/140 but in 2007 it was an MD-80 that ran LGA-RDU-AUS.
I'm really liking this RDU expansion. Adds another place I can connect through exDCA. More options are always great. |
FWIW, if anyone is looking to go to SWSX, pricing is favorable at the moment relative to other carriers RDU - AUS...
|
Originally Posted by WWads
(Post 27382560)
I shudder at the thought of an 1100 mile flight on one of those...
I'm really liking this RDU expansion. Adds another place I can connect through exDCA. More options are always great. |
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 27383057)
I remember when CO put a 145 on IAH-Bakersfield, CA. Talk about an awful route for an ERJ.
|
Originally Posted by WWads
(Post 27383083)
That's absurd. Only the ignorant would take that flight.
|
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 27383057)
I remember when CO put a 145 on IAH-Bakersfield, CA. Talk about an awful route for an ERJ.
|
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 27383057)
I remember when CO put a 145 on IAH-Bakersfield, CA. Talk about an awful route for an ERJ.
Originally Posted by pbarnette
(Post 27384409)
Not to mention that when you finally get off the plane, you are in Bakersfield.
|
Originally Posted by WWads
(Post 27382560)
I shudder at the thought of an 1100 mile flight on one of those...
|
Originally Posted by apodo77
(Post 27380018)
Definitely a long time in a CR9.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.