Fine print on overhead space
#31
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 354
Delta should be ashamed to market this as a perk to begin with. Fine print not withstanding it’s simply misleading.
#32
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: BNA
Programs: DL GM, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,027
Agreed. Not to mention they tell you "your bag" has to have some goldilocks standards applied to it. Not too large and not too small. Your bag has space unless it doesn't, and even if there is space your bag is too small so we ask you to reserve that space for larger roll aboards.
#33
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
There simply is no guarantee of OH space because, for better or for worse, in a standard narrow-body, even with the C+ pitch, there is not enough space if everybody brings the largest "legal" carry on. At least, if you are able to board with your BG, e.g. not a tight connection, if the C+ bins can't accommodate you, it is somebody in the back who loses out because you still have time to find OH space.
Absent a major change, the choices are to reduce the carry-on allowance and enforce it to the millimeter, or to muddle by as it is today.
#34
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: BNA
Programs: DL GM, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,027
Any reasonable person understands exactly what it means and it is far from misleading.
There simply is no guarantee of OH space because, for better or for worse, in a standard narrow-body, even with the C+ pitch, there is not enough space if everybody brings the largest "legal" carry on. At least, if you are able to board with your BG, e.g. not a tight connection, if the C+ bins can't accommodate you, it is somebody in the back who loses out because you still have time to find OH space.
Absent a major change, the choices are to reduce the carry-on allowance and enforce it to the millimeter, or to muddle by as it is today.
There simply is no guarantee of OH space because, for better or for worse, in a standard narrow-body, even with the C+ pitch, there is not enough space if everybody brings the largest "legal" carry on. At least, if you are able to board with your BG, e.g. not a tight connection, if the C+ bins can't accommodate you, it is somebody in the back who loses out because you still have time to find OH space.
Absent a major change, the choices are to reduce the carry-on allowance and enforce it to the millimeter, or to muddle by as it is today.
I get your point though, it is basically free while supplies last, joke is the supplies are few.
#35
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 354
Any reasonable person understands exactly what it means and it is far from misleading.
There simply is no guarantee of OH space because, for better or for worse, in a standard narrow-body, even with the C+ pitch, there is not enough space if everybody brings the largest "legal" carry on. At least, if you are able to board with your BG, e.g. not a tight connection, if the C+ bins can't accommodate you, it is somebody in the back who loses out because you still have time to find OH space.
Absent a major change, the choices are to reduce the carry-on allowance and enforce it to the millimeter, or to muddle by as it is today.
There simply is no guarantee of OH space because, for better or for worse, in a standard narrow-body, even with the C+ pitch, there is not enough space if everybody brings the largest "legal" carry on. At least, if you are able to board with your BG, e.g. not a tight connection, if the C+ bins can't accommodate you, it is somebody in the back who loses out because you still have time to find OH space.
Absent a major change, the choices are to reduce the carry-on allowance and enforce it to the millimeter, or to muddle by as it is today.
#36
Join Date: Sep 2016
Programs: DL PM, Marriott, IHG
Posts: 193
I used to be a diehard one bag traveler, but have switched to checking my rollaboard and carrying a small backpack in the cabin. For me it is a more laidback approach to travel.
#37
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,184
More often than not, I see travelers (usually the road warrior type) with a rollaboard, a largish backpack/briefcase, and a smaller bag. I can understand the desire, but I just think it is a selfish attitude. It's a little disappointing that the gate agents don't enforce that rule--I guess on time departure is more important (and keeping the customer happy).
I used to be a diehard one bag traveler, but have switched to checking my rollaboard and carrying a small backpack in the cabin. For me it is a more laidback approach to travel.
I used to be a diehard one bag traveler, but have switched to checking my rollaboard and carrying a small backpack in the cabin. For me it is a more laidback approach to travel.
#38
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LAS
Programs: DL PM, Honors Gold, Marriott Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 894