Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

Delta Flight Diverts to Salt Lake City Due to “Unruly Crew”

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Delta Flight Diverts to Salt Lake City Due to “Unruly Crew”

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2016, 6:14 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kingdom of the Sun
Programs: DL GM/MM
Posts: 3,708
Which begs the question: does anyone know whether "interference with flight crew" is a misdemeanor or a felony? and what the prescribed penalties are? (I presume it's a federal offense)
Pharaoh is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 8:25 am
  #62  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Injured passenger should file assault charges against the crew.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 8:35 am
  #63  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
I'd like to know how many miles (or how large of credit vouchers) DL has been offering to passengers on that flight. I'm almost surprised that no one on FT was there.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 8:45 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere above the Mason-Dixon
Programs: DL Ham Samich
Posts: 1,660
Originally Posted by BearX220
Injured passenger should file assault charges against the crew.
Not that most people will care, but

1. Battery, not assault
2. It's up to the State/Federal government to file charges. Individuals are limited to the report for criminal cases

Cheers
RFDMinnesota is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 9:48 am
  #65  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: ba silver
Posts: 729
It's so hard to believe. Flight attendant are professionals and I'm certain they are are just as disgusted to hear about what took place on that plane. I have a lot of respect for flight crews and would never judge any of them by this.

Still the one or ones responsible need to be made an example of. Passengers deserve to all be compensated and EU 261- style amount for being delayed, as well as any out of pocket expenses. If they refuse let the airline identify them and them them face a hundred or so lawsuits. That should make them realize what they did was wrong. Perhaps a some time in prison will help too. Flight attendants are there for our safety, what they did what create an unsafe situation.

Not picking on flight crews here...I would do the same with any unruly passengers who force a diversion, which happens far more frequently. If I pay for a ticket nobody has a right to behave in a matter that will disrupt my plans or interfere with my safety.
stevendorechester is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 10:32 am
  #66  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
If this had been Southwest the passengers would have just knocked them in the head with the coffee pot and proceeded to MSP. No diverting. That's what happened on two Southwest flights with a seriously unruly passenger.
'cept there are no minimum staffing requirements for pax, you can knock them all out & still fly.
MikeMpls is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 10:43 am
  #67  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
Originally Posted by stevendorechester
It's so hard to believe. Flight attendant are professionals and I'm certain they are are just as disgusted to hear about what took place on that plane. I have a lot of respect for flight crews and would never judge any of them by this.

Still the one or ones responsible need to be made an example of. Passengers deserve to all be compensated and EU 261- style amount for being delayed, as well as any out of pocket expenses. If they refuse let the airline identify them and them them face a hundred or so lawsuits. That should make them realize what they did was wrong. Perhaps a some time in prison will help too. Flight attendants are there for our safety, what they did what create an unsafe situation.

Not picking on flight crews here...I would do the same with any unruly passengers who force a diversion, which happens far more frequently. If I pay for a ticket nobody has a right to behave in a matter that will disrupt my plans or interfere with my safety.
It was a 75 minute delay. IIRC EC261 would not give them any compensation, nor would the duty of care responsibility kick in and mandate meals or hotel rooms at SLC. At best, they should have been offered water.

I like the idea of making the two FAs pay the cost of the diversion, but if they're fired from their junior positions, they're unlikely to have the financial resources to do so.

I'm curious what work rules issues could possibly lead two young women into a physical confrontation.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 11:09 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: ba silver
Posts: 729
If the delay was only 75 minutes then most passengers probably would not have been affected in this case.

However some passengers could have missed connections. The guilty party could have been forced to pay for any passengers that had to be re-routed, on another airline if space in whatever cabin they was not avail. or any other expenses the passengers can prove. This was not part of a normal operation of an airline and therefore those who interfered should pay dearly.

The same applies when unruly passengers who cause a diversion through illegal acts.
stevendorechester is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 2:57 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 5
From a Flight Attendant I know

Originally Posted by BearX220
Injured passenger should file assault charges against the crew.
2 female LAX based flight attendants, one senior and one junior on the flight got into some kind of argument over seniority. One punched the other and the fight was on. 3rd FA tried to intervene and was punched herself. No report of any passengers involved.

All 3 females, the combatants, and the one who was punched were left off the flight in SLC and additional crew members were put on board to take their places.
bigwave916 is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 3:25 pm
  #70  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
Originally Posted by bigwave916
2 female LAX based flight attendants, one senior and one junior on the flight got into some kind of argument over seniority. One punched the other and the fight was on. 3rd FA tried to intervene and was punched herself. No report of any passengers involved.

All 3 females, the combatants, and the one who was punched were left off the flight in SLC and additional crew members were put on board to take their places.
If one is senior and one junior, how can there be an argument over seniority? It's obvious which one is more senior. Similarly, crew rules about the senior employee having priority in picking the position etc. AFAIK are long standing, well known, and clear. It's hard to imagine such facts leading to violence.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 4:16 pm
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
I like the idea of making the two FAs pay the cost of the diversion, but if they're fired from their junior positions, they're unlikely to have the financial resources to do so.
2015 profit-sharing will be paid out in two weeks - dunno if DL is legally able to or whether it would attempt to offset the costs of the diversion by withholding their profit-sharing checks. The profit-sharing will equal about 20% of their 2015 W-2 wages. That would probably cover the landing fees at SLC and the incremental wage expenses of replacing three FAs.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 5:27 pm
  #72  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Just make the offending flight attendants work flights to and from PBI for the rest of their career. That will be punishment enough.
readywhenyouare is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 5:34 pm
  #73  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,790
Apparently in the scheme of things they were all "junior" LAX crew. All with less than 20 years seniority each. All female.
airplanegod is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 5:41 pm
  #74  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
IIRC both DL and NW had an LAX flight attendant base. Maybe it was a mixed crew and one of them got shafted in the seniority integration. I wonder who threw the first punch. I would be somewhat surprised if it was a PMNW flight attendant as they are usually too lazy to even wave goodbye upon deboarding.
readywhenyouare is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2016, 5:53 pm
  #75  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
IIRC both DL and NW had an LAX flight attendant base. Maybe it was a mixed crew and one of them got shafted in the seniority integration. I wonder who threw the first punch. I would be somewhat surprised if it was a PMNW flight attendant as they are usually too lazy to even wave goodbye upon deboarding.
The crew integration occurred years ago. Plus, even if someone did get a raw deal then, it's not the fault of some individual FA.
MSPeconomist is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.