Emotional Support Animals, Service Dogs and Comfort Pets: The Definitive Thread
#46
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,072
The Health Dept. isn't going to "confiscate" any traveling animals that have been let out of a carrier, nor is a pet a bigger health threat than an "emotional support animal."
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
It might not be a bigger health threat, but the law doesn't see it that way. The law says no animals, with some exceptions.
#48
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,072
If a person doesn't like having a pet out of its carrier, mention it politely to the person involved and/or to a manager. There's no need for passive-aggressive complaints to the Health Department, which might — if you're lucky — respond three weeks later, by which time the offending pet is likely to be thousands of miles away.
#49
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The Indo Jungle
Programs: AA EXP, IHG Spire
Posts: 1,319
Happy to hear that both you and others actually took action. Too many sensitive little flowers these days.
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4me
Posts: 11,956
If a person doesn't like having a pet out of its carrier, mention it politely to the person involved and/or to a manager. There's no need for passive-aggressive complaints to the Health Department, which might if you're lucky respond three weeks later, by which time the offending pet is likely to be thousands of miles away.
Ah but maybe they can put the pooch on the TSA's no fly list
#51
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,072
Monstrous! It's more people we need on the no-fly list!
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: London
Posts: 17,007
What is it with carrying pets around?
Maybe the legal barriers are too high in Europe or Asia but I never see dogs on aircraft outside of the US.
Maybe the legal barriers are too high in Europe or Asia but I never see dogs on aircraft outside of the US.
#53
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: VPS
Programs: IHG Diamond, Delta PM, Hilton Gold, Accor Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 7,210
Back in the Northwest days, I flew a couple of times with the late great Five cat because it was cheaper to take him on the plane than to pay for a catsitter. He only ever left the carrier when he had to at security; like a lot of cats, he felt safer in his box than he would have taken out of it when there were far too many strange people around him.
Save for a few meows when the air pressure changed, you'd have to see the carrier to know I had a cat with me, and I always tried to end up at the opposite end of the plane as anyone who said they had allergies. Alas, the people who don't follow the rules mess it up for those of us who try to do so.
Save for a few meows when the air pressure changed, you'd have to see the carrier to know I had a cat with me, and I always tried to end up at the opposite end of the plane as anyone who said they had allergies. Alas, the people who don't follow the rules mess it up for those of us who try to do so.
#55
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCO
Programs: DL-DM/1MM, HILTON-DIA, .HYATT-DIA/GLOB , IHG-PLT,HERTZ 5*, NATIONAL ES
Posts: 8,691
IMHO, dog owners in general have a grossly exaggerated idea of what is appropriate. They think everyone just loves dogs and they don't understand why people have an issue with their saliva and germs (and poo). I like dogs, but they don't belong in a lounge unless in a carrier.
Yes, I'm a cat owner and you won't see my cats drooling over the food in the lounge. They'll be at home where they belong.
Yes, I'm a cat owner and you won't see my cats drooling over the food in the lounge. They'll be at home where they belong.
#56
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: BOS
Programs: Delta DM, SPG PLT100, Marriott Gold
Posts: 346
On a similar note, there was a woman with a dog not in a carrier on flight 2836 from BOS to ATL on Wednesday. She boarded, saw that the seat next to her was (temporarily) open, and let her dog jump up on it! She even said something like "Ooh, maybe you'll get your own seat!" A few minutes later, the owner of that seat boarded. She didn't say anything, but what if she had been allergic to dogs or something? Completely unacceptable to let a dog jump on a seat. This wasn't even a little wiener dog. It was a small-medium sized dog. Looked like a young labdradoodle, but I'm not sure.
#57
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DCA
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 6,709
On a similar note, there was a woman with a dog not in a carrier on flight 2836 from BOS to ATL on Wednesday. She boarded, saw that the seat next to her was (temporarily) open, and let her dog jump up on it! She even said something like "Ooh, maybe you'll get your own seat!" A few minutes later, the owner of that seat boarded. She didn't say anything, but what if she had been allergic to dogs or something? Completely unacceptable to let a dog jump on a seat. This wasn't even a little wiener dog. It was a small-medium sized dog. Looked like a young labdradoodle, but I'm not sure.
Too bad the airlines are too cowardly to try to stop the practice. If I was allergic to dogs and saw one sitting in my seat, I'd demand that the dog and its owner be offloaded. Then again, people with "comfort" animals seem to have more passenger rights than the rest of us, so I'd probably be the one left at the gate.
#58
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: RDU
Posts: 5,208
This whole "comfort" animal thing is out of control. If you don't have a legitimate physical limitation, your animal needs to stay in a carrier, or at your house.
Too bad the airlines are too cowardly to try to stop the practice. If I was allergic to dogs and saw one sitting in my seat, I'd demand that the dog and its owner be offloaded. Then again, people with "comfort" animals seem to have more passenger rights than the rest of us, so I'd probably be the one left at the gate.
Too bad the airlines are too cowardly to try to stop the practice. If I was allergic to dogs and saw one sitting in my seat, I'd demand that the dog and its owner be offloaded. Then again, people with "comfort" animals seem to have more passenger rights than the rest of us, so I'd probably be the one left at the gate.
We better get this back on topic before this thread gets locked, LOL.
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
This whole "comfort" animal thing is out of control. If you don't have a legitimate physical limitation, your animal needs to stay in a carrier, or at your house.
Too bad the airlines are too cowardly to try to stop the practice. If I was allergic to dogs and saw one sitting in my seat, I'd demand that the dog and its owner be offloaded. Then again, people with "comfort" animals seem to have more passenger rights than the rest of us, so I'd probably be the one left at the gate.
Too bad the airlines are too cowardly to try to stop the practice. If I was allergic to dogs and saw one sitting in my seat, I'd demand that the dog and its owner be offloaded. Then again, people with "comfort" animals seem to have more passenger rights than the rest of us, so I'd probably be the one left at the gate.
Or I'd demand that the airline give me a written statement that it is ignoring my allergies (which I would then use any time they suggested that I avoid eating nuts of peanuts because of someone else's allergies).
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,159
If a person doesn't like having a pet out of its carrier, mention it politely to the person involved and/or to a manager. There's no need for passive-aggressive complaints to the Health Department, which might if you're lucky respond three weeks later, by which time the offending pet is likely to be thousands of miles away.