Snarky FA on a Power Trip
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: DL DM, AA Plat, Hertz #1 Gold
Posts: 279
Snarky FA on a Power Trip
I was on a flight this morning and I had an encounter with a flight attendant that really left me with an unpleasant boarding experience.
I boarded in Sky Priority and as I settled into my seat in an EC middle (since my companion insisted on the window seat), I placed my backpack in the overhead above the seat.
A few moments later an this FA came down the aisle and asked "whose backpack is this?" I said it was mine. The FA said that "smaller bags should be placed under the seat in front of you". With that he took my bag down and handed it to me.
My backpack is a standard size backpack and had my laptop, etc in it.
I argued that it was my only bag but he insisted that it must go under the seat in front of me, and so I complied and took my bag, but for the moment didn't put it under the seat in front of me. I was pretty sure there would be space for my bag since the flight wasn't full, so I let it ride, and mentioned that I don't want to argue over this.
He replied with snark and said I could argue all I wanted.
At this point I let it go and watched other passengers board and put their small carryons and backpacks in the overhead. I also overheard other passengers getting a similar treatment.
About 5 minutes later he came back, and seeing that there was plenty of bin space, he and offered to put my bag up, in the same overhead bin I had put it in in the first place!
I understand that bin space is at a premium, and that we can board with one carryon and one personal item and in this case I only had one carryon, but thats why I boarded early to make sure I had overhead bin space.
Maybe he was having a bad day, maybe it was because I was sitting in a middle seat, or maybe it was because I was wearing a costume (late Halloween!).
I believe that the FA was out of line with the attitude and snark he showed during the boarding process during this flight. It was completely uncalled for.
I boarded in Sky Priority and as I settled into my seat in an EC middle (since my companion insisted on the window seat), I placed my backpack in the overhead above the seat.
A few moments later an this FA came down the aisle and asked "whose backpack is this?" I said it was mine. The FA said that "smaller bags should be placed under the seat in front of you". With that he took my bag down and handed it to me.
My backpack is a standard size backpack and had my laptop, etc in it.
I argued that it was my only bag but he insisted that it must go under the seat in front of me, and so I complied and took my bag, but for the moment didn't put it under the seat in front of me. I was pretty sure there would be space for my bag since the flight wasn't full, so I let it ride, and mentioned that I don't want to argue over this.
He replied with snark and said I could argue all I wanted.

At this point I let it go and watched other passengers board and put their small carryons and backpacks in the overhead. I also overheard other passengers getting a similar treatment.
About 5 minutes later he came back, and seeing that there was plenty of bin space, he and offered to put my bag up, in the same overhead bin I had put it in in the first place!
I understand that bin space is at a premium, and that we can board with one carryon and one personal item and in this case I only had one carryon, but thats why I boarded early to make sure I had overhead bin space.
Maybe he was having a bad day, maybe it was because I was sitting in a middle seat, or maybe it was because I was wearing a costume (late Halloween!).
I believe that the FA was out of line with the attitude and snark he showed during the boarding process during this flight. It was completely uncalled for.
#3
In memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PIT
Programs: DM life is over 2MM PM now & NW MillionAir Wyndham Rewards Plat -Hotels.com Silver -Accor Silver
Posts: 15,408
Sometimes I think that some people in service related jobs get so jaded by problems that they tend to get snarky over time, and it takes a sit-down lecture / write-up with a supv. to remind them who's ultimately responsible for putting the money in their paychecks.
The second thing, I think, is that, for the last year or so, no matter how full or empty a flight is, they ALWAYZ make the announcement that the flight is COMPLETELY FULL, put smaller items under the seat, and not to put coats in the bins till all bags are up there - - yada yada. I think it's etched in their brains that every inch of space will be needed - which it is most of the time.
The second thing, I think, is that, for the last year or so, no matter how full or empty a flight is, they ALWAYZ make the announcement that the flight is COMPLETELY FULL, put smaller items under the seat, and not to put coats in the bins till all bags are up there - - yada yada. I think it's etched in their brains that every inch of space will be needed - which it is most of the time.
#4
Join Date: May 2014
Programs: DL FO
Posts: 114
From DL's own skypriority page:
HIGHEST BOARDING PRIORITY
Being first on the plane definitely has its advantages. Boarding in Zone SKYPRI lets you secure the best overhead bins, so you can sit back and relax before takeoff.
So much for that benefit. Wonder if they would do the same thing in the FC cabin
HIGHEST BOARDING PRIORITY
Being first on the plane definitely has its advantages. Boarding in Zone SKYPRI lets you secure the best overhead bins, so you can sit back and relax before takeoff.
So much for that benefit. Wonder if they would do the same thing in the FC cabin
#5
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 48,761
If OP can characterize the "snark" he can complain about that, although he himself says that he argued and then said that he wouldn't.
DL does not reserve OH space and there is no entitlement to it. Makes sense to keep the bags which fit under the seat under the seat until it's clear that there is space in the OH so that fewer bags are gate-checked. Delaying the flight at the last minute is a poor option.
Not relevant directly to OP's post because there was room in the end, but it would be really helpful if DL GA's strictly enforced the carry-on limits. Never a guarantee that everybody gets their compliant carry-on in the cabin, but makes it much more likely and it would give experienced travelers the comfort to board towards the end of the boarding process.
DL does not reserve OH space and there is no entitlement to it. Makes sense to keep the bags which fit under the seat under the seat until it's clear that there is space in the OH so that fewer bags are gate-checked. Delaying the flight at the last minute is a poor option.
Not relevant directly to OP's post because there was room in the end, but it would be really helpful if DL GA's strictly enforced the carry-on limits. Never a guarantee that everybody gets their compliant carry-on in the cabin, but makes it much more likely and it would give experienced travelers the comfort to board towards the end of the boarding process.
#6
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ORD / MDW / FLL
Programs: DL DM/1MM, AA EXP, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 2,129
Appreciate the OP's perspective but I can see both sides of the argument here.
The reality of the situation is that the GAs and FAs at ANY airline have it hard. Pax flagrantly ignore the rules, get offended and argumentative when they are called out and make the experience unpleasant for everyone. They have it hard largely because any ounce of civility people once had when flying is gone.
I agree that if the backpack fits under the seat that's here it should be. Why potentially force a situation where people boarding later have to gate check their larger carry-ons. It's inconvenient and risks potential delays.
That said, I also agree that once boarding is complete the OP should fee free to place anything that'll fit in the remaining overhead space. I honestly don't think someone enforcing the rules is on a power trip.
The reality of the situation is that the GAs and FAs at ANY airline have it hard. Pax flagrantly ignore the rules, get offended and argumentative when they are called out and make the experience unpleasant for everyone. They have it hard largely because any ounce of civility people once had when flying is gone.
I agree that if the backpack fits under the seat that's here it should be. Why potentially force a situation where people boarding later have to gate check their larger carry-ons. It's inconvenient and risks potential delays.
That said, I also agree that once boarding is complete the OP should fee free to place anything that'll fit in the remaining overhead space. I honestly don't think someone enforcing the rules is on a power trip.
#8
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 4,230
The OP had a single bag … perhaps they checked the other bag instead of bringing on board so they could have leg room. I was just on a flight with the [email protected]#$% seat legs right in the $#@! middle of where I would put my feet. No way a bag could fit under there.
IMNSHO first bag can go in the overhead regardless.
#9
In memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PIT
Programs: DM life is over 2MM PM now & NW MillionAir Wyndham Rewards Plat -Hotels.com Silver -Accor Silver
Posts: 15,408
"Sir, would you kindly consider placing this small backpack under your seat til we see how much space is left at the end of boarding? Overhead bin space is really tight these days."
I don't think we'd see any post or complaint here from the OP if the FA had said something similar to this.
#10
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ORD / MDW / FLL
Programs: DL DM/1MM, AA EXP, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 2,129
Here we go again …
The OP had a single bag … perhaps they checked the other bag instead of bringing on board so they could have leg room. I was just on a flight with the [email protected]#$% seat legs right in the $#@! middle of where I would put my feet. No way a bag could fit under there.
IMNSHO first bag can go in the overhead regardless.
The OP had a single bag … perhaps they checked the other bag instead of bringing on board so they could have leg room. I was just on a flight with the [email protected]#$% seat legs right in the $#@! middle of where I would put my feet. No way a bag could fit under there.
IMNSHO first bag can go in the overhead regardless.
If the shoe were on the other foot and the OP was boarding later and had to gate check a bad because others were tossing backpacks, coats and other small items in the overheads my guess is (s)he would be singing a different tune...as would you.
It's simple courtesy and etiquette. If it fits under the seat put it there. When the boarding door is closed you can move stuff where ever it fits.
#11
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Anywhere with mountains
Programs: DL PM, Hertz 5*, SPG
Posts: 328
The overheads are NOT configured to allow every passenger to have a bag up top. I guess the OP can put a small bag in the overhead space and be inconsiderate of people boarding later or the OP could purchase a seat in EC where extra legroom is guaranteed.
If the shoe were on the other foot and the OP was boarding later and had to gate check a bad because others were tossing backpacks, coats and other small items in the overheads my guess is (s)he would be singing a different tune...as would you.
It's simple courtesy and etiquette. If it fits under the seat put it there. When the boarding door is closed you can move stuff where ever it fits.
If the shoe were on the other foot and the OP was boarding later and had to gate check a bad because others were tossing backpacks, coats and other small items in the overheads my guess is (s)he would be singing a different tune...as would you.
It's simple courtesy and etiquette. If it fits under the seat put it there. When the boarding door is closed you can move stuff where ever it fits.
#13
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ORD / MDW / FLL
Programs: DL DM/1MM, AA EXP, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 2,129

It's unfair to slam the FA without understanding the FA's said on this. There are many times I've seem people (and likely myself included) claim their were being nice while the employee was rude when in fact it was the other way around.
#14
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Anywhere with mountains
Programs: DL PM, Hertz 5*, SPG
Posts: 328
You are assuming the FA was snarky just because the OP said the FA was snarky. Of course, everything everyone reports on FT is the most accurate, unmitigated truth. 
It's unfair to slam the FA without understanding the FA's said on this. There are many times I've seem people (and likely myself included) claim their were being nice while the employee was rude when in fact it was the other way around.

It's unfair to slam the FA without understanding the FA's said on this. There are many times I've seem people (and likely myself included) claim their were being nice while the employee was rude when in fact it was the other way around.

#15
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Programs: DL DM, 2MM
Posts: 732
Factual! Unbiased! What's the internet coming to? Nevertheless, I have seen an increase in the number of surly FAs lately. Don't have a hypothesis, other than every plane is full and there are no friendly skies anywhere anymore.