Broken Record: Boarding Zones - Delta Policy Not to Enforce
#16
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 4,785
Yes several times. The last time was at JFK I was patiently waiting outside the gate area. You could not hear a damn thing but people were moving to board.
Given I was in FC and the number of people boarding I figured they had called FC so I moved to the gate through the mass of people. Turns out they had a large number of pre boards. As such, when I got up the GA he said we are doing preboards only.
I looked at him squarely in the eye and said they needed to get their act together as one could not hear any gate announcements and with the mass of people around the gate it was difficult to get to the gate area. They got the message and boy did the announcements start coming.
That said for some time now I compliment and gripe directly to the GA when they do not board via zones nor make appropriate announcements.
Given I was in FC and the number of people boarding I figured they had called FC so I moved to the gate through the mass of people. Turns out they had a large number of pre boards. As such, when I got up the GA he said we are doing preboards only.
I looked at him squarely in the eye and said they needed to get their act together as one could not hear any gate announcements and with the mass of people around the gate it was difficult to get to the gate area. They got the message and boy did the announcements start coming.
That said for some time now I compliment and gripe directly to the GA when they do not board via zones nor make appropriate announcements.
#17
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: Delta DM, SPG Plat, Marriott Plat, IHG Spire
Posts: 1,021
As to the original subject, I don't know what they need to do, but they do need to do something. The gate areas get outright crazy sometimes.
I've also seen a non-upgraded SP person park themselves next to the SP sign and remain there, blocking it, while FC boarded and tripped over him and his carry on(s). I took it to be passive-aggressive irritation that he wasn't upgraded.
#18
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: Delta SkyMiles FO
Posts: 123
This has actually helped quite a bit on United flights. It's much more visible to the Kettle who have no idea what's going on. Plus, it makes it easier to get there later and go down the priority lane. The bigger issue with United is for smaller gates, they have Zone 1-2 in a single line; which causes traffic jams as Zone 2 fill up the line and when Zone 1 is called no one can get through.
DL tested this in DTW and a few other places. Word was they really didn't help much and elites didn't like lining up either.
I liked that method as a Zone 1 boarder. However, the signage was not that visible.
#19
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: TPA
Programs: United - PG, Marriott Silver
Posts: 1,625
This issue all stems from the desire to get on the plane first. The desire to get on the plane first stems from pax wanting to secure bin space for their carry-ons. It's a cascading problem. People who don't need to pre-board do so anyway so that they can find a place for diaper bags, or simply to get out of zone 3. Then, seeing that so many people have already boarded, the SKY Zone folks try to squeeze in with the Premium Zone folks. Then the Zone 1 folks try to squeeze in with the Sky Zone folks, and so on. The need for bin space is, in large part, a product of pax not wanting to pay to check bags. If you want to fix the boarding problem you have to fix the carry-on problem.
Because you do not need to eliminate all carry-on baggage, just some of it, I think one solution would be to allow folks who are paying to check a full-size bag, to also check a smaller bag for free. If you did that, you could eliminate gate checks on a vast majority of flights. Over time, people would realize that there is generally enough bin space, and they would be in less of a hurry to board.
Because you do not need to eliminate all carry-on baggage, just some of it, I think one solution would be to allow folks who are paying to check a full-size bag, to also check a smaller bag for free. If you did that, you could eliminate gate checks on a vast majority of flights. Over time, people would realize that there is generally enough bin space, and they would be in less of a hurry to board.
#20
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ATL
Programs: DL SkyMiles, MR, HH, ICH/PC, Avis Pref., Hertz Gold
Posts: 2,897
I know the Agents primary responsibility is to have the flight push back on time; however, is there anything Delta can do to to better enforce these boarding zones in the future? Why advertise these medallion programs when any Kettle can walk up and board with First Class as long as he/she is carrying their American Express card? I asked the agents when boarding why they don't enforce the zones (preferably putting those who do not listen in time out), and they told them it is Delta's policy not to enforce Boarding Zones on Domestic Flights.
That AMEX "priority boarding' perq has cause a lot of confusion with the infrequent flyer crowd. This is an education issue, though, and should be clearly addressed at the gate.
#21
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: Lowly Delta Silver, Marriott LT Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 8
Why does DL have PREM, SKY, and then Zone 1? Answer: To make everyone feel special and confuse the heck out of infrequent travelers.
Why not have just Zones 1-5 which would be much easier for everyone involved. I think the main problem is the infrequent traveler sees Zone 1 on BP and thinks they are first in line when really they are 3rd (or first runner-up).
Why not have just Zones 1-5 which would be much easier for everyone involved. I think the main problem is the infrequent traveler sees Zone 1 on BP and thinks they are first in line when really they are 3rd (or first runner-up).
#22
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: BIL
Programs: Delta FO
Posts: 786
#23
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: TPA
Programs: United - PG, Marriott Silver
Posts: 1,625
Why does DL have PREM, SKY, and then Zone 1? Answer: To make everyone feel special and confuse the heck out of infrequent travelers.
Why not have just Zones 1-5 which would be much easier for everyone involved. I think the main problem is the infrequent traveler sees Zone 1 on BP and thinks they are first in line when really they are 3rd (or first runner-up).
Why not have just Zones 1-5 which would be much easier for everyone involved. I think the main problem is the infrequent traveler sees Zone 1 on BP and thinks they are first in line when really they are 3rd (or first runner-up).
#24
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,679
Why does DL have PREM, SKY, and then Zone 1? Answer: To make everyone feel special and confuse the heck out of infrequent travelers.
Why not have just Zones 1-5 which would be much easier for everyone involved. I think the main problem is the infrequent traveler sees Zone 1 on BP and thinks they are first in line when really they are 3rd (or first runner-up).
Why not have just Zones 1-5 which would be much easier for everyone involved. I think the main problem is the infrequent traveler sees Zone 1 on BP and thinks they are first in line when really they are 3rd (or first runner-up).
#25
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Why has Delta stopped using the automated boarding announcements? This problem didn't seem as bad when they were using the gate announcement system. The system repeatedly reminded everyone of which zones were boarding. Much better than listening to a gate who sounds like they have a mouth full of marbles. The system also made Delta unique as no other airline has ever used such a system.
#26
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
This issue all stems from the desire to get on the plane first. The desire to get on the plane first stems from pax wanting to secure bin space for their carry-ons. It's a cascading problem. People who don't need to pre-board do so anyway so that they can find a place for diaper bags, or simply to get out of zone 3. Then, seeing that so many people have already boarded, the SKY Zone folks try to squeeze in with the Premium Zone folks. Then the Zone 1 folks try to squeeze in with the Sky Zone folks, and so on. The need for bin space is, in large part, a product of pax not wanting to pay to check bags. If you want to fix the boarding problem you have to fix the carry-on problem.
Because you do not need to eliminate all carry-on baggage, just some of it, I think one solution would be to allow folks who are paying to check a full-size bag, to also check a smaller bag for free. If you did that, you could eliminate gate checks on a vast majority of flights. Over time, people would realize that there is generally enough bin space, and they would be in less of a hurry to board.
Because you do not need to eliminate all carry-on baggage, just some of it, I think one solution would be to allow folks who are paying to check a full-size bag, to also check a smaller bag for free. If you did that, you could eliminate gate checks on a vast majority of flights. Over time, people would realize that there is generally enough bin space, and they would be in less of a hurry to board.
If the carry-on issue were dealt with, the boarding issue would become a big nothing.
#27
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PVU, SLC
Programs: DL Pork Medallion, PP, GE
Posts: 1,657
If DL would just enforce its own carry-on rules, none of this silliness would be necessary. Those with non-compliant carryons should be told to step aside and have their bags gate checked after the last zone is boarded. The bags would be tagged to the baggage office at the final destination and could be claimed after the scammer pays their checked bag fee + a significant penalty.
If the carry-on issue were dealt with, the boarding issue would become a big nothing.
If the carry-on issue were dealt with, the boarding issue would become a big nothing.
#28
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,679
If DL would just enforce its own carry-on rules, none of this silliness would be necessary. Those with non-compliant carryons should be told to step aside and have their bags gate checked after the last zone is boarded. The bags would be tagged to the baggage office at the final destination and could be claimed after the scammer pays their checked bag fee + a significant penalty.
If the carry-on issue were dealt with, the boarding issue would become a big nothing.
If the carry-on issue were dealt with, the boarding issue would become a big nothing.
Now, if executives would like to staff up extra GAs to enforce baggage and boarding policy then there might be something. But I wouldn't count on it.
Rest assured, the folks at corporate will have a series of meetings yet again about how to make boarding better. They'll put money into even more convoluted policies and programs, and then give themselves a big pat on the back for wasting a bunch of money. But heaven forbid they actually put an extra low-wage employee at the gate.
#30
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,409
I have seen many times where, in anticipation of a very full flight (whether it's a 763 or a CR9), the GAs make repeated announcements (before boarding announcements, so the gate area isn't as loud or in pandemonium like when boarding is announced) that passengers can come to the desk, voluntarily check bags, and won't even be charged for it. I've seen this on domestic and international flights. A lot of people don't take that option IMO, probably because they have items that are valuable/fragile/they think are fragile or valuable (as has been mentioned upthread), they want to have their things with them (gotta have the laptop and the iPhone and the iPad and 12,000 other things), or they want it gate checked so they don't have to pick it up at baggage claim later.