DL to AZ connection at CDG, and 767-300 Questions
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Plat
Posts: 234
DL to AZ connection at CDG, and 767-300 Questions
A couple of weeks ago I booked an economy award ticket SEA-CDG-FCO and return. The TATL flight is a DL 767-300 (fully refurbed I think as the seat map shows EC, and the BE cabin shows 1-2-1 seating) ; this connects to an AZ flight at CDG.
I've seen many negative reports of connections gone wrong at CDG, but about a year ago I recall reports of CDG restructuring to improve the connection process (in fact I don't recall seeing any CDG connection horror stories for many months now).
Have thing really improved ? ... and more specifically how difficult will a DL-to-AZ connection be at CDG, rather than the more typical DL to AF scenario ?
[I'm DL PM so I could still rebook thru AMS if necessary but the timing works well thru CDG].
Re the 767-300 (I've already studied the various seating and EC wikis):
I currently have seat 17F bulkhead EC - this seems a good choice for legroom but exit rows 20 and 21 are still available. Why does 21 seem preferred over 20 in various FT posts ?
Aso, has DL refurbed all its TATL 767-300 AC ? Any chance of another 767 being subbed in given the very long stage length (5,000 miles: US West Coast to Europe) ?
Thanks.
I've seen many negative reports of connections gone wrong at CDG, but about a year ago I recall reports of CDG restructuring to improve the connection process (in fact I don't recall seeing any CDG connection horror stories for many months now).
Have thing really improved ? ... and more specifically how difficult will a DL-to-AZ connection be at CDG, rather than the more typical DL to AF scenario ?
[I'm DL PM so I could still rebook thru AMS if necessary but the timing works well thru CDG].
Re the 767-300 (I've already studied the various seating and EC wikis):
I currently have seat 17F bulkhead EC - this seems a good choice for legroom but exit rows 20 and 21 are still available. Why does 21 seem preferred over 20 in various FT posts ?
Aso, has DL refurbed all its TATL 767-300 AC ? Any chance of another 767 being subbed in given the very long stage length (5,000 miles: US West Coast to Europe) ?
Thanks.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: LHR
Programs: DL DM 2MM, BA Bronze, Various Hotels
Posts: 10,187
Non-Schengen to Schengen transfers have been made far easier at CDG. I've made numerous transfers in the past several months without issue. There are Sky Priority/Access No 1 lanes, which make things a little better as well.
As far as Economy Comfort...
I prefer the bulkhead on the 763.
Row 20 vs. 21 - 21 typically has better recline. Some do not like these rows because of their proximity to the lavatories.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta...t-seating.html
As far as Economy Comfort...
I prefer the bulkhead on the 763.
Row 20 vs. 21 - 21 typically has better recline. Some do not like these rows because of their proximity to the lavatories.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta...t-seating.html
#3
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: PVU, SLC
Programs: DL Pork Medallion, PP, GE
Posts: 1,657
Non-Schengen to Schengen transfers have been made far easier at CDG. I've made numerous transfers in the past several months without issue. There are Sky Priority/Access No 1 lanes, which make things a little better as well.
As far as Economy Comfort...
I prefer the bulkhead on the 763.
Row 20 vs. 21 - 21 typically has better recline. Some do not like these rows because of their proximity to the lavatories.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta...t-seating.html
As far as Economy Comfort...
I prefer the bulkhead on the 763.
Row 20 vs. 21 - 21 typically has better recline. Some do not like these rows because of their proximity to the lavatories.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta...t-seating.html