Feb 1, 2014, 10:35 am
Last edit by: pauly_long
Please post links to content which includes photographs in this discussion — along with a brief description of the photograph included in each link...
...and by brief, I do not mean underwear.
Please use the format below for consistency purposes. Date and chronological order might be helpful as well. Thank you.
Trashed Airplane Garbage and trash filled the seats of an Airbus A332 aircraft after the conclusion of a Philadelphia Eagles charter flight from Seattle to Philadelphia last year. Photograph posted by FlyerTalk member tod701 on December 12, 2013.
To save some time searching, photos are in posts (please update wiki when you post a new photo): 28, 93, 123, 164, 205, 278, 279, 286, 297, 303, 310, 321, 330, 410, 415, 418, 419, 444, 468, 483, 486, 495, 510, 529, 568, 577, 588, 606, 620, 632, 644, 661, 673, 675, 693, 708, 709, 716, 752, 773, 786, 873, 887, 907, 914, 917, 922, 934, 953, 967, 987, 998, 1006, 1013, 1019, 1025, 1029, 1032, 1036, 1037, 1058, 1067, 1107, 1131, 1137, 1151, 1159, 1163, 1179, 1201, 1243, 1246, 1249, 1268, 1279, 1295, 2028, 2235, 2237, 2240, 2241, 2936
...and by brief, I do not mean underwear.
Please use the format below for consistency purposes. Date and chronological order might be helpful as well. Thank you.
Trashed Airplane Garbage and trash filled the seats of an Airbus A332 aircraft after the conclusion of a Philadelphia Eagles charter flight from Seattle to Philadelphia last year. Photograph posted by FlyerTalk member tod701 on December 12, 2013.
To save some time searching, photos are in posts (please update wiki when you post a new photo): 28, 93, 123, 164, 205, 278, 279, 286, 297, 303, 310, 321, 330, 410, 415, 418, 419, 444, 468, 483, 486, 495, 510, 529, 568, 577, 588, 606, 620, 632, 644, 661, 673, 675, 693, 708, 709, 716, 752, 773, 786, 873, 887, 907, 914, 917, 922, 934, 953, 967, 987, 998, 1006, 1013, 1019, 1025, 1029, 1032, 1036, 1037, 1058, 1067, 1107, 1131, 1137, 1151, 1159, 1163, 1179, 1201, 1243, 1246, 1249, 1268, 1279, 1295, 2028, 2235, 2237, 2240, 2241, 2936
Hall of Shame: Photographic Evidence of Disgusting Acts by Delta Air Lines Passengers
Apr 24, 2015, 3:07 pm
#1771
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AMS
Programs: A number, but no status no more
Posts: 3,049
Being pedantic, one could say that this does not qualify for this thread, since it's clearly not a DL passenger, and we could even chastise the person mentioning this for being disloyal to DL :P
Apr 24, 2015, 5:03 pm
#1773
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,042
This is the direct result of the fad for bare feet in shoes with no socks or hose. The shoes hurt, liberate the feet, put 'em up any old where...yuck. This is even more revolting when men do it.
Apr 24, 2015, 5:09 pm
#1774
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SLC
Programs: DL FO, KM, & 1.7MM; UA nothing; HH♦; National EE
Posts: 6,344
Why?
Apr 24, 2015, 7:05 pm
#1775
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Chattanooga
Programs: DL, Hyatt, National
Posts: 318
A nice and well groomed foot is nothing like the tree climbing fungus infested ape feet we see in some of these pictures.
There are feet that should never be allowed out in public....EVER.
Take a look at your feet....(By the way - If you can't see them and have no idea how they look - keep them hidden from us as well - they are probably not aesthetically pleasing).
If you can and there fungus under your nails or a bunion the size of a toe - for the love of god wear shoes!!!!!!
There are feet that should never be allowed out in public....EVER.
Take a look at your feet....(By the way - If you can't see them and have no idea how they look - keep them hidden from us as well - they are probably not aesthetically pleasing).
If you can and there fungus under your nails or a bunion the size of a toe - for the love of god wear shoes!!!!!!
Apr 24, 2015, 7:18 pm
#1776
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Twin Cities
Programs: Delta DM MM, IHG Plat, Hilton DM, Marriott SE, Emerald EE, Oakdale Gun Club, NRA & GOA Life Member
Posts: 3,870
I'd be willing to bet that bare feet carry fewer germs than bare hands. I fail to understand some people's obsession with feet on this forum. BTW, I don't put my bare feet on anything in public except the ground on the occasions where I'm bare footed.
Apr 24, 2015, 7:36 pm
#1777
Join Date: May 2013
Location: YYZ
Posts: 585
I see it akin to the amenity kit for trans-ocean flights
Is it theft if you take the kit with you? No. Then why is the blanket such a special item?
Arguably it costs a fraction of that amenity kit...
Apr 24, 2015, 9:32 pm
#1778
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,042
Why is it less objectionable for women than men to show bare feet in public places where bare feet are not really appropriate? Pedicures and nail polish look more polished and well groomed. Women's feet are not so big. The sandals some women wear are not far from bare anyway so we are more used to it. Foot odor is usually more of a problem for men because men sweat more. Some men's are pretty gnarly. But for either one, I don't think we have a right to object if the bare feet stay in the foot space, not on the audio visual equipment or the table.
Apr 24, 2015, 11:57 pm
#1779
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: DL GM
Posts: 217
Okay genuine question, is it really considered theft if you take that blanket?
I see it akin to the amenity kit for trans-ocean flights
Is it theft if you take the kit with you? No. Then why is the blanket such a special item?
Arguably it costs a fraction of that amenity kit...
I see it akin to the amenity kit for trans-ocean flights
Is it theft if you take the kit with you? No. Then why is the blanket such a special item?
Arguably it costs a fraction of that amenity kit...
So is it a theft?
I imagine you'd say yes. How about safety information cards? I bet those printed cards cost a fraction of a fraction of amenity kit. Headrest covers? Stack of paper towels from lav? Pillows? Ultimately, where's that line of stealing and not stealing?
Amenity kits are personal things, and sometimes there's even a welcome note inside saying it's all yours. On the contrary, numerous times I've seen a tag on blankets saying "Airline property. Do not remove from aircraft."
Blankets are just not intended to be taken, and that's it. And I completely agree with Sabai. Next time airline just won't provide blankets, simple. Business is all about "fractions". Penny here, penny there...
Apr 25, 2015, 2:42 am
#1780
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: QFF Gold, Flying Blue, Enrich
Posts: 5,366
(Disclaimer: this was on Hawaiian, not Delta)
Apr 25, 2015, 4:37 am
#1781
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,659
Okay genuine question, is it really considered theft if you take that blanket?
I see it akin to the amenity kit for trans-ocean flights
Is it theft if you take the kit with you? No. Then why is the blanket such a special item?
Arguably it costs a fraction of that amenity kit...
I see it akin to the amenity kit for trans-ocean flights
Is it theft if you take the kit with you? No. Then why is the blanket such a special item?
Arguably it costs a fraction of that amenity kit...
Munch munch munch......
Apr 25, 2015, 9:44 am
#1782
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SLC
Programs: DL FO, KM, & 1.7MM; UA nothing; HH♦; National EE
Posts: 6,344
Why is it less objectionable for women than men to show bare feet in public places where bare feet are not really appropriate? Pedicures and nail polish look more polished and well groomed. Women's feet are not so big. The sandals some women wear are not far from bare anyway so we are more used to it. Foot odor is usually more of a problem for men because men sweat more. Some men's are pretty gnarly. But for either one, I don't think we have a right to object if the bare feet stay in the foot space, not on the audio visual equipment or the table.
While I personally don't take my socks off on the plane, I do take my shoes off frequently. I keep them on top of my shoes, or on my carry-on bag, not in the seat back pocket or on the AVOD. My feet smell like freshly baked cookies compared to some of the women's feet I've experienced. My feet aren't huge (as if size matters...), and I think they look just fine. If all women had pedicured and de-sented feet, maybe I could accept your position.
This.
Apr 25, 2015, 2:14 pm
#1785
Join Date: Jan 2010
Programs: AA Plat 2MM/UA G MM/DL MM DM 2015/BA Silver/Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 3,103
Grammatically the sentence is correct. The subject is the tootsies and they belonged to a women. The prepositional phrase on a plane refers to the location of the encounter, not the plane. Had the plane belonged to the women, the sentence would have read ....on a plane which ( or that) belonged to a women.