Community
Wiki Posts
Search

EC now installed on CRj900

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2012, 7:50 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Everywhere....
Programs: Delta DM
Posts: 463
EC now installed on CRj900

Caught a ride on a Expressjet 900 the other day, aircraft now has 3 rows of EC. I did notice more leg room in rows 5-6-7, not tons but enough to make a difference. FA told me reconfig on the 700s start this week.


Last edited by flightattendantsteve; Apr 17, 2012 at 7:58 pm
flightattendantsteve is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2012, 7:54 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: Hilton, United, Gold DL
Posts: 993
Can't even tell there is a difference. Couldn't replace the cushions either?
RacingJunkie is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 11:38 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Everywhere....
Programs: Delta DM
Posts: 463
I would estimate I saw at least 2" of additional leg room. I can't answer on the seat cushions. But it's going to make any trip on a 900 more comfortable when you don't get an UG. I'm anxious to see the 700 reconfigured.
flightattendantsteve is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 11:44 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta GM, Marriott Platinum, Hertz 5*
Posts: 2,530
Originally Posted by flightattendantsteve
I would estimate I saw at least 2" of additional leg room.
Finally! RJs that are no longer inhumane for tall GMs!
dcline414 is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 11:46 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CHA/TYS
Programs: The Mac Daddy of Heimlich County (and low-ball status)
Posts: 2,868
Originally Posted by dcline414
Finally! RJs that are no longer inhumane for tall GMs!
we still got all those barbie CRJs, brah!
mrredskin is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 12:07 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta GM, Marriott Platinum, Hertz 5*
Posts: 2,530
Originally Posted by mrredskin
we still got all those barbie CRJs, brah!
I think the only reason the 200s weren't updated is that their days are (finitely) numbered!
dcline414 is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 1:20 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: Hilton, United, Gold DL
Posts: 993
Originally Posted by flightattendantsteve
But it's going to make any trip on a 900 more comfortable when you don't get an UG.
Where do they typically use the CRJ900, I've only seen it listed for ATL - BZE.
RacingJunkie is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 2:14 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: OKC
Programs: DL DM/2.768MM, Global Entry, Titanium_Marriott, GHertz
Posts: 6,748
Originally Posted by RacingJunkie
Where do they typically use the CRJ900, I've only seen it listed for ATL - BZE.
ATL-OKC-ATL only gets one a day (I just came off one) now as we are stuck with more of the RJ7s but do get one MD88 a day.
Xeno is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 2:37 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta GM, Marriott Platinum, Hertz 5*
Posts: 2,530
Originally Posted by RacingJunkie
Where do they typically use the CRJ900, I've only seen it listed for ATL - BZE.
I see them all over in ATL, JFK, ORD, and MEM. Seems they fly off-peak routes that normally use an MD.

Bring on the 900s over the MDs anytime!
dcline414 is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 4:41 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: JFK/LGA/EWR
Posts: 1,296
Originally Posted by RacingJunkie
Where do they typically use the CRJ900, I've only seen it listed for ATL - BZE.
I'm flying JFK-CVG on one this Tuesday.
sbjnyc is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 5:04 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist & Ambassador: China
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: DL DM/MM, UA 1K, AA Exp, HH Dia, WOH Glob, IHG Plat, Marriott Gold, NA EE, Hertz PC
Posts: 17,419
So the CR9/CR7/CRJ experience has now gone from painful to slightly less than painful?
mnredfox is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 5:18 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: OKC
Programs: DL DM/2.768MM, Global Entry, Titanium_Marriott, GHertz
Posts: 6,748
Originally Posted by mnredfox
So the CR9/CR7/CRJ experience has now gone from painful to slightly less than painful?
I like 1A on the RJ 9 better than 2B on the MD88: great seat, Wifi, etc. I don't like the RJ7 as much and refuse to route international trips through MSP because of those tiny CRJ200s with no FC. In other words, they should not be grouped together.
Xeno is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 6:07 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Programs: Southwest A-List Preferred/Companion Pass, Amtrak Select, Priority Club Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 453
And people pay extra for THAT comfort? Wow, that's barely noticable...what does EC cost? Frankly, I'm more concerned with width, than depth-I can always stick my feet under the seat in front of me, especially with the CRJ's where you have to gate check anything larger than a package of Biscoff cookies.
Paddlenpedal is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2012, 10:18 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Programs: Ham Sandwich Medallion
Posts: 889
Originally Posted by dcline414
I think the only reason the 200s weren't updated is that their days are (finitely) numbered!
Either that, or DL figured that if they can't make money with 50 pax on board, they certainly couldn't with 46 after the row of seats is removed to make room for EC. Pitch on those CR2's is inhumane as-is; I couldn't see them making it any smaller.
T.J. Bender is offline  
Old Jun 10, 2012, 11:51 pm
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Look up - On a ✈ DELTA ✈ jet NOW!
Programs: Blogger & Delta Diamond Medallion Million Miler
Posts: 4,174
Question EC or EXIT

Originally Posted by flightattendantsteve
I would estimate I saw at least 2" of additional leg room. I can't answer on the seat cushions. But it's going to make any trip on a 900 more comfortable when you don't get an UG. I'm anxious to see the 700 reconfigured.
So is EC better or last exit row better would you say on a 700/900 for max leg room? Thanks for this very much!
Renes Points is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.