Skymiles Change Rumor?
#2521
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: So Fla & NYC
Programs: DL DM/2MM, UA MM, BV LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 23,766
I am finding no difference at all in award availability between MIA and FLL. The only exception to this are the AF nonstops to CDG which take me to MIA for C awards at 100K.
#2522
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,269
Yup - I'm still doing them at the same clip. Could you give an example or three (not cherry-picked to suit one airline's heavy presence) of routes where DL has much less low/saver awards where US/AA/UA have many? The few times I have serious trouble finding 25K with a little flexibility, it's almost always the case that no peer has it for that rate either.
#2523
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,289
ATL-LAS. Let's give DL the advantage and start our search from their fortress hub. For August, 17 days in Low on UA (only 11 show up on the award calendar, but 6 more days have them if you actually click the dates to view flights). 7 on DL. For September? 23 days with saver economy on UA. 13 days with low awards on DL.
That said, everyone has their own patterns, and UA/AA/US might work better for some. In my case, I have a pretty varied redemption pattern domestically, and DL on *average* works out to be the best value by far, and that's not even factoring in the cost of acquiring the miles. A few years ago, UA seemed to be the general winner around peak periods, US on the east coast, and there were a few other niches where DL was inferior domestically, but now even those gaps seem to have narrowed.
#2524
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,269
No, I am not logging in as an elite on either airline.
I've never had to pay 50k on United for coach seating. 50k gets me First Class a much greater portion of the time than 45k does on DL. All too often FC awards at 80k are just as common as Y at 40.
I've never had to pay 50k on United for coach seating. 50k gets me First Class a much greater portion of the time than 45k does on DL. All too often FC awards at 80k are just as common as Y at 40.
#2525
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
Also check BCN-NYC in C.
Everyone is equal on this one.
(EWR For UA, JFK for all other airlines)
Everyone is equal on this one.
(EWR For UA, JFK for all other airlines)
#2526
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,289
I think you're correct that 50K domestic F is more readily available on UA/AA/US than with DL for 45K, but that becomes relevant only if you want to redeem for guaranteed domestic F outside your window. If you're willing to risk it and you are mid-tier elite or above, 25K gives domestic F on DL much of the time, so no need to bother with the 45K availability. Or you can mix and match (use more on a competitive route where you are concerned about missing the upgrade.)
I was discussing Delta's competitiveness in the 48 contiguous states only.
#2528
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LAS
Programs: PA FT, TW Gold, NW/CO PE, VK Eagleflyer
Posts: 7,173
#2529
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,289
Global indeed, but the vast majority of their routes and revenues are wholly within the US, so being the best where they do most of their business might make sense.
#2530
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: So Fla & NYC
Programs: DL DM/2MM, UA MM, BV LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 23,766
They seem to stick to their mission of supplying comfort and perks which are more weighted in favor of the business traveler domestically and are looking mostly to attract the steady business of those who are not extremely price-sensitive on their international routes.
Internally, I do not think that there are many at DL who consider the leisure traveler to be much more than a "ham sandwich" whether he takes one trip a year or earns Medallion status. So this is the way I see it and certainly can live with it as long as I fit into the first category. When I retire, and that is not all that long a projection, I certainly will reconsider.
#2531
FlyerTalk Evangelist & Ambassador: China
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: DL DM/MM, UA 1K, AA Exp, HH Dia, WOH Glob, IHG Plat, Marriott Gold, NA EE, Hertz PC
Posts: 17,419
Yup - I'm still doing them at the same clip. Could you give an example or three (not cherry-picked to suit one airline's heavy presence) of routes where DL has much less low/saver awards where US/AA/UA have many? The few times I have serious trouble finding 25K with a little flexibility, it's almost always the case that no peer has it for that rate either.
Right, that's what I was saying. As for international use - I take no issue with that. DL has been a laggard in international awards all along (with a few specific exceptions). Domestic, on the other hand, they've been golden in my book.
Right, that's what I was saying. As for international use - I take no issue with that. DL has been a laggard in international awards all along (with a few specific exceptions). Domestic, on the other hand, they've been golden in my book.
SFO-ATL, anytime now though 1st 3 weeks in Aug (trying to go visit a sister):
DL: 7 low OB, 2 return
AA: 10 OB, 8 return
UA: 23 OB, 21 return
Well we all know the DL award calendar lies by our "Here we Go again" video/thread, so I checked every date one by one on DL. Of the 7 OB, 2 actually don't exist. They are both med. Of the 2 return, both as well are NOT low.
So updated results:
DL: 5 low OB, 0 return
AA: 10 OB, 8 return
UA: 23 OB, 21 return
Again, accuse me of what you may but this is a real life example I have to deal with. I think the repeated studies show this time and time again that DL is far far worse than other competitors (maybe exception US).
#2532
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,289
Well, you ask for non-cherry picked and of course you could always accuse me of this, but I'll give you a REAL example of a need I have. SFO-ATL, granted two hubs but one is UA and one is DL. Close in award, F, logged in as DM (so exactly the criteria you mooper always claim to have luck with).
SFO-ATL, anytime now though 1st 3 weeks in Aug (trying to go visit a sister):
DL: 7 low OB, 2 return
AA: 10 OB, 8 return
UA: 23 OB, 21 return
SFO-ATL, anytime now though 1st 3 weeks in Aug (trying to go visit a sister):
DL: 7 low OB, 2 return
AA: 10 OB, 8 return
UA: 23 OB, 21 return
It would be a pretty overwhelming task to get a very broad picture of elite availability to compare in a manner that accounts for different patterns and puts all airlines on fair footing. None of the studies I've seen have ever done this - there's always some substantial bias.
#2533
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,269
We often disagree, but you've always seemed honest. I don't doubt you. Good find - it happens that DL has relatively low availability for those three weeks. Change your target period to the month of August as a whole, however, and you see 13 low days both directions and DL looks relatively good again. Also, remember that the calendar display errors domestically are usually related to Medallion inventory and aren't always out of an elite's favor in terms of what is displayed (i.e., if you click through on a yellow/medium day on the calendar, you'll often find that low/saver is available.) And not to beat a dead horse, but remember again that as a DM, you're comparing what will be a seat in F when you go DL versus coach in the others.
It would be a pretty overwhelming task to get a very broad picture of elite availability to compare in a manner that accounts for different patterns and puts all airlines on fair footing. None of the studies I've seen have ever done this - there's always some substantial bias.
It would be a pretty overwhelming task to get a very broad picture of elite availability to compare in a manner that accounts for different patterns and puts all airlines on fair footing. None of the studies I've seen have ever done this - there's always some substantial bias.
#2534
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,289
Correct. I should have mentioned that. Those UA upgrades aren't, however, as reliable as award upgrades for DL PMs and DMs especially. As a DM, I haven't missed a single award upgrade in many dozens of segments. AA and US have no such complimentary award upgrades available in any capacity.
#2535
FlyerTalk Evangelist & Ambassador: China
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: DL DM/MM, UA 1K, AA Exp, HH Dia, WOH Glob, IHG Plat, Marriott Gold, NA EE, Hertz PC
Posts: 17,419
We often disagree, but you've always seemed honest. I don't doubt you. Good find - it happens that DL has relatively low availability for those three weeks. Change your target period to the month of August as a whole, however, and you see 13 low days both directions and DL looks relatively good again. Also, remember that the calendar display errors domestically are usually related to Medallion inventory and aren't always out of an elite's favor in terms of what is displayed (i.e., if you click through on a yellow/medium day on the calendar, you'll often find that low/saver is available.) And not to beat a dead horse, but remember again that as a DM, you're comparing what will be a seat in F when you go DL versus coach in the others.
It would be a pretty overwhelming task to get a very broad picture of elite availability to compare in a manner that accounts for different patterns and puts all airlines on fair footing. None of the studies I've seen have ever done this - there's always some substantial bias.
It would be a pretty overwhelming task to get a very broad picture of elite availability to compare in a manner that accounts for different patterns and puts all airlines on fair footing. None of the studies I've seen have ever done this - there's always some substantial bias.
I see what you're saying about late Aug, but of course not when I need it.