The Definitive "Delta - TSA Pre-Check" thread
#1651
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ATL
Programs: DL SkyMiles, MR, HH, ICH/PC, Avis Pref., Hertz Gold
Posts: 2,897
Delete your middle initial or name. This was the problem with mine. Even though my middle initial is on my known traveller profile, when I removed it I'm 100 percent on precheck. Literally I've had the check in counter remove it and boom I got precheck when they reprinted the boarding pass.
#1652
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: PDX
Programs: DL, UA, lotsa hotels
Posts: 79
Earlier this year at IAD again, I walked into the regular security line with a PreCheck pass (didn't even notice or think about it) and was told I had to go to the PreCheck line. 100 yards down, thru the check, down one escalator, and 100 yds back for the second escalator to the train.
At PDX, PreCheck is at the ABC gates, but Delta is at D. I go through the FF checkin lane all the time with a PreCheck BP and no-one says a thing; they just look to see the BP is OK for the FF line. Imagine if they started to insist that PreCheck pax walk to the ABC, thru security, and then back around the other side (there's a moving-walkway in the secure area between the ABC and DEF gates). Lots of pissed-off pax I'd think! PreCheck is useless and redundant for PDX on Delta or UAL (E gates).
Are there any non-Medallion PreCheck pax who might benefit from the quicker check?
At PDX, PreCheck is at the ABC gates, but Delta is at D. I go through the FF checkin lane all the time with a PreCheck BP and no-one says a thing; they just look to see the BP is OK for the FF line. Imagine if they started to insist that PreCheck pax walk to the ABC, thru security, and then back around the other side (there's a moving-walkway in the secure area between the ABC and DEF gates). Lots of pissed-off pax I'd think! PreCheck is useless and redundant for PDX on Delta or UAL (E gates).
Are there any non-Medallion PreCheck pax who might benefit from the quicker check?
#1653
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: DL Scattered Smothered Covered Medallion, Some hotel & car stuff, Kroger Plus Card
Posts: 10,745
Earlier this year at IAD again, I walked into the regular security line with a PreCheck pass (didn't even notice or think about it) and was told I had to go to the PreCheck line. 100 yards down, thru the check, down one escalator, and 100 yds back for the second escalator to the train.
At PDX, PreCheck is at the ABC gates, but Delta is at D. I go through the FF checkin lane all the time with a PreCheck BP and no-one says a thing; they just look to see the BP is OK for the FF line. Imagine if they started to insist that PreCheck pax walk to the ABC, thru security, and then back around the other side (there's a moving-walkway in the secure area between the ABC and DEF gates). Lots of pissed-off pax I'd think! PreCheck is useless and redundant for PDX on Delta or UAL (E gates).
Are there any non-Medallion PreCheck pax who might benefit from the quicker check?
At PDX, PreCheck is at the ABC gates, but Delta is at D. I go through the FF checkin lane all the time with a PreCheck BP and no-one says a thing; they just look to see the BP is OK for the FF line. Imagine if they started to insist that PreCheck pax walk to the ABC, thru security, and then back around the other side (there's a moving-walkway in the secure area between the ABC and DEF gates). Lots of pissed-off pax I'd think! PreCheck is useless and redundant for PDX on Delta or UAL (E gates).
Are there any non-Medallion PreCheck pax who might benefit from the quicker check?
That said, I had Pre before I had SP, so I got in the habit of seeking out the Pre lanes even if they were a bit more of a walk back to the gate. The time savings vs. the general lines were well worth it.
Even with SP now, I would always consider a walk to/from a Pre checkpoint since a) sometimes even the SP lines are outrageous, especially in ATL, and b) I very much enjoy not having to do the whole song and dance during the actual screening.
#1654
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
Earlier this year at IAD again, I walked into the regular security line with a PreCheck pass (didn't even notice or think about it) and was told I had to go to the PreCheck line. 100 yards down, thru the check, down one escalator, and 100 yds back for the second escalator to the train.
At PDX, PreCheck is at the ABC gates, but Delta is at D. I go through the FF checkin lane all the time with a PreCheck BP and no-one says a thing; they just look to see the BP is OK for the FF line. Imagine if they started to insist that PreCheck pax walk to the ABC, thru security, and then back around the other side (there's a moving-walkway in the secure area between the ABC and DEF gates). Lots of pissed-off pax I'd think! PreCheck is useless and redundant for PDX on Delta or UAL (E gates).
#1655
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: LAS - where you can get married and divorced in the same 24 hour period. Perfect for the woman who's saving herself for marriage and the man who wants a one night stand.
Programs: DL DM, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond, Marriott Platinum, UA, AA, AS, WN kettle, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,613
The name in the secure data must match the Global Entry info - and the profile name must match the passport. All four must be the same FN, MN and LN.
The advantage with GE/NEXUS is all airline PreCheck plus special security lines in Canada if you have the card in hand.
The advantage with GE/NEXUS is all airline PreCheck plus special security lines in Canada if you have the card in hand.
#1656
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: DL Scattered Smothered Covered Medallion, Some hotel & car stuff, Kroger Plus Card
Posts: 10,745
I also applaud your parents on not giving you a middle name. My parents scr*wed me by giving me a middle initial instead of a middle name. They couldn't agree on "Joseph" or "Jeffrey" so they compromised on the initial. Anytime a middle name was needed, though, they would spell out "Jay" instead of just putting "J" so my birth certificate says one thing and my high school diploma says another. My first passport said "J" but the renewal said "Jay." Go figure.
Nonetheless, the only place it continues to be an issue is with DL!
Nonetheless, the only place it continues to be an issue is with DL!
But when I moved states a few years ago, to one I had lived in previously, the initial popped back into my DL even though it was nowhere on my paperwork.
Notice I didn't mention birth certificate. The origin of my middle initial is my parents chose to be surprised, but planned for me to be a girl. When I popped out with a different set of equipment, it took them three days just to pick a first name. The nurse drew a squiggle or scratched something out or something in the middle name box on the birth certificate, and somewhere along the way that translated to a letter G.
To keep us back OT, I've had a DL FF account going back to the mid-80s, but have never used my middle name/initial in anything with DL. I intentionally left it out of my legal name in my GE app, though I think I included it in a AKA/FKA field or something. I don't use a salutation or have a suffix. And I'm batting 1.000 for precheck. ^
#1657
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: PDX
Programs: DL, UA, lotsa hotels
Posts: 79
Point is, I dont' mind the choreography so much, it's the time wasted in the process from start to finish. At the time at IAD there would have been maybe 3 people in front of me; having to head over to PreCheck increased the through-time. I wasn't in a hurry -- had plenty of time for a glass and snack at Vino Volo -- but I keep mental notes on this stuff for the next time when I'm down to 30-minutes...
#1658
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: BDU
Programs: DL:MM, Marriott:LTT
Posts: 8,779
...The origin of my middle initial is my parents chose to be surprised, but planned for me to be a girl. When I popped out with a different set of equipment, it took them three days just to pick a first name. The nurse drew a squiggle or scratched something out or something in the middle name box on the birth certificate, and somewhere along the way that translated to a letter G.
To keep us back OT, I've had a DL FF account going back to the mid-80s, but have never used my middle name/initial in anything with DL. I intentionally left it out of my legal name in my GE app, though I think I included it in a AKA/FKA field or something. I don't use a salutation or have a suffix. And I'm batting 1.000 for precheck. ^
To keep us back OT, I've had a DL FF account going back to the mid-80s, but have never used my middle name/initial in anything with DL. I intentionally left it out of my legal name in my GE app, though I think I included it in a AKA/FKA field or something. I don't use a salutation or have a suffix. And I'm batting 1.000 for precheck. ^
#1659
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MSP
Programs: DL DM, Marriott Plat, National Exec Elite
Posts: 1,357
it was mentioned in my GE interview by US Customers, maybe he wasn't fully up to speed, but with a number of people starting to see %'s decline.
#1660
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: BDU
Programs: DL:MM, Marriott:LTT
Posts: 8,779
Again, it makes no sense for TSA to take what is working and make it more expensive, especially given the flack they got a few months ago when the lines were slowed at the start of the forced government budget cuts. At that time, TSA made it clear they were looking for ways to move more people into the Pre-Check lines, not a way to move more people back to the regular lines. Given that nothing has changed budget-wise, it seems unlikely TSA would be thinking of anything like this, could afford to move people back, nor could handle the PR backlash if they did.
#1661
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MSP
Programs: DL DM, Marriott Plat, National Exec Elite
Posts: 1,357
So let me get this straight... You're saying a low level worker at US Customs told you something about TSA and you think that's a reliable source? It's so super-secret that it hasn't been leaked anywhere else, but a low level person in an entirely different organization who just happens to know about it blabs to you. (You do realize while both are under the US Dept of Homeland Security, there are two distinctly different organizations, right?)
Again, it makes no sense for TSA to take what is working and make it more expensive, especially given the flack they got a few months ago when the lines were slowed at the start of the forced government budget cuts. At that time, TSA made it clear they were looking for ways to move more people into the Pre-Check lines, not a way to move more people back to the regular lines. Given that nothing has changed budget-wise, it seems unlikely TSA would be thinking of anything like this, could afford to move people back, nor could handle the PR backlash if they did.
Again, it makes no sense for TSA to take what is working and make it more expensive, especially given the flack they got a few months ago when the lines were slowed at the start of the forced government budget cuts. At that time, TSA made it clear they were looking for ways to move more people into the Pre-Check lines, not a way to move more people back to the regular lines. Given that nothing has changed budget-wise, it seems unlikely TSA would be thinking of anything like this, could afford to move people back, nor could handle the PR backlash if they did.
It will be phased out all good things phase away when money gets involved.
#1662
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Money is already involved. The PreCheck-enrolled airlines airlines are a substantial material contributor to PreCheck's cost.
#1663
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Why? It's not a reward, flight-by-flight honor or paid-for service. It's an acknowledgement that TSA knows enough about you and your flying habits to know you aren't a threat. It saves TSA money and frequent passengers time. Under what rational would TSA decide those who are trusted should no longer be trusted, so the TSA should spend more money on them? TSA invested time, money and effort on figuring out who qualified for the program. Do you really think they are going to go to Congress and explain it was money and effort wasted? That it didn't work?
#1665
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: BDU
Programs: DL:MM, Marriott:LTT
Posts: 8,779
Pre-Check started with a group the airlines and TSA were able to identify as the lowest risk. The next group doesn't automatically qualify as the lowest risk, but upon more detailed examination may fit the criteria. By paying a fee, those in that second group are able to have a background check and interview to determine if they do qualify. The fee pays for the background check, fingerprint check and interview. The first group didn't need those things, so they didn't have to pay for those things.
You are not paying for Pre-Check. You are paying the costs associated with being qualified for Pre-Check. Pre-Check saves TSA money. With their current budget concerns, TSA isn't about to make things more expensive by taking those who have already been deemed trustworthy and push them into the more expensive line.
For that matter, those with GE haven't paid for Pre-Check, either. Once they've been approved by that other government agency, TSA knows they are trustworthy and puts them through the cheaper line.
BTW, I've paid for TSA 100 times this year. Putting me through the cheaper line is what makes the most money for TSA.