Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

TSA detained a flight attendant at SEA this morning

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA detained a flight attendant at SEA this morning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2010, 8:20 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle , WA DL DM 2MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy, Delta Skymiles
Posts: 318
TSA detained a flight attendant at SEA this morning

On my way to SLC from SEA this morning. Gate agent mentioned the reason for delayed boarding was that TSA has detained a flight attendant. This is a first for me. I'm glad they were able to get a non rev FA to work the flight.
SFOFlyer2 is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 9:37 am
  #2  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
TSA cannot detain anyone. Either law enforcement was involved, or the FA chose to remain at the checkpoint.
Spiff is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 9:41 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: LAX/BOS/HKG/AMS/SFO...hmm, I need a life.
Programs: United1K, AA ExPlAAt, DL MM/Gold, Hilton Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 13,316
Originally Posted by Spiff
TSA cannot detain anyone. Either law enforcement was involved, or the FA chose to remain at the checkpoint.
Yup. They do NOT have the authority to detain you. The AP police or local police need to be called in for that.
avidflyer is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 9:47 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Diamond 1.7MM, Starlux Insighter, Bonvoy Titanium, Hilton Gold, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,947
Pretty classy of the non-revving F/A to step up and help so the flight could operate!

I've had some pretty darn good experiences with SEA-based flight attendants lately... not sure if the F/A who stepped up to help was SEA based, but it wouldn't surprise me at all. The crew base here is divided in half - the PMNW base covers most of the int'l flying and former NW hub flying, while the PMDL base is very small so those attendants are stuck grinding out SEA-ATL-SEA over and over and over again. Really cool folks in both pre-merger groups, and from idle chatter they all seem excited about working together in the future.
BenA is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 9:54 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: DTW/FNT
Programs: Delta (nee NW), Hilton Diamond. IHG (PT)
Posts: 4,823
Originally Posted by BenA
Pretty classy of the non-revving F/A to step up and help so the flight could operate!

I've had some pretty darn good experiences with SEA-based flight attendants lately... not sure if the F/A who stepped up to help was SEA based,
+1

It may not have been someone assigned to SEA that stepped forward, might just be someone that lived there.

Bob H
BobH is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 9:55 am
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
Originally Posted by SFOFlyer2
On my way to SLC from SEA this morning. Gate agent mentioned the reason for delayed boarding was that TSA has detained a flight attendant. This is a first for me. I'm glad they were able to get a non rev FA to work the flight.
Did DL say that the FA was detained and that a nonrev "volunteer" is taking her place? Or could it be that he/she was simply delayed by TSA and hence arrived at the aircraft late? If the FA was really arrested, I would expect the incident to be in the news.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 1:36 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Seattle , WA DL DM 2MM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Programs: Marriott Bonvoy, Delta Skymiles
Posts: 318
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Did DL say that the FA was detained and that a nonrev "volunteer" is taking her place? Or could it be that he/she was simply delayed by TSA and hence arrived at the aircraft late? If the FA was really arrested, I would expect the incident to be in the news.
From what the FA told me was that TSA found something suspicious in the FA's baggage at the security checkpoint and would not let her go. Had the non rev not volunteered the flight would have been cancelled.

I don't know if the AP were involved or not but the GA made the announcement that the FA was detained by TSA and hence the boarding was delayed till the FA shows up or they find a replacement.
SFOFlyer2 is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 1:45 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
Originally Posted by SFOFlyer2
From what the FA told me was that TSA found something suspicious in the FA's baggage
I'll wager it was a 4 oz bottle of hand lotion.
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 1:50 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: AA, DL, Bonvoy, WoH, HH
Posts: 762
Originally Posted by Gargoyle
I'll wager it was a 4 oz bottle of hand lotion.
You lost, mail your SWU to my address
Any on duty crew is exempted from 3-1-1 rule. :
ControlTower is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 2:00 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Likely being followed...
Programs: DYKWIA Extraordinaire. TrollSlayer Mega Diamond. [insert esoteric sounding status level(s) here]
Posts: 5,240
Originally Posted by jameskwon
You lost, mail your SWU to my address
Any on duty crew is exempted from 3-1-1 rule. :
Alas Gargoyle was being sarcastic...

But it was likely probably something similar knowing the smurfs at SEA.
Vuelos is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 3:43 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Originally Posted by jameskwon
You lost, mail your SWU to my address
Any on duty crew is exempted from 3-1-1 rule. :
Yes but TSA is exempt from any semblance of consistency in applying their own rules. Uncertainty is security.

Kuddos to the FA who stepped up.
MikeMpls is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 3:47 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ATL/BOS
Posts: 331
Was the "non-rev" FA just deadheading, or was he/she actually traveling for personal reasons? Was he/she in uniform?
skidv25 is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 8:38 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
Originally Posted by jameskwon
You lost, mail your SWU to my address
My SWU's are as useless as the TSA, so it's a fair deal.
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 8:50 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MKE
Programs: BA Gold, DL PM, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,241
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
Yes but TSA is exempt from any semblance of consistency in applying their own rules. Uncertainty is security.

Kuddos to the FA who stepped up.
I agree.

skidv25, I do not think that crew can work w/o being in uniform.

Dave
Davescj is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 10:38 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ATL/BOS
Posts: 331
Originally Posted by Davescj

skidv25, I do not think that crew can work w/o being in uniform.
So it sounds like it was a deadheading/commuting FA who volunteered to fill in? Either way, ^ to him or her.
skidv25 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.