TSA detained a flight attendant at SEA this morning
On my way to SLC from SEA this morning. Gate agent mentioned the reason for delayed boarding was that TSA has detained a flight attendant. This is a first for me. I'm glad they were able to get a non rev FA to work the flight.
|
TSA cannot detain anyone. Either law enforcement was involved, or the FA chose to remain at the checkpoint.
|
Originally Posted by Spiff
(Post 15461791)
TSA cannot detain anyone. Either law enforcement was involved, or the FA chose to remain at the checkpoint.
|
Pretty classy of the non-revving F/A to step up and help so the flight could operate!
I've had some pretty darn good experiences with SEA-based flight attendants lately... not sure if the F/A who stepped up to help was SEA based, but it wouldn't surprise me at all. The crew base here is divided in half - the PMNW base covers most of the int'l flying and former NW hub flying, while the PMDL base is very small so those attendants are stuck grinding out SEA-ATL-SEA over and over and over again. Really cool folks in both pre-merger groups, and from idle chatter they all seem excited about working together in the future. |
Originally Posted by BenA
(Post 15461878)
Pretty classy of the non-revving F/A to step up and help so the flight could operate!
I've had some pretty darn good experiences with SEA-based flight attendants lately... not sure if the F/A who stepped up to help was SEA based, It may not have been someone assigned to SEA that stepped forward, might just be someone that lived there. Bob H |
Originally Posted by SFOFlyer2
(Post 15461326)
On my way to SLC from SEA this morning. Gate agent mentioned the reason for delayed boarding was that TSA has detained a flight attendant. This is a first for me. I'm glad they were able to get a non rev FA to work the flight.
|
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 15461934)
Did DL say that the FA was detained and that a nonrev "volunteer" is taking her place? Or could it be that he/she was simply delayed by TSA and hence arrived at the aircraft late? If the FA was really arrested, I would expect the incident to be in the news.
I don't know if the AP were involved or not but the GA made the announcement that the FA was detained by TSA and hence the boarding was delayed till the FA shows up or they find a replacement. |
Originally Posted by SFOFlyer2
(Post 15463466)
From what the FA told me was that TSA found something suspicious in the FA's baggage
|
Originally Posted by Gargoyle
(Post 15463530)
I'll wager it was a 4 oz bottle of hand lotion.
Any on duty crew is exempted from 3-1-1 rule. ::rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by jameskwon
(Post 15463569)
You lost, mail your SWU to my address ;)
Any on duty crew is exempted from 3-1-1 rule. ::rolleyes: But it was likely probably something similar knowing the smurfs at SEA. |
Originally Posted by jameskwon
(Post 15463569)
You lost, mail your SWU to my address ;)
Any on duty crew is exempted from 3-1-1 rule. ::rolleyes: Kuddos to the FA who stepped up. |
Was the "non-rev" FA just deadheading, or was he/she actually traveling for personal reasons? Was he/she in uniform?
|
Originally Posted by jameskwon
(Post 15463569)
You lost, mail your SWU to my address ;)
|
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
(Post 15464356)
Yes but TSA is exempt from any semblance of consistency in applying their own rules. Uncertainty is security.
Kuddos to the FA who stepped up. skidv25, I do not think that crew can work w/o being in uniform. Dave |
Originally Posted by Davescj
(Post 15465783)
skidv25, I do not think that crew can work w/o being in uniform. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:13 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.