Clearing Customs Is A Joke At ATL
#31
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta PlM, 1M
Posts: 6,363
This would help connectors also by reducing the TSA load.
A very easy improvement to the existing setup that would help somewhat is a direct line post immigration that bypasses baggage claim and TSA rescreen. All it would take is a blocked off line and a single customs agent. In return, all the pax w/o bags avoid the TSA.
#32
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SAV
Programs: Atlanta's hometown airline. A bunch of hotel programs. PetSmart PetPerks.
Posts: 2,531
What do you think about this idea for ATL int'l arriving pax staying in ATL . . .
A shuttle bus from E to T (post security)! Simple!! Could be temporary, til the new terminal is opened. Maybe operate it only during peak int'l arrival hours!! No more bag re-check! No more re-screen!! It would also take huge amounts of people off the people mover system!
A shuttle bus from E to T (post security)! Simple!! Could be temporary, til the new terminal is opened. Maybe operate it only during peak int'l arrival hours!! No more bag re-check! No more re-screen!! It would also take huge amounts of people off the people mover system!
#33
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: DL Plat/SC 1MM, HHonors Gold, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Sam's Club
Posts: 524
Welcome to ATL immigration early morning! At lease I don't have to connect. Most times it works quite well, unless there's a snag. Just like late afternoon when the European flights start swarming in.
#34
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ATL - DL DM/3MM - HH Lifetime Diamond - Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 3,117
#35
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ATL - DL DM/3MM - HH Lifetime Diamond - Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 3,117
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,539
I'm happy that you're happy with DTW but I'm not. IMO, absolutely the worst airport for reentry. Two flights entering at once and suddenly we have a problem. OP, I think you saw ATL on it's worst day. I've come in early quite a few times and was surprised to not be delayed. Really though, no airport can handle things when it's gets busy. I take it back, DTW is not the worst, Dulles is. Sorry....
DTW, MSP, IAH and DFW are on the good list. I can feel confident scheduling a 90 minute connection at these airports, but usually try for 120 just to err on the side of safety. I'd need 2.5-3 hours at JFK or ATL. 2 hours would usually work for LAX.
#37
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta & San Francisco
Programs: DL 2MM DM & My Wife is a DL 3MM DM
Posts: 2,784
Hopefully they could also provide a bus shuttle from E to the new terminal groundside.
This would help connectors also by reducing the TSA load.
A very easy improvement to the existing setup that would help somewhat is a direct line post immigration that bypasses baggage claim and TSA rescreen. All it would take is a blocked off line and a single customs agent. In return, all the pax w/o bags avoid the TSA.
This would help connectors also by reducing the TSA load.
A very easy improvement to the existing setup that would help somewhat is a direct line post immigration that bypasses baggage claim and TSA rescreen. All it would take is a blocked off line and a single customs agent. In return, all the pax w/o bags avoid the TSA.
#38
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SAV
Programs: Atlanta's hometown airline. A bunch of hotel programs. PetSmart PetPerks.
Posts: 2,531
As to the post RE: OP is a troll...can't the mods block users who continually post nonsense? Though seems other thoughts have steered this thread beyond the original grievance.
#39
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: DL PM/MM, Hilton Silver, SPG+, Hertz PC
Posts: 7,899
Passengers who stay in ATL should be let out after immigration/customs, without having to rescreen.
Passengers connecting without checked baggage also should have their own channel, with no re-screening, since they can be kept sterile.
By implementing these two simple (and very reasonable) policies ATL would be a much better place.
That said, you've gotta re-screen at JFK as well...
Passengers connecting without checked baggage also should have their own channel, with no re-screening, since they can be kept sterile.
By implementing these two simple (and very reasonable) policies ATL would be a much better place.
That said, you've gotta re-screen at JFK as well...
#40
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SAV
Programs: Atlanta's hometown airline. A bunch of hotel programs. PetSmart PetPerks.
Posts: 2,531
Passengers connecting without checked baggage also should have their own channel, with no re-screening, since they can be kept sterile.
By implementing these two simple (and very reasonable) policies ATL would be a much better place.
That said, you've gotta re-screen at JFK as well...
By implementing these two simple (and very reasonable) policies ATL would be a much better place.
That said, you've gotta re-screen at JFK as well...
#41
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: West Hollywood, U.S.A.
Programs: Dl PM-MMX2, AA Gold, UA Priemier, Hyatt D, Hilton D, Marriott Plat, Avis President's
Posts: 368
Rest-assured, these engineers and designers are not stupid. Anyone here who thinks that there is not a plan to move people where they need to go at the world's busiest airport have some serious ego issues.
#42
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: DL PM/MM, Hilton Silver, SPG+, Hertz PC
Posts: 7,899
They think the Evildoers would pass on crashing a widebody on NYC or ATL in order to crash a CRJ somewhere in Kansas ?
#43
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta
Programs: DL:PM - Reserve, 2MM, FC, RW; HH: SILVER MR: SILVER
Posts: 1,225
Here is the latest article on the new International Terminal in ATL - click here. This also includes a new virtual tour of the facility. Pretty impressive.
I read somewhere that the plan is for all international arrivals to happen in the new terminal and international departures will be from both Terminal E and F. Between E & F there will be 46 gates capable of handling the wide body international aircraft.
Yes, ATL is busy and has a ton of people flowing through it, but there isn't another Delta HUB airport that can handle the volume of ATL. It has the daily total volume of DTW, MSP and SLC combined!
I read somewhere that the plan is for all international arrivals to happen in the new terminal and international departures will be from both Terminal E and F. Between E & F there will be 46 gates capable of handling the wide body international aircraft.
Yes, ATL is busy and has a ton of people flowing through it, but there isn't another Delta HUB airport that can handle the volume of ATL. It has the daily total volume of DTW, MSP and SLC combined!
#44
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SAV
Programs: Atlanta's hometown airline. A bunch of hotel programs. PetSmart PetPerks.
Posts: 2,531
This is about all I can fin of late... http://enr.construction.com/infrastr...lExpansion.asp
Rest-assured, these engineers and designers are not stupid. Anyone here who thinks that there is not a plan to move people where they need to go at the world's busiest airport have some serious ego issues.
Rest-assured, these engineers and designers are not stupid. Anyone here who thinks that there is not a plan to move people where they need to go at the world's busiest airport have some serious ego issues.
#45
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: DL DM, SPG Plat, AMEX Centurion (And All That Goes With It)
Posts: 393
Perhaps I should have been more clear:
My problem is not necessarily Customs/Immigration. I am well aware that they are a mess almost anywhere. My point is that when I fly Delta, pretty much everywhere in the world, I always seem to have a Sky Priority security line to go through. I find it odd that in Atlanta, their main hub, after clearing immigration and customs, Delta does not provide a Sky Priority lane for their most frequent travelers to go through when having to go be re-screened by U.S. security (i.e. TSA) for connecting flights after arriving from overseas.
As for Global Entry, no thanks. I am not going to pay the government for the privilege of having my fingerprints on file. I am one of those people who don't trust the government, and the less they know about me, the better.
My problem is not necessarily Customs/Immigration. I am well aware that they are a mess almost anywhere. My point is that when I fly Delta, pretty much everywhere in the world, I always seem to have a Sky Priority security line to go through. I find it odd that in Atlanta, their main hub, after clearing immigration and customs, Delta does not provide a Sky Priority lane for their most frequent travelers to go through when having to go be re-screened by U.S. security (i.e. TSA) for connecting flights after arriving from overseas.
As for Global Entry, no thanks. I am not going to pay the government for the privilege of having my fingerprints on file. I am one of those people who don't trust the government, and the less they know about me, the better.