Southwest v. Delta in ATL
#16
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MSP
Programs: Delta Gold, UA Plat. Hyatt Diamond, Marriott Plat. Hilton Plat. US Airways, Starwood Gold, Avis Pres
Posts: 1,382
I have done SW to ATL once. It was nice because coming from MSP the airport is MUCH easier on SW than Delta.
However, DELTA is way better because of the flight options. (times)
However, DELTA is way better because of the flight options. (times)
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
I firmly believe if you are looking for a less expensive fare you need to go to a market serviced by WN. Once WN is there the majors will match the fare or do better. If you are flying to two cities where there are not any LCC bank on it that the fares will be high. With WN going to ATL it will hurt DL's bottom line.
In the case of ATL, I doubt prices will drop much since DL & FL already compete head to head on many routes, at least not until the economy improves and capacity increases. The MSP-ATL tickets (DL) that I've bought the last couple years were pretty deeply discounted given the distance.
Last edited by MikeMpls; Sep 27, 2010 at 8:26 pm
#20
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta PlM, 1M
Posts: 6,363
I can only speak about a friend of mine that lives in ATL and flies DL only. He claims that DL is quite expensive and drives to Birmingham all the time to get his fare reduced.
I firmly believe if you are looking for a less expensive fare you need to go to a market serviced by WN. Once WN is there the majors will match the fare or do better. If you are flying to two cities where there are not any LCC bank on it that the fares will be high. With WN going to ATL it will hurt DL's bottom line.
I firmly believe if you are looking for a less expensive fare you need to go to a market serviced by WN. Once WN is there the majors will match the fare or do better. If you are flying to two cities where there are not any LCC bank on it that the fares will be high. With WN going to ATL it will hurt DL's bottom line.
Air Tran has it's hub in ATL, not Southwest.
I also live in ATL and the flights out of Birmingham are more expensive now (years ago your post was correct).
If this goes though it will be bad for ATL flyers and good for DL's bottom line.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Air Tran is the LCC, not Southwest.
Air Tran has it's hub in ATL, not Southwest.
I also live in ATL and the flights out of Birmingham are more expensive now (years ago your post was correct).
If this goes though it will be bad for ATL flyers and good for DL's bottom line.
Air Tran has it's hub in ATL, not Southwest.
I also live in ATL and the flights out of Birmingham are more expensive now (years ago your post was correct).
If this goes though it will be bad for ATL flyers and good for DL's bottom line.
I doubt ATL will be a consideration since WN does not now serve ATL. They are not consolidating the services of two current competitors at ATL.
It really depends on your perspective. From mine (MSP) WN is very much a LCC. My "normal" fares to CHI & STL have dropped 60% since the "Southwest effect" took place here, and sometimes when they have fare sales the savings is 80% in comparison to how we used to be gouged.
#23
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta PlM, 1M
Posts: 6,363
Whatever ....
I doubt ATL will be a consideration since WN does not now serve ATL. They are not consolidating the services of two current competitors at ATL.
It really depends on your perspective. From mine (MSP) WN is very much a LCC. My "normal" fares to CHI & STL have dropped 60% since the "Southwest effect" took place here, and sometimes when they have fare sales the savings is 80% in comparison to how we used to be gouged.
I doubt ATL will be a consideration since WN does not now serve ATL. They are not consolidating the services of two current competitors at ATL.
It really depends on your perspective. From mine (MSP) WN is very much a LCC. My "normal" fares to CHI & STL have dropped 60% since the "Southwest effect" took place here, and sometimes when they have fare sales the savings is 80% in comparison to how we used to be gouged.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
When the merger is reviewed for anti-trust issues, they won't even blink at ATL, since WN currently has no operations in ATL. ATL will be a non-issue as far as the merger is concerned.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Whatever ....
I doubt ATL will be a consideration since WN does not now serve ATL. They are not consolidating the services of two current competitors at ATL.
It really depends on your perspective. From mine (MSP) WN is very much a LCC. My "normal" fares to CHI & STL have dropped 60% since the "Southwest effect" took place here, and sometimes when they have fare sales the savings is 80% in comparison to how we used to be gouged.
I doubt ATL will be a consideration since WN does not now serve ATL. They are not consolidating the services of two current competitors at ATL.
It really depends on your perspective. From mine (MSP) WN is very much a LCC. My "normal" fares to CHI & STL have dropped 60% since the "Southwest effect" took place here, and sometimes when they have fare sales the savings is 80% in comparison to how we used to be gouged.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Yep. Fares won't move at all in either direction (in ATL). The competition already exists.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,683
#28
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: East Coast
Programs: Delta Silver Medallion
Posts: 60
ok friends, get this:
SWA is blah. I've stopped flying them since 2009 because they dont really take measures to ensure the ride is enjoyable. I've had so many problems with my ears popping/clogging during landings because SWA does not pressurize their cabins properly.
Oh, and read this (from CNN.com article):
"SWA is the creeping cancer of the air, old aircraft, shoddy maintenance, hidden fees. Bags fly free? Total lie. Right before the started that ad campaign, they raised their fares across the board to hide bag fees. You're now paying a bag fee on SWA even if you don't have a bag to check."
That is VERY true. I see that they charge like $271 for ONE-WAY ticket from LGA to LAX. Are you freakin' kidding me? $271?!?!!? how is that LOW cost? Obviously the baggage-fees are built-in so nobody thinks that they are being charged. it's a very clever business trick.
Also, let's play the mergers/acquisitions (who marries who) game:
Delta/Northwest
America West/US Airways
ValuJet ---> AirTran (rebranding)
Southwest/AirTran
United/Continental
and maybe in the next few years: American Airlines/US Airways.
This is not a good sign for consumers. People should not be applauding these mergers. Price competition will drop.
Also, the Dept of Justice needs to ramp it up with being more strict on these mergers. They really don't have the consumer in mind.
I am totally against the SWA/AirTran acquisition.
SWA is blah. I've stopped flying them since 2009 because they dont really take measures to ensure the ride is enjoyable. I've had so many problems with my ears popping/clogging during landings because SWA does not pressurize their cabins properly.
Oh, and read this (from CNN.com article):
"SWA is the creeping cancer of the air, old aircraft, shoddy maintenance, hidden fees. Bags fly free? Total lie. Right before the started that ad campaign, they raised their fares across the board to hide bag fees. You're now paying a bag fee on SWA even if you don't have a bag to check."
That is VERY true. I see that they charge like $271 for ONE-WAY ticket from LGA to LAX. Are you freakin' kidding me? $271?!?!!? how is that LOW cost? Obviously the baggage-fees are built-in so nobody thinks that they are being charged. it's a very clever business trick.
Also, let's play the mergers/acquisitions (who marries who) game:
Delta/Northwest
America West/US Airways
ValuJet ---> AirTran (rebranding)
Southwest/AirTran
United/Continental
and maybe in the next few years: American Airlines/US Airways.
This is not a good sign for consumers. People should not be applauding these mergers. Price competition will drop.
Also, the Dept of Justice needs to ramp it up with being more strict on these mergers. They really don't have the consumer in mind.
I am totally against the SWA/AirTran acquisition.
#29
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FLL
Programs: DL ♦M MM|HH♦|Marr Slvr|CO UA AA US|Pri Cub Plat|SPG|Avis 1st|Htz 5*
Posts: 5,044
I firmly believe if you are looking for a less expensive fare you need to go to a market serviced by WN. Once WN is there the majors will match the fare or do better. If you are flying to two cities where there are not any LCC bank on it that the fares will be high. With WN going to ATL it will hurt DL's bottom line.
Amen to that. What happened to putting a stop to "too big to fail"? Airlines are following the banking model. When the next crisis occurs DL and their giant ilk will line up to congress for a bailout and hold the threat of an economic meltdown over their heads unless they (congress) comes through.
#30
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: South Carolina
Programs: Delta FO
Posts: 313
As for the bag fees, perhaps delta will eliminate/reduce them to match wn. I doubt delta would lower them systemwide, but it could be done on routes in direct competition with wn.
Keep in mind the network effects. Supposing fares/routes stay the same out of atl, travelers will be more attracted to wn than fl standing alone.
I'm hoping delta offers a sky miles promotion out of atl, ala the stl, bna, pit,...deal.
Keep in mind the network effects. Supposing fares/routes stay the same out of atl, travelers will be more attracted to wn than fl standing alone.
I'm hoping delta offers a sky miles promotion out of atl, ala the stl, bna, pit,...deal.