Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SkyMiles to be based on dollars spent?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2010, 11:36 am
  #166  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 5,292
TL2000

TL2000 - the best post I have read on Flyertalk. You are SPOT-ON.

These sub 5000 posers complain about service in first class, etc. and how it has declined. It has declined because it is upgrade class for cheapskate elites. Sure it is all done "by their rules", but it is also people greedily .......izing the rules to accomplish what they want. Revenue base this program, Delta! Solve your problems and return to what you were.
bubbashow is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 12:33 pm
  #167  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Programs: Delta-Diamond Medallion, United-Premier 1K, Hilton-Gold, SPG-Gold, National-Executive, Hertz-Preside
Posts: 365
Program, not miles

Originally Posted by Exiled in Express
What percentage of the Skymiles minted currently come from flying versus partners and AMEX spending? I think we may already be there.
He specifically says "Frequent Flyer PROGRAMS". The program for Delta is Medallion level. You can spend $1M a year on your Amex or any other kind of miles accumulation method and it's not going to go towards MQMs.
mfullmer is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 1:00 pm
  #168  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kingdom of the Sun
Programs: DL GM/MM
Posts: 3,708
Originally Posted by runninaway
That might be fine logic for selecting Coke over Pepsi, but for something like this, Delta would be well served to expand beyond their regionalism if they truely aspire to have a global customer base.
Yeah ... until they run out of petty cash...
Pharaoh is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 1:58 pm
  #169  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Originally Posted by pbarnette
Let's be honest, the complaints are not that DL went with a regional bank, but that they went with a different regional bank than NW used.
It's also unlikely that DL & US Bank would kiss & make up after DL's aborted lawsuit over FlexPerks, esp. given that US Bank continues to market FlexPerks quite agressively.
MikeMpls is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 2:39 pm
  #170  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW
Programs: Marriott Life Titanium, Hilton Diamond, United Silver, DL, IHG Plat, etc.
Posts: 2,888
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
It's also unlikely that DL & US Bank would kiss & make up after DL's aborted lawsuit over FlexPerks, esp. given that US Bank continues to market FlexPerks quite agressively.
Not sure how this impacts the basis of Skymiles but I'll say that NEITHER US Bank nor Suntrust is a good choice. Why does the #1 airline have to choose a bank that doesn't even reach the 5 most populous states in the US. Its like asking a toy poodle to pull a chariot. If they are going to have a debit card bankign partner it should be a truly national bank like BofA or Wells Fargo.
pmaddock is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 3:01 pm
  #171  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by pmaddock
Not sure how this impacts the basis of Skymiles but I'll say that NEITHER US Bank nor Suntrust is a good choice. Why does the #1 airline have to choose a bank that doesn't even reach the 5 most populous states in the US. Its like asking a toy poodle to pull a chariot. If they are going to have a debit card bankign partner it should be a truly national bank like BofA or Wells Fargo.
Even BofA doesn't serve every hub market. Wells Fargo does better, but even they don't cover DTW or CVG, and they also don't cover BOS, which is a decent-sized market.

Let's face it... NO bank has enough retail presence to be called national, much less global. Wells Fargo would probably be the top choice, but every contender has holes in their network.
pbarnette is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 3:41 pm
  #172  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW
Programs: Marriott Life Titanium, Hilton Diamond, United Silver, DL, IHG Plat, etc.
Posts: 2,888
Originally Posted by pbarnette
Even BofA doesn't serve every hub market. Wells Fargo does better, but even they don't cover DTW or CVG, and they also don't cover BOS, which is a decent-sized market.

Let's face it... NO bank has enough retail presence to be called national, much less global. Wells Fargo would probably be the top choice, but every contender has holes in their network.
Actually there are now 3 banks with presence in all 50 states - Chase, Citi, and BofA. Just google "bank in all 50 states'. I was wrong to offer Wells in my earlier post. Also, I suspect that this status is only recently achieved due to the various buyouts of the last finiancial crisis.

However, you made me look further - you can't get a single bank with branches close to all 6 hubs (dang MEM - Chase had the rest). There are definitely better options than SunTrust though.

I guess this is why NWA didn't have an exclusive on Debit cards - they had deals with both US Bank and Comerica.

Last edited by pmaddock; Jun 1, 2010 at 3:51 pm
pmaddock is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 4:04 pm
  #173  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Posts: 9,995
Originally Posted by pbarnette
Even BofA doesn't serve every hub market. Wells Fargo does better, but even they don't cover DTW or CVG, and they also don't cover BOS, which is a decent-sized market.

Let's face it... NO bank has enough retail presence to be called national, much less global. Wells Fargo would probably be the top choice, but every contender has holes in their network.
FWIW, Wells Fargo is one of the biggest banking chains in SLC, but BofA has no bricks-and-mortar presence here. (BofA tried a couple of times, but never hard enough, and thus both times ending up withdrawing from the market.) Chase is a major chain here and US Bank is also but neither to the extent of Wells Fargo. Obviously, SunTrust has no presence here at all.
amanuensis is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 4:10 pm
  #174  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Posts: 9,995
Originally Posted by pmaddock
Actually there are now 3 banks with presence in all 50 states - Chase, Citi, and BofA. Just google "bank in all 50 states'. I was wrong to offer Wells in my earlier post. Also, I suspect that this status is only recently achieved due to the various buyouts of the last finiancial crisis.

However, you made me look further - you can't get a single bank with branches close to all 6 hubs (dang MEM - Chase had the rest). There are definitely better options than SunTrust though.

I guess this is why NWA didn't have an exclusive on Debit cards - they had deals with both US Bank and Comerica.
Citi might have loan offices here in SLC, but no consumer banking branches. Same as with BofA. No consumer banking branches. When I googled "bank in all 50 states" all I got were spam links on the first page of results.
amanuensis is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 5:44 pm
  #175  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: check swarm
Programs: DL DM & 2MM, SPG/Bonvoid LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, $tarbucks Titanium
Posts: 14,404
Originally Posted by n301dp

Set SkyPriority at a $10,000 spend threshold for individuals...it'd make more sense than the current lumping of GM and above.
I agree that the top tier should be at least partially based on spend

Originally Posted by MikeMpls

The competition will clean Delta's clock if they do anything this stupid. We've already seen both UA & CO realign their programs to attract Delta's disenchanted customers. Expect more of the same if this radical proposal take place.

Hauenstein is the head beancounter. If you think SkyMiles has gone downhill lately, it appears he's only just begun.
You got that right. A lot of the things we complain about can be traced to Hauenstein. While he may be brilliant at counting beans, he knows nothing about marketing, loyalty or consumer behavior.

Originally Posted by BobRoss
Agreed. I don't see per $ being the primary source of status being accepted by ANY airline passengers (not in the near-term). However, I do see value in making a different tier of status based on rev/profit/whatever. Just like we can earn status via MQMs and MQS independently, I would not be surprised (nor worried) if we had a third way via total passenger spend (I just wanted to use TPS acronym - or some other $-based calculation).
I agree a hybrid approach is the way to go. DL can't just fire the sLUT crowd and expect to keep it's loads.

Originally Posted by Spiff
The 0.5 MQM for inSULT fares cost Delta a lot of passengers when the other carriers did not join in on that poor decision. Hopefully no other carrier would also consider such a move.
One upside is that a disaster of such a decision might be the end of Hauenstein and his anti-consumer actions at Dulta.

(I understand that he played a role in things like fake cheese and taking shortcuts on the IT systems.)
itsaboutthejourney is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 5:48 pm
  #176  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW
Programs: Marriott Life Titanium, Hilton Diamond, United Silver, DL, IHG Plat, etc.
Posts: 2,888
Originally Posted by amanuensis
Citi might have loan offices here in SLC, but no consumer banking branches. Same as with BofA. No consumer banking branches. When I googled "bank in all 50 states" all I got were spam links on the first page of results.
Odd - when I googled that the first result was:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc..._n5hGsBGw8wa3A

I did go ahead and google map each of the 6 hubs. Only Chase had something within 10 miles of each save MEM. Chase is in TN but not near MEM. Not that DL would deal with Chase although Chase doesn't seem to mind having multiple competing partners (e.g. IHG and Marriott). Chances are DL had to get sign-off from Amex on a 'non threatening' bank at the credit card level.

Back to topic - so what's the feeling - is there really any word that DL might re-establish some form of EP/White enveolope based on spend? Clearly some here would prefer a program revamp but I just don't see that in the cards because:

1. Amex is issuing MQM in signficant quantity and Amex has DL by the financial shorthairs. Any attempt to re-negotiate would probably open DL to an unpleasant discussion about how much Amex should be paying for a Skymile.
2. The current program is basically 'new' and has all the overhead created by Rollover. Changing out the foundation would be very messy.
3. Even if DL did want to change things they clearly have a deficit of people that can execute major implementations. Apparently the merger has burnt them out. The Award engine is a mess, they are slipping on various start dates, and so on. I don't think they can do anything right now save some sort of low volume program driven by special manual care processes. An EP could be run that way though.

Last edited by pmaddock; Jun 1, 2010 at 5:53 pm
pmaddock is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 5:48 pm
  #177  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: HY
Programs: AA-EXP (3.3MM), AAirpass, SQ-PPS Solitaire, DL-PM (.777MM), SPG-Plat, HH-D
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted by Nelumbo
http://travelne.us/05152010/delta/05152010deltap2.html
From the excerpt of this interview by Bob Weiss, DL Executive VP Glen Hauenstein "addressed an important change that may be coming to the airline industry in the next few year and expects to see frequent flyer programs to be based on dollars spent, rather than miles flown by passengers."
It would be interesting to see how the flying patterns of DL elites change in cope with this, in a few years though.
This would be awesome. Look forward to it. ^
psyflyer is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 6:27 pm
  #178  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
There might be some twisted entertainment value in seeing DL management doing this "SkyMiles based on dollars spent, rather than miles flown by passengers" approach.

Get your popcorn ready, DL management wrecks even that which is well enough left alone.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 7:00 pm
  #179  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MCO
Programs: DL DM/MM, Marriott Plat Premier, HH Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 4,081
Originally Posted by GUWonder
There might be some twisted entertainment value in seeing DL management doing this "SkyMiles based on dollars spent, rather than miles flown by passengers" approach.

Get your popcorn ready, DL management wrecks even that which is well enough left alone.
But we already have SM based on $$. I interpreted his comment to be directed at MQMs, not SMs. Under his idea, it seems all elite levels would be based on $$, not miles flown.

If DL wants to add yet another level based on $$, so be it. Maybe they would be DM+ or something like that. I think his floating an idea that $$ would apply to all elite levels is what's creating the firestorm. Of course, we don't know what those levels would look like so everything here is just speculation. But hey, that's part of the fun.
Sez_Who is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2010, 7:39 pm
  #180  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Posts: 9,995
Originally Posted by pmaddock
Odd - when I googled that the first result was:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc..._n5hGsBGw8wa3A
When I did the search, I used quotation marks around the phrase; retrying the phrase now without the quotes gave me your results.

Anyhow, the answer to the question is simply wrong; neither Citi nor BofA has what I consider to be "banks" in Salt Lake City. The significance of this of course derives from the fact that SLC is a Delta hub.

I strongly suspect that there are a lot of other states where BofA and/or Citi do not have "banks". And the asker of the e-how question was asking about "banks" not about ATM networks, etc. From the Citi and BofA websites, I see that there are ATMs in Salt Lake City that their customers can use without fees, but those ATMs are owned by third parties.
amanuensis is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.