![]() |
Possible Return to Cruising
Light at the end of the tunnel?
I'm willing to get underway and 'sea' how it goes.. Hopefully fair winds and following seas. CDC 'committed' to U.S. cruise industry resuming operations by mid-summer The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is "committed" to the resumption of cruise industry passenger operations in the United States by mid-summer, the agency said on Wednesday, announcing new steps to speed approvals. |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 33213688)
Light at the end of the tunnel?
I'm willing to get underway and 'sea' how it goes.. Hopefully fair winds and following seas. CDC 'committed' to U.S. cruise industry resuming operations by mid-summer |
Originally Posted by Randyk47
(Post 33213779)
Wonder if this will have any impact on Canada to open their ports and waters to the bigger cruise ships? There doesn’t seem to be any traction in Congress to waive provisions of the PVSA so the Alaskan season will not happen even if other US based cruises start up in July.
|
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 33213878)
Would seem that a waiver of PVSA should be possible. Would a Seattle, Alaska, Seattle itinerary be reasonable?
|
I really see no harm of sailing through Canadian waters if not docking. If a ship did dock for an emergency easy enough to quarantine the entire ship.
How other countries welcome ships back will determine how successful the resumption of cruising will be. Maybe Canada is just PO'd with America for not sending more vaccine their way. |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 33215037)
I really see no harm of sailing through Canadian waters if not docking. If a ship did dock for an emergency easy enough to quarantine the entire ship.
How other countries welcome ships back will determine how successful the resumption of cruising will be. Maybe Canada is just PO'd with America for not sending more vaccine their way. |
Originally Posted by Randyk47
(Post 33213779)
Wonder if this will have any impact on Canada to open their ports and waters to the bigger cruise ships?
Originally Posted by Randyk47
(Post 33215117)
Canada actually doing fairly well now with vaccines
|
The issue that hasn't been addressed is where the crew (at least the non-European big wigs) will get their vaccines from.
|
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 33215037)
I really see no harm of sailing through Canadian waters if not docking. If a ship did dock for an emergency easy enough to quarantine the entire ship.
How other countries welcome ships back will determine how successful the resumption of cruising will be. Maybe Canada is just PO'd with America for not sending more vaccine their way. https://www.canada.ca/en/transport-c...e-vessels.html Minister of Transport, the Honourable Omar Alghabra, announced two new Interim Orders, which prohibit pleasure craft in Canadian Arctic waters and cruise vessels in all Canadian waters until February 28, 2022. This means:
|
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 33215575)
If you think that, you haven't been paying attention. BC is under severe restrictions until at least the end of May, and we still have to wait four months for our second shots.
|
Originally Posted by Randyk47
(Post 33216186)
I was going by this article. https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/corona...hots-1.5247509
|
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 33216119)
Canada's ban on cruise ships carrying over 100 people is scheduled to be in place until February 22, 2022 and applies to Canadian waters not just ports.
https://www.canada.ca/en/transport-c...e-vessels.html The ban pre-dates America loaning Canada a million doses of Astra Zeneca, a vaccine that is not approved by the FDA and is prohibited for use in America. |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 33217320)
It's understood that Canada has banned cruise ships from their ports and waters until some later date. I was wondering what harm would be caused by a transiting ship with no scheduled port calls?
|
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 33217422)
No harm would be done but sovereign nations typically do not take kindly to foreign vessels violating their territorial waters when they've been told to stay out. Spain tried it in the 90's on Canada's east coast and one of their ships was fired upon and seized.
|
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 33217460)
Not suggesting such action, just wondering why Canada would keep the transit restriction in place if the U.S. resumes cruising. Nothing more! I'm not suggesting that they open their ports. In a transit from the U.S. mainland to Alaska the inside passage is the safest route. While I'm confident cruise ships can tolerate heavy weather I'm not so sure about the passengers. Removing the transit option seems heavy handed and unnecessary in my opinion.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:45 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.