![]() |
Cruising on a freighter?
Are freighters still accepting passengers in this post 9-11 world? Chris Buckley wrote a wonderful book, Steaming to Bamboola, many years ago, and it sounded so interesting in an offbeat way.
|
At least 3 lines. Biggest one is probably CMA-CGM (taking pax is a policy of the company's founder and there's no security- screw 9/11 and all that security cr@p) with some 75 ships that take passengers (grand total of <1,000 pax a year). Other lines that do include Hanjin and Hamburg Sued.
See the thread about trans-oceanic crossing a page or two back. |
duplicate removed
|
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
(Post 26606750)
See the thread about trans-oceanic crossing a page or two back.
YVR Cockroach's trip report linked in that thread is amazing. |
YVR Cockroach's main thread - http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trip-...dai-china.html
My TR from a long ago freighter cruise - http://gardyloo.us/freighter.htm |
One hazard of travelling on a freighter is being stuck due to port strikes, or, as a recent example, the line's bankruptcy. Hanjin, a Korean line (owned by the same corporate parent as KE FWIW), went insolvent over the weekend stranding the goods, crew and possibly passengers on 85 ships. You still have to pay even if stranded onboard!
|
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
(Post 27175971)
One hazard of travelling on a freighter is being stuck due to port strikes, or, as a recent example, the line's bankruptcy. Hanjin, a Korean line (owned by the same corporate parent as KE FWIW), went insolvent over the weekend stranding the goods, crew and possibly passengers on 85 ships. You still have to pay even if stranded onboard!
Freighter travel interests me. The joys of sea travel minus the odious "cruise culture." |
Article in the NYT about this recently:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/tr...minnesota.html
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 27177469)
Freighter travel interests me. The joys of sea travel minus the odious "cruise culture."
|
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 27177469)
You can face the same risk if there's an airport strike or if an airline goes bankrupt.
Freighter travel interests me. The joys of sea travel minus the odious "cruise culture." |
Originally Posted by KevinDTW
(Post 27177506)
Article in the NYT about this recently:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/21/tr...minnesota.html Agree completely; the Great Lakes cruise in the article looks very interesting. |
Originally Posted by Badenoch
(Post 27177469)
You can face the same risk if there's an airport strike or if an airline goes bankrupt.
|
Here's a story of being stuck onboard a freighter of a bankrupt line. Ship is moored outside Japan's territorial waters. Helicopter charter, anyone?
http://vancouversun.com/news/nationa...food-and-water Another Hanjin ship was stranded outside YPR's container port for over a week. http://www.thenorthernview.com/news/392451351.html |
Originally Posted by YVR Cockroach
(Post 27178012)
Difference is, you may not be able to get off the ship, and the airlines don't keep charging you the extra time you are onboard. The Hanjin ships are just anchored off shore as no ports want to take them in case they don't get paid.
|
And how does a brat survive without internet service on board a freighter?
|
Strand Travel in the UK used to do it but they've just retired.
This company supposedly does it http://www.cruisepeople.co.uk/ |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:21 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.