![]() |
Originally Posted by WHBM
(Post 17821743)
Starting to see the financial impact.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16573283 That doesn't seem to tell all the story I can't believe anyone from the shipping company can remotely contemplate getting the vessel back up again and restored to service from this position. They do have a $30 million insurance deductible on the ship, but who knows if the salvage is part of that, or just the refit. I think the $85-95 million they are talking about is just loss of use of the ship for the remainder of this fiscal year, ending Nov 30, but doesn't include the impact this will have on people deciding not to cruise, especially in Europe and especially on Costa. The share price is down around it's 52 week low this morning, which makes a nice buying opportunity, especially for people who cruise the Carnival brands frequently and want to take advantage of the shareholder benefit. |
I am sure they will fix it up again.
I would also guess that it would be assigned to another line, I think Italians are way too superstitious to get back on it (after all when it was christened, the champagne bottle did not break, so the ship was doomed according to my in laws) Then again, given that the entire crew pretty much was no where to be found according to many of the passenger reports I don't know why anybody would book Costa, but that's another issue One would hope the cruise lines put in monitors to see where their ships are, and when they go off course. Supposedly there would have been alarms in the bridge when it went off course, those should be transmitted to operations so they can be involved earlier and not leave all the decision making to one person whose competence is most certainly questionable. |
You can't fix that up.
Look at the Herald of Free Enterprise, just capsized onto sand, didn't strike anything or do structural damage, yet that was scrapped, and when righted and being towed to the breakers yard the structure nearly broke up. This one has a ripped hull down one side, goodness knows (yet) what damage on the other side, which is laying on rocks, and all the internals and fitout, propulsion machinery, etc ruined by saltwater. Plus nobody will want to buy it. I hear there's a more active sea moving in to the area which will roll it around over the rocks, the end for any ship's structure. I think Italians are way too superstitious to get back on it (after all when it was christened, the champagne bottle did not break, so the ship was doomed according to my in laws) |
The ship costs $600M and was in service for only 5 years, so of course it'll be repaired.
And likely renamed, because I doubt they'll want the name Costa Concordia repeated after recommissioning. |
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 17822711)
I would also guess that it would be assigned to another line, I think Italians are way too superstitious to get back on it (after all when it was christened, the champagne bottle did not break, so the ship was doomed according to my in laws)
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 17822711)
Then again, given that the entire crew pretty much was no where to be found according to many of the passenger reports I don't know why anybody would book Costa, but that's another issue
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 17822711)
One would hope the cruise lines put in monitors to see where their ships are, and when they go off course. Supposedly there would have been alarms in the bridge when it went off course, those should be transmitted to operations so they can be involved earlier and not leave all the decision making to one person whose competence is most certainly questionable.
|
Well the guy from Lloyds insurance (probably knows more than all of us here added together) says it's pretty certainly a total loss.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16584075 |
I'd say anybody who isn't actually on site is just making a WAG (wild-assed guess) as to whether Concordia will be repaired or scrapped.
|
Originally Posted by WHBM
(Post 17823752)
Well the guy from Lloyds insurance (probably knows more than all of us here added together) says it's pretty certainly a total loss.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16584075 |
It's too early to tell what they will do with it, nobody can say until they get a detailed look. The primary concern from that I've read over the next two weeks will be to get all the fluids off the ship before they ruin the ocean there.
One story said it's totally possible they can weld giant plates over the hole, pump out the water, and tow it away. In the same story it also said they may bring in a bunch of people with torches and cut it into little pieces and haul it off for salvage. I'm betting they will repair it, but it's a total guess. |
Partial transcript of today's news conference with Pier Luigi Foschi, chairman and chief executive officer of Costa Crociere, parent company of Costa Cruises:
http://cruiseradio.net/costa-concord...ce-transcript/ |
Originally Posted by JNelson113
(Post 17812156)
I'm at a complete loss for how this could happen! With all the sophisticated navigational equipment, really, how? Absolutely horrifying.
|
A co-worker mentioned to me today that a friend of his had just recently started a new job as a crew member on the Concordia. They have been in touch since the accident so the friend did get off the boat safely.
Small world..... |
Originally Posted by cordelli
(Post 17824360)
One story said it's totally possible they can weld giant plates over the hole, pump out the water, and tow it away. In the same story it also said they may bring in a bunch of people with torches and cut it into little pieces and haul it off for salvage. I'm betting they will repair it, but it's a total guess. Thinking back to cheesy movies of my youth, like Airport 70-something and Raise The Titanic, I wonder if they can put big balloons under the starboard side of the ship, inflate those and tilt the ship back up on it's keel, allowing the water to settle into the lower levels of the ship, where it can then be pumped out. I'm positive there is going to be a documetary on this, and I can't wait to see it. |
Originally Posted by DanJ
(Post 17827713)
Thinking back to cheesy movies of my youth, like Airport 70-something and Raise The Titanic, I wonder if they can put big balloons under the starboard side of the ship, inflate those and tilt the ship back up on it's keel, allowing the water to settle into the lower levels of the ship, where it can then be pumped out. I'm positive there is going to be a documetary on this, and I can't wait to see it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16573312 |
Originally Posted by dodo
(Post 17828876)
Looks like what they are looking at according to the BBC
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:14 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.