Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN or Signature) [2017>]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jan 16, 2017, 10:23 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: serpens


Older (archived) threads:
2012-2015 2016

What is EMV?
EMV is a standard for smart (or integrated-circuit, or chip) cards and the devices that can accept them. The standards are maintained by EMVCo and based on ISO 7816 (or ISO 14443 for contactless).

These cards come in two flavours: contact and contactless. Examples below:
----------------------------------------------------------

Notice the contactless indicator on the right-hand side (it looks like a sideways Wi-Fi symbol). It may also be found on the back of the card (for example, on the back of the new Costco credit card).


Where can I get a chip card?

Hawaiian717 operates a website with crowd-sourced information about various cards. You can adjust the search parameters to see cards with contactless, have PIN-primary authentication, etc.

Which businesses accept chip cards?

tmiw operates a website, also primarily crowd-sourced, that tracks chip-enabled merchants on a map. You can see if a merchant supports PIN, contactless, Quick Chip, et al.

Why doesn't my chip card ask for a PIN?

This is likely because you have a signature-preferring card. At this time, PIN-preferring cards issued in the US are rare. Not many financial institutions offer them; most of them instead provide Chip-and-Signature cards, which are programmed to prefer signature over PIN, if the card supports PIN at all.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?

To the cardholder, the only major difference is how they authenticate themselves at the point of sale. The cardholder inserts their card as normal; instead of signing a screen or receipt, they will be asked to enter their PIN on the keypad.

[spoiler]

A few financial institutions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees.

Why no PIN? (cont.)
American debit cards are unique because they are psuedo-PIN-preferring cards. which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN? (cont.)

Most cards issued in the US are programmed to prefer signature, so save very few instances, they will prompt for a signature (unless the merchant sets a signature waiver). A PIN may be necessary in countries with mostly PIN-preferring cards when using unattended terminals (such as pay-at-the-pump or mass transit). If the card has a PIN for backup verification or ATMs, then that PIN should work. Otherwise, the card will be rejected. If the card is rejected, then either a.) the transaction must be performed by an attendant or b.) an alternative payment method will be required.

Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM (Cardholder Verification Method) as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.


I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.


There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote its capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.

In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s, and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the de-facto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN or Signature) [2017>]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2018, 10:47 am
  #3616  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by Majuki
I don't know if it's necessarily a comfort level versus not bothering to setup a signature waiver for only certain transactions. If the signature requirement goes away completely I could see more businesses formally removing the signature line. My only concern overseas would be situations of DCC where there is zero opportunity to dispute based on a signature receipt. Visa would have to update its rules. MC is already more permissive on the issue, having a buyer's remorse opt out of DCC, at least in theory.
On that note, I know of one business whose limit is set to $5. I'm not sure if this is something the merchant selected or if it's a processor decision (they used Clover at the time I found this out). If the former, they may not get rid of it at all.

Also, I wonder if DCC may be a factor in why only AmEx seems to be waiving signature globally. No need to really change the rules when you still need to sign in Europe and elsewhere.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2018, 1:06 pm
  #3617  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,060
Originally Posted by tmiw
Also, I wonder if DCC may be a factor in why only AmEx seems to be waiving signature globally. No need to really change the rules when you still need to sign in Europe and elsewhere.
I would think it would be more than DCC. AmEx is a closed network versus Visa and MC who provide the payment network but don't issue cards themselves. Also think about the scrutiny signatures receive overseas versus in North America, so it makes sense to eliminate the signature collection requirement here when nobody is checking them anyway. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe AmEx still issues signature preferring cards in some markets that are predominantly chip-and-PIN? If that is the case, it might be a motivation for AmEx versus the other payment networks.
Majuki is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2018, 3:51 pm
  #3618  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Programs: BA Gold (OWE), Star Alliance Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,194
Something interesting I've noticed is that my US Amex card on my Canadian Samsung phone supports EMV on Samsung Pay. I guess this makes some sense as my UK Nationwide cc supports the MST on my phone as well (even though MST isn't turned on in the UK on Samsung Pay). It uses SDA (instead of DDA) though so will only work in offline mode on transit (and nowhere else)
reclusive46 is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2018, 5:43 pm
  #3619  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by Majuki
I would think it would be more than DCC. AmEx is a closed network versus Visa and MC who provide the payment network but don't issue cards themselves. Also think about the scrutiny signatures receive overseas versus in North America, so it makes sense to eliminate the signature collection requirement here when nobody is checking them anyway. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe AmEx still issues signature preferring cards in some markets that are predominantly chip-and-PIN? If that is the case, it might be a motivation for AmEx versus the other payment networks.
I'm not sure signature preference in other markets will have much of an impact considering that contactless payment has also begun to take over in many of those same markets. This is really for the benefit of domestic transactions, IMO.

Thinking more, this might be pretty good from a PR standpoint; people will think we've "caught up" by getting rid of signature without really having to change much in the way of how things are done in the US. On top of that, people might not have to sign for Apple/Google Pay transactions anymore, which is one of the biggest complaints besides merchant availability.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2018, 5:49 pm
  #3620  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Programs: BA Gold (OWE), Star Alliance Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,194
Originally Posted by tmiw
I'm not sure signature preference in other markets will have much of an impact considering that contactless payment has also begun to take over in many of those same markets. This is really for the benefit of domestic transactions, IMO.

Thinking more, this might be pretty good from a PR standpoint; people will think we've "caught up" by getting rid of signature without really having to change much in the way of how things are done in the US. On top of that, people might not have to sign for Apple/Google Pay transactions anymore, which is one of the biggest complaints besides merchant availability.
I'm not sure how they're going to market this to chip and signature users of cards in places like the UK where they issue some C&S cards (for those with disabilities or who request one and corporate cardholders) as they'll now have to essentially market it as chip and no security (Maybe they'll market it as pin suppressed instead to make it not sound as bad?). I can also imagine some merchants being confused if they insert someones card, it asks for no pin and there is no signature line on the terminal (hopefully acquirers program their terminal to print 'NO SIGNATURE REQUIRED" on the bottom). Some terminals in the UK on Amex cards don't ask for signatures for under £30 transactions (usually with small merchants who have standalone terminals), so I imagine it'll probably be rolled out.
reclusive46 is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2018, 6:14 pm
  #3621  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by reclusive46
I'm not sure how they're going to market this to chip and signature users of cards in places like the UK where they issue some C&S cards (for those with disabilities or who request one and corporate cardholders) as they'll now have to essentially market it as chip and no security (Maybe they'll market it as pin suppressed instead to make it not sound as bad?). I can also imagine some merchants being confused if they insert someones card, it asks for no pin and there is no signature line on the terminal (hopefully acquirers program their terminal to print 'NO SIGNATURE REQUIRED" on the bottom). Some terminals in the UK on Amex cards don't ask for signatures for under £30 transactions (usually with small merchants who have standalone terminals), so I imagine it'll probably be rolled out.
Keep in mind that waiving signature isn't a mandate, even if allowed in a particular country; there are still a lot of places in the US that ask for $5-10 purchases, for instance. However, if some/most acquirers in e.g. the UK get on board, there might still be decent (though probably not 100%) adoption simply due to most merchants not having much control over their terminals.

As for marketing, I imagine they could just say "some merchants may not ask for signature but rest assured, your card is still safe".
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2018, 8:09 pm
  #3622  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
While it is unlikely I will ever be visiting the UK again, what always bugged me was going into say Boots, making a purchase of say of £2.10, being directed to a self service machine, scanning my item, inserting my chipped card and getting the message seek assistance and then waiting for some clerk to get off his or her whatever and enter a code for a sales slip to print, have me sign and even check the signatures match! How dumb. Perhaps that will change now. And there is a way to bring this to a head. Simply remove the signature panels from newly issued cards! (But then again there are merchants, I suppose, who will begin requiring ID!) Oh yes, and they will charge me 5p for a bag to carry it out!
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2018, 3:18 am
  #3623  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
While it is unlikely I will ever be visiting the UK again, what always bugged me was going into say Boots, making a purchase of say of £2.10, being directed to a self service machine, scanning my item, inserting my chipped card and getting the message seek assistance and then waiting for some clerk to get off his or her whatever and enter a code for a sales slip to print, have me sign and even check the signatures match! How dumb. Perhaps that will change now. And there is a way to bring this to a head. Simply remove the signature panels from newly issued cards! (But then again there are merchants, I suppose, who will begin requiring ID!) Oh yes, and they will charge me 5p for a bag to carry it out!
I dunno, I just used Apple Pay for nearly everything when I was in the UK a couple of months ago and had no issues. Mobile devices or contactless cards seem like an easier solution to me.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2018, 3:05 pm
  #3624  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
PIN entry on mobile devices is now condoned by PCI. For what it's worth, I don't think there will be much impact in the US, but might be useful elsewhere.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2018, 3:50 pm
  #3625  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 306
Originally Posted by tmiw
PIN entry on mobile devices is now condoned by PCI. For what it's worth, I don't think there will be much impact in the US, but might be useful elsewhere.
Apple will be the biggest beneficiary of this change. They're probably the largest retailer that uses a mobile device almost exclusively as a POS device. Outside of the US, they place wired PIN pads throughout the store and try to hide them when not in use, and the sales reps would have to use both the iOS device to scan the items and then connect to one of the wired pin pads placed throughout the store to complete the transaction. Very ugly solution.

In Canada and possibly a few other countries they've adopted a special ingenico case that has both a chip reader and a pin pad built in. Now they would just need a case that has a chip reader.
B407 is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2018, 5:40 pm
  #3626  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by B407
Apple will be the biggest beneficiary of this change. They're probably the largest retailer that uses a mobile device almost exclusively as a POS device. Outside of the US, they place wired PIN pads throughout the store and try to hide them when not in use, and the sales reps would have to use both the iOS device to scan the items and then connect to one of the wired pin pads placed throughout the store to complete the transaction. Very ugly solution.

In Canada and possibly a few other countries they've adopted a special ingenico case that has both a chip reader and a pin pad built in. Now they would just need a case that has a chip reader.
Apple recently standardized on the US PIN pad setup throughout the world now, replacing the Ingenico and the wired PIN pads for other countries. The new setup is very nice, has all 3 payment types, and now allows EMV debit to work using common AID. The current US and Future-ROW setup is an iPhone 7 in a mophie case with a magnet, holding an Ingenico rPX ROAM terminal on the back. They can detach the two at will, and they use the camera to scan.

AT&T got new terminals too, Ingenico iSMP with color screens now that bluetooth to the same iPad Airs they had. The self service kiosk shows the contactless logo on an iSC 250, but then disappears and says "Coming in the future!" which is lame but at least you can Apple Pay for in person transactions. The kiosk however, does support EMV.

But with PIN on glass, I'm sure all of these MPOS setups will get something like a Square reader, but obviously more "enterprise grade"
RedLight2015 is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2018, 6:34 pm
  #3627  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 5
Maybe

Maybe it will, but the situation seems released a lot
veronaqqq is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2018, 6:50 pm
  #3628  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by B407
Apple will be the biggest beneficiary of this change.
Bigger companies are already using dedicated PIN pads/readers, though. I don't see Square for example going through the effort (assuming they haven't already done so) for the US versions of their devices when almost every card's chip and signature anyway. The one possible exception being if they wanted to get into debit acceptance, but nearly every US debit card also has a Visa/MC logo on it too.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2018, 7:01 pm
  #3629  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: *G^2, Bonvoyed, NEXUS
Posts: 3,516
Originally Posted by tmiw
I don't see Square for example going through the effort (assuming they haven't already done so) for the US versions of their devices when almost every card's chip and signature anyway. The one possible exception being if they wanted to get into debit acceptance, but nearly every US debit card also has a Visa/MC logo on it too.
Square was already operating under some 'pilot regulations' from the card networks that were a precursor to this to allow it to offer PIN support in other markets. They theoretically could enable support for PIN in the US, but I don't see the incentive from them to do so. Remember Square's business model is to charge merchants a flat fee and make money on the markup. If they process a debit card as Visa/MC, it is still cheaper for them than a credit card, but the merchant pays the same.

I'm more interested if Interac in Canada will allow this for their cards. They are very strict on PIN requirements and security.
D582 is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2018, 7:05 pm
  #3630  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SFO
Programs: *G^2, Bonvoyed, NEXUS
Posts: 3,516
Originally Posted by B407
Apple will be the biggest beneficiary of this change..
I doubt it. The target for this are companies like Square. A large company like Apple already isolates their payment infrastructure and systems from their core POS application. The last thing they are going to do is put back all of that payment logic into it, especially with EMV.
D582 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.