Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Old Feb 28, 2015, 12:43 pm
  #9916  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,501
Originally Posted by uds0
Any place that requested a pin would not accept this card's [cash advance or 0000] pin but did accept my Arrival+ (which has on+offline pin). My most recent experience (end of January 2015) continues to be that the Chase reps ALL flatly, emphatically, and repeated stated that the pin was ONLY for cash advances at ATMs. They also repeatedly declined to even guess at a possible pin implementation horizon.

With more and more pin capable (sadly virtually none pin priority except UN and First Tech FCU) cards becoming available, Chase (and BofA) should be getting serious pressure to get off their butts and fix this.
Sounds like you tried to use the CSP at an unattended kiosk, which is known to cause issues. "No CVM" is supposed to be accepted at such terminals within a year IIRC but as we've seen in the US, there will probably be a few that won't be ready by the deadline. Could it be possible that Chase no longer feels the need to implement PIN because of the Visa mandate?

That said, if Visa is serious about enforcing it, there will soon be very few situations where PIN is required. And it'll be very unlikely that most travelers will run into those.
tmiw is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2015, 12:53 pm
  #9917  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,501
On that note, in our debates about signature vs. PIN we've really been focusing on the wrong issue. The US is the largest chip and signature market, so of course the card brands are going to force acceptance on everyone else (and likely succeed for the most part). The real issues with chip and signature are two-fold:
  1. It gives businesses in the US a cop-out from actually implementing proper security practices. For instance, restaurants are still taking cards away from tables after turning on EMV instead of supporting table side payments.
  2. It's making acceptance of things like Apple Pay a lot more difficult, especially when businesses aren't even being told that their terminals support NFC/contactless (let alone being trained for it). Seriously, they're being told that everything's the same as before except they have to insert the card instead of swiping it.
Those issues are why we should be complaining about chip and signature, not due to an international acceptance problem that's going to rapidly get better over time.
tmiw is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2015, 1:14 pm
  #9918  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,056
Originally Posted by uds0
Any place that requested a pin would not accept this card's [cash advance or 0000] pin but did accept my Arrival+ (which has on+offline pin). My most recent experience (end of January 2015) continues to be that the Chase reps ALL flatly, emphatically, and repeated stated that the pin was ONLY for cash advances at ATMs. They also repeatedly declined to even guess at a possible pin implementation horizon.
I wish I could send a video to those CSRs of myself entering the cash advance PIN at the Taiwan HSR kiosks in order to complete the transaction and then showing that those transactions post as purchases.
Majuki is online now  
Old Feb 28, 2015, 6:20 pm
  #9919  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,501
I emailed First Data's media relations team to see if I can perhaps get a listing of their EMV enabled merchants to add to the map, but I'm not sure I'll get anything of value from FD. Any other suggestions as to who to contact?
tmiw is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 11:33 am
  #9920  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: Delta + United Airmiles
Posts: 703
Originally Posted by Majuki
I wish I could send a video to those CSRs of myself entering the cash advance PIN at the Taiwan HSR kiosks in order to complete the transaction and then showing that those transactions post as purchases.
Ok, I recently got a replacement for my CSP (haven't used) and I just noticed it's CMV list may have changed to now include PIN support:

Chase Ink Business Plus (and prior Chase Sapphire Preferred)
Visa 1 ONline PIN - unattended cash Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful
2 Signature (paper) Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
3 No CVM Required Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful

Chase Sapphire Preferred (received mid January 2015)
Visa 1 ONline PIN - unattended cash Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
2 Signature (paper) Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful
3 ONline PIN Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
4 OFFline (ICC verified) PIN Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
5 OFFline (ICC verified) Plaintext PIN Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
6 No CVM Required - Always Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful

Since I sent the CSP cards back because they're, being metal, tough to destroy (closed account due to AF charge and 2nd fraud issue despite very low usage), can someone PLEASE verify that this updated CVM list is correct.

Perhaps the reps either have not been informed or they can't tell whether a customer has the new PIN version and thus are being conservative?

I just called Chase Business Plus rep and she repeatedly stressed that NO Chase card has PIN support beyond ATM cash advance and has no info on when that support might be added. Perhaps their software has the PIN support turned off and the pin is not set on the card? I got the strong impression that their software design is screwed up by having a pin always trigger cash advance treatment in their software and they are now trying to sort that out.

3/5/15 UPDATE: Since this has exactly the same CVM as my Barclay Arrival+, I may have had a technical (or fat finger) issue with my card reader that the Barclay Arrival+ data was displayed because the data wasn't refreshed when I replaced the Barclaycard Arrival+ card with the CSP card in the reader and pressed the buttons to reread the CSP card. PLEASE, anyone with a very recent Arrival+ report their CVM list. Sorry for the possible goof up on my part.

Last edited by uds0; Mar 5, 2015 at 1:38 pm Reason: 3/5 update - technical/operator error?
uds0 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 11:50 am
  #9921  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: Delta + United Airmiles
Posts: 703
Chase Ink Plus 60k miles + $95 AF waived 1st year in branch

http://thepointsguy.com/2015/02/chas...no-annual-fee/

I got this card a few months ago and had to pay the $95!

points are transferable (instantly) to United and other airline true airmile programs so the card can be retired without losing those points once they have been transferred.

A business can be you personally (real estate investments, ebay sales, etc).

I got an extra 10k by referral which may still be around?
uds0 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 12:55 pm
  #9922  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: Delta + United Airmiles
Posts: 703
Offline terminals NOT affected by July 1st "pin AND No CVM method required"

http://pmaa.org/weeklyreview/attachm...0Terminals.pdf

does not apply to the many offline terminals abroad, so seems to be that Offline pin feature is still critical there.

I'm wondering ... if unmanned Online terminals MUST allow pin AND No CVM in order to shift fraud liability to card issues as of 7/1/2015, what protects card holders from huge fraud (which issuers are responsible for but still a big hassle) due to No CVM being forced onto these terminals and thus defeating having to use a pin by a card thief?

For small charge this seems just annoying, but for big charges ...
uds0 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 1:39 pm
  #9923  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,501
Originally Posted by uds0
Ok, I recently got a replacement for my CSP (haven't used) and I just noticed it's CMV list may have changed to now include PIN support:

Chase Ink Business Plus (and prior Chase Sapphire Preferred)
Visa 1 ONline PIN - unattended cash Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful
2 Signature (paper) Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
3 No CVM Required Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful

Chase Sapphire Preferred (received mid January 2015)
Visa 1 ONline PIN - unattended cash Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
2 Signature (paper) Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful
3 ONline PIN Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
4 OFFline (ICC verified) PIN Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
5 OFFline (ICC verified) Plaintext PIN Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful
6 No CVM Required - Always Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful

Since I sent the CSP cards back because they're, being metal, tough to destroy (closed account due to AF charge and 2nd fraud issue despite very low usage), can someone PLEASE verify that this updated CVM list is correct.
Congratulations, you may have been selected to beta test their new cards! I'd say to try the cash advance PIN but that'll probably require traveling outside the US. I have this feeling that unattended kiosks here will pretty much just assume that signature is equivalent to no CVM and never ask for a PIN.

FWIW my second CSP (issued a couple months ago due to the Home Depot breach) has additional entries compared to your first one but they're not for purchases. And definitely no offline PIN anywhere.

Originally Posted by uds0
http://thepointsguy.com/2015/02/chas...no-annual-fee/

I got this card a few months ago and had to pay the $95!

points are transferable (instantly) to United and other airline true airmile programs so the card can be retired without losing those points once they have been transferred.

A business can be you personally (real estate investments, ebay sales, etc).

I got an extra 10k by referral which may still be around?
Looks like it expires today, unfortunately. I'll probably get an Ink Cash for my side business since I can't justify an AF for the revenue it makes and I would be unable to meet spend on the Plus without using it for personal expenses (which is against the T&C). Good find though.

Originally Posted by uds0
http://pmaa.org/weeklyreview/attachm...0Terminals.pdf

does not apply to the many offline terminals abroad, so seems to be that Offline pin feature is still critical there.

I'm wondering ... if unmanned Online terminals MUST allow pin AND No CVM in order to shift fraud liability to card issues as of 7/1/2015, what protects card holders from huge fraud (which issuers are responsible for but still a big hassle) due to No CVM being forced onto these terminals and thus defeating having to use a pin by a card thief?

For small charge this seems just annoying, but for big charges ...
Offline authentication and offline processing are two different things. There are cards that can do offline processing yet are signature only (for example, all US issued American Express cards). Also, I was under the impression that offline only terminals were becoming more and more rare?
tmiw is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 3:12 pm
  #9924  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 114
I sure hope those new CVM entries are true for all newly issued CSP's. If it is, I think my CSP's magnetic stripe is no longer working and I'll need a replacement.
RTWRide is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 8:47 pm
  #9925  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: Delta + United Airmiles
Posts: 703
I too really hope the CSP CVM list I posted is what is now being issued.

As mentioned, since I sent the metal CSP's back to Chase that I recently received because of my 2nd fraud alert in less than 6 months (silly in retrospect), I have none to recheck the CVM list on my reader or try at Walmart or elsewhere locally. I doubt that the posted list is inaccurate, and I always try to double check my facts to be sure I provide accurate info in my blog posts.

Had the rep not repeatedly warned me that the pin was only for cash advances, I might have considered keeping the CSP since I got over 20k points for signing up for the non-fee CS version a few weeks before then (which, in one sense, covers over 2 years of CSP fees). Although I was initially denied the non-fee version, I simply ended up calling them to move some of my CSP credit to the CS version to get instantly approved via the reconsideration line. Them refusing to send out non-metal CSP cards (the Ink card is plastic!) didn't help either.

Thus, I hope someone who recently got the CSP card can verify the CVM list I posted matches their card's CVM list.

Also, I now have no CSP to test during my 5 week trip in April from Istanbul throughout Italy, southern France, Paris, London, and Amsterdam.

Since my CSP AF posted at the end of January 2015 and I cancelled the card a few days later because of that fee (they refused to reverse the fee without closing the account), wanting to start the bonus signup clock ASAP for the next round of 40k points, and already having the business Ink version that I needed to do some spend on, any thoughts on whether Chase might approve another CSP for me, and even more important, whether they might give me the 40k signup bonus again this close in time!?!

Here is the CSP 40k offer fine print that has me wondering:

"Chase cardmembers who currently have or have had a Chase credit card in any Rewards Program associated with this offer, may not be eligible for a second Chase credit card in the same Rewards Program. Chase cardmembers currently receiving promotional pricing, or Chase cardmembers with a history of only using their current or prior Chase card for promotional pricing offers, are not eligible for a second Chase credit card with promotional pricing."

That "MAY not be eligible" part needs comparison to what really happens and is being reported for recent Chase CSP apps since I got the CSP 40k 13 months ago and canceled a year later.

Last edited by uds0; Mar 1, 2015 at 9:54 pm Reason: added Chase CSP offer language
uds0 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 8:59 pm
  #9926  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: Delta + United Airmiles
Posts: 703
Originally Posted by tmiw
Congratulations, you may have been selected to beta test their new cards! I'd say to try the cash advance PIN but that'll probably require traveling outside the US. I have this feeling that unattended kiosks here will pretty much just assume that signature is equivalent to no CVM and never ask for a PIN.

FWIW my second CSP (issued a couple months ago due to the Home Depot breach) has additional entries compared to your first one but they're not for purchases. And definitely no offline PIN anywhere.

Looks like it expires today, unfortunately. I'll probably get an Ink Cash for my side business since I can't justify an AF for the revenue it makes and I would be unable to meet spend on the Plus without using it for personal expenses (which is against the T&C). Good find though.

Offline authentication and offline processing are two different things. There are cards that can do offline processing yet are signature only (for example, all US issued American Express cards). Also, I was under the impression that offline only terminals were becoming more and more rare?
Sorry I didn't post the offer a few days ago so that you could get the Ink card at a branch with 1st year fee waived and 60k airmiles. Since I justified my business as my rental properties, I paid fed and state taxes to satisfy the sign up spend, and that income supports me taking a trip abroad so that cost plus all other trip costs I also consider business expenses. I could be wrong by not limiting spend to expenses on schedule C to satisfy T&C terms - hope not. I am more concerned that expenses on that card may not have the same 0 liability protection since it is a business account.

I have not been too concerned, since I haven't had an issue, with offline transaction processing. Missing a train because my card wouldn't work in an offline ticket machine and thus had to get in a queue to buy a ticket, or getting stuck at a unattended gas station or toll station, or holding up a line to get management to approve a signature (or find a pen or "educate" the clerk) are very real situations that functional offline (and online) pin capability solves.

Last edited by uds0; Mar 1, 2015 at 9:05 pm
uds0 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 9:33 pm
  #9927  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,501
Originally Posted by uds0
Sorry I didn't post the offer a few days ago so that you could get the Ink card at a branch with 1st year fee waived and 60k airmiles. Since I justified my business as my rental properties, I paid fed and state taxes to satisfy the sign up spend, and that income supports me taking a trip abroad so that cost plus all other trip costs I also consider business expenses. I could be wrong by not limiting spend to expenses on schedule C to satisfy T&C terms - hope not. I am more concerned that expenses on that card may not have the same 0 liability protection since it is a business account.
No worries. I've heard of 70k offers for the Ink Plus before so it might all work out in the end anyway. Now that I think about it there's one thing I've been meaning to buy that I think I could justify as a business expense...
tmiw is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 9:59 pm
  #9928  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: Delta + United Airmiles
Posts: 703
Originally Posted by RTWRide
I sure hope those new CVM entries are true for all newly issued CSP's. If it is, I think my CSP's magnetic stripe is no longer working and I'll need a replacement.
Better take that card down from behind that fridge magnet and keep it out from under your tires!
uds0 is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 10:05 pm
  #9929  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Programs: Delta + United Airmiles
Posts: 703
I would like to test for offline terminals during my upcoming 5 week trip through Europe in April. What might be the most reliable way to survey suspected offline terminals that doesn't trigger fees or require undesired purchases?
uds0 is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2015, 7:45 am
  #9930  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ORDwest
Posts: 332
Originally Posted by uds0
I too really hope the CSP CVM list I posted is what is now being issued.

I doubt that the posted list is inaccurate, and I always try to double check my facts to be sure I provide accurate info in my blog posts.

Thus, I hope someone who recently got the CSP card can verify the CVM list I posted matches their card's CVM list.
Well, I was also issued a new CSP sometime last year (Fall maybe?) as a result of the HD breach, but didn't think to check it with Cardpeek at the time. I just did so, and found some changes to the CVM list, but they don't match yours:

My Old List: (1) PIN for unattended cash (2) Signature (3) no CVM

My New List: (1) PIN unattended cash (2) enciphered PIN online for manual cash (3) Signature for manual cash (4) Fail CVM processing if purchase with cashback (5) Signature (6) no CVM required. Not sure I understand (4), but not relevant to this topic anyway.

I'm not doubting your report - I also try to double check things before reporting "facts," but I see no trace of any PIN CVM for purchases
othermike27 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.