Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2015, 10:08 pm
  #9031  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by reclusive46
It doesn't seem uncommon for Australian third party Amex cards to not have a chip but the cards are still swipe and PIN ( On both credit and debit cards in Australia)
Since the service code for "use PIN where feasible" appears (third digit 6 for an otherwise unrestricted card) seems to be rarely/never used, and instead PIN is forced by the terminal, is Australia like Romania where you need to know your PIN to use a magnetic stripe card?
AllieKat is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2015, 10:49 pm
  #9032  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,171
Originally Posted by AllieKat
Since the service code for "use PIN where feasible" appears (third digit 6 for an otherwise unrestricted card) seems to be rarely/never used, and instead PIN is forced by the terminal, is Australia like Romania where you need to know your PIN to use a magnetic stripe card?
When I was there a couple months ago, the only time I was prompted for a PIN with my mag stripe only VentureOne was at a fast food place at the airport, and there I was able to cancel out and sign instead, at the direction of the employee. A couple other places where I handed the card to an employee to swipe I was asked verbally if it was signature or PIN, and was given the printed signature slip to sign.
Hawaiian717 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 1:48 am
  #9033  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Sounds like Target is on track to miss their promises, too. I just asked them about it in a message today, and I got this response:

"We're on track to start issuing and accepting chip-enabled REDcards in 2015."

Notice... in 2015. Not in early 2015 like they were saying. That is obviously a change to their scripted answer.

I'm starting to believe that I will never end up using a chip card in a major store in the US (except Walmart, which doesn't count to me given the horrid implementation).
AllieKat is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 3:31 am
  #9034  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ORDwest
Posts: 332
Originally Posted by tmiw
He also talks about what one should ask a bank if they try to push liability on you for a fraudulent transaction.
Yes, but remember that this is from the EU perspective.

For USA cardholders, only the conspiracy theorists among us worry that EMV rollout means the eventual end of the $50 liability limit, or the pressures of a highly competitive market.
othermike27 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 7:19 am
  #9035  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,133
The Wall Street Journal has a front-page article today on the use of signature verification instead of PINs for the new cards. Note you may need a subscription to read.

Why New Credit Cards May Fall Short on Fraud Control
MASTERNC is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 7:22 am
  #9036  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by AllieKat
Sounds like Target is on track to miss their promises, too. I just asked them about it in a message today, and I got this response:

"We're on track to start issuing and accepting chip-enabled REDcards in 2015."

Notice... in 2015. Not in early 2015 like they were saying. That is obviously a change to their scripted answer.

I'm starting to believe that I will never end up using a chip card in a major store in the US (except Walmart, which doesn't count to me given the horrid implementation).
You don't have much to worry about, these upgrades are much harder on the retailers than most think, remember these retailers have complicated POS systems that isn't just throw new terminal on computer and done.

Early 2015 vs. 2015 doesn't make a difference. Remember early also is code for sometime around Spring- right around the same time that Square is coming out with their EMV readers, and when Walgreens and CVS is claiming to accept EMV.

Home Depot is claiming February now.

Also, Walmarts implementation can't last post Oct 2015. Walmart would never pay for the fraud, they're even complaining about fees as is. Also, don't forget Walmart has been a long time pusher for EMV in the US, long before EMV was even a blip on the radar for the U.S.
RedLight2015 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 8:13 am
  #9037  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by MASTERNC
The Wall Street Journal has a front-page article today on the use of signature verification instead of PINs for the new cards. Note you may need a subscription to read.

Why New Credit Cards May Fall Short on Fraud Control
It's an interesting article. If you do a google search on its title, you can get around the imbecilic pay wall many periodicals are putting on their online editions (I thought the internet was supposed to be free). But there is not one word in there which hasn't been discussed on this thread in its over 600 pages.

The banks present the usual excuses (how hard it is for many customers to deal with pins, the reluctance to put a new barrier to peoples' use of the card, yada yada yada), it points out Chase has ditched its plans to go chip and pin. It even quotes an official from UNFCU who is very adamant that chip and pin is the way to go (which is good to hear that they will probably not be abandoning chip and pin). It then goes on to suggest that perhaps the real reason the banks are not going chip and pin but rather chip and signature is the bean counters have determined that the savings in fraud control that chip and pin would provide will be outweighed by the cost of converting to chip and pin which we all know here is the real reason behind it.

My only quibble with the article is they seem to think Americans will have increasing problems with using their cards outside the USA when all indications are that as part of this deal, the card networks have been successful for the most part in forcing merchants not to void transactions that do not require pins (at least we are not hearing all that many today) and that they will hopefully be outlawing the practice of kiosks not accepting pinless transactions as of June 2015. It's also, as always, reading the comments of people and their misunderstanding of the whole thing.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 9:20 am
  #9038  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by MASTERNC
The Wall Street Journal has a front-page article today on the use of signature verification instead of PINs for the new cards. Note you may need a subscription to read.

Why New Credit Cards May Fall Short on Fraud Control
Googling the title of that article will get you a non-paywalled version.

First, I'm not convinced PIN is ever going to be worthwhile to implement, especially after chip and signature and some sort of solution for CNP is implemented. Counterfeit and CNP fraud are basically 80%+ of the total credit card fraud here. Lost and stolen are what, maybe 15%? Even if CNP and counterfeit go away completely the total amount of fraud may very well be low enough to just be eaten as the "cost of business".

Second, if customer experience is really what's important, why not implement something like this? The customer experience will be mostly the same as swiping, leaving PIN as the only thing that's different. Then again, we'll have to give our cards to the cashier (which we mostly do now) as there's no customer-facing terminals that support swipe and park.

Even if we were to implement PIN, it would open our cards to at least the CVM downgrade attack. Other man-in-the-middle attacks would also be possible if we had chosen offline PIN over online PIN. The issuers definitely know about these and thanks to zero liability, make PIN yet more expensive.

BTW 100k members was more than I expected UNFCU to have.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 9:22 am
  #9039  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Programs: IHG Diamond, HH Diamond, BW Diamond Select, Accor Silver, Marriott Gold
Posts: 4,228
Originally Posted by RedLight2015
My uncle came over from Australia, and I asked to see his credit and debit cards just out of curiosity. Here's the part that struck me weird:

-He has a Westpac "EFTPOS" (we know that as debit here in the US) with no chip whatsoever. It is a Mastercard branded card.
-He also has an American Express with no chip whatsoever. It looked to be an "Bank issued" co branded American Express credit card.
This doesn't strike me as weird. Australia has had PINs on cards for decades without chips. The recent edict that signatures are no longer to be accepted on local credit cards doesn't force chips to appear. EFTPOS cards are unlikely to be affected at all. I guess the replacement ones in a year or two will have chips. On the credit card side, Amex was much slower to implement any changes, including having PINS at all, than Visa/Mastercard.

Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
My only quibble with the article is they seem to think Americans will have increasing problems with using their cards outside the USA
Sounds accurate to me. I know one place that was rejecting any PIN-less transactions only weeks after Australia switched to PIN-only. If tourists keep to places that expect ancient PIN-less cards, they'll be fine. Otherwise, you will find that merchants are expecting tap or PIN and you are likely, at the very least, to experience confusion and/or annoyance from merchants having to deal with signatures again.

(It probably doesn't help that in the massive stream of media reporting and Visa/Mastercard publicity in Australia, I never saw any mention that non-PIN cards exist in some countries overseas, let alone that those would still be accepted in Australia. It is covered in the last FAQ at the bottom of the page on pinwise.com.au, but I'll bet most people have never read that.)
Kremmen is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 10:02 am
  #9040  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by tmiw
Googling the title of that article will get you a non-paywalled version.

First, I'm not convinced PIN is ever going to be worthwhile to implement, especially after chip and signature and some sort of solution for CNP is implemented. Counterfeit and CNP fraud are basically 80%+ of the total credit card fraud here. Lost and stolen are what, maybe 15%? Even if CNP and counterfeit go away completely the total amount of fraud may very well be low enough to just be eaten as the "cost of business".

Second, if customer experience is really what's important, why not implement something like this? The customer experience will be mostly the same as swiping, leaving PIN as the only thing that's different. Then again, we'll have to give our cards to the cashier (which we mostly do now) as there's no customer-facing terminals that support swipe and park.

Even if we were to implement PIN, it would open our cards to at least the CVM downgrade attack. Other man-in-the-middle attacks would also be possible if we had chosen offline PIN over online PIN. The issuers definitely know about these and thanks to zero liability, make PIN yet more expensive.

BTW 100k members was more than I expected UNFCU to have.
Some European credit card readers incorporate the Magnetic Stripe and EMV reader in the same slot, depending on the card type, it's insert and remove or insert and leave in.

Also most places I go to, you DONT hand the card to the cashier, so I don't know what this is.
RedLight2015 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 10:17 am
  #9041  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by Kremmen
This doesn't strike me as weird. Australia has had PINs on cards for decades without chips. The recent edict that signatures are no longer to be accepted on local credit cards doesn't force chips to appear. EFTPOS cards are unlikely to be affected at all. I guess the replacement ones in a year or two will have chips. On the credit card side, Amex was much slower to implement any changes, including having PINS at all, than Visa/Mastercard.



Sounds accurate to me. I know one place that was rejecting any PIN-less transactions only weeks after Australia switched to PIN-only. If tourists keep to places that expect ancient PIN-less cards, they'll be fine. Otherwise, you will find that merchants are expecting tap or PIN and you are likely, at the very least, to experience confusion and/or annoyance from merchants having to deal with signatures again.

(It probably doesn't help that in the massive stream of media reporting and Visa/Mastercard publicity in Australia, I never saw any mention that non-PIN cards exist in some countries overseas, let alone that those would still be accepted in Australia. It is covered in the last FAQ at the bottom of the page on pinwise.com.au, but I'll bet most people have never read that.)
Yes and no. One of the things that pushed US banks to em v in the first place was the growing problem of merchants refusing to process mag strip cards. This was the original impetus to begin travelling the emv road. But it quickly became clear the American banks were implementing signature priority cards. There were scattered, very scattered to be fair, of merchants telling people with c&s cards they would not continue processing the card even though the pos terminal had already approved the transaction and tne message signature required came up on the screen. As mor and more US banks began issuing more and more c&s cards, the number of such reports have not only not grown but have actually seemed to decrease. Visa has been very adamant that it will be supporting c&s adoption in the US by working with all merchants to try to make sure they understand c&s cards are just as valid as c&s. They have also put into effect regulations, whether they will work or not is another matter, prohibiting the rejection of pin less emv compliant cards in unpersonneled kiosks.

We can argue from now till whenever just how much more c&p is than c&s or just how effective these regulations will prove but if they do work, then from a consumer viewpoint unless one lays away nights worrying what happens if his or her card is lost or stolen, it won't matter the USA goes for c&s priority. We will just have to wait and see.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 10:18 am
  #9042  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by RedLight2015
Also, Walmarts implementation can't last post Oct 2015. Walmart would never pay for the fraud, they're even complaining about fees as is. Also, don't forget Walmart has been a long time pusher for EMV in the US, long before EMV was even a blip on the radar for the U.S.
Correct, but that date goes along with what I said of me never seeing it with my own eyes, I don't intend to be living in the US in October, I graduate university in May.

Now, onto the Wall Street Journal article, Discover must REALLY think 'Muricans are STUPID: "are such a big shift that we didn’t want to make it more difficult than it already will be." A BIG SHIFT? DIFFICULT? YOU PUT THE BLOODY THING IN THE SLOT FOR A FEW SECONDS! A TWO YEAR OLD COULD DO IT!!!

No mention in the article of ANY merchant plans to accept chip cards. I bet I never see it, personally. Maybe Home Depot or Walgreens - but not Walmart (properly), Target, etc.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 11:00 am
  #9043  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,171
Getting called out on the front page of the WSJ might get someone's attention. Might also be an opportunity for a smaller player to get a boost in the credit card market by offering C&P and advertising it as more secure.

I thought the advertising copy on that swipe and park keyboard was funny. Retailers are concerned about how it would keep the costs of retraining staff to a minimum. Except for the whole parking the card thing, that would be a change that staff will be have to be retrained: Having to park the card rather than immediately handing it back to the customer. And at first I thought it absurd that a retailer would be worried about their staff not being able to recognize an EMV card, but then I remembered that I sometimes read notalwaysworking.com and think maybe they're on to something.
Hawaiian717 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 12:20 pm
  #9044  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
My pessimism may be misplaced on several things in this thread. These may be more minor delays than I anticipate.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2015, 12:29 pm
  #9045  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by Hawaiian717
Getting called out on the front page of the WSJ might get someone's attention. Might also be an opportunity for a smaller player to get a boost in the credit card market by offering C&P and advertising it as more secure.

I thought the advertising copy on that swipe and park keyboard was funny. Retailers are concerned about how it would keep the costs of retraining staff to a minimum. Except for the whole parking the card thing, that would be a change that staff will be have to be retrained: Having to park the card rather than immediately handing it back to the customer. And at first I thought it absurd that a retailer would be worried about their staff not being able to recognize an EMV card, but then I remembered that I sometimes read notalwaysworking.com and think maybe they're on to something.
BMO should have kept their app open to take advantage.
tmiw is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.