Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

    Hide Wikipost
Old Jan 15, 16, 11:38 am   -   Wikipost
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been on FT for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: philemer
Wiki Link
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credi...signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

Closed Thread

Old Dec 8, 14, 2:49 pm
  #8551  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,155
Originally Posted by IslesFan View Post
Can anyone tell me why it's up to UA in the first place to decide to add a chip to their card?
Probably because United designed the card?


Add a chip to it, and since Chase uses the bigger size chip, it probably obscures part of the "MileagePlus Explorer" lettering in the middle.

I dunno how much UA paid for this design, but perhaps they don't want to spend $$$ again in re-doing the artwork for something they should've planned for before they went ahead with this design.
kebosabi is offline  
Old Dec 8, 14, 2:54 pm
  #8552  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 12,943
Originally Posted by kebosabi View Post
Chase: Hey UA, don't you want your cards to be EMV? Everyone is doing it?

UA: No.

Chase: Look, we really want you to convert to EMV. You'll leaving your and our best customers frustrated and vulnerable for fraud.

UA: We'll do it if you pay for it.

Chase: Uhh...

UA: Either that or we find someone else to work with!

Chase: Ok, ok, ok! You can leave it as the mag-stripe!
Doesn't seem to make sense considering:
  1. Chase shouldn't be consulting UA to determine whether or not to upgrade to EMV
  2. Chase should be paying anyways, regardless (so UA's "threat" would seem to be what would happen anyways)
  3. Considering Chase has shown that it makes financial sense to upgrade all their other cards at cost to EMV to lower their fraud costs, not sure why they wouldn't want to here. Even if it should have been UA paying and UA said that they can only do it if Chase pays, it would still make sense for Chase to pay
  4. Threatening to go somewhere else? Where they gonna go. What large bank would be willing to go non-EMV, when you look at how all the banks have moved towards EMV (not counting that Citi and Amex likely wouldn't take UA to begin with)? And what smaller bank/CU (that would so like the money from UA cards that they wouldn't mind no EMV) could be able to handle such an operation?
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Dec 8, 14, 3:38 pm
  #8553  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,155
Originally Posted by joshwex90 View Post
Chase shouldn't be consulting UA to determine whether or not to upgrade to EMV
My theory is:

1. Chase probably needs to consult UA because perhaps it was UA who was the one who provided them with the design of the card. (Think of it another way, let's say hypothetically, Chase deals with Disney. Chase can't just use Disney logos and characters without Disney's consent, so Disney will be the one provides Chase with the design)

2. Chase can't alter the card design without UA's consent if (1) is true

3. Adding the EMV chip could "damage" the design; anyone have a card and able to super-impose where the chip will be (and Chase uses the larger chip size) and if it obscures UA's "MileagePlus Explorer" text in the middle of the card? (I'm sure Disney will be pissed if the chip overlaps Mickey's head )

4. If adding a chip, Chase needs a new design from UA which UA has to pay the designer for.


Originally Posted by joshwex90 View Post
Threatening to go somewhere else? Where they gonna go. What large bank would be willing to go non-EMV, when you look at how all the banks have moved towards EMV (not counting that Citi and Amex likely wouldn't take UA to begin with)? And what smaller bank/CU (that would so like the money from UA cards that they wouldn't mind no EMV) could be able to handle such an operation?
UA may not be opposed to adding the EMV chip, but they're not willing to spend $$$ in re-designing the card to accommodate the chip either.

So the poker play is that UA could say if Chase doesn't like it, UA can look for another bank, say Citi or BofA, that would love to have UA's business and maybe willing to put up their $$$ to come up with a design that looks ok even with an EMV chip on it.

I'm sure Citi and BofA would love to have UA's business and they might be willing to pony up the re-design cost too (not just the artwork, but also the printing plates for the card, etc.). Let's say a new design cost $50,000 to Citi or BofA and that's what it takes to get UA to partner with their bank? Of course.

And Chase wouldn't want to lose UA either. So either Chase keeps it as it is chip-less, or Chase pays for new design of the card.

Last edited by kebosabi; Dec 8, 14 at 3:51 pm
kebosabi is offline  
Old Dec 8, 14, 3:41 pm
  #8554  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,391
I forget, but does the Southwest card have EMV already? I thought it didn't.
tmiw is online now  
Old Dec 8, 14, 3:49 pm
  #8555  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,057
Originally Posted by tmiw View Post
I forget, but does the Southwest card have EMV already? I thought it didn't.
I don't see a chip in the graphics on the Chase or Southwest website. But the card graphics also show an airplane in the Canyon Blue livery, so the card is due for a redesign to showcase the Heart livery anyway. It also looks like there's room for a chip without disrupting the aircraft on the current design, so it may not need to be a big redesign.
Hawaiian717 is online now  
Old Dec 8, 14, 3:52 pm
  #8556  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,057
Originally Posted by joshwex90 View Post
Threatening to go somewhere else? Where they gonna go. What large bank would be willing to go non-EMV, when you look at how all the banks have moved towards EMV (not counting that Citi and Amex likely wouldn't take UA to begin with)?
CapitalOne?
Hawaiian717 is online now  
Old Dec 8, 14, 4:10 pm
  #8557  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,057
Originally Posted by kebosabi View Post
3. Adding the EMV chip could "damage" the design; anyone have a card and able to super-impose where the chip will be (and Chase uses the larger chip size) and if it obscures UA's "MileagePlus Explorer" text in the middle of the card? (I'm sure Disney will be pissed if the chip overlaps Mickey's head )
I did a quick composite of the UA MP Explorer and Marriott Rewards cards using the images from the Chase web site and came up with this:

Hawaiian717 is online now  
Old Dec 8, 14, 4:18 pm
  #8558  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Programs: Marriott Titanium Elite/Lifetime Titanium, Delta Platinum Medallion, Hertz #1 Gold
Posts: 565
Originally Posted by Hawaiian717 View Post
I did a quick composite of the UA MP Explorer and Marriott Rewards cards using the images from the Chase web site and came up with this:

I have the marriott card... and the credit card numbers are no where near as big as they are on your composite. What would prevent chase from just moving the words "MileagePlus Explorer" down? Does the UA card have the card number on the back?
IslesFan is offline  
Old Dec 8, 14, 4:55 pm
  #8559  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,155
Originally Posted by IslesFan View Post
What would prevent chase from just moving the words "MileagePlus Explorer" down?
I take it won't be Chase's call if it's UA that provided the design. And I'm sure it's not as easy as sticking in blank card in an inkjet printer; there has to be a new plate created that has to be sent to the actual credit card manufacturer and those likely don't come cheap.
kebosabi is offline  
Old Dec 8, 14, 5:00 pm
  #8560  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,531
Originally Posted by kebosabi View Post
I take it won't be Chase's call if it's UA that provided the design. And I'm sure it's not as easy as sticking in blank card in an inkjet printer; there has to be a new plate created that has to be sent to the actual credit card manufacturer and those likely don't come cheap.
Not very expensive either. I mean, at least not as a percentage of the cost of a card.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Dec 8, 14, 5:03 pm
  #8561  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,155
Originally Posted by AllieKat View Post
Not very expensive either. I mean, at least not as a percentage of the cost of a card.
Of course. But in the eyes of a bean counter at UA, they'd likely want to use that plate as much as possible. The UA MP Explorer card was released like what, about 2 years ago? They would want to milk it for at least 5 years with the same card design before switching to a new one.

Of course, if they knew EMV was coming they should've thought ahead to keep the logos or text lower to accomodate the chip beforehand, but meh. You know how these guys are.

Compare that with the chipless Chase Freedom card with the EMV chipped Freedom card, and there was definitely a design problem.


I'm pretty sure in the Chase Freedom case, Chase had to suck up the cost of a new design so that the EMV chip doesn't obscure the "Freedom" logo text. But dealing with a third party partner, things get more ugly/confusing, especially if it's the partner that provides the design of the card.

Just my theory. I could be wrong.

Last edited by kebosabi; Dec 8, 14 at 5:11 pm
kebosabi is offline  
Old Dec 8, 14, 9:45 pm
  #8562  
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,942
I think people are analyzing this way too much. The cost of re-designing a card is pretty negligible when the operation is so big. Chase and UA have a detailed contract specifying the rights and responsibilities of each party. Of course it's confidential, but we can speculate that the revenue is divided according to some formula. I don't think it's as simple as "Chase shall buy ____ miles from United Airlines for $______".

If Chase is satisfied with the purchase volume on the cards, then the extra revenue and lower fraud liability may not be sufficient to justify the costs of conversion at this time. Similarly, if UA is satisfied with the number of miles Chase is buying and the price, they may not be bothered either.
cbn42 is offline  
Old Dec 8, 14, 10:47 pm
  #8563  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 147
For United MP cards not to have chip at this point is just inexcusable. Chase and United really needs to get their stuff together.
benny08 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 14, 4:26 am
  #8564  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ORDwest
Posts: 329
Originally Posted by cbn42 View Post
I think people are analyzing this way too much. The cost of re-designing a card is pretty negligible when the operation is so big. Chase and UA have a detailed contract specifying the rights and responsibilities of each party. Of course it's confidential, but we can speculate that the revenue is divided according to some formula. I don't think it's as simple as "Chase shall buy ____ miles from United Airlines for $______".

If Chase is satisfied with the purchase volume on the cards, then the extra revenue and lower fraud liability may not be sufficient to justify the costs of conversion at this time. Similarly, if UA is satisfied with the number of miles Chase is buying and the price, they may not be bothered either.
Agreed. If these matters are covered by a comprehensive agreement between UA and Chase, it may be that changing the card appearance (by adding a chip) might open up the entire deal to renegotiation. If that's true, then the stalling on EMV could come from whichever party thinks they might lose any favorable terms they have now.
othermike27 is offline  
Old Dec 9, 14, 7:09 am
  #8565  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 12,943
Originally Posted by kebosabi View Post
My theory is:

1. Chase probably needs to consult UA because perhaps it was UA who was the one who provided them with the design of the card. (Think of it another way, let's say hypothetically, Chase deals with Disney. Chase can't just use Disney logos and characters without Disney's consent, so Disney will be the one provides Chase with the design)
Except the design isn't the same as Disney characters, and wouldn't really need to be altered

2. Chase can't alter the card design without UA's consent if (1) is true
See above

3. Adding the EMV chip could "damage" the design; anyone have a card and able to super-impose where the chip will be (and Chase uses the larger chip size) and if it obscures UA's "MileagePlus Explorer" text in the middle of the card? (I'm sure Disney will be pissed if the chip overlaps Mickey's head )
I've compared the Explorer card to a Freedom EMV and CSP EMV card. Almost exactly "no harm no foul" situation

4. If adding a chip, Chase needs a new design from UA which UA has to pay the designer for.
No they don't

UA may not be opposed to adding the EMV chip, but they're not willing to spend $$$ in re-designing the card to accommodate the chip either.
In which case, Chase should be happy to, no different than they do for all their other cards

So the poker play is that UA could say if Chase doesn't like it, UA can look for another bank, say Citi or BofA, that would love to have UA's business and maybe willing to put up their $$$ to come up with a design that looks ok even with an EMV chip on it.

I'm sure Citi and BofA would love to have UA's business and they might be willing to pony up the re-design cost too (not just the artwork, but also the printing plates for the card, etc.). Let's say a new design cost $50,000 to Citi or BofA and that's what it takes to get UA to partner with their bank? Of course.

And Chase wouldn't want to lose UA either. So either Chase keeps it as it is chip-less, or Chase pays for new design of the card.
While I doubt Citi could take them (AA), even if BoA wanted them, they've shown even more interest than Chase in terms of EMV.

Originally Posted by Hawaiian717 View Post
CapitalOne?


Originally Posted by Hawaiian717 View Post
I did a quick composite of the UA MP Explorer and Marriott Rewards cards using the images from the Chase web site and came up with this:

Coming up with similar in my own imaging of the physical card

Originally Posted by kebosabi View Post
Of course. But in the eyes of a bean counter at UA, they'd likely want to use that plate as much as possible. The UA MP Explorer card was released like what, about 2 years ago? They would want to milk it for at least 5 years with the same card design before switching to a new one.

Of course, if they knew EMV was coming they should've thought ahead to keep the logos or text lower to accomodate the chip beforehand, but meh. You know how these guys are.

Compare that with the chipless Chase Freedom card with the EMV chipped Freedom card, and there was definitely a design problem.


I'm pretty sure in the Chase Freedom case, Chase had to suck up the cost of a new design so that the EMV chip doesn't obscure the "Freedom" logo text. But dealing with a third party partner, things get more ugly/confusing, especially if it's the partner that provides the design of the card.

Just my theory. I could be wrong.
If Chase was able to adapt Freedom, they can adapt Explorer
joshwex90 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread