Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2014, 4:26 pm
  #8476  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Speaking of Australia having the US style readers, as of February every single place there printed a paper receipt for me to sign. If the screens are for digital signing, they're not currently using them that way.
tmiw is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2014, 4:30 pm
  #8477  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by tmiw
Speaking of Australia having the US style readers, as of February every single place there printed a paper receipt for me to sign. If the screens are for digital signing, they're not currently using them that way.
That is the purpose of the bigger screens, initially at least. I do think a lot of retailers use them because they like the design/advertising space. Even in the US, many retailers do not use the signature capture functionality.

Non-signature capture terminals will be most common in the US for high volume low value situations such as fast food.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2014, 9:02 pm
  #8478  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 3,251
Originally Posted by tmiw
Speaking of Australia having the US style readers, as of February every single place there printed a paper receipt for me to sign. If the screens are for digital signing, they're not currently using them that way.
A lot of retailers don't see the need to use them for that purpose, especially in Australia where chip & PIN is now normal. But most use it as a scrolling receipt for your transaction and more. Many stores use it also to enter Loyalty Card information etc.

I've noticed at Fast Food places they mostly have a terminal with such a screen for ad space as you still sign on paper receipts.

But yes the intended purpose of such large color screens is for signing. Whether retailers actually use it for, is totally up to the retailer. Sad they rather show ads on it instead.
RedLight2015 is offline  
Old Dec 4, 2014, 10:59 pm
  #8479  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,171
I applied for the Navy Federal GoRewards MasterCard last month after the reports came out that NFCU was issuing PIN-priority cards. Card finally came today. No chip. I called and the agent knew what I was talking about when I asked about a Chip and PIN version and put in a request for one, but she did say she wasn't sure if the GoRewards card was available with chip yet. She said it could take 30-60 days for the card to come if the request goes through.
Hawaiian717 is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 1:52 pm
  #8480  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,171
A while back there was some discussion about the spreadsheet lacking a distinction between online and offline PIN. I know there's another site out there too that lists US EMV credit cards, but I thought it would be useful to have a search-focused site to easily allow people to find what they're looking for.

I went back through most of the posts on this thread for this year, hunting for posted CVM lists. I stuck to ones that had enough detail to be able to fully distinguish the CVM entries, not just reports of the "Walmart test" or the like. So I'm certain it's incomplete (I couldn't find a CVM list for the US Bank FlexPerks card for example), and would be happy to get additional details, either from this thread, via PM, or via the contact form linked on the site.

http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv

I will state up front that the site is more functional than pretty. I can always make it look better later. I also just focused on purchase CVM entries since that seems to be where we're most concerned with the differences; unattended cash (ATM cash advance) seems to be pretty much universally online PIN only. I also added just credit cards, not debit cards, and only US-issued cards. Though I did design the backend database to support debit and non-US cards if there's enough interest in expanding the scope. I also didn't include corporate cards that would normally be issued to employees via a business, though I did include "small business" oriented cards like Chase Ink.

I also made some assumptions based on card issuer patterns, such as including all the Bank of America cards as signature/online PIN/no CVM since all the ones discussed here follow that pattern.

Any additions, corrections, and suggestions are welcome.
Hawaiian717 is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 2:02 pm
  #8481  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: DFW
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold, Admirals Club, Global Entry
Posts: 1,141
This looks like a lot of work and a great start, but you left off the main high-end card in the United States -- the "regular" Amex Platinum -- and you left off what's practically the only "mainstream" pure (emphasis on "pure") chip & pin card in the United States, namely Diners Club. I'm simplifying greatly, of course.

The Amex Plat is a little weird because it's issued as mag stripe only; then you can call get it replaced with a Chip & Signature card. You'd think that they'd just throw in the towel and skip step one, but they don't.
FallenPlat is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 3:28 pm
  #8482  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
I don't think online vs offline PIN is going to matter much soon. Contactless is becoming more common and that requires online PIN to enable transactions above the no CVM limit. I can't imagine only having online PIN support in the contactless reader.
tmiw is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 3:44 pm
  #8483  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by Hawaiian717
A while back there was some discussion about the spreadsheet lacking a distinction between online and offline PIN. I know there's another site out there too that lists US EMV credit cards, but I thought it would be useful to have a search-focused site to easily allow people to find what they're looking for.

I went back through most of the posts on this thread for this year, hunting for posted CVM lists. I stuck to ones that had enough detail to be able to fully distinguish the CVM entries, not just reports of the "Walmart test" or the like. So I'm certain it's incomplete (I couldn't find a CVM list for the US Bank FlexPerks card for example), and would be happy to get additional details, either from this thread, via PM, or via the contact form linked on the site.

http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv

I will state up front that the site is more functional than pretty. I can always make it look better later. I also just focused on purchase CVM entries since that seems to be where we're most concerned with the differences; unattended cash (ATM cash advance) seems to be pretty much universally online PIN only. I also added just credit cards, not debit cards, and only US-issued cards. Though I did design the backend database to support debit and non-US cards if there's enough interest in expanding the scope. I also didn't include corporate cards that would normally be issued to employees via a business, though I did include "small business" oriented cards like Chase Ink.

I also made some assumptions based on card issuer patterns, such as including all the Bank of America cards as signature/online PIN/no CVM since all the ones discussed here follow that pattern.

Any additions, corrections, and suggestions are welcome.
First and foremost, a very nice job and it must have taken you a while to do it and it is much appreciated. But having said that, above you seem to be denigrating the "Walmart test" I suggested as the magnitude of what the networks had decided began to become apparent. It really seems that every card with signature listed first, which is almost every card except the one issued by UNFCU and the Diners Club cards will fail the Walmart test and hence in effect will function as chip and signature in almost every pos terminal in the world as they almost all do not distinguish between c&p and c&s. What good does it do, if this is important to you, that say the Arrival+ card will do a chip and pin transaction if every terminal will do a chip and signature and then a merchant takes it upon himself or herself to refuse to complete the transaction?

I would still say, and again forgive me because I am not for one second denigrating the wonderful job you did, the easiest way to verify where a particular card stands is to use it at a place which has a functioning emv pos terminal. Once it asks for a signature, that means the card is signature priorith without having to go through any other further checks.


And it also doesn't address the problem of whether an individual card will work in an unattended kiosk which is more a function of the programming of the terminal than a function of the cvm's on the card.

In the end, though, it shouldn't matter. The networks claim as part of their conversion of the American card industry to signature priority chip and signature they will be re-enforcing their their policies on the universal acceptance of all cards and prohibiting kiosks from not accepting non pin cards. Whether this will truly happen is anybody's guess.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 4:00 pm
  #8484  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Since I'm back on my computer and no longer on my phone...
  1. American Express has more contactless cards than what's in the database right now. List: https://community.americanexpress.co...ge/24000#24000
  2. Speaking of contactless, it is possible in theory to have a contactless CVM list different than the contact one. The contact chip could prefer signature while contactless could prefer PIN (as unlikely as it would be for an issuer to do such a thing).
  3. Also, perhaps the signature/PIN checkboxes should cause the page to search just the first entry in the list instead of all of them. For instance, if I check offline PIN I should just see Diners Club and UNFCU.

Finally, I'd include the debit cards too (Schwab and BoA), even if their use outside the US will be unlikely except at the ATM.
tmiw is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 6:36 pm
  #8485  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: DFW
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold, Admirals Club, Global Entry
Posts: 1,141
I don't know much about credit cards, but I've been to Europe a time or two. I can therefore state with authority that, as implied above, the issue of whether a card will work in an unattended, off-line kiosk is absolutely central and critical, i.e., that the difference between on-line PIN and off-line PIN is central and critical. So the "PIN" in all my wonderful US chip & signature cards is pretty useless if I'm not at an ATM, where I'd use a bank cash card anyway rather than a credit card. (ATMs use the on-line PIN feature of all the chip-and-signature cards.)

Translated into simpler English for anyone who's not following me here, it boils down to this: does my card work at the unmanned CDG train-to-the-city (RER) kiosks or do I have to wait for an hour at the manned counter? With an off-line, true PIN (e.g., Diners Club), yes; with anything else, maybe not. And that, to repeat, is a critical, central difference. Really, really important.

(To complete the circle: after playing machine-and-card roulette at CDG recently, I did get my new Merrill chip-and-signature card to work; all my chip-and-signature cards worked at the in-town remote kiosks. I have no idea why even after trying various amounts both under and over 10 Euros. I can only imagine what people who encounter unmanned toll booths and unmanned gas stations with their US cards must go through; it's been a while since I've driven in Europe.)
FallenPlat is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 6:51 pm
  #8486  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by FallenPlat
I don't know much about credit cards, but I've been to Europe a time or two. I can therefore state with authority that, as implied above, the issue of whether a card will work in an unattended, off-line kiosk is absolutely central and critical, i.e., that the difference between on-line PIN and off-line PIN is central and critical. So the "PIN" in all my wonderful US chip & signature cards is pretty useless if I'm not at an ATM, where I'd use a bank cash card anyway rather than a credit card. (ATMs use the on-line PIN feature of all the chip-and-signature cards.)

Translated into simpler English for anyone who's not following me here, it boils down to this: does my card work at the unmanned CDG train-to-the-city (RER) kiosks or do I have to wait for an hour at the manned counter? With an off-line, true PIN (e.g., Diners Club), yes; with anything else, maybe not. And that, to repeat, is a critical, central difference. Really, really important.

(To complete the circle: after playing machine-and-card roulette at CDG recently, I did get my new Merrill chip-and-signature card to work; all my chip-and-signature cards worked at the in-town remote kiosks. I have no idea why even after trying various amounts both under and over 10 Euros. I can only imagine what people who encounter unmanned toll booths and unmanned gas stations with their US cards must go through; it's been a while since I've driven in Europe.)
Yes; this is the bigger problem than pos transactions with human beings present. As far as your point about Paris, that discussion is here. Machines operated by the RER such as the ones at CDG as of now require off line pins. The card networks have said somewhere they are working on ending that by June; I'mm not sure that will actually happen. Machines operated by RATP which is the local Paris transit authority found in the metro operate without a cvm and hence will work not only with chip and signature cards but US non emv cards at least for now.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 7:44 pm
  #8487  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN
Posts: 1,171
Originally Posted by FallenPlat
This looks like a lot of work and a great start, but you left off the main high-end card in the United States -- the "regular" Amex Platinum -- and you left off what's practically the only "mainstream" pure (emphasis on "pure") chip & pin card in the United States, namely Diners Club. I'm simplifying greatly, of course.
Amex Platinum was an oversight on my part, it's in there now. I also added several other Amex cards. They haven't updated the graphics on their site so it's not obvious to me which ones have chips. I think there was some discussion that all the currently available Amex cards have EMV now but I'm not sure so I didn't add the rest yet.

Diners Club was in there, to find it search for "BMO Harris Bank" as the issuer.

Like I said, I know I don't have all the available EMV cards in there (US Bank and M&T come to mind); I only added ones where I could find someone had posted Cardpeek results or I had access to a card to look myself.

Originally Posted by tmiw
I don't think online vs offline PIN is going to matter much soon. Contactless is becoming more common and that requires online PIN to enable transactions above the no CVM limit.
I think it's important to distinguish online versus offline PIN, since there are still some places that only take offline PIN, like the French rail kiosks. I'm not so sure about distinguishing enciphered versus plaintext, that's why I didn't add it to the search page but since there is a difference in the CVM list itself I included both in the actual card results.

Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
But having said that, above you seem to be denigrating the "Walmart test" I suggested as the magnitude of what the networks had decided began to become apparent.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think the Walmart test is a bad thing. Based on both yours and tmiw's suggestions, I've added the ability to search for a card based on priority, so if you want to see just PIN priority cards or Signature priority cards, you can do that now. This is the same as the results of the Walmart test.

My problem with the Walmart test is that it's just not enough information for me to add a card to the database. It will tell us whether a card is signature or PIN priority, but that's it. It doesn't tell us what's after that on the card, or if a PIN priority card prefers offline or online PIN. I need Cardpeek results for that.

My original goal with the CVM search options was just to list what cards supported. My thinking was that most people weren't as likely to care which was first, so much as they wanted to be able to find what would work. So if you wanted a PIN priority card, you could select online and offline PIN, then look through the results to find one with PIN first. But now you don't have to do that.

Originally Posted by tmiw
American Express has more contactless cards than what's in the database right now.
Thanks for the link. It helped me fill in which Amex cards are available as Chip and Signature as well. I didn't add the cards that they're not currently offering (e.g. Clear), since I'm thinking more along the use case of someone trying to find a card to do certain things. Though I suppose it could be useful to have other cards as well, if people want information about their existing cards. But it becomes harder to find details about those cards if they're not being advertised on the issuer's web site. I'll have to give further thought if I want to expand scope.

Originally Posted by tmiw
Speaking of contactless, it is possible in theory to have a contactless CVM list different than the contact one. The contact chip could prefer signature while contactless could prefer PIN (as unlikely as it would be for an issuer to do such a thing).
It might be my biases showing, but I'm not really all that excited about contactless. And your earlier comment seems to imply that contactless is generally going to be effectively No CVM up to a certain value, then online PIN. It also complicates things if I have to support multiple CVM lists per card (which we know is the case with debit cards). I think for now, showing whether or not a card supports contactless is good enough.

Originally Posted by tmiw
Also, perhaps the signature/PIN checkboxes should cause the page to search just the first entry in the list instead of all of them. For instance, if I check offline PIN I should just see Diners Club and UNFCU.
As I noted above, the original signature/PIN checkboxes were intended to state whether or not a card supports it, not to get into which is priority. I've added a separate search for that.

Originally Posted by tmiw
Finally, I'd include the debit cards too (Schwab and BoA), even if their use outside the US will be unlikely except at the ATM.
This might be my biases again, but I don't find debit cards as interesting. One, my personal preference is to only use them at ATMs (which means online PIN) and to use credit cards for purchases to put that extra layer between the merchant (or thief who gets a hold of my card number) and my bank account. I also feel like people aren't likely to be looking for new debit cards since that means having to change (or at least open) another bank account. Plus there's coming up with the best way to handle the two CVM lists. But I'll give it more thought.
Hawaiian717 is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 7:48 pm
  #8488  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by FallenPlat
I don't know much about credit cards, but I've been to Europe a time or two. I can therefore state with authority that, as implied above, the issue of whether a card will work in an unattended, off-line kiosk is absolutely central and critical, i.e., that the difference between on-line PIN and off-line PIN is central and critical. So the "PIN" in all my wonderful US chip & signature cards is pretty useless if I'm not at an ATM, where I'd use a bank cash card anyway rather than a credit card. (ATMs use the on-line PIN feature of all the chip-and-signature cards.)

Translated into simpler English for anyone who's not following me here, it boils down to this: does my card work at the unmanned CDG train-to-the-city (RER) kiosks or do I have to wait for an hour at the manned counter? With an off-line, true PIN (e.g., Diners Club), yes; with anything else, maybe not. And that, to repeat, is a critical, central difference. Really, really important.

(To complete the circle: after playing machine-and-card roulette at CDG recently, I did get my new Merrill chip-and-signature card to work; all my chip-and-signature cards worked at the in-town remote kiosks. I have no idea why even after trying various amounts both under and over 10 Euros. I can only imagine what people who encounter unmanned toll booths and unmanned gas stations with their US cards must go through; it's been a while since I've driven in Europe.)
That may be true now but since the major card brands have decided that it's less expensive to make US cards work at unattended locations than to modify the cards themselves, I still think that the type of PIN ultimately won't matter. By making US cards work, the terminals effectively become online capable and can support no CVM as well as both types of PIN.

Also, if the US eventually adopts PIN issuers will probably put online PIN above offline to enable easy IVR changes and avoid having people remember the old PIN after changing it.

Last edited by tmiw; Dec 6, 2014 at 8:21 pm Reason: stupid autocorrect
tmiw is offline  
Old Dec 6, 2014, 9:10 pm
  #8489  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by Hawaiian717
It might be my biases showing, but I'm not really all that excited about contactless. And your earlier comment seems to imply that contactless is generally going to be effectively No CVM up to a certain value, then online PIN. It also complicates things if I have to support multiple CVM lists per card (which we know is the case with debit cards). I think for now, showing whether or not a card supports contactless is good enough.
In the US it would be no CVM up to $25/$50 (depending on card brand) and then signature afterward, but yes.

The thing that sucks is that the issuers have basically decided that we should have to buy a $700+ device to give us the security that they could have provided for free on the physical cards themselves. OTOH, Apple Pay is basically the one best shot at getting contactless in the US; if it fails, then it's very unlikely issuers are ever going to try again. Especially since scare stories like this are still being published, basically ensuring that physical cards won't have it (with a few exceptions).
tmiw is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2014, 3:48 am
  #8490  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Oh, I almost forgot--the Asian market still enforces the service code (FD100?/FD35 combo). Tonight I tried swiping; the clerk immediately asked to see my card and inserted it for me. So Walmart does appear to be the outlier so far.
tmiw is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.