Go Back   > > >
    Hide Wikipost
Old Jan 15, 16, 6:38 pm   -   Wikipost
FlyerTalk Forums Thread Wiki: USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been on FT for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: philemer
Wiki Link
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credi...signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 7, 14, 5:08 am   #5356
  
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brighton, United Kingdom
Programs: HHonors, Hyatt, Accor, SPGCorp, BA, Virgin
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiw View Post
Only way to be 100% sure is for someone to get that card and put it in a card reader. But yeah, I'm leaning towards C&S priority myself.
PayPass (as used on HSBC's cards) is what is used in the UK for Mastercard contactless payments so if the card supports this, you'll be able to use it anywhere in the UK that supports contactless (Transport for London buses, coffee shops, supermarkets etc).
architect1337 is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 8:16 am   #5357
  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgAAFT View Post
What is the contactless chip? Is that for paywave?
If yes, I thought that there was a discussion here once that US cards only work at US paywave locations?

Sidenote,
throughout my travels in Europe I have yet to see a overseas terminal support paywave? (Maybe I haven't looked close enough)
Yes. I don't think there's any restrictions since EMV is supposed to be compatible with it. /shrug
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 8:17 am   #5358
  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DFW,OVB (Russia)
Programs: AA HH Gold SPG Gold BA
Posts: 1,803
Update on Chase Freedom EMV

Called again today
1. Frontline CSR didn't have a clue
2. Asked to speak to supervisor, supervisor seemingly knew exactly what I was talking about and said that typically those cards go out in waves to customers, BUT since I told her I was "traveling" she said that "I can submit a special request for you to receive the card"
3. Gladly accepted and asked for express delivery
I will update here once I receive the card
rgAAFT is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 11:25 am   #5359
  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiw View Post
Barclay's card lets you change your PIN online or by phone and someone from them confirmed that the change gets pushed on the next use, IIRC. Might be the same here.
Does anyone have firsthand evidence that this is true? I know I've read it elsewhere in the forum but I rather doubt it actually works this way.
bullfrog is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 12:06 pm   #5360
  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinW23 View Post
I've been following this topic for quite a while and finally registered to contribute with a card that I didn't see in the wiki. United Nations Federal Credit Union has a card called Visa Azure. It has no annual fee, but does have a 1% FTF. The card and PIN are mailed separately and the PIN cannot be changed, so it looks like it supports offline PIN. I'm in Vancouver at the moment, but have also used this card in Europe and it has been accepted everywhere I go and I've always been asked for a PIN.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiw View Post
Not sure if anyone's noticed, but HSBC's US cards are now EMV enabled (and are contactless! ): http://www.us.hsbc.com/1/2/home/pers...g/credit-cards

From reading the information there, it appears that the cards have a PIN but are signature priority like the other C&P cards in this country. But still, they support contactless. And that's pretty huge if you're going to be traveling somewhere where the mass transit no longer takes cash.

Thanks, updated HSBC cards and UNFCU Azure to spreadsheet.
kebosabi is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 12:14 pm   #5361
  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DFW,OVB (Russia)
Programs: AA HH Gold SPG Gold BA
Posts: 1,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullfrog View Post
Does anyone have firsthand evidence that this is true? I know I've read it elsewhere in the forum but I rather doubt it actually works this way.
I listed a link a while back to Barclays official travel blog which had the post with the information. I would imagine the person that posted the information is a Barclays employee
rgAAFT is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 2:19 pm   #5362
  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
Here is the CVM list for the USAA MasterCard I just received:

Code:
CVM 1   > Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful:
        Enciphered PIN verified online - If unattended cash

CVM 2   > Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful:
        Signature (paper) - If terminal supports the CVM

CVM 3   > Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful:
        Enciphered PIN verified online - If terminal supports the CVM

CVM 4   > Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful:
        Enciphered PIN verification performed by ICC - If terminal supports the CVM

CVM 5   > Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful:
        Plaintext PIN verification performed by ICC - If terminal supports the CVM

CVM 6   > Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful:
        No CVM Required - If terminal supports the CVM

Last edited by tvholic; Jul 7, 14 at 2:38 pm
tvholic is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 2:35 pm   #5363
  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvholic View Post
Here is the CVM list for the USAA MasterCard I just received:

Code:
CVM 1   > Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful:
        Enciphered PIN verified online - If unattended cash

CVM 2   > Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful:
        Signature (paper) - If terminal supports the CVM

CVM 3   > Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful:
        Enciphered PIN verified online - If terminal supports the CVM

CVM 4   > Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful:
        Enciphered PIN verification performed by ICC - If terminal supports the CVM

CVM 5   > Apply succeeding CV rule if this rule is unsuccessful:
        Plaintext PIN verification performed by ICC - If terminal supports the CVM

CVM 6   > Fail cardholder verification if this CVM is unsuccessful: No
        CVM Required - If terminal supports the CVM
Unfortunate, but matches JEFFJAGUAR's experience. I wonder why USAA doesn't allow PIN as a backup in case of failed signature verification though. That might help with the merchants who aren't supposed to reject signature but do so anyway.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 2:41 pm   #5364
FlyerTalk Evangelist
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 12,327
More newbie questions:

1. What's the difference between "enciphered PIN" and "plaintext PIN?"
2. What practically happens with CVMs where it says "apply succeeding rule" versus "fail." At the end of the day, the terminal is checking. Does that mean that if the terminal supports both enciphered online and enciphered offline PIN, and my online PIN was wrong, it'll ask for an offline PIN?
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 3:00 pm   #5365
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ORDwest
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiw View Post
Unfortunate, but matches JEFFJAGUAR's experience. I wonder why USAA doesn't allow PIN as a backup in case of failed signature verification though. That might help with the merchants who aren't supposed to reject signature but do so anyway.
Well, that's a real shame. Thanks for posting; this is proof for JJ's hypothesis that the new cards would be downgraded like his. My old card expiry date is Feb 2015, and I only have one intl. trip planned before then Oh well, it worked great the last couple years.
othermike27 is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 3:18 pm   #5366
  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshwex90 View Post
More newbie questions:

1. What's the difference between "enciphered PIN" and "plaintext PIN?"
2. What practically happens with CVMs where it says "apply succeeding rule" versus "fail." At the end of the day, the terminal is checking. Does that mean that if the terminal supports both enciphered online and enciphered offline PIN, and my online PIN was wrong, it'll ask for an offline PIN?
Enciphered PIN = PIN is encrypted in the terminal before being sent to the card/acquirer. Plaintext = no encryption done on the PIN. I think most terminals support both but most cards with a PIN use plaintext for offline PIN due to the expense required to make cards that can do encryption.

Fail means the transaction will just be voided. "Apply succeeding rule" means the terminal will go to the next supported rule in the card's CVM list, failing if it can't find any other rules.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 3:52 pm   #5367
FlyerTalk Evangelist
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 12,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiw View Post
Enciphered PIN = PIN is encrypted in the terminal before being sent to the card/acquirer. Plaintext = no encryption done on the PIN. I think most terminals support both but most cards with a PIN use plaintext for offline PIN due to the expense required to make cards that can do encryption.
So why do any credit cards offer plaintext online PIN? Seems kinda silly to not encipher a PIN.

As for enciphered offline, if I understand correctly, the card would need to encipher it before sending it to the terminal for confirmation? If so, sounds like the USAA still does that, above what others do.

I also don't get why a plaintext PIN would ever be a CVM than an enciphered one.

Quote:
Fail means the transaction will just be voided. "Apply succeeding rule" means the terminal will go to the next supported rule in the card's CVM list, failing if it can't find any other rules.
So how can it fail signature but still have lower CVMs? Is that only for terminals that don't support signature? You mentioned it would be nice not to fail so as to help where merchants just void signature transactions - how would that help if the terminal would just pop out a slip? Could he press "void" and it would then ask for a PIN?
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 4:06 pm   #5368
  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshwex90 View Post
So why do any credit cards offer plaintext online PIN? Seems kinda silly to not encipher a PIN.

As for enciphered offline, if I understand correctly, the card would need to encipher it before sending it to the terminal for confirmation? If so, sounds like the USAA still does that, above what others do.

I also don't get why a plaintext PIN would ever be a CVM than an enciphered one.
I don't believe any support plaintext online PIN. It's a massive security issue if they do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshwex90 View Post
So how can it fail signature but still have lower CVMs? Is that only for terminals that don't support signature? You mentioned it would be nice not to fail so as to help where merchants just void signature transactions - how would that help if the terminal would just pop out a slip? Could he press "void" and it would then ask for a PIN?
The other CVMs are supposed to be for terminals that don't support signature, I think.

As for pushing "void", I'm not 100% sure. The prompt for the merchant is something like "is signature valid? Yes/No" in their local language. I would think it would go to PIN next if they push No but it really depends on the terminal and card. I'm tempted to go to the yogurt shop I went to earlier in the thread with my Andrews card (since all of the CVM rules are "apply succeeding") and have the cashier push No to find out.
tmiw is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 7:07 pm   #5369
  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: DFW,OVB (Russia)
Programs: AA HH Gold SPG Gold BA
Posts: 1,803
I don't imagine so but,
Does anyone have any updates on the Chase CSP pin version roll out?
rgAAFT is offline  
Old Jul 7, 14, 11:48 pm   #5370
  
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LAX/SFO/OAK
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiw View Post
I don't believe any support plaintext online PIN. It's a massive security issue if they do.



The other CVMs are supposed to be for terminals that don't support signature, I think.

As for pushing "void", I'm not 100% sure. The prompt for the merchant is something like "is signature valid? Yes/No" in their local language. I would think it would go to PIN next if they push No but it really depends on the terminal and card. I'm tempted to go to the yogurt shop I went to earlier in the thread with my Andrews card (since all of the CVM rules are "apply succeeding") and have the cashier push No to find out.

Plaintext Online PIN does not exist. All online PINs are enciphered. Online PINs are encrypted by the terminal and sent to the acquirer. Online PINs for EMV are handled by the terminal just like PINs for debit cards.

And no, your theory about the CVM list is incorrect. In your scenario, the terminal at the yogurt shop would actually void the transaction when you pushed NO. Per the EMV standard, once the terminal decides to try a CVM (either by choice or automatically), then the transaction will be voided if that particular CVM cannot be completed.

Also, there is no way for USAA to have a backup PIN for the people who void signature transactions.
WhatWhatTech is offline  
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Search Thread
Go to Top
Forum Jump
Contact Us - FlyerTalk - Archive - Top