Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Old Jun 26, 2014, 12:12 am
  #5176  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LAX/SFO/OAK
Posts: 218
Based on the amount of confusion over CVMs over the last couple of pages of this thread, I think we should add a section to the wiki on CVMs. I think it will be especially helpful for people who are just joining the discussion. I also think that we should make a note on the entries in the spreadsheet that have not had their CVMs verified by Cardpeek. This should reduce a lot of the confusion in this thread.
WhatWhatTech is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 3:06 am
  #5177  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,501
I went to a local frozen yogurt shop tonight and tried to use my CSP to pay. The cashier was having problems using my card with the "brand new" credit card terminal they got, so I got to walk her through running her first EMV card. When I told her that they're replacing people's cards with chip cards she was 100% on board and understood the security advantages. ^
tmiw is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 7:26 am
  #5178  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 213
Last message from USAA:
" Please note that the PIN is not stored on the World MasterCard itself; we do in fact store the PIN in a server. "

If someone can please review the last couple of pages and answer some outstanding questions, it would really help.

Mostly I just want to know:

- Is this current USAA card a true chip-n-pin?
- How is it different than the PenFed card, which does not allow PIN to be changed

And most importantly:

- any examples of specific cases where the USAA card will NOT work, and where the PenFed will not work

- and any case where USAA will work and PenFed will not, or vice-verse?

Thanks guys!!
kayanco is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 7:36 am
  #5179  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 213
Also if someone can explain, there was a discussion of TWO pins?
So I was wondering, the European cards, which are "True" chip-n-pin cards, i.e. they would work in all cases in all European terminals. Do they have two pins? one for offline and one for online??
kayanco is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 7:51 am
  #5180  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
The problem is you cannot get anybody at USAA who has a clue as to what is going on. Yesterday somebody claiming to be from the credit card department and the ceo's office called me and it quickly became apparent to me show didn't have a clue as to what I was talking about. She had no idea about cvm's. So I asked her to transfer me to somebody who knew but she claimed she knew. Then why have you changed the cvm on at least my, and I am sure all, cards issued after a certain date and she hemmed and hawed and then began reciting some of the lies again. (The reason you were asked for a signature and not a pin is because of the way the merchant's pos is set up). Is your pin online or offline? Well that's information we can't release according to her. Incidentally I did bring my Pen Fed card with me also and tried it in the French SNCF kiosk and it didn't work for whatever that's worth. She promised to get back to me later yesterday and naturally didn't. It will be time later today for another e-mail.

Now if you ask me, here's what happened. USAA is an innovative bank and felt the USA would be going chip and pin and wanted to be in on the ground floor so they issued the chip and pin card and no matter what they try to say it was a true chip and pin card as we can see by the list that was posted. But in the on-going discussions, both mastercard and visa have been very adamant that chip and signature is almost as secure as chip and pin in card is present transactions (they may well be right but that is not the point) and have strongly pushed on the banks in the USA that they should go chip and signature. Once it became evident that the USA would probably be going chip and signature, USAA bean counters figured why spend the exptra for a chip and pin card and scaled their card back to chip and signature with chip and pin capabilaities.

Of course in some of the articles I have read, there still remain two problems. As somebody else just said, the security issue is not important to me nor should it be to any Americans because of the liability laws. It is will our cards work when they have to? Mastercard and visa both claim and admit there will be some situations where the chip and signature cards will not work but claim to be happy with 99.7% coverage. Of course if you're caught in that 0.3% situation, you're not going to be very happy.

I just wish I could get somebody at USAA to level with me of just what is going on and realize they are not talking to somebody who doesn't understand the whole thing.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 7:59 am
  #5181  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Originally Posted by kayanco
Also if someone can explain, there was a discussion of TWO pins?
So I was wondering, the European cards, which are "True" chip-n-pin cards, i.e. they would work in all cases in all European terminals. Do they have two pins? one for offline and one for online??
There is no such thing as a "true Chip&PIN" card. Most posters refer to a card where the first CVM is PIN.
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 8:23 am
  #5182  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
The problem is you cannot get anybody at USAA who has a clue as to what is going on. Yesterday somebody claiming to be from the credit card department and the ceo's office called me and it quickly became apparent to me show didn't have a clue as to what I was talking about. She had no idea about cvm's. So I asked her to transfer me to somebody who knew but she claimed she knew. Then why have you changed the cvm on at least my, and I am sure all, cards issued after a certain date and she hemmed and hawed and then began reciting some of the lies again. (The reason you were asked for a signature and not a pin is because of the way the merchant's pos is set up). Is your pin online or offline? Well that's information we can't release according to her. Incidentally I did bring my Pen Fed card with me also and tried it in the French SNCF kiosk and it didn't work for whatever that's worth. She promised to get back to me later yesterday and naturally didn't. It will be time later today for another e-mail.

Now if you ask me, here's what happened. USAA is an innovative bank and felt the USA would be going chip and pin and wanted to be in on the ground floor so they issued the chip and pin card and no matter what they try to say it was a true chip and pin card as we can see by the list that was posted. But in the on-going discussions, both mastercard and visa have been very adamant that chip and signature is almost as secure as chip and pin in card is present transactions (they may well be right but that is not the point) and have strongly pushed on the banks in the USA that they should go chip and signature. Once it became evident that the USA would probably be going chip and signature, USAA bean counters figured why spend the exptra for a chip and pin card and scaled their card back to chip and signature with chip and pin capabilaities.

Of course in some of the articles I have read, there still remain two problems. As somebody else just said, the security issue is not important to me nor should it be to any Americans because of the liability laws. It is will our cards work when they have to? Mastercard and visa both claim and admit there will be some situations where the chip and signature cards will not work but claim to be happy with 99.7% coverage. Of course if you're caught in that 0.3% situation, you're not going to be very happy.

I just wish I could get somebody at USAA to level with me of just what is going on and realize they are not talking to somebody who doesn't understand the whole thing.
So your USAA didn't work, AND, your PenFed didn't work either!

This is definitely confusing...I'm not sure if it includes French SNCF kiosk, but I've read reports on PenFed working at the rail and bus ticket kiosks in France and unmanned gas stations.

I don't really care what CVM list is used or even Sig. vs. Pin....as long as the card won't be outright rejected, I think it's okay....but right now it's not even clear in what cases will PenFed and USAA be rejected, or if having both will give broader coverage, or if it's just redundant.

I wish we could apply for an European card

Or we should launch a card company and let people customize their own CVM list !!

CVM1: pin
CVM2: pin
CVM3: pinnnnnnnnnnnnn
...
kayanco is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 9:20 am
  #5183  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SLC
Posts: 229
Confirmation that Barclaycard is Using Scripts

This was recently posted here by an employee on the Barclaycard Arrival Community:

When a chip card is made, the chip contains a system generated default PIN. So when a customer changes PIN online or via IVR (automated phone service), the PIN is changed in the system, but not in the chip since the system can’t reach the chip at that point. For the new PIN to get to the chip, the chip needs to come online. That’s why the first transaction after PIN change must be an online transaction.

Often it's difficult to determine if a terminal is online. And since most online terminals are attended, customers are directed to look for an attended terminal. The cashier does not do anything to help the customer, nor will the customer get any confirmation of PIN activation. (This is all invisible and happens in a split second. It looks like a regular transaction to both the customer and the cashier.)

Here’s how the PIN is changed: When customer changes their PIN online or via IVR, the system generates a script. Once a chip card is inserted into an online terminal, the terminal will connect to the system and see the script. The terminal will get the script and run the script. The script writes the new PIN to the chip. At that point, the PIN is synced up and ready to go.

Any online terminal can do this, domestic or foreign.

Next time when the customers goes to a terminal that is offline, the terminal will just read the PIN in the chip and validate it against customer input. The terminal does not need to come online.
So they are using scripts and, unless I'm totally missing the point, the Arrival card seems to definitely include Offline PIN. Has anyone verified this using Cardpeek?
PhillyInvestor is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 9:23 am
  #5184  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ORDwest
Posts: 332
Originally Posted by kayanco
I don't really care what CVM list is used or even Sig. vs. Pin....as long as the card won't be outright rejected, I think it's okay....but right now it's not even clear in what cases will PenFed and USAA be rejected, or if having both will give broader coverage, or if it's just redundant.

I wish we could apply for an European card
Even that wouldn't give you universal access in Europe. As reported way back in this thread, there is no single card that is guaranteed to work at every merchant and every unattended kiosk. Some countries or municipalities accept only locally issued cards - some credit cards, and some special-purpose access cards for that transportation system only.

I wish I could carry just one card that would access all my credit lines (VISA, MC, Amex, whatever) wherever I wanted to spend money, guaranteeing every merchant that I'm the real me and good for the payment, while also working in train stations and toll booths, etc. Heck, if I had such a card I would even pay Chris Elliott's toll if he drove up behind me on the autostrada. But I really don't hold my breath waiting for this to happen (and no, I don't count wallaby and similar efforts).

If you have travel coming up soon, I suggest a set of 2-4 EMV-enabled cards with at least one that claims to be C+P, backed up by cash. Better yet, if you can afford to wait, hold off applying for any new cards until there is more clarity on the issues we are discussing here.
othermike27 is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 9:24 am
  #5185  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by WhatWhatTech
Based on the amount of confusion over CVMs over the last couple of pages of this thread, I think we should add a section to the wiki on CVMs. I think it will be especially helpful for people who are just joining the discussion. I also think that we should make a note on the entries in the spreadsheet that have not had their CVMs verified by Cardpeek. This should reduce a lot of the confusion in this thread.
The wiki is editable to all so you can jump right in to add something if you wish.

For the Google Docs spreadsheet, I think I already gave you edit access so you can change the CMV portion to show it's has/has not been verified with cardpeek if you like.

kebosabi is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 9:26 am
  #5186  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ORDwest
Posts: 332
Originally Posted by PhillyInvestor
This was recently posted here by an employee on the Barclaycard Arrival Community:



So they are using scripts and, unless I'm totally missing the point, the Arrival card seems to definitely include Offline PIN. Has anyone verified this using Cardpeek?
This is great info! Thanks for posting. ^
othermike27 is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 9:29 am
  #5187  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by PhillyInvestor
This was recently posted here by an employee on the Barclaycard Arrival Community:



So they are using scripts and, unless I'm totally missing the point, the Arrival card seems to definitely include Offline PIN. Has anyone verified this using Cardpeek?
I get what you're saying and after the fact I realized that is what might have happened i.e. I changed the pin online before I left and I should have tried the old pin in the SNCF kiosk but...I should have been informed by USAA when I changed the pin that I would have to use the card at least once in a chip and signature terminal (would have meant a quick visit to Walmart) but they didn't tell me that. Just more ammunition for when I finally get through to the clowns at USAA.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 9:38 am
  #5188  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: ORDwest
Posts: 332
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
I get what you're saying and after the fact I realized that is what might have happened i.e. I changed the pin online before I left and I should have tried the old pin in the SNCF kiosk but...I should have been informed by USAA when I changed the pin that I would have to use the card at least once in a chip and signature terminal (would have meant a quick visit to Walmart) but they didn't tell me that. Just more ammunition for when I finally get through to the clowns at USAA.
Please let us know if/when you do get more info from them. I would also really like to see a cardpeek scan of the CVM list on a recent issue USAA card to get an independent view of what they have/have not done to the sequence.
othermike27 is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 9:50 am
  #5189  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by othermike27
Even that wouldn't give you universal access in Europe. As reported way back in this thread, there is no single card that is guaranteed to work at every merchant and every unattended kiosk. Some countries or municipalities accept only locally issued cards - some credit cards, and some special-purpose access cards for that transportation system only.

I wish I could carry just one card that would access all my credit lines (VISA, MC, Amex, whatever) wherever I wanted to spend money, guaranteeing every merchant that I'm the real me and good for the payment, while also working in train stations and toll booths, etc. Heck, if I had such a card I would even pay Chris Elliott's toll if he drove up behind me on the autostrada. But I really don't hold my breath waiting for this to happen (and no, I don't count wallaby and similar efforts).

If you have travel coming up soon, I suggest a set of 2-4 EMV-enabled cards with at least one that claims to be C+P, backed up by cash. Better yet, if you can afford to wait, hold off applying for any new cards until there is more clarity on the issues we are discussing here.

Agreed! Which is why I'm trying to figure out if PenFed and USAA will give broad coverage or if they are redundant/overlap...not sure if they work exactly the same in terms of online/offline pin.

Btw, there is something called "Coin" (https://onlycoin.com), which does what you are talking about with many card ....obviously doesn't have chip-n-pin yet
kayanco is offline  
Old Jun 26, 2014, 9:53 am
  #5190  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 213
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
I get what you're saying and after the fact I realized that is what might have happened i.e. I changed the pin online before I left and I should have tried the old pin in the SNCF kiosk but...I should have been informed by USAA when I changed the pin that I would have to use the card at least once in a chip and signature terminal (would have meant a quick visit to Walmart) but they didn't tell me that. Just more ammunition for when I finally get through to the clowns at USAA.
But we still don't know if USAA follows that exact methodology or something else...please do find out from them
kayanco is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.