Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2014, 9:51 pm
  #4456  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: LAS - where you can get married and divorced in the same 24 hour period. Perfect for the woman who's saving herself for marriage and the man who wants a one night stand.
Programs: DL DM, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond, Marriott Platinum, UA, AA, AS, WN kettle, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,613
PIN required at Sam's Club

I used my Diners Club MC at Sam's Club and a message was on the screen that the mag stripe couldn't be used - insert the card in the bottom.

The cashier knew nothing about this.

I had to rotate the terminal to see the slot outlined in blue LED light and insert the card.

It then displayed a screen requesting the PIN - which I never bothered to memorize. Looks like I'll have to find it and memorize it to shop there again with the BMO MC.
puddinhead is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 9:54 pm
  #4457  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by puddinhead
I used my Diners Club MC at Sam's Club and a message was on the screen that the mag stripe couldn't be used - insert the card in the bottom.

The cashier knew nothing about this.

I had to rotate the terminal to see the slot outlined in blue LED light and insert the card.

It then displayed a screen requesting the PIN - which I never bothered to memorize. Looks like I'll have to find it and memorize it to shop there again with the BMO MC.
Surprised the cashier didn't know, they must have just turned it on. Also, sadly, you just demonstrated the argument many American banks have against chip and PIN - that the PINs would be forgotten, thus their card would be used less.
AllieKat is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 11:04 pm
  #4458  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by alexmt
Surprised the cashier didn't know, they must have just turned it on. Also, sadly, you just demonstrated the argument many American banks have against chip and PIN - that the PINs would be forgotten, thus their card would be used less.
The main issue currently is the inability to change the PINs. PINs could be memorized easily if the cardholder was allowed to change it to something they can remember (which everyone does with their ATM/debit cards) rather than some random 4 digit number that they cannot change.

Also, a lot of memorization comes from repetition (i.e. passwords in online sites). The more places one faces where they are asked to enter a PIN (or a password), the more people will remember through frequency of use.

Of course those are the ideal situations. In this current state, I resort to writing down my PIN for my Andrews FCU card on the back of the card using codes and glyphs that only I know how to decipher.

Last edited by kebosabi; May 21, 2014 at 11:09 pm
kebosabi is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 11:05 pm
  #4459  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Why not do what Australia did for a bit and give the user a choice between signature and PIN at checkout? I know it's against the EMV spec to do that, but it'll settle the PIN vs. signature debate once and for all by giving us data on what consumers actually prefer.
tmiw is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 11:19 pm
  #4460  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 103
Originally Posted by mre5765
Berlin, last August (2013). My BA Chase C&S was rejected by the restaurant's PoS terminal. Chase.com had no fraud alerts.
Had a similar problem with my BofA C&S card in Granada last year, turned out the PoS terminal lost its internet connection.
dmapr is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 11:20 pm
  #4461  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by tmiw
Why not do what Australia did for a bit and give the user a choice between signature and PIN at checkout? I know it's against the EMV spec to do that, but it'll settle the PIN vs. signature debate once and for all by giving us data on what consumers actually prefer.
Allowing PIN bypass isn't against EMV specs if properly presented (PIN was required, PIN pad was working, PIN wasn't entered) for authorisation. It's up to banks and merchants to allow that, and my understanding is it's actually recommended as a stopgap measure when a country is introducing chip and PIN.
AllieKat is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 2:15 am
  #4462  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by emvchip
Earlier you called a 1% currency conversion fee absurd (I think it's quite reasonable considering all of the infrastructure in place to do it that cheaply, although 0% beats 1%). But you surcharge your own customers in New York 3%?

Can you even use Square for card not present transactions?
You're right. I'm a terribly selfish guy. I want my cake and want to eat it too. I won't try to defend what I do but my side line business is not a big money maker and far from something I rely on. Until square came along, I longed to take credit cards as a convenience for some of my clients. It just seemed the proper thing to do but at the time, I obeyed NY law and didn't surcharge them. When the fed judge pulled the garbage he did and declared a NY state law prohibiting surcharges unconstitutional under the freedom of speech amendment, something that makes no sense whatsoever, I decided to go along. Basically, for the 10 or so clients I have who pay with credit cards, we laugh about it. Imagine paying $12 to collect 400 miles. You're a great guy, they tell me. No, it's not a good justification but more in good fun (I'm very good at what I do, btw).

As far as the 1% ftf, that fee is particularly irksome because there is no justification for it other than the banks wishing to make money on our backs. The banks have nothing to do with currency conversion, it's done by mc/visa so hence there is no risk to them, as if currencies can fluctuate in normal time 1% in the space of the time between an item is purchased and it is posted to the account. Besides, as you put it, I had an alternative i.e. using Capital One or at the time MBNA to have no currency conversion fees. And then the situation became more regretable when the banks had the unmitigated gall to change the currency fee to a foreign transaction fee where they have no risk whatsoever on the ground well foreign transactions are more prone to fraud. Prove it.

At the time, I felt and still feel the 1% ftf charged by USAA was better than 3% but still 1% higher than it should be. I still feel that way. Why pay a fee for something that is available for free? There are enough cards around today sans ftf to make that one of the most important qualities I look for in a card.

Finally, in answer to your last question, yes. With square, you can key in the number of the card. Don't hold me to the exact figures but I think the discount rate goes from 2.7% for a swipe to something like 3.5% for a manually entered card number. You can check on their web site.

Now I know, these were not the answers you wanted to hear but then again, I'm not a conventional person as you probably have figured out from my posts. But I do like to stir the pot (figuratively not actually).
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 6:31 am
  #4463  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6
Angry PenFed Chip and Pin really Chip and Sig?

I am confused about how chip and pin cards are supposed to work. I recently went to Europe with my (supposed) PenFed chip and pin card, and not once did I have to enter my pin...always the little hand-held terminals spit out a receipt for me to sign. This was contrary to my expectation; that I had the additional security of having to enter a pin to confirm my purchase. I contacted PenFed, and at first they insisted that there was nothing wrong with my card, and that it was indeed chip and pin. The last message, however, said this:

"We wish to clarify that while a PIN is embedded into your chip, the card is
chip-and-signature. Please accept our apologies for the frustration and
inconvenience this has caused."

I am indeed frustrated. And I still don't know whether this card will work at an unattended terminal such as in airports. Much has been made of the PenFed cards on various sites, as being one of the few chip and pin cards that is also FEX free. It now appears that this is just another chip and signature card
prathmell is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 6:57 am
  #4464  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Welcome to FT!!

The card should indeed have a PIN. It *prefers* signature, so when you insert at a terminal that allows for signature, it will have you sign. But when somewhere that only allows PIN, in theory, the PIN should work.

The card itself is just as secure from cloning/hacking as any other EMV card is, including Chip&PIN.
joshwex90 is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 7:39 am
  #4465  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6
Originally Posted by joshwex90
Welcome to FT!!

The card should indeed have a PIN. It *prefers* signature, so when you insert at a terminal that allows for signature, it will have you sign. But when somewhere that only allows PIN, in theory, the PIN should work.

The card itself is just as secure from cloning/hacking as any other EMV card is, including Chip&PIN.
Thank you Joshwex90. I think PenFed does not understand its own technology. My original message to them was to ask if the card was signature priority (which they vigorously denied). As long as it will work in situations where a signature is not allowed, I am satisfied. I wish there was a way to test this, though, instead of finding out the hard way.
prathmell is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 7:58 am
  #4466  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
I think there's a card issued in the US that has an offline PIN. I forget which, but if so, that may have universal acceptance
joshwex90 is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 8:40 am
  #4467  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Welcome. If you have a couple of hours of spare time, you can go through this 290 page thread which is still growing and you will find your answer somewhere.

When several fcu's in the DC area introduced with great (or maybe not so great) fanfare their new generation of chip and pin cards (c&p), we all shouted in harmony hip hip horay or something to that effect. And then we found out the truth when people started using PenFed or State Department or Andrews FCU's supposed c&p card. It's in here somewhere.

The reality is these cards are really chip and signature chards with chip and pin capability at unpersonneled kiosks and the like. What does that mean? If you go back a few pages you will find a link to Barclay's Bank introduction of its premier arrival card. In their informatin connected to the link, they explain just what is mean by chip and signature with pin capability. It's exactly what you encountered. Basically at a personneled pos terminal, the card defaults as chip and signature as you found out. The good news to report is that it seems the cards do deliver the goods at the unpersonneled kiosks you hear so much about. We've heard some reports of non functionality at some of the French autoroutes automatic plazas but that is an ongoing problem, apparently, not related to c&s and c&p.

While nothing definitive has come out, it is the belief of some here (myself included) that this is the ultimate direction the US banks will go with the introduction of emv cards in this country tentatively scheduled for October 2015. The banks, for the most part, seem very adamant that Americans prefer signing to pin verification based on who knows what research. Now others here disagree and have adopted a wait and see attitude but as of now, we really don't know what direction ultimately the US banks will go off on when they finally get around to introducing credit cards with emv chips.

Now it really shouldn't matter if this is the direction the USA decides to go. However, as a possible downer, I must report to you that there have been a few reports, I emphasize only a few as of now, of Americans tendering their c&s emv equipped cards at pos terminals manned or womanned by a human being who, when the terminal lights up and says signature required, suddenly say, "no way Jose" or whatever and refuse to complete the transaction. Visa and mc claim this is a violation of their merchant agreements and are trying to do something about it. But then again visa and mc regs have very little real impact.

Now, as we've discussed here, we believe there are only 3 what we would call "true" c&p cards put out with US cardholders. One is Diners Club which is really an expensive mastercard today but Bank of Montreal which owns the name in North America has for the last year and a half or more refused to issue new cards to American residents. Then there is UNFCU which recently opened up membership to the lay public if they join some organization relted to encouraging Americans to support the UN. The third is the FCU owned and operated by USAA. The problem there is membership seems to be restricted to people who ctually have US military blood in their veins. That's it for "true" c&p cards in the USA.

So you may feel Pen FCU lied to you. No. It's more a case that their csr's (customer service reps) don't have a clue as to what is going on and just read from a script.

When the smoke clears, will we have emv in the USA. Almost surely yes. Will it be c&p? My guess is probably not that the banks will go off in the direction of Barclay's Bank and the FCU's in the DC area. But that's only a guess. It really shouldn't matter as the cards shoould work everywhere and you do have the protection of the emv chip against cloning,but we will see.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 9:15 am
  #4468  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by alexmt
Allowing PIN bypass isn't against EMV specs if properly presented (PIN was required, PIN pad was working, PIN wasn't entered) for authorisation. It's up to banks and merchants to allow that, and my understanding is it's actually recommended as a stopgap measure when a country is introducing chip and PIN.
Good to know. I think the banks have already made up their minds and will go C&S for the most part, but the option's there if they really want to know.
tmiw is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 11:49 am
  #4469  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,933
Originally Posted by joshwex90
I think there's a card issued in the US that has an offline PIN. I forget which, but if so, that may have universal acceptance
The Diners Club card (issued in the US to existing Diners Club customers but not yet available to new customers) is "offline" PIN. That is the card that a post above talking about Sam's Club is referring to. (Sam's Club is a division of Wal-Mart, so no surprise to those of who knew about Wal-Mart enabling EMV that Sam's Club would have it enabled too.)

Meanwhile, while offline PIN may have the most universal acceptance, there is no such thing as truly universal acceptance, because some merchants (at least in some places in Europe) only accept credit cards issued in that country, no matter what the technology. So until a card card comes along that can "pretend" to have been isueed in whatever country it's being used in, there would be unviersal acceptance!

And then, of course, there are those merchants (including notoriously Arco in the US) which take debit cards but no credit cards, so until a credit card can "pretend" to be a debit card at Arco, there's also not going to be such a thing as universal accpetance.
sdsearch is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 7:38 pm
  #4470  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 148
I was hoping the news from Barclay and Chase would be positive the sense that they would offer C&P priority, but it seems those hopes are dashed. Probably will just join UNFCU and try for their cards.
rtwvagabond is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.