Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2014, 4:55 pm
  #2671  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SF
Programs: UA, VX, QF, EY, VA
Posts: 756
The UNFCU cards (even the "Elite" with CLs of 100K) have a 2% FTF (they call it an ISA, and blame Visa for it, and say they don't charge any fees themselves).

I'm tempted to believe them, but then that means Chase and Barclays are eating 2% on every outside US transaction. I highly doubt banks are giving up 2% for no reason, so I'm going to assume it's because Chase/Barclays have much higher volumes and can negotiate better rates.
patrick.barnes is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:14 pm
  #2672  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: KWI
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 806
Originally Posted by patrick.barnes
The UNFCU cards (even the "Elite" with CLs of 100K) have a 2% FTF (they call it an ISA, and blame Visa for it, and say they don't charge any fees themselves).

I'm tempted to believe them, but then that means Chase and Barclays are eating 2% on every outside US transaction. I highly doubt banks are giving up 2% for no reason, so I'm going to assume it's because Chase/Barclays have much higher volumes and can negotiate better rates.
Is there a chance it's because Chase tends to issue their no FTF cards as Visa Signatures and Barclays as MC World Elites? They'd get a higher interchange rate to make up for it.

My Capital One Venture with no FTF is a Visa Signature even.

Last edited by LoneTree; Jan 12, 2014 at 5:21 pm
LoneTree is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:17 pm
  #2673  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York
Programs: Cutting down :-(
Posts: 604
Originally Posted by patrick.barnes
The UNFCU cards (even the "Elite" with CLs of 100K) have a 2% FTF (they call it an ISA, and blame Visa for it, and say they don't charge any fees themselves).

I'm tempted to believe them, but then that means Chase and Barclays are eating 2% on every outside US transaction. I highly doubt banks are giving up 2% for no reason, so I'm going to assume it's because Chase/Barclays have much higher volumes and can negotiate better rates.
The standard Visa fee is 1%. Anything over that is pure profit.
cvarming is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:19 pm
  #2674  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SF
Programs: UA, VX, QF, EY, VA
Posts: 756
Maybe... the CC FAQ is here:

http://www.unfcu.org/qa.aspx?id=1038

I don't really know. My SF Fire CU Visa is not a Sig, and has 0% FTF. They're very generous though, so they're probably eating the fee. But UNFCU is 4x bigger than SF Fire CU, so... I don't get it.

The UNFCU debit card seems to only charge 0.8% for ATM withdrawals outside the US, and they say that's just the MasterCard fee for doing it.

Either way, I'll send in the application tomorrow. Love me some CUs.
patrick.barnes is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:21 pm
  #2675  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SF
Programs: UA, VX, QF, EY, VA
Posts: 756
Originally Posted by cvarming
The standard Visa fee is 1%. Anything over that is pure profit.
From their FAQ:

What is the International Service Assessment (ISA) Fee?

An International Service Assessment Fee (ISA) is a currency conversion fee. Since all transactions on US issued credit cards are posted in USD, VISA converts any purchase amount made outside the US, Puerto Rico, or the US Virgin Islands into USD and charges a currency conversion fee for that process regardless of whether there is a currency conversion associated with the transaction. Transactions made with your credit card are charged 2% of the total transaction amount, which is equal to the ISA fee, while other financial institutions may charge up to 3% of the total transaction amount. Please note that this fee is NOT a new fee. Changes with card company regulations now require it to be listed as a separate charge on your statement. Previously, this fee was included in the exchange rate by VISA as part of the total transaction amount. The ISA fee is assessed by VISA, not by United Nations Federal Credit Union.

---

I don't really know why an obviously international organization like this would be making this up. Or maybe... a huge percentage of their transactions occur non-US, so they can't eat the fees?
patrick.barnes is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:23 pm
  #2676  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: KWI
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 806
Originally Posted by patrick.barnes
I don't really know why an obviously international organization like this would be making this up. Or maybe... a huge percentage of their transactions occur non-US, so they can't eat the fees?
State Department FCU caters to us Foreign Service Officers who ostensibly spend most of our life overseas, and they eat the fee, so it can't just be that.
LoneTree is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:28 pm
  #2677  
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,580
Originally Posted by Majuki
But who's getting the cut with DCC? I thought it was the merchant and POS terminal bank, not the card's issuing bank.
But it's all connected. If the merchant and their bank get a profit, they will accept a less favorable contract in other areas, and the network and issuer will benefit.
cbn42 is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:49 pm
  #2678  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,059
Originally Posted by kebosabi
The key to getting merchants to stop going after DCC is to turn the tables around: make it cost inefficient to go after DCC by overloading their workload.

<snip>

Furthermore, don't lash out the front end employees. They're just doing their job to get paid a crappy wage, the managers are just desk employees and aren't likely to know these intricate mumbo-jumbo as well. For all I care, they're just like us, work for a set a time and they go home to play Grand Theft Auto V or whatever. Much of these things are corporate decisions at the board level and the manuals are written by equally clueless MBAs. In order force change at the board room level, it's usually "what's the overhead costs" that are the keys to decision making.

There's a lot of things I want to change other than this EMV thing. DCCs, how public transit fares are collected, etc. etc. But at least we went from absolutely no EMV cards in the US back in 2010 to where we are right now in 2014.

There's the old way of doing things, and there's a millennial way of doing things. That's what I learned from this EMV debacle. We millennials are said to have high BS meters. And that's true, we don't accept their BS excuses
Hey! As a millennial and an MBA I resemble some of your remarks. I don't lash out at front-end employees, but I sometimes have to get involved in a lively dialogue.

I know what you're saying about the BS meter. This comic comes to mind. Also, I'm not trying to get this post into OMNI/PR territory, but it's a lot like the Obamacare pro and con ad campaigns targeting our demographic. Quite frankly, I don't respond well to either "Hey bro! Do you got insurance?!" depicted here or the Koch brothers' opt-out tailgate and TV ad campaign. Both of these squarely fall into the category of how not to sell something to our generation. It would go a lot further to explain the benefits of having insurance (for the pro side) or the high cost vs. value (for the con side).

I apologize for drifting OT on your thread, so from now on I'll stick to talking about EMV issues.
Majuki is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:56 pm
  #2679  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: KWI
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 806
Originally Posted by cvarming
The standard Visa fee is 1%. Anything over that is pure profit.
Even though the FAQ says 2%, the credit card terms and application say 1%.
LoneTree is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 5:56 pm
  #2680  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: AA EXP 1.5MM, Asiana Club Silver, KE Morning Calm, Hyatt Platinum, Amtrak Select
Posts: 7,161
Originally Posted by cbn42
I have no problem with DCC. The DCC scam is similar to the high APR scam. It enables the banks to make more money off the suckers, which improves the rewards programs for us.
The problem with DCC as noted is because there's no full control choice from the consumer. It's operate like a scam where it's not an option but rather, sneaked up upon. At least for APRs and FTFs, you can shop around for the best deal. DCC however, is thrust upon to all cardholders no matter who you're card is: AndrewsFCU, BofA, Citi, Chase, there's not much way around it in that particular scenario. In a way, it's like there's not much consumer protection from this.

If it clearly said something clearly like "you have the full option of being charged in your local currency for your convenience, however bear in mind that if you choose this option, you will end up paying more," and if still people prefer to choose it this way because they feel comfortable seeing the charge in their local currency, then no problem. When you, the consumer, have full control and if you still want to do via DCC, then that's your choice.

But when it's something like the Marriott in Frankfurt or the Burger King in Ireland where you do not full control over DCC and it's more like "sorry can't do anything about it, it's the machine that's set up that way and no, we're not supposed to tinker with it because that's the corporate decision, and we're lowly peons who don't have the authority to question the board members, there's not much we can't do," then that's a problem.

At least DCC on EMV give you the input choice on the terminal where your choice is done instantaneously online with no choice or input done by the merchant. Doing DCC via mag-stripe which requires a check marking the receipt, requires an offline input from the merchant later, in which they can get to do whatever they want in their best interest once we're out of the store.

Last edited by kebosabi; Jan 12, 2014 at 6:05 pm
kebosabi is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 6:30 pm
  #2681  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SF
Programs: UA, VX, QF, EY, VA
Posts: 756
Originally Posted by LoneTree
Even though the FAQ says 2%, the credit card terms and application say 1%.
Can you please link the terms?
patrick.barnes is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 6:38 pm
  #2682  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: KWI
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 806
Originally Posted by patrick.barnes
Can you please link the terms?
http://www.unfcu.org/schumer/default.aspx

Azure and Elite are the two Chip and PIN cards. No Annual Fee and $50 respectively.
LoneTree is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 6:53 pm
  #2683  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
I will almost wager a nickel, my standard wager, that it's 1% which I've read somewhere. Also USAA when you question them about the foreign fee (frankly I'm not sure if it's a foreign currency fee or a foreign transaction fee) have told me this is a pass along of the mastercard charge and they add no additional fee and on their statement for each transaction, they list the fee (1%).
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 6:57 pm
  #2684  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP, Hhonors Gold, National Executive, Identity Gold, MLife Gold
Posts: 2,687
<Haven't read this thread in a while. Wow, the discussion in here has really gone off the rails.>

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014...ta-breach?lite

While Target investigates how the breach happened, Steinhafel is pushing for new credit card technology for American consumers — a chip-and-PIN-number system called EMV technology that replaces vulnerable magnetic strips. However, switching the entire payment system will be a steep undertaking — and it likely won’t happen for shoppers in the U.S. until the end of 2015.
Not clear where the "end of 2015" part comes from. And I don't think EMV is a guarantee that there won't be breaches in the future, esp. if the attackers are able to get code inside the POS itself.
OverThereTooMuch is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2014, 7:03 pm
  #2685  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: KWI
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 806
Originally Posted by OverThereTooMuch
<Haven't read this thread in a while. Wow, the discussion in here has really gone off the rails.>

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014...ta-breach?lite



Not clear where the "end of 2015" part comes from. And I don't think EMV is a guarantee that there won't be breaches in the future, esp. if the attackers are able to get code inside the POS itself.
Likely referring to the liability shift deadline.

Even if the POS unit was hacked, won't the One Time Pad nature of EMV prevent merely replicating the same sequence?
LoneTree is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.