Last edit by: NewbieRunner
TRAVEL REQUIREMENTS TO ENTER THE UNITED STATES STARTING NOVEMBER 8, 2021
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...vel/index.html
IN EFFECT JANUARY 26, 2021 TO DECEMBER 31, 2021 UNLESS OTHERWISE AMENDED
https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/pdf/g...ncrypted-p.pdf
FAQ
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...travelers.html
PASSENGER ATTESTATION FOR TRAVEL TO THE USA
https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/pdf/a...21-01-12-p.pdf
OTHERS
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...L7PwJTTCggyB7k
ISSUED 21 JAN 2021: National Strategy for the COVID-19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness "EXECUTIVE ORDER PROMOTING COVID-19 SAFETY IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL" begins on page 174 of this document.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...vel/index.html
IN EFFECT JANUARY 26, 2021 TO DECEMBER 31, 2021 UNLESS OTHERWISE AMENDED
https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/pdf/g...ncrypted-p.pdf
FAQ
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...travelers.html
PASSENGER ATTESTATION FOR TRAVEL TO THE USA
https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/pdf/a...21-01-12-p.pdf
OTHERS
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...L7PwJTTCggyB7k
ISSUED 21 JAN 2021: National Strategy for the COVID-19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness "EXECUTIVE ORDER PROMOTING COVID-19 SAFETY IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL" begins on page 174 of this document.
Covid test for entry/re-entry to US [merged thread]
#61
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
For business travelers the testing program is a good idea though, but I doubt that TATL travel can survive on business travel only.
#62
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAX
Posts: 10,908
She and her family get a very hard and probably quite expensive lesson on the perils of self-indulgent, non-essential leisure travel during a pandemic.
Canada has had this requirement for a week know. The fury of the non-essential leisure travelers who disregarded the government warning not to travel and now have to produce a negative COVID test is music to the ears of those of us who deferred our travel plans until the all clear is sounded.
Canada has had this requirement for a week know. The fury of the non-essential leisure travelers who disregarded the government warning not to travel and now have to produce a negative COVID test is music to the ears of those of us who deferred our travel plans until the all clear is sounded.
I'd support the measure a year ago when we needed to prevent virus entry but it serves little purpose now.. our spread is community and family based, removal of travel will only make it worse.
#63
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,752
The US travel show has always been on the road throughout 2020 due to lack of testing/quarantine restrictions. US travellers were basically keeping the Mexican and Carribean industries aliive, and with this new rule millions of our neighbors will starve and end up in deep poverty due to lost tourism revenue.
#64
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM SK EBG LATAM BL
Posts: 23,305
Isnt intl OPM flying pretty much dead anyway? Who would want to fly for work and risk getting stranded? What company would take on that liability?
#65
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 3,648
Doubt it. I'll be watching to see how quickly the airlines start canceling their imminent flights to the few countries you can travel to now. I am all set to fly to Costa Rica with AA next week Jan. 20 returning Jan. 30. I am expecting AA to cancel the flights all together when those of us booked for the next month have to cancel our vacations.
#66
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX
Programs: AA PLT / 2MM
Posts: 2,113
Why doesn't the CDC require a negative test for domestic travel? It would certainly keep us all safer. Too many powerful airline lobbyists would fight it?
#67
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
I'm wondering if we will be able to waive the requirement with proof that we receive the vaccine...
#68
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: DL DM 2MM, Marriott LT Titanium, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 15,197
Absolutely mind boggling that airlines would be pushing for this. Immediate effect is going to be the rapid death of what little international travel there was. Hardest hit areas I suspect will be leisure travel/vacation destinations such as the central america and Caribbean. Small countries and islands don't have the infrastructure or capacity to be testing an additional 1000+ visitors a day when that is a 2x or more increase over what they are doing now for their own citizens.
It simply won't be possible to get a test within 3 days of return, and even then people (and businesses) won't take the risk of being stranded in quarantine in another country. So in a nutshell - kiss what little business travel there was goodbye, along with killing whatever recovery there was in leisure travel.
It simply won't be possible to get a test within 3 days of return, and even then people (and businesses) won't take the risk of being stranded in quarantine in another country. So in a nutshell - kiss what little business travel there was goodbye, along with killing whatever recovery there was in leisure travel.
#69
Join Date: May 2012
Location: JFK, MAN
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Amex Plat
Posts: 425
Airline are delusional if they think that the average American who can barely afford a vacation for a family of four to Mexico or Europe will take the risk of getting stranded. Not to mention paying for 8 (!) tests. My take is that they will stick to the US. After all, you can have a beach vacation in Florida too.
For business travelers the testing program is a good idea though, but I doubt that TATL travel can survive on business travel only.
For business travelers the testing program is a good idea though, but I doubt that TATL travel can survive on business travel only.
#70
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: DL DM 2MM, Marriott LT Titanium, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 15,197
Yup, there basically is no intl business travel currently, and this will kill whatever was left along with any shred of leisure travel.
#71
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: DL DM 2MM, Marriott LT Titanium, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 15,197
There is nothing to indicate that this would be the case. There is currently no evidence that the vaccine prevents one from being a carrier and spreading the virus to others.
#72
Join Date: May 2012
Location: JFK, MAN
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Amex Plat
Posts: 425
Perhaps this is because of the Europe travel ban when you consider the extent of international business between the US and Europe. If testing replaces a blanket ban, I am all for it.
#73
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 218
Also, the airlines got nothing yet. "The CDC did not mention easing entry restrictions in tandem with the new testing requirement". It's more like a signal from new administration?
Last edited by freedom2020; Jan 12, 2021 at 6:53 pm
#74
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: DL DM 2MM, Marriott LT Titanium, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 15,197
Please explain how that would keep anyone safer? Just look at most of the EU that had full lockdowns before and they're in the same situation as other countries that did not shut down everything... and are delusional expecting that more lockdowns will change anything.
#75
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: DL DM 2MM, Marriott LT Titanium, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 15,197
When the airlines cancel flights because there are only a dozen pax on board, it will effectively become a blanket travel ban.