Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

US reopened on 8 November 2021 (& subsequent entry restrictions for non-citizens)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 15, 2021, 1:47 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
New thread for discussing 1-day test requirements for travellers arriving in the US by air
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/coronavirus-travel/2060730-us-require-air-travelers-provide-negative-test-within-1-day-departure.html

Entry ban from eight southern African countries starting on November 29, 2021

Most non-U.S. citizens who have been in South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Namibia, Lesotho, Eswatini, Mozambique or Malaw within the prior 14 days will not be allowed into the United States.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/11/26/a-proclamation-on-suspension-of-entry-as-immigrants-and-nonimmigrants-of-certain-additional-persons-who-pose-a-risk-of-transmitting-coronavirus-disease-2019/

Entry ban by air to be lifted on November 8, 2021 - All travelers should refer to CDC for travel requirements.

3 day pre-flight testing requirement will continue (US citizens/LPR not vaccinated will have to test no earlier than 1 day prior) Children under 2 years old do not need to test.

Children under 18 are exempt from vaccination requirement
Accepted vaccines will include:
  • AstraZeneca
  • BIBP/Sinopharm
  • Covishield
  • Janssen/J&J
  • Moderna
  • Pfizer-BioNTech
  • Sinovac
Vaccination certificates must come from an official source
There is a face mask mandate when flying to/from the USA, with effectively no exemptions, and including children two and above years old
Airlines need to provide some sort of contact tracing information for potential follow-up cases

Update on U.S. travel policy requiring COVID-19 vaccination
Last Updated: October 25, 2021

As announced by the White House today, the new travel policy requiring foreign nationals traveling to the United States to demonstrate proof of full vaccination against COVID-19 will take effect November 8. The CDC’s website explains that, for purposes of entry into the United States, the accepted vaccines will include FDA approved or authorized and WHO Emergency Use Listing vaccines.

COVID-19 Travel Restrictions and Exceptions - U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs
Last updated: October 25, 2021

The presidential proclamations described on this page will no longer be in effect on November 8, 2021. For additional information, please see Safely Resuming Travel by Vaccine Requirement and Rescission of Travel Restrictions on Brazil, China, India, Iran, Ireland, the Schengen Area, South Africa, and the United Kingdom (travel.state.gov).

To protect the public health, there are four presidential proclamations that suspend entry into the United States of all noncitizens who were physically present in any of 33 countries during the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted entry into the United States. They are Presidential Proclamation 9984 (China); Presidential Proclamation 9992 (Iran); Presidential Proclamation 10143 (Schengen Area, United Kingdom, Ireland, Brazil, and South Africa); and Presidential Proclamation 10199 (India).

What we know so far is
- Confirmed to start on 8 November
- Children under 18 are exempt from the vaccine restrictions, so the varying international standards on jab ages won't be an issue here.

- Vaccines that are OK will include Pfizer, Moderna, AZ, J&J and the two Chinese vaccines.
- Some exemptions from vaccinations are potentially allowed, notably for US citizens, though my guess is airlines will be expecting to see vaccine certificates

- 3 day pre-flight testing requirement will continue, so this needs to be a documented antigen/Lateral Flow test or PCR.
- 3 days is potentially more than 72 hours, departure on a Friday afternoon means a test on Tuesday morning or thereafter.
- NHS Lateral Flows and PCRs can't be used.
- Children over 2 years old travelling with vaccinated travellers have to be tested on the same basis (3 days).
- 1 day testing for unvaccinated USA legal residents (testing on or the day before departure), including their children.

- All passengers need to sign an attestment to confirm their negative test result and also a statement to confirm full vaccination status.
- Children who are not vaccinated do not need to get vaccinated but do need to get a "viral test" 3 to 5 days after arrival in the USA
- As a result there is a separate attestion question for unvaccinated children to confirm that the viral test is arranged.

- Vaccination certificates must come from an official source. The NHS COVID Pass app and EU DCC are specifically mentioned as acceptable.
- Vaccination is counted as two weeks from dose2, or 2 weeks after the sole dose in the case of J&J.
- Antibody certification is not a replacement for the need for vaccination, at least for non USA residents.
- 14 clear days need to elapse before travel. So if jabbed on 1 October then 15 October is when you are good to go.
- Booster vaccinations are not a factor here, they don't count towards or against the primary dose process.

- There is a face mask mandate when flying to/from the USA, with effectively no exemptions, and including children two and above years old.
- Airlines need to provide some sort of contact tracing information for potential follow-up cases.
- These restrictions do not apply at the land border.

Note that a lot of interpretation onus falls on airlines. For example there is no language requirement for vaccine certificates as far as the CDC is concerned, however you can imagine Air France may be hesitant in accepting a vaccine certificate issued in the Welsh language, to take one example.

CDC link
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2...el-System.html


Print Wikipost

US reopened on 8 November 2021 (& subsequent entry restrictions for non-citizens)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2021, 8:28 am
  #226  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,333
From a purely economic standpoint, the EU has no reason to hold out for reciprocity. By opening up its own borders, more money will be flowing in from visitors. If the EU residents have fewer options for leaving, they will also end up spending more money within the EU. It is a win-win for anyone more interested in financial gain than taking a trip to the USA. Of course, the airlines would love to sell more tickets to EU residents, but even they would prefer some traffic over no traffic.
lobo411 and jddbz like this.
downinit is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 8:51 am
  #227  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PVG, FRA, SEA, HEL
Programs: UA Premier Gold
Posts: 4,783
When Trump banned entry from Schengen countries there was no reciprocal actions.
No, the unilateral action by Trump triggered the travel ban that EU countries have implemented, e.g. against US citizens.
lobo411, Owenc and DL77 like this.
warakorn is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 9:33 am
  #228  
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: btw Athens & Patras
Programs: Le Club Accor
Posts: 213
ASAP ! Please ...
Owenc likes this.
gioannis13 is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 9:48 am
  #229  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Programs: UA Platinum, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by warakorn
Lufthansa's PR department has to paint an optimistic and positive picture. The fact is that German-based Germans (or from adjacent countries) cannot possibly book transatlantic travel at this point.
A couple of points on this. Firstly whilst you are right that PR departments have a job to be optimistic and positive, as a public company with shareholders the messages issued by the company cannot be misleading or inaccurate in any way as it could have an impact on the stock price. As such if the airline says right now they are planning to operate those flights, I expect it is their absolute intention to do so. Admittedly if many passengers cancel because of ongoing restrictions Lufthansa may change their mind and cancel the flights. However I traveled on a fairly full LH route from US to Germany last September so there is definitely demand there and it’s increasing as the days go by.

Secondly, whether somebody should or should not book transatlantic travel is a matter for themselves, taking into account prevailing restrictions. We have flights from the US to the UK booked in July and fully intend to go whether the rules change or not. We are in the fortunate position of being able to do so - many people are not but will book flights anyway, perhaps to lock in a cheaper fare, hoping the restrictions will be lifted by the time they are due to travel. Again, if they decide to do that it’s up to them.
mattg85 is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 9:54 am
  #230  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Colorado (anywhere between DEN DMM BAH)
Programs: United MileagePlus, SkyMiles, AAdvantage, NEXUS
Posts: 3,030
JetBlue just announced flights between JFK and LHR in August and JFK and LGW in September. Is this indicative of anything? Or did they rush into it?

JetBlue | All
Nayef is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 9:56 am
  #231  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Programs: UA Platinum, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by Nayef
JetBlue just announced flights between JFK and LHR in August and JFK and LGW in September. Is this indicative of anything? Or did they rush into it?

JetBlue | All
All speculative - there are some quotes attributed to JetBlue management today stating they believe US should already be on the Uk green list - they firmly believe it will be by the time they launch the routes.
mattg85 is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 9:59 am
  #232  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Originally Posted by mattg85
as a public company with shareholders the messages issued by the company cannot be misleading or inaccurate in any way as it could have an impact on the stock price. As such if the airline says right now they are planning to operate those flights, I expect it is their absolute intention to do so.
Not really. Whilst it may be their intention to operate these services, the statements are issued with such nuance that there is no misrepresentation. Don't think that the status as a public company means that every statement is an iron-clad intention.
LondonElite is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 10:30 am
  #233  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PVG, FRA, SEA, HEL
Programs: UA Premier Gold
Posts: 4,783
JetBlue just announced flights between JFK and LHR in August and JFK and LGW in September. Is this indicative of anything? Or did they rush into it?
If the UK/Ireland Travel Ban is still active in September, Jetblue will cancel those flights. Easy!

Firstly whilst you are right that PR departments have a job to be optimistic and positive, as a public company with shareholders the messages issued by the company cannot be misleading or inaccurate in any way as it could have an impact on the stock price. As such if the airline says right now they are planning to operate those flights, I expect it is their absolute intention to do so.
... but Carsten Spohr (LH CEO) has publicly said two weeks ago that the Schengen Travel Ban would be lifted within weeks or days -> at that point I could only shake my head to hear such a ridiculous statement. This kind of PR is generated to put pressure on various governments and lay the groundwork to say that in a couple of days. "Well, we wanted to start many flights in June, save the jobs and pay back the loan - but we were shocked by not-anticipated failure of the US administration to lift the travel ban"
warakorn is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 10:33 am
  #234  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Rome, Italy
Programs: Delta, Lufthansa
Posts: 30
I have to go to Miami this summer as I own property there I have not been able to check upon for a year and a half now. Leaving politics aside (because this is not a question of science for vaccinated people), I have a ticket to Miami June 19th with LH (which I really ought to use as their voucher conditions are not very good if I cancel) and a ticket I can cancel with a refund for Cancun with Air France. I could let things be and just fly with whatever option is open June 19th but the LH ticket has to be used within a year from booking if I cancel and go with AF, whereas the AF ticket can be used for travel to the States again next summer. Are airlines like AF and LH adding flights for June any indication or should I just rebook the LH now and take the fare change now? My booking class on that flight is all sold out ofcoyrse and I have no idea how much more it will be to wait and see and of so, for how long.
jo535 is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 10:48 am
  #235  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Originally Posted by jo535
I have to go to Miami this summer as I own property there I have not been able to check upon for a year and a half now. Leaving politics aside (because this is not a question of science for vaccinated people), I have a ticket to Miami June 19th with LH (which I really ought to use as their voucher conditions are not very good if I cancel) and a ticket I can cancel with a refund for Cancun with Air France. I could let things be and just fly with whatever option is open June 19th but the LH ticket has to be used within a year from booking if I cancel and go with AF, whereas the AF ticket can be used for travel to the States again next summer. Are airlines like AF and LH adding flights for June any indication or should I just rebook the LH now and take the fare change now? My booking class on that flight is all sold out ofcoyrse and I have no idea how much more it will be to wait and see and of so, for how long.
I'm not sure what you're really asking, and I've also not got my crystal ball with me, but do not expect to be admitted into the US directly from Schengen in mid-June. Either delay or go via a third country.
LondonElite is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 10:52 am
  #236  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 722
Originally Posted by downinit
From a purely economic standpoint, the EU has no reason to hold out for reciprocity. By opening up its own borders, more money will be flowing in from visitors. If the EU residents have fewer options for leaving, they will also end up spending more money within the EU. It is a win-win for anyone more interested in financial gain than taking a trip to the USA. Of course, the airlines would love to sell more tickets to EU residents, but even they would prefer some traffic over no traffic.
Eu citizens have to be treated fairly.
DL77 likes this.
Owenc is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 11:10 am
  #237  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Originally Posted by Owenc
Eu citizens have to be treated fairly.
By whom? Why? What do you mean?
LondonElite is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 11:16 am
  #238  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Programs: UA Platinum, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by LondonElite
Not really. Whilst it may be their intention to operate these services, the statements are issued with such nuance that there is no misrepresentation. Don't think that the status as a public company means that every statement is an iron-clad intention.
My point was that at the time of making that statement, it has to be their intention to operate those flights. I agree it doesn’t have to be an ironclad intention, and I acknowledge that fact. The next sentence of my post which you didn’t quote suggested that if passengers started canceling in large numbers, they could very well end up canceling the flights. Or they could cancel for no reason at all.

What I am saying is at this point in time, in order to make a public statement about demand and intended routes, it does actually have to be their intention to fly those routes and the demand increases they are quoting have to be based on actual facts, otherwise it is potentially misleading to the market.
TravisMT81 likes this.
mattg85 is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 11:41 am
  #239  
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Milan, Italy
Programs: Skymiles
Posts: 271
Originally Posted by LondonElite
By whom?
For example, those who say that vaccinated people can go back to travel, take off their masks and lead a normal life but then say that European vaccinated people cannot enter the UK or the USA because are dangerous.
Well in this case it is legitimate to think that either they are stupid or in bad faith.
RobertS975 and Owenc like this.
DL77 is offline  
Old May 19, 2021, 12:11 pm
  #240  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 722
Originally Posted by LondonElite
By whom? Why? What do you mean?
By the United States. If they expect their people to be free to enter to the EU, the same should apply to EU citizens.
DL77 likes this.
Owenc is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.