Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:

A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.

It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.

Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.

LATEST UPDATES

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19


18 March travel to the UK changes

If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
  • take any COVID-19 tests – before you travel or after you arrive
  • fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel

This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.

You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.

*****

The following historical information is retained for the time being.

The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.

Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules

England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)

Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html

Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made

Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)

Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf

Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)


PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[

Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.

This means that you can:[list]
  • Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
    • On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
      • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        Alternatively:
        • Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
          • Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
          • On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
            • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.

        If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.

        Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :
        • Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
          • Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.

Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.

DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, £160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just £120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for £18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.

Useful data sources:

New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments


Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
  • LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
  • PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
  • NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
Print Wikipost

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 8, 2020, 1:46 pm
  #2071  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Programs: AA, BA, B6, DL, D8, EI
Posts: 38
Sigh. Thank you CWS as always. I'm fine with quarantining where I am travelling but don't want to be blacklisted completely.
sadeconomy is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 2:08 pm
  #2072  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,520
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
It was speculation for which I haven't found any evidence. Since FCO advice, which is kind-of linked to the self-isolation exemption list, is country wide, albeit with regional potential, the list for exemption is drawn by country. Moreover the drop-down used in the Passenger Locator Form is country level. I cannot see this scheme working at anything other than at US wide level. At the margins, they may separate out (e.g.) Puerto Rico or even Hawai'i. For Portugal there was a discussion as to whether non continental Portugal (Madeira / Azores) could be exempt. It wasn't in the end, but the FCO advice did change favourably for these Portuguese territories.
Indeed, I can't imagine the regulation separating between US mainland states without doing the same for Russia, Canada, etc. Having sub-state specific regulations is possible, but to be honest, I can only imagine it if it is in the context of entirely refusing entry to people who have been to a certain area, from a public health's perspective, it is simply not worth it engaging in that level of detail to spare travellers from quarantining.

I agree with you that Puerto Rico and dependent territories like Guam or the American Samoa may get their own rules though. After all, we got those for the various French territories (including cws's own dream destination of St Pierre et Miquelon, or was it Miquelon only? ) and Curacao

(note: for the record, I still think that all of the above pale in comparison to the Pitcairns islands and their 50ish inhabitants or the British Antarctic Territory!! )
flyingcrazy likes this.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 2:11 pm
  #2073  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,791
Originally Posted by sadeconomy
Sigh. Thank you CWS as always. I'm fine with quarantining where I am travelling but don't want to be blacklisted completely.
Well you do have one option: if you go to Bermuda you need a PCR test before you depart, fill in a travel authorisation form and pay $75. This fee then gets you another PCR test on arrival in BDA, and you self isolate at your hotel only for a few hours for the second test to be OK. If it is, then BDA is open to you and is reasonably low on Covid, so you can enjoy a break there. After 14 days you would then be free to come to any part of the UK as an exempt traveller. You would need a big bag of money to stay on Bermuda though!

Aruba has a similar arrangement, but being from NY does remove the second measure so it's easier still, but getting from Aruba to the UK isn't easy.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 2:27 pm
  #2074  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ABZ/NCL
Posts: 2,943
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
Well you do have one option: if you go to Bermuda you need a PCR test before you depart, fill in a travel authorisation form and pay $75. This fee then gets you another PCR test on arrival in BDA, and you self isolate at your hotel only for a few hours for the second test to be OK. If it is, then BDA is open to you and is reasonably low on Covid, so you can enjoy a break there. After 14 days you would then be free to come to any part of the UK as an exempt traveller. You would need a big bag of money to stay on Bermuda though!

Aruba has a similar arrangement, but being from NY does remove the second measure so it's easier still, but getting from Aruba to the UK isn't easy.
It's not too difficult actually, klm are now flying there 5x a week and most UK cities have at least 1x daily to AMS now to connect to.

I believe for Aruba, you have the choice of either proving you had a negative test result within the past 72 hours, or pay 75usd for a test on arrival. Certain US states however now do not have the option of paying for a test on arrival. I suspect such requirements will be watered down though in the coming months.

UK could introduce state specific guidelines but I agree seems too cumbersome.
flyingcrazy is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 2:32 pm
  #2075  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,791
With a hat-tip to brithk , Jersey has published the UK's green, amber and red ratings.

https://www.gov.je/Health/Coronaviru...elHistory.aspx

Red is
Armenia, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Kazakhstan, Panama, Peru, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Sweden, United States of America

Green = the exempt list upthread, Amber is everywhere else, including Canada and Portugal. Madeira is Green on the list, but because Portugal is Amber, so the exemption doesn't apply there.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 2:33 pm
  #2076  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Programs: AA, BA, B6, DL, D8, EI
Posts: 38
I agree that it would be cumbersome; NY is actually asking people that have been in 19 other states to complete a 14-day quarantine on arrival. Again, I'm fine with quarantining where I am travelling to but I don't want to purchase tickets and end up having to cancel due to the US being blacklisted and be stuck with a voucher.

https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/gov...states-will-be
flyingcrazy likes this.
sadeconomy is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 2:34 pm
  #2077  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ABZ/NCL
Posts: 2,943
Originally Posted by sadeconomy
I agree that it would be cumbersome; NY is actually asking people that have been in 19 other states to complete a 14-day quarantine on arrival. Again, I'm fine with quarantining where I am travelling to but I don't want to purchase tickets and end up having to cancel due to the US being blacklisted and be stuck with a voucher.

https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/gov...states-will-be
The UK has not actually blacklisted any country. US arrivals are still allowed but will have to quarantine for 14 days. This is different to many EU countries where US citizens are actually banned from entry.
flyingcrazy is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 3:18 pm
  #2078  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Programs: AA, BA, B6, DL, D8, EI
Posts: 38
Originally Posted by orbitmic
In fact, to be brutal, I don't think that even the DfT or FCO which, as you rightly pointed out, have been "pro-opening" forces of late would support that at the moment. I think they may push for more countries (Canada, Portugal, etc) being progressively moved to the OK list, but bluntly, countries such as the US, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, India, or Russia are currently seen as such major viral hotspots at the moment that if anything, I could imagine some pressure to temporarily close doors entirely bar exceptional cases as most of the rest of the world are now doing (and as, in fact, the US are doing themselves in the other direction), especially if quarantine is proving hard to enforce on a background of increasing movement..
I know that no country is currently blacklisted. This is what got me thinking about the possibility.
orbitmic likes this.

Last edited by sadeconomy; Jul 8, 2020 at 3:19 pm Reason: Clarity
sadeconomy is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 5:28 pm
  #2079  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: York, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, Hilton Diamond, Marriott GOLD, Accor Club Gold
Posts: 709
Update on Swissport plans for testing at LHR?

Does any kind soul happen to know if there have been any developments of the idea of testing being offered at LHR, which - if negative - would allow those entering the UK to avoid the 14 day quarantine? It was in the news in mid June but all has gone quiet...
DominicB is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 7:18 pm
  #2080  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, HHonors Diamond, IHG Uninspired, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium, UK AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,152
Originally Posted by DominicB
Does any kind soul happen to know if there have been any developments of the idea of testing being offered at LHR, which - if negative - would allow those entering the UK to avoid the 14 day quarantine? It was in the news in mid June but all has gone quiet...
See the post from CWS yesterday - https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32515891-post2019.html
Gagravarr is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 8:29 pm
  #2081  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: York, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, Hilton Diamond, Marriott GOLD, Accor Club Gold
Posts: 709
Thank you for the above. I have to say my knowledge of the science about testing is non-existent. Do I take it from CWS' post referenced directly above that a negative test soon after a flight does not rule out the fact that you might later show signs of the infection?

And related to all this - given the Swissport idea seems not to be happening - if I have been in quarantine in the UK for, say, two days, and I go and get a test which comes back negative, do I have to remain in quarantine?
DominicB is offline  
Old Jul 8, 2020, 11:05 pm
  #2082  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Programs: BAEC GGL, HHonors Diamond, IHG Uninspired, Marriott Bonvoy Titanium, UK AMEX Plat
Posts: 2,152
Having a test result, positive or negative, makes no difference to the quarantine rules. If you come from somewhere on the naughty list and don't have a work-based exemption, you have to quarantine for 14 days. If from tomorrow you come from somewhere on the allowed list, and didn't go anywhere else on the way home, no quarantine required.

However, if you do have a test and it comes back positive, you do need to self-isolate under the current guidelines, and tell the track+track people who you might've infected. That isn't because of returning from abroad, that's the normal steps if you're in the UK and discover you have covid-19!
Gagravarr is offline  
Old Jul 9, 2020, 1:01 am
  #2083  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,791
Originally Posted by DominicB
Thank you for the above. I have to say my knowledge of the science about testing is non-existent. Do I take it from CWS' post referenced directly above that a negative test soon after a flight does not rule out the fact that you might later show signs of the infection?
Yes, you've basically got that right, and why a single PCR test isn't that helpful. People have Covid-19 for 14 days (by international convention), they can spread the disease throughout this period, but are most infectious around days 3 to 10. The PCR test is very accurate, but to keep it accurate you can only test people for 5 of the 14 days starting around day 2 or 3, however if you have symptoms they show up on day 3 or 4. What's more these dates aren't fixed, they cover most cases, but I gather the median length is 12 days, but some people have Covid for 3 weeks, and of course there are, separately, worrying cases where people suffer the consequences of Covid for months on end.

When someone comes into a country, you don't know if they are on day 1 (too soon to test), day 13 (too late) or awkwardly day 18 (too late but a remote possiblity of still spreading the infection). So the Swissport idea is obviously flawed on multiple counts. There is, just about, a way of shortening self isolation to say 5 days in combination with 2 tests, 4 days apart, but because the timeline isn't fixed, even that isn't 100% robust and would arguably be the worst of all worlds: a lot of work, doesn't avoid self isolation and imperfect.

If imperfection is the way we have to work with this, the Bermuda system of a test before, a test on arrival, a half day of isolation, and a locator form would be better.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jul 9, 2020, 1:44 am
  #2084  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
Yes, you've basically got that right, and why a single PCR test isn't that helpful. People have Covid-19 for 14 days (by international convention), they can spread the disease throughout this period, but are most infectious around days 3 to 10. The PCR test is very accurate, but to keep it accurate you can only test people for 5 of the 14 days starting around day 2 or 3, however if you have symptoms they show up on day 3 or 4. What's more these dates aren't fixed, they cover most cases, but I gather the median length is 12 days, but some people have Covid for 3 weeks, and of course there are, separately, worrying cases where people suffer the consequences of Covid for months on end.

When someone comes into a country, you don't know if they are on day 1 (too soon to test), day 13 (too late) or awkwardly day 18 (too late but a remote possiblity of still spreading the infection). So the Swissport idea is obviously flawed on multiple counts. There is, just about, a way of shortening self isolation to say 5 days in combination with 2 tests, 4 days apart, but because the timeline isn't fixed, even that isn't 100% robust and would arguably be the worst of all worlds: a lot of work, doesn't avoid self isolation and imperfect.

If imperfection is the way we have to work with this, the Bermuda system of a test before, a test on arrival, a half day of isolation, and a locator form would be better.
interestingly enough the UK position is 7 days self isolation if you catch it in the uk, and if you have no symptoms after the 7 days you are free to go. There is a serious debate around asymptomatic transmission as well; so I was surprised when the uk mandated 14 day quarantine, but I will not even call it a quarantine as it is unsupervised and you are free to go to your house to self isolate.
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Jul 9, 2020, 10:08 am
  #2085  
Senior Moderator, Moderator: Community Buzz and Ambassador: Miles & More (Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, and other partners)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 150km from MAN
Programs: LH SEN** HH Diamond
Posts: 29,512
Here is the list of exempt countries and territories published by the Welsh Government.

Andorra
Antigua and Barbuda
Aruba
Australia
Austria
The Bahamas
Barbados
Belgium
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
Croatia
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominica
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Polynesia
Germany
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
The Republic of Korea
La Reunion
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Malta
Mauritius
Monaco
Netherlands
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
San Marino
Serbia
Seychelles
Spain
Saint Barthelemy
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Switzerland
Taiwan
Trinidad and Tobago
Turkey
Vatican City
Vietnam

United Kingdom Overseas Territories
The Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia in the Island of Cyprus
Anguilla
Bermuda
British Antarctic Territory
British Indian Ocean Territory
British Virgin Islands
Cayman Islands
Falkland Islands
Gibraltar
Montserrat
Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
Turks and Caicos Islands

https://gov.wales/written-statement-...el-regulations

Note: The list is essentially identical to the UK English list with a few minor variations:
South Korea is listed as The Republic of Korea
Ireland is missing presumably because of the Common travel area
The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man which appear on the DfT list are not listed

Last edited by NewbieRunner; Jul 9, 2020 at 11:50 am
NewbieRunner is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.