Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:

A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.

It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.

Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.

LATEST UPDATES

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19


18 March travel to the UK changes

If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
  • take any COVID-19 tests – before you travel or after you arrive
  • fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel

This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.

You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.

*****

The following historical information is retained for the time being.

The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.

Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules

England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)

Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html

Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made

Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)

Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf

Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)


PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[

Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.

This means that you can:[list]
  • Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
    • On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
      • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        Alternatively:
        • Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
          • Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
          • On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
            • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.

        If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.

        Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :
        • Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
          • Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.

Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.

DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, £160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just £120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for £18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.

Useful data sources:

New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments


Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
  • LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
  • PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
  • NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
Print Wikipost

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2021, 1:57 pm
  #9436  
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: BA Gold, UA, Southwest
Posts: 119
I am back from my fifth (or six if you count initial shutdown) trip to the UK during the pandemic. This was the second trip since testing has been required. I did a test run in May before traveling with my husband and son a couple weeks ago. I had good luck with Collinson the first go around so I used it again for this trip. It was extremely expensive for all three of us and with the transportation costs of getting back and forth to Heathrow, I think it came in at about $1000. I way underestimated the additional stress that two more people would have on me. It was bad enough waiting for results with me alone, but with my husband and son it seemed to go up exponentially. It's easy to convince yourself that you won't be one of the rare breakout cases (we are all fully vaccinated) when you are sitting at home planning, but it's much more stressful given the ramifications when you are sitting in a hotel room quarantining with three people and knowing that one positive test could extend quarantine for days. Fortunately, that didn't happen, but the threat caused many sleepless nights the first half of our two-week trip. I posted a few days back, but unlike my last trip in May where I was called every day by Track and Trace, this time we weren't called once. Instead we received two in-person visits on the same day on our TTR day. The first one was for my son and the guy was great. The second guy was for my husband and I and he was hard to understand and flat.

Last time I did the day 2 test on arrival, but this time we decided to test on our actual day 2. It was nice to get out of the hotel room, although given the additional transport costs, I'm not sure I'd do it again. The response times were slower than last time, but still among the quicker turn arounds given that tests are in person and you don't have to wait the extra days for mail. My son's Day 2 took quite a bit longer than ours, which didn't help my stress levels, but it was within the time frame they gave me.

Day 2: took on July 3rd at about 10:30 am. Results for me and my husband at 2 pm on July 4th (so 27-ish hours) and at about 8 pm (so 35-ish hours) for our son. They told me 36-48, but last time I want to say I got them back in more like 24 hrs.

Day 5: TTR on July 6th at about 10:30 am. Results are supposed to be "same day." Last time they were back by 7:30 pm. This time, we didn't get them until after 11 pm, which was also stressful. It may have been a coincidence, but the results came through about 30-45 minutes after the end of one of the soccer games

Day 8 (taken on Day 9 to use for my return to the US test) July 10 at about 10:30 am. Results about 2 pm on July 11th so right around the same turn around time as the day 2. I'd used this test for my return last time, and it was fine. Passport number is printed on it, but I'm not sure that was necessary. It uploaded quickly to Verifly and was approved almost right away unlike last time.

My Verifly issues continued though. For the 3rd time out of 4 attempts, I had problems. Before it was getting the COVID test to move from pending, but this time, it was trying to get the attest toggle to unlock for my companions. I was able to do mine but no amount of scrolling would unlock the toggle for both my husband and son. I ended up having to have them do it separately on their own phones. It was a hassle, but I knew it would save time at the airport, which it did. I really hate the Verifly app and the inability to have any customer service if something goes wrong. But it does speed things up and the agents are grateful.

On arrival back in the US this time, we were not forced to show our covid tests to agents meeting the plane. We breezed through US customs and didn't have to show any paper work. We were also asked to complete a US health screening on board that no one at the airport collected.

I really hope the Amber restrictions are lifted for vaccinated US travelers soon. We have a timeshare in London and my daughter is at Oxford so I'm grateful to be able to tavel to the UK, but it is hard not to weigh the burden, stress and financial costs especially when the restrictions do not seem aimed to minimizing risk. I think most governments (the US included) are in the "hammer" stage of restrictions, when I want a scalpel. I realize it's not realistic, but it doesn't stop me wishing that restrictions could be aimed more precisely to where they pose the most risk. We have trips to the UK/Europe scheduled in October (River Cruise), November (daughter's graduation ceremony) and December (Christmas). Not sure how we will proceed. I'm hoping the River Cruise is cancelled so I don't have to decide.
remaxmac is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2021, 2:57 pm
  #9437  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: DWC
Programs: OWS, *A G
Posts: 626
Originally Posted by mustafina
Shapps suggested last week on a BBC Breakfast interview that recognition of the EU vaccination passport was likely to happen soon (whatever that means) - US likely longer because of the lack of a single system.

I have no idea what's taking so long: various European countries with much lower case rates are happy to accept a random piece of paper from NHS Scotland or the CDC, yet showing the EU digital Covid passport is apparently not sufficient for UK Gov. Keen to know what it plans to do with the data if it wants to integrate systems in some way.
The EUDCC (i.e. the QR code) is merely a vehicle which may be issued irrespective of the number and type of vaccinations. Clearly this means it can’t be accepted at face value.

On the other hand, the decryption and validation of the sensitive personal information behind the QR code is controlled by the EU’s system (think GDPR, among others).

Knowing how the EU negotiates, one could imagine that it’s a ‘sign up to our system or no deal’. I don’t suppose it’s politically acceptable to HMG.

I’m not holding my breath. (Luckily though as a dual national I’ll be able to obtain an EUDCC for myself.)
remaxmac likes this.
zat_dude is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2021, 6:01 pm
  #9438  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: LHR
Programs: AA EXP, DL DM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,032
Originally Posted by RB211
And I expect US jabs (which is what I'm specifically interested in) won't qualify for some time after the EU ones are given the OK. So much for that "special relationship!" Conforming to a fairly severe restriction purely based on which side of the Atlantic shots were administered is a little... strenuous!

What's the fastest I can get a day 5 TTR result? I'm looking for minutes rather than hours! ;-)

rb211.
Not sure about minutes, but the LAMP tests offered by Collinson are probably the fastest (still "hours" though, -- I've only done a LAMP test once, and that time I got my results back in about two hours).
RB211 likes this.
taxicabnumber is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2021, 8:29 pm
  #9439  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cayman, San Diego, London
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold, AA 4MM Lifetime Platinum, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond Amb, Bonvoy Lifetime Gold
Posts: 1,054
Wife fully vaccinated in US; me in UK!

Originally Posted by KSVVZ2015
any movement on amber exemption for us non UK vaccinated folks?
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
No movement that I can detect other than a lot of further discussions with EU digital team. The political pressure is mainly from UK expats wanting to visit the UK (the EU certificate helps a lot with that one), and the airlines/travel industry focus on tourism into the UK.
We're currently in the US. I'm British; my wife is American. I am double-vaxxed in the UK (AZ) and can enter without quarantine after showing my NHS app, but she must endure (again) 10 days isolation, tests, etc etc etc because she was double-vaxxed in the US (Pfizer).

Totally incomprehensible, pathetic policy.
prof, enviroian, Lynyrd and 7 others like this.

Last edited by NewbieRunner; Sep 19, 2021 at 8:53 am Reason: Fixed broken quote tags
Full Score is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2021, 9:37 pm
  #9440  
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: DCA
Programs: AA EXP, DL FO, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 6,712
Originally Posted by Full Score
Originally Posted by KSVVZ2015 [img]images/buttons/viewpost.gif[/img]
any movement on amber exemption for us non UK vaccinated folks?

We're currently in the US. I'm British; my wife is American. I am double-vaxxed in the UK (AZ) and can enter without quarantine after showing my NHS app, but she must endure (again) 10 days isolation, tests, etc etc etc because she was double-vaxxed in the US (Pfizer).

Totally incomprehensible, pathetic policy.
Especially since the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have shown much higher effectiveness against the new variants than AZ.

I do wish that the CDC had set up a better framework than hand-written cards to verify vaccination status. At the very least some sort of more official documentation.
KDCAflyer is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2021, 10:37 pm
  #9441  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,190
Originally Posted by taxicabnumber
Not sure about minutes, but the LAMP tests offered by Collinson are probably the fastest (still "hours" though, -- I've only done a LAMP test once, and that time I got my results back in about two hours).
Thanks, I'll look into that!

rb211.
RB211 is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2021, 11:55 pm
  #9442  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 963
Originally Posted by KDCAflyer
Especially since the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have shown much higher effectiveness against the new variants than AZ.

I do wish that the CDC had set up a better framework than hand-written cards to verify vaccination status. At the very least some sort of more official documentation.
I don’t disagree BUT given that (i) paper COVID test results can be easily faked and (ii) there is no indications of widespread fraud of CDC cards - the focus on this point is misplaced. And there are many countries (including in the EU) happy to take a CDC card at face value as proof of vaccination.
adrianlondon and LETTERBOY like this.
KSVVZ2015 is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2021, 12:19 am
  #9443  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,804
Originally Posted by KDCAflyer
Especially since the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines have shown much higher effectiveness against the new variants than AZ.
I'll just correct that if I may. From real world evidence in the UK we see no difference - over time - between the three vaccines. Indeed the cohort jabbed in January then March, almost all with AZ, have slightly better Delta figures than Pfizer though the difference is small. This was the cohort over 70 years old, so particularly susceptible to Delta, and this explains why the death rate is currently 235 deaths a week, compared to 8,500 a week during the same point in Alpha's surge. After normalising for vaccine take-up, it's around 160 deaths for Beta, 8,400 for Alpha, a 98% reduction. That's an amazing figure by immunology standards, it's about 55% witth the flu jabs. Around 60% of UK vaccines have been AZ and in the critical age group over 50 years old it's nearly 80% AZ, 20% Pfizer. We don't have a lot of data on Moderna but the early signs are that it is also very effective.

There are small differences between the vaccines, but it's been overplayed here and elsewhere. Pfizer has a really excellent feature of triggering a strong B cell response in 10 days or so - no other vaccine ever invented has done this so well - and this is just the start of our understanding of this technology. AZ triggers a really good T cell immunity which strengthens over time. So AZ is a bit of a slow burner but when you have a multi-year pandemic and hassle with vaccine deployment that is a critically useful quality. From the way immunology works, it would be surprising to see much difference between vaccines which seek the same end point.
corporate-wage-slave is online now  
Old Jul 15, 2021, 1:23 am
  #9444  
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by Isochronous
If one is going to book a hotel for the 5-10 days inbound self-isolation, what recommendations do people have for the greater London area? Presumably one wants windows and a balcony, a decently sized room, but also not too far from the testing centres when you have to test on days 2/5/8?
We did Studios 2 Let Cartwright Gardens, several choices of balcony rooms or patio. Also garden out back, laundry. Good walk for exercise to Bond St location for Biogroup testing.. not first class, but clean, entertainment with tennis courts in the park to watch from balcony. Buzzer to your flat for food deliveries, but if you have balcony you can see them arrive.

Basic accommodations, good prices.
DaveS likes this.
mpatti is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2021, 2:23 am
  #9445  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,754
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
OK some changes to the Lists.

On the Green List - added: Bulgaria (didn't see that one coming) and Hong Kong
Green Watch List - Croatia and Taiwan (so you get Green access on the return but it could be changed).

Moving from Green to Amber - Balearics and British Virgin Islands. Balearics is going to cause problems for the unvaccinated, but those with UK vaccines won't be affected.

Moving to Red - 4 countries - Cuba, Indonesia, Myanmar, Sierra Leone.
It's very difficult to see the logic to Bulgaria and Croatia being added to the green list - based on the numbers there should be many more countries added.

Bulgaria - 8 cases per 100k and 12% of people fully vaccinated
Croatia - 20 cases per 100k and 31% of people fully vaccinated

Many other EU countries have much better numbers (Including vaccinations). How to explain Germany still being amber, with 10 cases per 100k and 43% fully vaccinated. Only explanation could be politics?
8420PR is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2021, 2:58 am
  #9446  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,591
Originally Posted by KDCAflyer
I do wish that the CDC had set up a better framework than hand-written cards to verify vaccination status. At the very least some sort of more official documentation.
The EU has a "forgery proof" (if that's not a challenge I don't know what is) QR code and they even provide an app which verifies them. The UK don't even accept those, so it's nothing to do with the quality of the CDC forms, it's the UK govt not really knowing what to do or how to do the stuff they think they should be doing.
LETTERBOY likes this.
adrianlondon is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2021, 3:15 am
  #9447  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 907
Originally Posted by KDCAflyer
I do wish that the CDC had set up a better framework than hand-written cards to verify vaccination status. At the very least some sort of more official documentation.
As a fellow DCA-er, I would add to this that the US approach is a lot more nuanced than “the CDC”. Each state has different requirements for vaccination, and each state has different requirements for proof Of vaccination. There is an added complexity of some states banning centralized vaccination certification, and the US federal government actively stating that it will not get involved
in a national certification effort (it pushes that effort either to the states or to industry). There are various factors at play here including federal law, state law, and (perhaps most importantly) heterogenous norms about sharing vaccination status (which differs significant from the bell curve of the UK, or at least England). In other words, it’s nuanced to the country, state, culture, and community.
The CDC is really an advisory body when it comes to domestic US vaccination certification (which is a precursor to how US citizens and residents demonstrate vaccination status)
Geordie405 likes this.
Simon Schus is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2021, 5:56 am
  #9448  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NYC, LON
Programs: *
Posts: 2,771
Originally Posted by Simon Schus
The CDC is really an advisory body when it comes to domestic US vaccination certification (which is a precursor to how US citizens and residents demonstrate vaccination status)
The discussion though is not domestic vaccination certification, but rather international public health. The latter comes under CDC and federal government remit. When vaccinations for COVID were started there was no expectation that it was to be used as a passport to enter countries. The focus was purely on protecting the population so there was no need for any certification beyond what was necessary for local health documentation and tracking. But as UK and other countries start to set requirements on vaccination for entry into countries then all sovereign countries will have to respond by having some form of legitimate vaccine passport for their vaccinated citizens. This includes the UK which currently lacks such universal certification for those vaccinated outside the NHS and in the different four nations. Remember going back to the 1960s to 80s when many countries still needed evidence of vaccination against small pox, yellow fever and cholera for entry, the US, did have a vaccination card with CDC and probably WHO, logo that was uniform and recognizable to immigration agents all over the world.
Simon Schus and remaxmac like this.
ani90 is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2021, 5:58 am
  #9449  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Programs: BA Gold, Sixt Platinum
Posts: 315
Apologies if I missed it, but has there been any talk about removing the amber self isolation requirement for those who recovered from an infection and have had their first (NHS) jab subsequently?
EDDLEGLL is online now  
Old Jul 15, 2021, 5:59 am
  #9450  
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,963
Originally Posted by EDDLEGLL
Apologies if I missed it, but has there been any talk about removing the amber self isolation requirement for those who recovered from an infection and have had their first (NHS) jab subsequently?
I haven't seen anything about that at all, and tbh I would be surprised if anything was done on that basis considering we are so close to the end of the vaccination rollout considering it would add extra complexity.
KARFA is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.