Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CO to cut 1700 jobs

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2009, 4:52 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 2,734
CO to cut 1700 jobs

Looks like second quarter earnings took a big dive:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009...s.html?_r=1&hp
docr775 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 4:53 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Really wondering what the other airlines post now....
Steph3n is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 5:02 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 2,734
Originally Posted by Steph3n
Really wondering what the other airlines post now....
AMR posted a smaller than expected loss:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/air...arnings-report


as far as the rest, I guess we will see over the next couple weeks, however it does not look good.
docr775 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 6:05 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,613
WN posted a small profit: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009...-Airlines.html, with revenue down less than 9% (as opposed to more than 22% for CO). Not that surprising given the international premium market is where the disastrous numbers are and WN isn't exposed to it.
yellow77 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 6:10 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio TX
Programs: CO Plat, US Air Silver, SPG Gold
Posts: 79
Thanks Larry . . .

Originally Posted by docr775
Looks like second quarter earnings took a big dive:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009...s.html?_r=1&hp
that was really a successful quarter . . .
Whatagoodboy is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 7:52 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Programs: Delta Diamond, HH Diamond, Avis PC, Bonvoy Plat, National EE
Posts: 163
It's been a rough couple of months with the Swine Flu hype/outbreak & the recession.
CO777ER is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 7:53 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In a van, down by the river.
Programs: Too many!
Posts: 497
Originally Posted by Whatagoodboy
that was really a successful quarter . . .
Really?

Yes, Larry did such an excellent job crafting the global economic meltdown with a worldwide health scare thrown in to top it off.
JetSet78 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 7:54 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DCA
Programs: UA LT 1K, AA EXP, Bonvoy LT Titan, Avis PC, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,658
Originally Posted by Steph3n
Really wondering what the other airlines post now....
UA is reporting a 2Q profit.

I am sure Larry's announced departure had something to do with CO 2Q.
cova is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 7:58 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Originally Posted by cova
UA is reporting a 2Q profit.

I am sure Larry's announced departure had something to do with CO 2Q.
Are we reading different news?

UAL Corp. beats by $0.38, reports revs in-line Reports Q2 (Jun) loss of $2.23 per share, non-cash hedging gains and other charges, $0.38 better than the First Call consensus of ($2.61); revenues fell 25.2% year/year to $4.02 bln vs the $4.04 bln consensus.
Steph3n is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 8:05 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DCA
Programs: UA LT 1K, AA EXP, Bonvoy LT Titan, Avis PC, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,658
I am looking at Market Watch under Yahoo.

Airline stocks up after United's quartelry profitExplore related topics
Airlines Nyse Arca Airline UAL Corp US Airways Group Inc Story Quotes Comments Screener (1) Alert Email Print By Christopher Hinton 5.00%2.50%0.00%-2.50%-5.00%10a11a12p1p2p3pXAL UAUA LCC AMR CAL NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Airline stocks climbed Tuesday after United Airlines reported a quarterly profit despite the decline in passenger demand.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/air...?siteid=yhoof2

Apparently UA profit is due to one-time gains such as fuel hedge gains and others, otherwise it lost.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/United....html?x=0&.v=5
cova is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 8:16 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 107
Did you really expect CO to make money now based on how they treat elite passengers and let all those schenanigans go on? I don't think so and good for CO that they lost so much. I hope this teaches them a lesson on how to treat their customers from now on.
Movieman123 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 8:22 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,812
Originally Posted by Movieman123
Did you really expect CO to make money now based on how they treat elite passengers and let all those schenanigans go on? I don't think so and good for CO that they lost so much. I hope this teaches them a lesson on how to treat their customers from now on.
ohh great you're back. it was getting quiet around here without your irrelevant and ridiculous ranting /end sarcasm
JC1120 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 8:22 am
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Guess I was correct when I posted I wouldnt be surprised that the reason CO was allowing automatic UPs to FC now also on 'M' fares besides Y & B was due to less Rev coming in
craz is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 8:25 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,613
Reading the UA and CO press releases, my guess is that the difference is that UA is reporting a huge mark-to-market gain on fuel hedging as the fuel price rose a little from 1Q09 to 2Q09. They would have booked this as a loss in the past. Hence they make a GAAP profit, but a loss excluding fuel hedge gains. CO was less hedged, so made less of a gain as the mark-to-market value of hedges rose with the oil price.
yellow77 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2009, 8:26 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Originally Posted by yellow77
Reading the UA and CO press releases, my guess is that the difference is that UA is reporting a huge mark-to-market gain on fuel hedging as the fuel price rose a little from 1Q09 to 2Q09. They would have booked this as a loss in the past. Hence they make a GAAP profit, but a loss excluding fuel hedge gains. CO was less hedged, so made less of a gain as the mark-to-market value of hedges rose with the oil price.
Yes I am curious the real numbers, look like mark to market tricks from what I am reading so far
Steph3n is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.