Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CO to cut 1700 jobs

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2009, 5:44 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,812
Originally Posted by MarkXS
Condolences to the CO employees losing their jobs.
+3. I hope that these employees are hired back soon when things start getting better, and that they got decent packages.
JC1120 is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 7:42 am
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,866
Originally Posted by iharker
I would argue that this depends on who you are working for and in what function....
Originally Posted by crnk
Have they? I'm asking in a curious way--I'm on an energy related project, but we're long term and bucking a lot of trends because it is mostly hush-hush and the money is coming out of a research budget. I think some of our oil related travel in the office has been reduced, but mostly related to project completion.
Perhaps I'm guilty of extrapolating based on one company (mine). Last year when oil prices were rising rapidly I suggested that CO had a built in "hedge" in that Houston's economy was humming, spurring travel demand (both business and leisure) there. Now the situation may be reversed to a degree.
Bonehead is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 9:08 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Verdi, NV, SFO & Olympic (aka Squaw )Valley.
Programs: Ikon Pass Full + AS Gold + Marriott Titanium + Hilton Gold. Recovering UA Plat. LT lounge AA+DL+UA
Posts: 3,823
Originally Posted by ContinentalFan
I think that's probably why wwd suggested chapter 7.
I suggested Ch 7 for LCC because it is probably the way to reallocate slots at LGA, DCA, etc. amongst everyone else. It would be bad for America to see a foreign country get control of the NRT and LHR slots controlled by UA. Any bankruptcy filing is complicated by the credit crisis making debtor in possession financing essentially unavailable. UA could buy a few extra weeks with a Ch 11 filing that would allow its assets to be more equitably distributed amongst the remaining carriers. (Maybe NRT to CO or AA, LHR to DL or CO) I could see ORD going to AA, DEN & SFO to CO and DL taking intl routes from LAX and IAD with everything else downsized.
worldwidedreamer is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 9:23 am
  #49  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PDX
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat
Posts: 11,500
Originally Posted by crnk
Have they? I'm asking in a curious way--I'm on an energy related project, but we're long term and bucking a lot of trends because it is mostly hush-hush and the money is coming out of a research budget. I think some of our oil related travel in the office has been reduced, but mostly related to project completion.
I think for a number of the medium oil and gas companies in Houston the travel has been severely reduced. For the three majors in Houston, travel has definitely been reduced, especially on the exploration side of things. It's kind of comical really, because when oil prices were high, the plane ticket prices reflected that but oil companies still bought the seats. Now, the oil prices are low and the ticket prices are dirt cheap, but no one is flying.
Hartmann is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 10:05 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sometimes Houston, Sometimes London.
Programs: CO Gold Elite, BA Blue, for the moment - Hyatt Gold Passport, Priority Club, Marriott etc etc
Posts: 2,126
It's not just oil companies in Houston that are cutting the travel. I work for a med school and travel here has to be approved in advance (never was before); my hubby works for HP and they had a complete clampdown on any non-essential travel since December 2008 (even customer-facing was eliminated).
ElkeNorEast is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 11:24 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: DCA/IAD (and, reluctantly, BWI if its cheaper)
Programs: UA 1MM but covet Qatar Q-Suites
Posts: 435
Originally Posted by worldwidedreamer
I suggested Ch 7 for LCC because it is probably the way to reallocate slots at LGA, DCA, etc. amongst everyone else. It would be bad for America to see a foreign country get control of the NRT and LHR slots controlled by UA. Any bankruptcy filing is complicated by the credit crisis making debtor in possession financing essentially unavailable. UA could buy a few extra weeks with a Ch 11 filing that would allow its assets to be more equitably distributed amongst the remaining carriers. (Maybe NRT to CO or AA, LHR to DL or CO) I could see ORD going to AA, DEN & SFO to CO and DL taking intl routes from LAX and IAD with everything else downsized.
Historically, its been basically impossible for ANY carrier of any size - LCC or not - in the US to go Ch7 bankrupt. There have been a few very powerful interests who are REALLY vested in seeing that NOT happen: Boeing, Airbus, leasing firms (ILFC, for example) and the engine manufacturers (GE principally). In years past, the airframe or engine manufacturer would extend credit to the struggling airline - heck, they need somebody to sell to, so they couldn't have their customers going out of business. Now, with credit essentially unavailable everywhere, we might actually see airlines REQUIRED to make money, and that might actually drive some of the stupider ones out of business for good. (If only!)

Lets all hope this starts to happen.

Noted that even if it did, and even if the survivors had pricing power back in their favor and raised ticket prices to cover costs, it would still be essentially a price game for the remaining carriers. Nobody in the US domestic market innovates in any substantial way with respect to its product, so its just about how many humans can you stack into a metal tube. And the downward pricing spiral would eventually start anew, leading us back to where we are now: unhappy pax on crowded planes with no food or drink, shuffled along by unhappier flight crews who make less than entry-level librarians, and stuck on tarmacs around the country, courtesy of a Congress who won't give the resources the FAA needs to upgrade the airspace management system, nor hold it accountable for doing the same.

Nope. Flying is not so much fun anymore, and I see it getting worse rather than better.

(At least CO provides a high-quality atmosphere and experience in its BF cabins. I give high kudos and great marks for what CO does for its pax in its widebody BF cabins.)
CALfly5 is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 1:36 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SFO/JFK/MGA
Programs: UA 1P MM, AA-PP, AS, DL, HH G, SPG Gold, TA nada
Posts: 2,043
Originally Posted by jaguar
CO should eliminate free meals in coach, and make on board meals a profit center.
If you call an iceburg salad and a BBQ Turkey dough blob a meal then yes bring on BOB.

I was looking forward to the "free meals" in Y but was sadly disappointed. Next time I'll just bring my own. Condolences to the CO employees losing their jobs. An unfortunate sign of the times
zoegksf is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 3:10 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 277
Originally Posted by Movieman123
Did you really expect CO to make money now based on how they treat elite passengers and let all those schenanigans go on? I don't think so and good for CO that they lost so much. I hope this teaches them a lesson on how to treat their customers from now on.
I can only hope and wish your company goes bankrupt! By all means let me know who you are! I'll be sure to show you how well we treat people like yourself.....
COEWRFA is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 3:47 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: STL
Programs: UA Platinum, AA Platinum Pro, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 1,429
Originally Posted by COEWRFA
I can only hope and wish your company goes bankrupt! By all means let me know who you are! I'll be sure to show you how well we treat people like yourself.....
By all means I second that....although as someone who was let go this afternoon I in no way would wish this on anyone else.
qukslvr619 is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 3:55 pm
  #55  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,866
Originally Posted by qukslvr619
...as someone who was let go this afternoon I in no way would wish this on anyone else.


Sorry to hear that, qukslvr619.
Bonehead is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 7:41 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Programs: AA EXP; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, UA 1.56MM (fmr UA1K)
Posts: 5,770
Originally Posted by CALfly5
Historically, its been basically impossible for ANY carrier of any size - LCC or not - in the US to go Ch7 bankrupt. There have been a few very powerful interests who are REALLY vested in seeing that NOT happen: Boeing, Airbus, leasing firms (ILFC, for example) and the engine manufacturers (GE principally). In years past, the airframe or engine manufacturer would extend credit to the struggling airline - heck, they need somebody to sell to, so they couldn't have their customers going out of business. Now, with credit essentially unavailable everywhere, we might actually see airlines REQUIRED to make money, and that might actually drive some of the stupider ones out of business for good. (If only!)

Lets all hope this starts to happen.
Be careful what you wish for....today it might be a carrier you don't particularly care for...the next day it might be one you like.
Renard is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 9:52 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NE
Posts: 195
Originally Posted by qukslvr619
By all means I second that....although as someone who was let go this afternoon I in no way would wish this on anyone else.
I hear you, qukslvr. My husband was laid off a couple months ago. It sucks.
jpsboo is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2009, 11:47 pm
  #58  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United, American, Delta, Hyatt, Hilton, Hertz, Marriott
Posts: 14,797
Originally Posted by worldwidedreamer
I suggested Ch 7 for LCC because it is probably the way to reallocate slots at LGA, DCA, etc. amongst everyone else. It would be bad for America to see a foreign country get control of the NRT and LHR slots controlled by UA. Any bankruptcy filing is complicated by the credit crisis making debtor in possession financing essentially unavailable. UA could buy a few extra weeks with a Ch 11 filing that would allow its assets to be more equitably distributed amongst the remaining carriers. (Maybe NRT to CO or AA, LHR to DL or CO) I could see ORD going to AA, DEN & SFO to CO and DL taking intl routes from LAX and IAD with everything else downsized.
Agreed; I too think that gates/slots are the important assets. If a chunk of capacity could be taken out of the system, it would be good for the industry--at least for a few years until they repeat their mistakes once again. One carrier needs to go into C7.
ContinentalFan is online now  
Old Jul 23, 2009, 1:26 am
  #59  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: LAS
Programs: AS MVPG 100K, IHG Plat Amb, MC Gold, HH Gold, MLife Platinum, Caesars Diamond
Posts: 38
Originally Posted by CALfly5
Historically, its been basically impossible for ANY carrier of any size - LCC or not - in the US to go Ch7 bankrupt.
How about Braniff 1 and 2, Pan Am 1 and 2, Eastern, Midway 1 and 2, et al?

Last edited by FLDave; Jul 23, 2009 at 1:38 am
FLDave is offline  
Old Jul 23, 2009, 1:31 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
Actually

Originally Posted by cova
CO has done the analysis. The cost of a coach sandwich is about $.50. They simply cater one for each passenger.

If they sold food - it requires accounting and estimating how much to sell. Then there would be waste. With CO owning Chelsea, it makes for more uniform work flow of kitchen employees. They need people there to make the BF and international meals in the evening. They can employ the people earlier in the day to make the sandwiches.

Increasing the baggage fee $5 makes more money.
Coach meals cost a little under $2 per meal to produce. Actually meals are made opposite of serving times, due to prep requirements. CO could reach back to the past and sell tray space to corporations. It was done in the early 1990's, hence the Subway sandwiches. Selling tray space is easier than selling food.

Last edited by dan3mike; Jul 23, 2009 at 1:34 am Reason: grammar
dan3mike is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.