![]() |
Transcon vs. Midcon - A Tale of Two Experiences
It's been a long time since I was on a true transcon flight, since all my west coast flights have been via IAH.
This weekend, I took a trip to SEA with the outbound via EWR and to ensure a nice experience, for the first time I used miles to upgrade. I have to say, the difference between what I have been experiencing and what I experienced on Friday is night and day. If only the schedule worked out better for me, I would be a transcon man 100%, but I had to take a half vacation day to make this itinerary. The crew was exceptionally professional and friendly upfront. Printed menus were handed out, the FA introduced himself and welcomed us aboard while taking the orders, and the food (at least my entree) was restaurant quality. Warm nuts were provided with our drinks, and the drinks were refilled constantly - no asking, no waiting. Two crew members worked up front, one plating the meals, and the aforementioned FA who did the serving. The meal consisted of an appetizer with two kinds of smoked salmon, a generous green salad, warm rolls, and the entree (a large and delicious white meat quarter chicken with vegetables). After the main dinner was collected, our serving FA went to the back to help out and the galley FA took our orders for the sundae and beverage service. Two movies were played, followed by the Comedy Channel (Mork and Mindy???). Announcements were very professional, clean, and crisp with proper grammar and pronunciation - none of the rushing, mistakes, adlibs, gaps or giggles I experience on other flights that annoy and detract from the quality of the product. For the most part, the Delta crews do the best announcements of any airline in the US. In general, Continental inflight service ranks pretty high for a major carrier in the US, but my transcon experience reminded me why CO consistently ranks number 1. |
Good to hear! ^
|
It is even better on the EWR-LAX 752 routes(currently 16/65) where the seats are BF and have AVOD in FC.
Dan |
Unfortunately your chances of getting a transcon EUA are very close to zero. That's one reason why many of us West Coast rabble are not very happy with CO.
|
Originally Posted by mike_plat
(Post 7387983)
Unfortunately your chances of getting a transcon EUA are very close to zero. That's one reason why many of us West Coast rabble are not very happy with CO.
|
Originally Posted by mike_plat
(Post 7387983)
Unfortunately your chances of getting a transcon EUA are very close to zero.
Then again, no jetway at SJC. It's a grass field. The information booth inside closes at 9pm when the electric generator shuts off, sort of like some islands I have visited. Still, the $50 cab fare to the Fremont BART station (forget any other option) isn't a bad price for an upgrade. |
Originally Posted by Syzygies
(Post 7388336)
Depends on the route. I sat next to a Silver on EWR-SJC who was flying weekly, working his way to Plat, and had been upgraded every flight.
Then again, no jetway at SJC. It's a grass field. The information booth inside closes at 9pm when the electric generator shuts off, sort of like some islands I have visited. Still, the $50 cab fare to the Fremont BART station (forget any other option) isn't a bad price for an upgrade. |
Originally Posted by bocastephen
(Post 7388019)
Which is why I cashed in the 15K - I heard the EWR/SEA dinner flight was about the hardest EUA in the system
|
It's particularly frustrating to contrast the service levels between the "true" transcons and, say, EWR-LAS, which is only about 200 miles shorter. I've been on EWR-LAS flights that have been sold out in F for over a week before departure, signaling that the paid FC yield is probably pretty high. I'm sure, on the whole, it's lower than EWR-LAX/SFO, but I can't imagine it's that much lower than the secondary transcon routes like PDX, SJC, SNA or even SAN.
|
Originally Posted by ijgordon
(Post 7390594)
It's particularly frustrating to contrast the service levels between the "true" transcons and, say, EWR-LAS, which is only about 200 miles shorter. I've been on EWR-LAS flights that have been sold out in F for over a week before departure, signaling that the paid FC yield is probably pretty high. I'm sure, on the whole, it's lower than EWR-LAX/SFO, but I can't imagine it's that much lower than the secondary transcon routes like PDX, SJC, SNA or even SAN.
|
Originally Posted by bocastephen
(Post 7388019)
Which is why I cashed in the 15K - I heard the EWR/SEA dinner flight was about the hardest EUA in the system
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 7391446)
I got one last Monday on 1881 as a platinumon an O fare. Not nearly as hard as the SFO/LAX options.
|
It's particularly frustrating to contrast the service levels between the "true" transcons and, say, EWR-LAS, which is only about 200 miles shorter.
I think I have been saying this for quite a while. CLE to LAX is also a "transcom" in terms of milage and time (45 min less than EWR) but our level of first class service is markedly degraded from what is delivered coast to coast. What is remarkable is that I will have done 3 of these in three weeks and have gotten no upgrades on the non-stops. This can only mean that CO is selling out the front of the plane and that means that people consider the toned down service to be worth the money when compared with the competition. I just wonder when the competition will wake up and realize that there is a subgroup of passengers willing to pay for a truely premium product. |
Originally Posted by radonc1
(Post 7391563)
It's particularly frustrating to contrast the service levels between the "true" transcons and, say, EWR-LAS, which is only about 200 miles shorter.
I think I have been saying this for quite a while. CLE to LAX is also a "transcom" in terms of milage and time (45 min less than EWR) but our level of first class service is markedly degraded from what is delivered coast to coast. What is remarkable is that I will have done 3 of these in three weeks and have gotten no upgrades on the non-stops. This can only mean that CO is selling out the front of the plane and that means that people consider the toned down service to be worth the money when compared with the competition. I just wonder when the competition will wake up and realize that there is a subgroup of passengers willing to pay for a truely premium product. same also for EWR-PHX/LAS routes. not much competition. you're not going to get printed menus and the like. youll get what they advertise. a choice or two, and sundaes. they have AA FS/BC and UA PS service to compete with out of NYC so they offer service to compete with them. from what ive heard, CO still wins in inflight service transcon. NOT seating, just meal service and offering. same holds true from iah. not much competition. flights from iah to the west coast are 3.5 hours and more, but recieve marginally better service than their 2.5 hour east coast counterparts (some northeast flights do get the marginally better service). |
Originally Posted by dlen111
(Post 7392099)
same also for EWR-PHX/LAS routes. not much competition. you're not going to get printed menus and the like. youll get what they advertise. a choice or two, and sundaes.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:06 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.