![]() |
Anyone Consider Logging Miles with Delta instead?
As many know from previous posts this year I will be short status on CO. However, next year I already have a V fare on AF to AGP, a CO F EWR-FCO, and a EWR-LAS also on CO K fare. This is just my leisure plans thus far. The issue is that CO doesn't accept 100%, only 50% on AF V fares but SkyMiles does the whole 100%. That alone is a difference of 5K. Plus SkyMiles will count 100% of my CO travel towards medallion. I am considering logging my miles on DL next year. Those 3 flights alone will be about 27K. Then do a status match on CO for Silver. And work towards gold on OP. The 27K makes no differnce to me. I have well over 100K in my OP account. I'll make that up with the shopping and CC partners plus promos over the year. What do you experts think. By the way, my business travel will be cut nearly 2/3 next year. So even though 5K is just a transcon, I can't count on it. Don't forget, I do mostly the EWR-RIC on the ERJ...
|
Delta status id fine if you fly them. Otherwise it gets you very little on CO and they will not match your status as partners don't do that. This is discussed in detail in the status match forum.
|
And of course, DL FC service is garbage.
|
Originally Posted by const3
Delta status id fine if you fly them. Otherwise it gets you very little on CO and they will not match your status as partners don't do that. This is discussed in detail in the status match forum.
|
Originally Posted by entropy
And of course, DL FC service is garbage.
|
Your whole idea doesn't make much sense to me if I understand it correctly. What I think you want to do is credit your 27K of flights in early 2006 to DL, earn DL silver, then ask for a status match to CO and go on to earn CO Gold in 2006.
First, as already mentioned, CO is highly unlikely to offer you a match for DL status because they are an ST partner (it's easy to get a match with (earned the hard way) AA or UA status, because these airlines are not part of Skyteam). Second, even if you do get a match to CO Silver status, you would get just the status (probably until Feb 2007 if you ask for the match early next year). You wouldn't start off with 27K EQM. So if you actually want to work towards CO Gold, you'd still have 50K EQM to go. On the other hand, if you just credit CO directly you'd have nearly 22K EQM in your CO account, with only 28K to go to get to Gold. If you're planning to apply for a match later in the year, then you might get status until all of 2007, which would be worth something (not much: this is CO Silver status we're talking about). Last, if you fly the ERJ then how much is status really worth to you anyway? Why worry? |
Originally Posted by yellow77
Your whole idea doesn't make much sense to me if I understand it correctly. What I think you want to do is credit your 27K of flights in early 2006 to DL, earn DL silver, then ask for a status match to CO and go on to earn CO Gold in 2006.
First, as already mentioned, CO is highly unlikely to offer you a match for DL status because they are an ST partner (it's easy to get a match with (earned the hard way) AA or UA status, because these airlines are not part of Skyteam). Second, even if you do get a match to CO Silver status, you would get just the status (probably until Feb 2007 if you ask for the match early next year). You wouldn't start off with 27K EQM. So if you actually want to work towards CO Gold, you'd still have 50K EQM to go. On the other hand, if you just credit CO directly you'd have nearly 22K EQM in your CO account, with only 28K to go to get to Gold. If you're planning to apply for a match later in the year, then you might get status until all of 2007, which would be worth something (not much: this is CO Silver status we're talking about). Last, if you fly the ERJ then how much is status really worth to you anyway? Why worry? |
You might consider NW as well since you can get 100% EQM's from DL.
|
Originally Posted by otralot
You might consider NW as well since you can get 100% EQM's from DL.
DL elite is really only beneficial if you are flying DL. If you want to get around the 50% EQM rule and you're flying CO, consider going for elite on NW. |
Originally Posted by ssullivan
And as a NW elite, you can qualify for free upgrades on both NW and CO. As a DL elite flying CO or NW, you can not get upgrades based on elite status.
DL elite is really only beneficial if you are flying DL. If you want to get around the 50% EQM rule and you're flying CO, consider going for elite on NW. |
Agreed that CO is far superior to DL. Check out the DL forum to glipse the shenanigans that DL is pulling as they go into bankruptcy. I've been Plat at DL since current program inception. But for the coming year(s) it looks like the only way I'll be flying them is for free - got to use up 3M+ miles (though OTOH the way they're devaluing their miles and their program, it may take everything to get a single free trip from them.) Very unsavory goings-on at DL. Be careful before making a switch.
|
Originally Posted by otralot
You might consider NW as well since you can get 100% EQM's from DL.
|
I have NW's Worldperks myself. Love the program, and NW's international service on A330's. I'd sure think long & hard before going to DL!
|
I am stuck with DL, as I am halfway to MM on them. Does anybody know if there is any talk of CO and DL becoming REAL partners with 100% MQM / EQM regardless of carrier flown? NW plays nicely with both CO & DL; is there any reason why CO & DL refuse to play nicely with each other?
|
Originally Posted by nd_eric_77
I am stuck with DL, as I am halfway to MM on them. Does anybody know if there is any talk of CO and DL becoming REAL partners with 100% MQM / EQM regardless of carrier flown? NW plays nicely with both CO & DL; is there any reason why CO & DL refuse to play nicely with each other?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:42 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.